Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5191
AbstractMost airborne topographic light detection and ranging (lidar) systems operate within the near-infrared spectrum. Laser pulses from these systems frequently are absorbed by water and therefore do not generate reflected returns on water bodies in the resulting void regions within the lidar point cloud. Thus, an analysis of lidar voids has implications for identifying water bodies. Data analysis techniques to detect reduced lidar return densities were evaluated for test sites in Blackhawk County, Iowa, and Beltrami County, Minnesota, to delineate contiguous areas that have few or no lidar returns. Results from this study indicated a 5-meter radius moving window with fewer than 23 returns (28 percent of the moving window) was sufficient for delineating void regions. Techniques to provide elevation values for void regions to flatten water features and to force channel flow in the downstream direction also are presented. |
First posted December 5, 2014 For additional information contact: Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here. |
Worstell, B.B., Poppenga, S.K., Evans, G.A., Prince, S.A., 2014, Lidar point density analysis—Implications for identifying water bodies: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5191, 19 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20145191.
ISSN 2328-0328 (online)
Abstract
Introduction
Study Area
Data Used in the Analysis
Lidar Point Density Analysis
Elevation Assignment for Void Regions
Lidar Return Density Variability of Void Regions
Assigning New Elevation Values in Rivers, Lakes, and Ponds
Limitations and Considerations
Summary
Acknowledgments
References Cited