USGS - science for a changing world

Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5027

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5027

Back to Table of Contents

Table 6. Aquatic-life benchmarks for pesticides and degradates detected in the lower Clackamas River basin, Oregon, 2000–2005.

[Pesticide concentrations in micrograms per liter (µg/L). Shaded values represent benchmark exceedances. USEPA OPP references available at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/ecorisk_ders/aquatic_life_benchmark.htm. Canada: CCME, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2003). NAS/NAE: National Academy of Sciences/ National Academy of Engineering (1973). Abbreviations: USEPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; OPP, USEPA Office of Pesticide Programs; NAS/NAE, National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; HBSL, Health-Based Screening Levels; Sept., September; Oct., October; na, no benchmark available for these compounds; ds, downstream]

Pesticide or degradate Sites and sample dates of aquatic-life benchmark exceedance Maximum concen-
trations
Benchmark quotient (BQ) Aquatic-life benchmark derived from USEPA Office of Water   Aquatic-life benchmark derived from USEPA OPP reregistration eligibility decisions and ecological risk assessments   Aquatic-life benchmark from other agencies USEPA OPP references
USEPA Other agency Fish   Benthic invertebrates Non-vascular plants (algae) acute-each sample Vascular plants acute-each sample Oregon DEQ   NAS/NAE Canada
Acute-
each sample
Chronic-4-day average Acute-
each sample
Chronic-60-day average Acute-
each sample
Chronic-21-day average Acute Chronic (Maximum concentration-
each sample)
Exceedance of USEPA aquatic-life benchmark
Azinphos-methyl Doane Creek ds Hwy 212 (Sept. 2005) 0.21 21 214   0.01   0.18 20.36   0.08 20.16         0.01   0.001   USEPA (2005b)
Chlorpyrifos NF Deep Creek at Boring (Sept. 2005) .17 3.4 167 .083 .041   .9 .57   .05 .04 140     0.083 .041   .001 0.004 USEPA (2000a, 2002)
  Noyer Creek ds Hwy 212 (May/Sept. 2005) .14 2.8 140                                  
  Rock Creek near mouth (Oct. 2000) .056 1.1 56                                  
Diazinon Carli Creek near mouth (Sept. 2005) .25 2.5 28 .17 .17   45 3.55   4,50.1 4.17 3,700     10.08 10.05   .009   USEPA (2000b, 2004c)
  Rock Creek at 172nd Ave (Sept. 2005) .17 1.7 19                                  
  Sieben Creek at Hwy 224 (May 2000) .16 1.6 18                                  
p,p'-DDE8 Deep Creek at Hwy 224 (Oct. 2000) .002 2.4   1.1 0.001                   1.1 .001      
Exceedance of non-USEPA aquatic-life benchmark
2,4-D NF Deep C trib at 312th Ave (Sept. 2005) 6.1 0.02 2.0       650,500 614,200   612,500 616,400 63,880 6299         3 4 USEPA (2004a)
Carbaryl9 Noyer Creek ds Hwy 212 (Sept. 2005) .15 .1 7.7       4125 4210   2.55 1.5   1,100         .02 .2 USEPA (2003a)
  Sieben Creek at Hwy 224 (May 2005) .094 .06 4.7                                  
  Rock Creek at 172nd Ave (Sept. 2005) .052 .03 2.6                                  
  Sieben Creek ds Sunnyside Rd (Sept. 2005) .026 .02 1.3                                  
Chlorpyrifos Clackamas River (source water) (Nov 2002/May 2005) .006 .12 6.0 0.83 0.41   .9 .57   .05 .04 140     0.083 0.41   .001 .004 USEPA (2002a, 2002)
Chlorothalonil Noyer Creek at mouth (May 2005) .26 .09 1.4       11.5 3   34 39 190             .18 USEPA (1999a)
Dieldrin Noyer Creek ds Hwy 212 (May/Sept. 2005) .024 .43 4.8 0.24 0.056                   0.24 0.019   .005  
  NF Deep C trib at 312th Ave (Sept. 2005) .01 .04 2                                  
  Rock Creek near mouth (Oct. 2000) .008 .03 1.6                                  
Diuron Doane Creek at Hwy 212 (Sept. 2005) 2.3 0.94 1.4       355 26   80 2160 2.4           1.6   USEPA (2003d)
  NF Deep Creek at Boring (Sept 2005) 1.9 .8 1.2                                  
Endosulfan1 Tickle Creek near Boring (Sept. 2005) .11 .51 35.2                       0.22 0.056   0.003 0.02  
Malathion Rock Creek near mouth (Sept. 2005) .05 .79 5.9   0.1   2 24   0.25 0.06         .1   .008   USEPA (2000c)
  Sieben Creek at Hwy 224 (May 2000) .025 .1 3.1                                  
No exceedances of aquatic-life benchmark (sorted by descending maximum benchmark quotient)
Methiocarb   0.09 0.86         218 50   3.5 0.1                 USEPA (1994b)
Dichlobenil   17 .56 0.46       2,465 3330   1,850 560 1,000 30         37   USEPA (1998b)
Ethoprop   .13 .16         150 24   22 .8 8,400               USEPA (1999b)
Trifluralin   .17 .15 .83       20.5 1.14   280 2.4 7.52 43.5           0.2 USEPA (1996a)
Pendimethalin   .35 .07         69 6.3   140 14.5 5.4 12.5             USEPA (1997b)
Glyphosate   45.8 .05 .70       42,450 >25,700   27,500 >50,000 850 21,500           65 USEPA 1993
Triclopyr   5.0 .05         180 104,000   850 80,700 100 880             USEPA (1998c)
Bromacil   .27 .04 .05       18,000     60,500   6.8             5 USEPA (1996c)
Simazine   .96 .03 .10       3,200 960   500 21,000 36 140         10 10 USEPA (2005c, 2005d)
Oryzalin   .29 .02         1,440 220   700   42 15.4             USEPA (1994c)
Atrazine   .30 .02 .16       2,650 62   360 62 32 18           1.8 USEPA (2003b, 2003c)
Linuron   .59 .01 .08       1,500 342   60 2120 67             7 USEPA (1995b)
2,4-D methyl ester   .73 .01 .18                               4  
Norflurazon   .11 .01         4,050 770   7,500 1,000 13 86             USEPA (1996b)
MCPA   0.07 0.003 0.03       6380 612,000   690 611,000 6160 620           2.6 USEPA (2004b)
Dinoseb   .03 .003 .55                              .05  
Terbacil   .03 .002         23,100     31,500   11 140             USEPA (1998d)
Tebuthiuron   .08 .002 .05       53,000 9,300   148,500 21,800 50 135           1.6 USEPA (1994e)
Propoxur   .01 .001         1,850     5.5                   USEPA (1997a)
Napropamide   1.3 .0004         3,200     7,150   3,400               USEPA (2005a)
Pronamide   .17 .0002         36,000     72,800   760               USEPA (1994a)
Metolachlor   .11 .0001 .01       1,950 780   12,550                 7.8 USEPA (1995a)
Dacthal   .46 .00004         15,000     13,500   711,000 711,000             USEPA (1998a)
Bentazon   .16 .00004         50,000     50,000   4,500 5,350             USEPA (1994d)

