<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE book SYSTEM "BITS-book2.dtd">
<book xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="2.0" xml:lang="EN">
<collection-meta collection-type="series">
<title-group>
<title>U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report</title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="pub-short-title">Scientific Investigations Report</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="pub-acronym-title">SIR</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group content-type="secretary-director">
<contrib><string-name><given-names/><surname/></string-name>
<aff><institution>U.S. Department of the Interior</institution></aff><role/></contrib>
<contrib><string-name><given-names/><surname/><suffix/></string-name>
<aff><institution>U.S. Geological Survey</institution></aff><role/></contrib>
</contrib-group><issn publication-format="print">2328-031X</issn><issn publication-format="online">2328-0328</issn>
</collection-meta>
<book-meta>
<book-id book-id-type="publisher-id">2026-5128</book-id>
<book-id book-id-type="doi">10.3133/sir20265128</book-id><book-title-group><book-title>Occurrence of Cyanobacteria and Associated Cyanotoxins in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex, New Jersey, August 2020 to August 2021</book-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">Occurrence of Cyanobacteria and Associated Cyanotoxins in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex, New Jersey, August 2020 to August 2021</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="sentence-case">Occurrence of cyanobacteria and associated cyanotoxins in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex, New Jersey, August 2020 to August 2021</alt-title></book-title-group>
<contrib-group content-type="collaborator">
<contrib><collab>Prepared in cooperation with the New Jersey Water Supply Authority and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection</collab></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<contrib-group content-type="authors">
<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><x>By</x><x> </x><given-names>Rebecca M.</given-names><x> </x><surname>Gorney</surname></string-name><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01"><sup>1</sup></xref><x>, </x></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Heather A.</given-names><x> </x><surname>Heckathorn</surname></string-name><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01"><sup>1</sup></xref><x>, </x></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Kyle R.</given-names><x> </x><surname>Clonan</surname></string-name><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn02"><sup>2</sup></xref><x>, </x></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Pamela A.</given-names><x> </x><surname>Reilly</surname></string-name><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01"><sup>1</sup></xref><x>, </x></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Kathryn</given-names><x> </x><surname>Cahalane</surname></string-name><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01"><sup>1</sup></xref><x>, and </x></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name><given-names>Bradley W.</given-names><x> </x><surname>Bjorklund</surname></string-name><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date date-type="pub">
<year>2026</year></pub-date><book-volume-number/>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>U.S. Geological Survey</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Reston, Virginia</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
<edition/>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>Harmful algal blooms, particularly cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs), have emerged as a substantial global concern because of their detrimental effects on water quality and aquatic ecosystem health. CyanoHABs can produce cyanotoxins, which pose serious health risks to humans and wildlife, such as liver failure and respiratory distress. This is particularly concerning for water bodies that serve as drinking-water sources. Recent trends indicate an increase in the frequency and intensity of cyanoHABs globally. This study focuses on the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex in New Jersey, where extensive monitoring was conducted from August 2020 to August 2021 to assess the presence of cyanobacteria and associated cyanotoxins. The research utilized a combination of discrete water-quality sampling, continuous monitoring, and solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) to capture the dynamics of cyanotoxin occurrence and potential transport. Findings revealed a widespread presence of cyanobacteria and potential for cyanotoxin production, although actual cyanotoxin concentrations remained below drinking water and recreational thresholds. The study, conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in collaboration with the New Jersey Water Supply Authority (NJWSA) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), highlighted the limitations of traditional sampling methods and emphasized that continuous monitoring can support better understanding of how cyanoHAB conditions change over time and in different places. Genetic testing included quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses, which demonstrated higher sensitivity, or increased findings of cyanobacteria compared to microscopy, indicating the potential for use in early warning systems. This research underscores that integrating various detection methods and hydrological data can enhance understanding of cyanotoxin dynamics in river systems.</p></abstract>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta><meta-name>Online Only</meta-name><meta-value>True</meta-value></custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
<notes notes-type="further-information">
<p>For more information on the USGS&#x2014;the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment&#x2014;visit <ext-link>https://www.usgs.gov</ext-link> or call 1&#x2013;888&#x2013;ASK&#x2013;USGS.</p></notes>
<notes notes-type="overview">
<p>For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit <ext-link>https://store.usgs.gov/</ext-link>.</p></notes>
<notes notes-type="disclaimer">
<p>Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.</p></notes>
<notes notes-type="permissions">
<p>Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.usgs.gov/survey-manual/11006-use-copyrighted-material-usgs-information-products">copyrighted items</ext-link> must be secured from the copyright owner.</p></notes>
</book-meta>
<front-matter>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following individuals and organizations for their invaluable contributions to the project design,&#x00A0;conceptualization, and collaborative research discussions: Heather Desko (New Jersey Water Supply Authority [NJWSA], Meiyin Wu (New Jersey Center for Water Science and Technology [NJCWST]), Robert Newby (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection [NJDEP]), Bob Schuster (NJDEP), and Eric Ernst (NJDEP). This study benefited from analytical services and consistent, timely provision of data from the NJCWST at Montclair State University, the NJDEP, and the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF). The authors also thank study partners&#x00A0;Molly Hillenbrand (NJCWST), Anne Hurley (NJCWST), David Hsu (NJCWST), Alessandra Rossi (NJCWST), Melissa Mazzaro (NJWSA), and Kenneth Klipstein (NJWSA) for their support with data collection, analysis, and guidance. Additionally, Jared Berger (NJWSA) is credited for creating the map in this report. The authors thank Jennifer Graham, Joshua Rosen, and Sabina Gifford of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for their expertise in phycology, lentic systems, and cyanotoxin analysis, and Erin Stelzer of the USGS for sample analysis and review. Special thanks are extended to USGS scientists Lawrence Feinson, Lisa Carper, Jonathan Cohl, Erika Bernal, and Zachary Bunnell for their diligent data-collection efforts. The authors also acknowledge Anna Boetsma of the USGS for project support and Kaitlin Bowen, Jacob Gray, and Lucas Sirotniak of the USGS for their assistance assembling solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) passive samplers for this study.</p>
</ack>
<front-matter-part book-part-type="Conversion-Factors">
<book-part-meta>
<title-group>
<title>Conversion Factors</title>
</title-group>
</book-part-meta>
<named-book-part-body>
<table-wrap id="ta" position="float"><caption><title>U.S. customary units to International System of Units</title></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="42.12%"/>
<col width="15.77%"/>
