Skip Links

USGS - science for a changing world

Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5152

DOE/ID-22218
Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy

A Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey Three-Dimensional Model Estimates of Groundwater Source Areas and Velocities to Independently Derived Estimates, Idaho National Laboratory and Vicinity, Idaho

By Jason C. Fisher, Joseph P. Rousseau, Roy C. Bartholomay, and Gordon W. Rattray

Thumbnail of and link to report PDF (32.5 MB)Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy, evaluated a three-dimensional model of groundwater flow in the fractured basalts and interbedded sediments of the eastern Snake River Plain aquifer at and near the Idaho National Laboratory to determine if model-derived estimates of groundwater movement are consistent with (1) results from previous studies on water chemistry type, (2) the geochemical mixing at an example well, and (3) independently derived estimates of the average linear groundwater velocity. Simulated steady-state flow fields were analyzed using backward particle-tracking simulations that were based on a modified version of the particle tracking program MODPATH. Model results were compared to the 5-microgram-per-liter lithium contour interpreted to represent the transition from a water type that is primarily composed of tributary valley underflow and streamflow-infiltration recharge to a water type primarily composed of regional aquifer water. This comparison indicates several shortcomings in the way the model represents flow in the aquifer. The eastward movement of tributary valley underflow and streamflow-infiltration recharge is overestimated in the north-central part of the model area and underestimated in the central part of the model area. Model inconsistencies can be attributed to large contrasts in hydraulic conductivity between hydrogeologic zones.

Sources of water at well NPR-W01 were identified using backward particle tracking, and they were compared to the relative percentages of source water chemistry determined using geochemical mass balance and mixing models. The particle tracking results compare reasonably well with the chemistry results for groundwater derived from surface-water sources (–28 percent error), but overpredict the proportion of groundwater derived from regional aquifer water (108 percent error) and underpredict the proportion of groundwater derived from tributary valley underflow from the Little Lost River valley (–74 percent error). These large discrepancies may be attributed to large contrasts in hydraulic conductivity between hydrogeologic zones and (or) a short-circuiting of underflow from the Little Lost River valley to an area of high hydraulic conductivity.

Independently derived estimates of the average groundwater velocity at 12 well locations within the upper 100 feet of the aquifer were compared to model-derived estimates. Agreement between velocity estimates was good at wells with travel paths located in areas of sediment-rich rock (root-mean-square error [RMSE] = 5.2 feet per day [ft/d]) and poor in areas of sediment-poor rock (RMSE = 26.2 ft/d); simulated velocities in sediment-poor rock were 2.5 to 4.5 times larger than independently derived estimates at wells USGS 1 (less than 14 ft/d) and USGS 100 (less than 21 ft/d). The models overprediction of groundwater velocities in sediment-poor rock may be attributed to large contrasts in hydraulic conductivity and a very large, model-wide estimate of vertical anisotropy (14,800).

First posted August 28, 2012

For additional information contact:
Director, Idaho Water Science Center
U.S. Geological Survey
230 Collins Road
Boise, Idaho 83702
http://id.water.usgs.gov

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge.


Suggested citation:

Fisher, J.C., Rousseau, J.P., Bartholomay, R.C, and Rattray, G.W., 2012, A comparison of U.S. Geological Survey three-dimensional model estimates of groundwater source areas and velocities to independently derived estimates, Idaho National Laboratory and vicinity, Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5152 (DOE/ID-22218), 130 p.



Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Purpose, Scope, and Methods

Groundwater Chemistry and Geographic Source Areas of Groundwater

Simulated Sources and Velocities of Groundwater within Each of the Six Model Layers

An Evaluation of Mixed Water Types at the NPR-W01 Well

An Evaluation of the Estimated Linear Velocity of the Young Fraction of Groundwater at Multiple Wells

Summary and Conclusions

References Cited

Appendix A. Modifications to the MODPATH Package

Appendix B. Data for Surface-Water and Groundwater Sampling Sites Located at the Idaho National Laboratory and Vicinity, Idaho

Appendix C. Data for Streams Used in the Steady-State Model of Groundwater Flow, Idaho National Laboratory and Vicinity, Idaho

Appendix D. Cation and Anion Data for Selected Wells at the Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho

Appendix E. Concentrations of Lithium and Boron in Water from Sampling Sites Located at the Idaho National Laboratory and Vicinity, Idaho

Appendix F. Binary Mixing Equation in Ratio-Element Space

Appendix G. Summary of Backward Particle-Tracking Results from a Sensitivity Analysis of the Source Area Contributions to Changes in Input Parameters for the Layered-Grid and NPR-W01 Well Simulations


Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5152/
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Page Last Modified: Thursday, January 10, 2013, 07:59:12 PM