1 Endosulfan includes endosulfan I and endosulfan II.

2 The chronic benchmark is based on the acute toxicity value (which was lower than the lowest available chronic toxicity value), and therefore may underestimate chronic toxicity.

3 Because the underlying toxicity value is a “less-than” value (such as <1,500), this benchmark may underestimate toxicity.

4 Although the underlying acute toxicity value is greater than or equal to the chronic toxicity value, the acute benchmark is lower than the chronic benchmark because acute and chronic toxicity values were multiplied by LOC values of 0.5 and 1, respectively.

5 During public comment on draft ambient water-quality criteria that are under development by USEPA, public comment noted an atypical distribution of the acute toxicity data for diazinon. If data from the second most sensitive study were used (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b risk assessment), rather than the most sensitive study, then the benchmark would change from 0.1 to 0.4 µg/L.

6 Original toxicity values are in micrograms of acid equivalents per liter. For 2,4-D and 2,4-DB, the toxicity values selected were the lowest available values for the acid or salt forms. For MCPA, acute toxicity values were the lowest for the acid, salt or ester forms, and chronic toxicity values were the lowest of the acid and salt forms. Selection was consistent with risk quotients in the cited USEPA references.

7 Because the underlying toxicity value is a “greater-than” value (such as >265,000), this benchmark may overestimate toxicity.

8 Benchmark applies to total DDT, so comparison with measured p,p´-DDE concentration may underestimate potential effects.

9 Carbaryl recoveries in some QA spike samples were as high as 304 percent. For more details, see the quality-control discussion in appendix A.

10 The diazinon benchmark concentrations are DEQ guidance values, rather than water-quality criteria. DEQ can, however, use these values in the application of Oregon’s Narrative Toxics Criteria (State of Oregon Administrative Rule 340-0033[1]).

Back to Table of Contents

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

Take Pride in America logoUSA.gov logoU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5027
Page Contact Information: Publications Team
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 10-Jan-2013 18:43:20 EST