Javascript Tree Menu by Deluxe-Tree.com
USGS - science for a changing world

Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5084

In cooperation with the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District

Water-Quality Characteristics for Selected Sites within the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Planning Area, Wisconsin, February 2004–September 2005

By Judith C. Thomas, Michelle A. Lutz, Jennifer L. Bruce, David J. Graczyk, Kevin D. Richards, David P. Krabbenhoft, Stephen M. Westenbroek, Barbara C. Scudder, Daniel J. Sullivan, and Amanda H. Bell

This report is available for download as a PDF (15,526 KB).


Abstract
Contents
Figures
Tables
Appendixes
Conversion Factors
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Purpose and Scope
Study Design, Sample Collection, QA
Land Use and Phase II sites
Collection of Stage and Discharge Data
Manual Water-Quality Sampling
Automated Water-Quality Sampling
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Evaluation of Data Collected
Hydrologic Conditions
Results from Manually and Automatically Collected Samples
Chloride
Nutrients and Chlorophyll a
Total Nitrogen
Nitrate
Total Phosphorus
Chlorophyll a
Suspended Sediment
Mercury
Total Mercury
Methylmercury
Indicator Organisms
Fecal Coliforms
Escherichia coli
Coliphage
Pathogenic Organisms
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Salmonella
Giardia
Cryptosporidium
Pesticides
Wastewater Compounds
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals
Semipermeable Membrane Devices and Wastewater Compounds
Bed Sediment
Water-Column Toxicity
Fish Tissues
Bioassessment
Fish Results
Macroinvertebrate Results
Algae Results
Relations among Habitat Variables and Biotic Communities
Relations between Stream Biological Metrics, Site Characteristics, and WQ Data
Potential Areas for Phase III
Summary
Summary of Relations between Biological Metrics, Site Characteristics, and WQ Data
Findings for Harbor Sites and the Milwaukee River Mouth
Phase I--Phase II Comparisons
References
Appendixes
Appendix 1. Land-Use Classes
Appendix 2. Methods for Harbor-Site and Mercury Sampling
Appendix 3. WQ Properties and Constituents
Appendix 4. Season and Flow Conditions
Appendix 5. Comparison of Phase I and Phase II Medians
Appendix 6. Hydrologic Conditions
Pesticides

Samples collected each year during spring-quarterly and summer-event sampling were analyzed for pesticides; thereby yielding data for four samples per site. The analytical schedule for pesticides included 41 pesticides and 23 metabolites, or breakdown products (appendix 3). Of the 41 pesticides, 21 were detected in at least one sample. Of the 23 metabolites, 9 were detected in at least one sample. Two pesticides were detected in every sample: atrazine (along with its metabolite 2-chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine) and metolachlor. Concentrations of all three constituents were generally higher in stream samples than harbor samples. Atrazine concentrations at stream sites ranged from 0.014 µg/L at Honey Creek to 0.95 µg/L at Root River at Grange Avenue, while concentrations at harbor sites ranged from 0.039 µg/L at the Northern Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake site to 0.11 µg/L at the Middle Mid-Harbor Milwaukee Outer Harbor site. 2-Chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine (deethylatrazine) concentrations at stream sites ranged from 0.006 µg/L at Honey Creek to 0.128 µg/L at Root River at Grange Avenue, while concentrations at harbor sites ranged from 0.013 µg/L at the Northern Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake site to 0.037 µg/L at the Middle Mid-Harbor Milwaukee Outer Harbor site. Metolachlor concentrations at stream sites ranged from 0.014 µg/L at Honey Creek to 0.488 µg/L at Little Menomonee River, while concentrations at harbor sites ranged from 0.008 µg/L at the Northern Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake and Middle Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake sites to 0.02 µg/L at the Middle Mid-Harbor Milwaukee Outer Harbor site. The presence of atrazine, deethylatrazine, and metalochlor in every sample is typical, as these pesticides are among the most heavily used and their presence in streams across the Nation has been well-documented (Gilliom and others, 2006).

Generally, concentrations of pesticides were low. The highest concentration observed was in a sample from Little Menomonee River (7.86 µg/L of simazine). In that same sample, no other pesticides were present in unusually high concentrations. Remaining samples ranged in concentration from below detection to 2.9 µg/L (bromacil, also at Little Menomonee River). These concentrations were typical of samples collected at fixed intervals and during normal flow conditions. Modern pesticides have moderate to high water solubility and relatively short half-lives. As a result, stream pesticides concentrations are generally highest following rainfall events producing notable runoff, with an enhanced effect when rainfall events occur shortly after pesticide application (Graczyk and others, 1997 and 1999). Selected pesticides will be discussed further in the wastewater compound section, where pesticides are divided into herbicide and insecticide classes.


return to top
continue to Wastewater Compounds

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sir/2007/5084/page11.html
Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing Network
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 01-Dec-2016 19:58:58 EST