Link to USGS home page.
Texas Water Science Center

Status of Fish Communities in the Rio Grande, Big Bend National Park, Texas—Comparison Before and After Spring 2003 Period of Low Flow

By J. Bruce Moring

U.S. Geological Survey
Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5209

In cooperation with the National Park Service


Abstract

During 2003–04 the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the National Park Service, re-evaluated the status of fish communities in three reaches of the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park that originally were evaluated when the three reaches were established for study in 1999. The objective was to determine whether there were measurable differences between 1999 and 2003–04 (referred to as 2004) fish community status that likely are attributable to a rare 58-day period of low flow (less than 1 cubic meter per second) in spring 2003 at the Johnson Ranch gaging station on the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park. The total number of fish species collected at all three sites (Boquillas, Johnson Ranch, and Santa Elena) in 1999 was greater than in 2004. The number of fish species collected at the Boquillas site in 1999 (10) was twice that collected in 2004; the number of species collected at the Johnson Ranch site in 1999 (nine) was almost twice that collected in 2004 (five). In contrast, the numbers at the Santa Elena site were nearly the same, 15 species in 1999, 14 in 2004. Percent community similarity for the Boquillas site is 8.04, for the Johnson Ranch site, 6.65, and for the Santa Elena site, 47.6, which indicates considerably more similarity between the 1999 and 2004 fish communities at the Santa Elena site than for the Boquillas and Johnson Ranch sites. At the Boquillas and Johnson Ranch sites, the fish communities shifted from small minnow (Cyprinidae) dominated in 1999 to largely gar (Lepisosteidae) and catfish (Ictaluridae) dominated in 2004. In contrast, no such shift occurred at the Santa Elena site between 1999 and 2004. Differences in flow conditions between the two downstream sites and the Santa Elena site might account for the dissimilar findings. The findings of the study provide some evidence that the spring 2003 period of low flow affected fish communities, but the findings are not definitive as other factors such as increased salinity, algal toxins, bioavailable contaminants, and exotic species can affect fish populations and, ultimately, fish community structure.

Table of Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Methods of Assessment

Fish Community Status Before and After Period of Low Flow

Summary

References

 

Figures

1.   Map showing fish community assessment sites on the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park, Texas, 1999 and 2003–04
2.   Boxplots showing distribution of daily mean discharge at International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) streamflow-gaging station Rio Grande at Johnson Ranch (IBWC site 08–3750.00), Big Bend National Park, Texas, 1936–2004
3–5.   Graphs showing:
  3.   Number of fish species collected at three sites on the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park, Texas, 1999 and 2004
  4.   Menhinick’s species richness for fish communities at three sites on the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park, Texas, 1999 and 2004
  5.   Relative abundance of major fish families at three sites on the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park, Texas, 1999 and 2004

Tables

1.   Historical fish species in the Rio Grande in and near Big Bend National Park, Texas
2.   Fish species, number of individuals, and percent community similarity for fish communities at three sites on the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park, Texas, 1999 and 2004

This document is available in Portable Document Format (PDF):  (11.6 MB)


To view this document, you need the Adobe Acrobat® Reader installed on your computer.
(A free copy of the Acrobat® Reader may be downloaded from Adobe Systems Incorporated.)



FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button