Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5041

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5041

Back to Table of Contents

References Cited

Bauer, H.H., and Vaccaro, J.J., 1987, Documentation of a deep percolation model for estimating ground-water recharge: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 86-536, 180 p.

Boyle, D.P., Gupta, H.V., and Sorooshian, S., 2000, Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods: Water Resources Research, v. 36, no. 12, p. 3663-3674.

Cherkauer, D.S., 2004, Quantifying ground water recharge at multiple scales using PRMS and GIS: Ground Water, v. 42, no. 1, p. 97-110.

Christiaens, K., and Feyen, J., 2002, Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE SHE model: Water Resources Research, v. 38, no. 9, p. 8.1-8.15.

Downer, C.W., and Ogden, F.L., 2003, Prediction of runoff and soil moistures at the watershed scale—Effects of model complexity and parameter assignment: Water Resources Research, v. 39, no. 3, p. 1.1‑1.13.

Drost, B.W., Ely, D.M., and Lum, W.E., III, 1999, Conceptual model and numerical simulation of the ground-water-flow system in the unconsolidated sediments of Thurston County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4165, 254 p.

Ely, D.M., 2003, Precipitation-runoff simulations of current and natural streamflow conditions in the Methow River Basin, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03‑4246, 35 p.

Ely, D.M. and Kahle, S.C., 2004, Conceptual model and numerical simulation of the ground-water-flow system in the unconsolidated deposits of the Colville River Watershed, Stevens County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5237, 72 p.

Ely, D.M. and Risley, J.C., 2001, Use of a precipitation-runoff model to simulate natural streamflow conditions in the Methow River Basin, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4198, 36 p.

Healy, R.W., 1990, Simulation of solute transport in variably saturated porous media with supplemental information modifications to the U.S. Geological Survey’s computer program VS2D: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4025, 125 p.

Healy, R.W., and Ronan, A.D., 1996, Documentation of computer program VS2DH for simulation of energy transport in variably saturated porous media—Modification of the U.S. Geological Survey’s computer program VS2DT: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4230, 36 p.

Hill, M.C., 1998, Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4005, 90 p.

Hogue, T.S., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H.V., Holz, A., and Braatz, D.T., 2000, A multi-step automatic calibration scheme for river forecasting models: Journal of Hydrometeorology, v. 1, p. 524-542.

Hunt, R.J., Steuer, J.J., and Bullen, T., 2001, Delineating a recharge area for a spring using numerical modeling, Monte Carlo techniques, and geochemical investigations: Ground Water, v. 39, no. 5, p. 702‑712.

Lappala, E.G., Healy, R.W., and Weeks, E.P., 1987, Documentation of computer program VS2D to solve the equations of fluid flow in variably saturated porous media: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4099, 184 p.

Leavesley, G.H., Lichty, R.W., Troutman, B.M., and Saindon, L.G., 1983, Precipitation-runoff modeling system—User’s manual: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4238, 207 p.

Leavesley, G.H., Restrepo, P.J., Markstrom, S.L., Dixon, M., and Stannard, L.G., 1996, The modular modeling system (MMS)—User’s manual: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-151, 200 p.

Lee, K.K., and Risley, J.C., 2002, Estimates of ground-water recharge, base flow, and stream reach gains and losses in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4215, 52 p.

Martinez, J.E., Duchon, C.E., and Crosson, W.L., 2001, Effect of the number of soil layers on a modeled surface water budget: Water Resources Research, v. 37, no. 2, p. 367-378.

Mastin, M.C., and Vaccaro, J.J., 2002, Watershed models for decision support in the Yakima River Basin, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-404, 48 p.

Poeter, E.P., and Hill, M.C., 1997, Inverse models: A necessary next step in ground-water modeling: Ground Water, v. 35, no. 2, p. 250-260.

Poeter, E.P., and Hill, M.C., 1998, Documentation of UCODE, a computer code for universal inverse modeling: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4080, 116 p.

Rorabaugh, M.I., 1964, Estimating changes in bank storage and groundwater contribution to streamflow: International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication 63, p. 432-441.

Rutledge, A.T., 1998, Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from streamflow records—Update: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4148, 43 p.

Rutledge, A.T., and Daniel, C.C., 1994, Testing an automated method to estimate ground water recharge from streamflow records: Ground Water, v. 32, no. 2, p. 180-189.

Samanta, S., and McKay, D.S., 2003, Flexible automated parameterization of hydrologic models using fuzzy logic: Water Resources Research, v. 39, no. 1, p. 1.1-1-13.

Scanlon, B.R., Healy, R.W., and Cook, P.G., 2002, Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying ground-water recharge: Hydrogeology Journal, v. 10, no. 1, p. 18-39.

Simunek, J., Sejna, M., and van Genuchten, M. Th., 1999, The HYDRUS-2D software package for simulating two­dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably saturated media. Version 2.0, IGWMC - TPS – 5: Golden, Colo., International Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, 251 p.

Steuer, J.J., and Hunt, R.J., 2001, Use of a watershed-modeling approach to assess hydrologic effects of urbanization, North Fork Pheasant Branch Basin near Middleton, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4113, 49 p.

Tiedeman, C.R., Hill, M.C., D’Agnese, F.A., and Faunt, C.C., 2003, Methods for using groundwater model predictions to guide hydrogeologic data collection, with application to the Death Valley regional groundwater flow system: Water Resources Research, v. 39, no. 1, p. 5.1-5.17.

Troutman, B.M., 1985, Errors and parameter estimation in precipitation-runoff modeling 2. Case Study: Water Resources Research, v. 21, no. 8, p. 1214-1222.

Vogel, R.M., and Sankarasubramanian, A., 2003, Validation of a watershed model without calibration: Water Resources Research, v. 39, no. 10, p. 7.1-7.9.

Woodward, D.G., Packard, F.A., Dion, N.P., and Sumioka, S.S., 1995, Occurrence and quality of ground water in southwestern King County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4098, 69 p., 4 pl.

Yobbi, D.K., 2000, Application of nonlinear least-squares regression to ground-water flow modeling, West-Central Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4094, 58 p.

Back to Table of Contents

For more information about USGS activities in Washington, visit the USGS Washington Water Science Center home page .


Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America home page. FirstGov button U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: https://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir20065041
Page Contact Information: Publications Team
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 01-Dec-2016 18:55:22 EST