Javascript Tree Menu by Deluxe-Tree.com
USGS - science for a changing world

Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5084

In cooperation with the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District

Water-Quality Characteristics for Selected Sites within the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Planning Area, Wisconsin, February 2004–September 2005

By Judith C. Thomas, Michelle A. Lutz, Jennifer L. Bruce, David J. Graczyk, Kevin D. Richards, David P. Krabbenhoft, Stephen M. Westenbroek, Barbara C. Scudder, Daniel J. Sullivan, and Amanda H. Bell

This report is available for download as a PDF (15,526 KB).


Abstract
Contents
Figures
Tables
Appendixes
Conversion Factors
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Purpose and Scope
Study Design, Sample Collection, QA
Land Use and Phase II sites
Collection of Stage and Discharge Data
Manual Water-Quality Sampling
Automated Water-Quality Sampling
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Evaluation of Data Collected
Hydrologic Conditions
Results from Manually and Automatically Collected Samples
Chloride
Nutrients and Chlorophyll a
Total Nitrogen
Nitrate
Total Phosphorus
Chlorophyll a
Suspended Sediment
Mercury
Total Mercury
Methylmercury
Indicator Organisms
Fecal Coliforms
Escherichia coli
Coliphage
Pathogenic Organisms
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Salmonella
Giardia
Cryptosporidium
Pesticides
Wastewater Compounds
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals
Semipermeable Membrane Devices and Wastewater Compounds
Bed Sediment
Water-Column Toxicity
Fish Tissues
Bioassessment
Fish Results
Macroinvertebrate Results
Algae Results
Relations among Habitat Variables and Biotic Communities
Relations between Stream Biological Metrics, Site Characteristics, and WQ Data
Potential Areas for Phase III
Summary
Summary of Relations between Biological Metrics, Site Characteristics, and WQ Data
Findings for Harbor Sites and the Milwaukee River Mouth
Phase I--Phase II Comparisons
References
Appendixes
Appendix 1. Land-Use Classes
Appendix 2. Methods for Harbor-Site and Mercury Sampling
Appendix 3. WQ Properties and Constituents
Appendix 4. Season and Flow Conditions
Appendix 5. Comparison of Phase I and Phase II Medians
Appendix 6. Hydrologic Conditions
Water-Column Toxicity

The Microtox Acute Toxicity Test has different sensitivities to different pollutants, with generally more sensitivity to organic pollutants than metals (Qureshi and others, 1998). Microtox analysis quantifies differences (in percent effect) of the fluorescence values of bioluminescent bacteria exposed to sample water when compared to a laboratory control. Decreases in fluorescence (positive percent effect values) are attributed to the toxic effects of sample water on the viability of test bacteria, and the magnitude of the change in luminescence relates positively to the toxicity of the sample water. Toxicity results are generally reported in one of two ways, depending on the level of toxicity in the sample. For samples with low toxicity, values are reported as the percent effect observed on analyses run with undiluted sample water (Chang and others, 1981). For more highly toxic samples, toxicities are generally reported as the EC50 or the concentration of sample water necessary to cause a 50-percent decrease in luminescence (when compared to laboratory controls) (Chang and others, 1981). The EC50 is computed by running a series of Microtox tests with different dilutions of sample water; at least one of these dilutions should cause less than a 35-percent effect, and at least one of the dilutions should cause greater than a 65-percent effect (Rand and Petrocelli, 1985).

Samples submitted for Microtox analysis were collected from all 21 Phase II sites during summer-quarterly and event sampling, yielding a total of 4 samples per site over the 2-year period. Analyses were first run with undiluted sample water, and values were reported as percent effect. Values were consistently below 20-percent effect, with a small number of samples exhibiting a greater effect. All environmental samples showing greater than 20-percent effect were collected from harbor sites (table 24). The maximum percent effect observed (40-percent effect) was well below the 65-percent effect needed for the determination of an EC50. Overall, results were not indicative of highly toxic conditions at any site.


Table 24. Percent effects in samples with readings at or above 20 percent for all Phase II sites in the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District planning area, Wis.

[All values in percent effect]

Harbor site name
Site abbreviation
5-minute percent effect
15-minute percent effect
South Mid-Harbor Milwaukee Outer Harbor Site
OH-11
8
21
Northern Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake Site
OH-12
24
22
Middle Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake Site
OH-14
40
28
Southern Outside Harbor Breakwall Lake Site
OH-13
35
33



Microtox analyses were also performed on extracts from SPMDs deployed at selected sites and these data are discussed elsewhere in this report. Results from those analyses reflect toxicities of hydrophobic compounds accumulated from the water column over a month.


return to top
continue to Fish Tissues

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sir/2007/5084/page15.html
Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing Network
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 01-Dec-2016 19:59:02 EST