Use of Sediment Rating Curves and Optical Backscatter Data to Characterize Sediment Transport in the Upper Yuba River Watershed, California, 2001–03
Table 4
Regression equation form and statistics for gaging stations in the Middle Yuba and South Yuba Rivers in the upper Yuba River watershed, California.
[Note: Regression variables, which include suspended-sediment concentration and streamflow, were converted to base-10 logarithms. r2, coefficient of determination. a is the Y intercept and b is the regression coefficient in equation 1. N, number of data points: Data points were used to determine group-averaged dataset; group-averaged data points were used in the regression analysis]
| a | b | r2 | Standard error | P value | F statistic | Critical F statistic | 6N | 7N (group-averaged) |
---|
Middle Yuba River (MYG, Station ID 11410000) |
---|
Average1 | −1.776 | 1.278 | 0.95 | 0.165 | 0.000 | 326 | 1.4 | 675 | 19 |
Summer/fall2 | −0.602 | 0.516 | 0.28 | 0.125 | 0.050 | 5 | 1.5 | 135 | 14 |
First flush3 | −4.377 | 2.987 | 0.60 | 0.423 | 0.001 | 18 | 1.5 | 154 | 14 |
Winter4 | −1.838 | 1.317 | 0.91 | 0.207 | 0.000 | 178 | 1.4 | 371 | 19 |
Spring snowmelt5 | −0.736 | 0.602 | 0.65 | 0.145 | 0.008 | 13 | 1.6 | 174 | 9 |
| | | | | | | | | |
South Yuba River (SYG, Station ID 11417500) |
---|
Average1 | −2.066 | 1.221 | 0.87 | 0.310 | 0.000 | 120 | 1.4 | 698 | 20 |
Summer/fall2 | −1.548 | 1.024 | 0.57 | 0.209 | 0.002 | 16 | 1.5 | 127 | 14 |
First flush3 | −3.127 | 1.945 | 0.79 | 0.383 | 0.000 | 40 | 1.5 | 145 | 12 |
Winter4 | −2.750 | 1.460 | 0.91 | 0.273 | 0.000 | 184 | 1.4 | 380 | 20 |
Spring snowmelt5 | −0.798 | 0.538 | 0.67 | 0.186 | 0.007 | 20 | 1.6 | 165 | 9 |