Method of Analysis at the U.S. Geological Survey California Water Science Center, Sacramento Laboratory – Determination of Haloacetic Acid Formation Potential, Method Validation, and Quality-Control Practices
Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5115, published 2005.
 
The analytical method was validated by using spiked samples to determine accuracy and precision for the method, and spiked fortified organic-free water to establish MDLs. Acceptable percent recoveries of the various quality-control samples, such as the matrix spike samples, the quality-control samples, the continuing calibration verification standards, and the surrogate standards, are in the range of 70 to 130 percent for this method. However, tighter limits for each type of quality-control sample can be observed and are addressed in this report.
The accuracy of the analytical method was assessed by spike recovery experiments using surface-water samples from Orange County, California. The water samples were diluted 1:5 with organic-free water prior to dosing (to lower the background concentration of HAA to appropriate levels). The samples were spiked with 8 μL of working standard solution B prior to extraction (table 6). The spiked concentrations were equal to the concentrations in the level-5 calibration standard (table 5). Background concentrations of HAA in these samples had been measured previously. Forty-one samples were used in the spike recovery experiments. Method accuracy is expressed as the mean percent recovery of the spike concentration. The number of samples used to calculate the mean percent recovery varied between 23 and 41 for the nine HAA (table 6) because the measured concentrations (spike plus background) for some analytes in some samples exceeded the concentration in the level-9 calibration standard and, therefore, could not be quantified.
Table 6 (View this table on a separate page.)Accuracy and precision for haloacetic acid method determined from analyses of spiked surface-water samples from Orange County, California.
[µg/L; micrograms per liter]
Analyte nameNumber of samplesSpiked concentration (μg/L)Mean percent recoveryStandard deviation (percent)
Bromochloroacetic acid394.010919
Bromodichloroacetic acid374.010726
Dibromochloroacetic acid3810.10422
Dibromoacetic acid412.011724
Dichloroacetic acid396.010923
Monobromoacetic acid414.09919
Monochloroacetic acid366.010622
Tribromoacetic acid4020.10730
Trichloroacetic acid232.011029
The percent recovery for each analyte is calculated from the following equation.
(1)
equation
where
  • Cmeas is the measured concentration,
  • Cbackgr is the background concentration of the sample, and
  • Cfortified is the concentration of analyte added to the sample
Precision is expressed as the percent relative standard deviation (RSD), which is calculated from the mean and the standard deviation of the replicate analyses:
(2)
equation
where
(3)
equation
and
(4)
equation
and where
  • x is the value for an analysis,
  • n is the number of replicate analyses,
  • x bar is the mean of the replicate analyses,
  • sx is the standard deviation of the replicate analyses, and
  • RSD is the relative percent standard deviation for the replicate analyses.
The mean percent recovery ranged from 99 to 117 percent and the percent RSD ranged from 17 to 28 percent. Ongoing accuracy and precision determinations are made by analyzing a set of spiked sample duplicates for 10 percent of the water samples analyzed.
The MDL, as defined by the USEPA, is the minimum concentration that can be measured and reported as greater than zero at the 99-percent confidence level (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997). The MDL was calculated using the formula:
(5)
equation
where
  • MDL is the method detection limit
  • sx is the standard deviation of the replicate analyses, and
  • n is the number of repliate analyses, and
  • t(n-1, a = 0.01) is the Student's t-test value for the 1-a (99-percent) confidence level for n replicate analyses (t = 2.988 for n = 8)
The MDLs were determined from eight replicate analyses of 40-mL samples of organic-free water spiked with 8 μL of working standard solution A. The spiked concentrations of the analytes (table 7) equaled the concentrations in the level-2 calibration standard (table 5). These eight replicate samples were extracted, methylated, and analyzed using the same procedures used for all samples. All eight were prepared on the same day. This spiked concentration was used because it contained all the analytes at concentrations less than five times the expected MDLs, but greater than the baseline noise and drift. The MDLs were calculated from the standard deviations about the mean concentrations for the nine HAA from the eight replicate samples using equation 5. The MDLs for the nine HAA range from 0.11 to 0.45 μg/L (table 7).
Table 7 (View this table on a separate page.)Method detection limits for nine haloacetic acids and the surrogate compound determined from analysis of eight replicate samples of spiked organic-free water.
[μg/L, micrograms per liter]
AnalyteSpiked concentration (μg/L)Standard deviation (μg/L)Method detection limit (μg/L)
Bromochloroacetic acid0.400.0540.16
Bromodichloroacetic acid0.400.0360.11
Dibromochloroacetic acid1.00.120.36
Dibromoacetic acid0.200.0480.14
Dichloroacetic acid0.600.140.42
Monobromoacetic acid0.400.0830.25
Monochloroacetic acid0.600.150.45
Tribromoacetic acid2.00.130.39
Trichloroacetic acid0.200.0470.14
2-bromopropionic acid (surrogate)1.00.0830.25