<col width="42.11%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Multiply</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">By</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">To obtain</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="col">Length</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">inch (in.)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="." style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">2.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">centimeter (cm)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">inch (in.)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">25.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">millimeter (mm)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">foot (ft)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.3048</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">meter (m)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">mile (mi)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">1.609</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">kilometer (km)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">yard (yd)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="." style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.9144</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">meter (m)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="col">Area</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">acre</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="." style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">4,047</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">square meter (m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">acre</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4047</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">hectare (ha)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">acre</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.4047</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">square hectometer (hm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">acre</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">0.004047</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">square kilometer (km<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">square mile (mi<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char=".">259.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">hectare (ha)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">square mile (mi<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="." style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">2.590</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">square kilometer (km<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tb" position="float"><caption><title>International System of Units to U.S. customary units</title></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="45.51%"/>
<col width="14.67%"/>
<col width="39.82%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Multiply</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="." scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">By</td>
<td valign="top" align="center" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">To obtain</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="col">Length</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">centimeter (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">0.3937</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">inch (in.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">millimeter (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03937</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">inch (in.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">meter (m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.281</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">foot (ft)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">kilometer (km)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.6214</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">mile (mi)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">kilometer (km)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.5400</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">mile, nautical (nmi)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">meter (m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">1.094</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">yard (yd)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="col">Area</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">square meter (m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">square foot (ft<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">square centimeter (cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.1550</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">square inch (in<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">hectare (ha)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.003861</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">square mile (mi<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">square kilometer (km<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.3861</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">square mile (mi<sup>2</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="col">Flow rate</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">kilometer per hour (km/h)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.6214</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">mile per hour (mi/h)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" valign="top" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="col">Mass</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">gram (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">0.03527</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">ounce, avoirdupois (oz)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">kilogram (kg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.205</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">pound avoirdupois (lb)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="row">metric ton (t)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.102</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ton, short [2,000 lb]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">metric ton (t)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.9842</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">ton, long [2,240 lb]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Temperature in degrees Celsius (&#x00B0;C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (&#x00B0;F) as follows:</p>
<p>&#x00B0;F = (1.8 &#x00D7; &#x00B0;C) + 32</p>
<p>Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (&#x00B0;F) may be converted to degrees Celsius (&#x00B0;C) as follows:</p>
<p>&#x00B0;C = (&#x00B0;F &#x2013; 32) / 1.8.</p>
</named-book-part-body>
</front-matter-part>
<front-matter-part book-part-type="Supplemental-Information">
<book-part-meta>
<title-group>
<title>Supplemental Information</title>
</title-group>
</book-part-meta>
<named-book-part-body>
<p>Concentrations of chemical constituents in water are given in either milligrams per liter (mg/L) or micrograms per liter (&#x00B5;g/L).</p>
</named-book-part-body>
</front-matter-part>
<glossary content-type="Abbreviations"><title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list><def-item><term>AVLD</term>
<def>
<p>absolute value logarithmic difference</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>cyanoHAB</term>
<def>
<p>cyanobacteria harmful algal bloom</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>DNA</term>
<def>
<p>deoxyribonucleic acid</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>ELISA</term>
<def>
<p>enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>EPA</term>
<def>
<p>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>HAB</term>
<def>
<p>harmful algal bloom</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>LC-MS/MS</term>
<def>
<p>liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>MDL</term>
<def>
<p>method detection limit</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>MRL</term>
<def>
<p>method reporting limit</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>mRNA</term>
<def>
<p>messenger ribonucleic acid</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>NJCWST</term>
<def>
<p>New Jersey Center for Water Science and Technology</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>NJDEP</term>
<def>
<p>New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>NWIS</term>
<def>
<p>National Water Information System</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>NJWSA</term>
<def>
<p>New Jersey Water Supply Authority</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>qPCR</term>
<def>
<p>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>RPD</term>
<def>
<p>relative percent difference</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>RNA </term>
<def>
<p>ribonucleic acid</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>rRNA </term>
<def>
<p>ribosomal ribonucleic acid</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>SPATT</term>
<def>
<p>solid phase adsorption toxin tracking</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>USGS</term>
<def>
<p>U.S. Geological Survey</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
</front-matter>
<book-body>
<book-part>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Harmful algal blooms (HABs), or the excessive growth of certain taxa of protists, cyanobacteria, or algae in water, are of growing international concern (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>). In freshwater, cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) can propagate under favorable conditions and produce secondary metabolites, such as cyanotoxins, which can have adverse effects on water quality and the health of aquatic ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Brooks and others, 2016)</xref>. Cyanotoxins can cause acute toxicity in mammals. Exposure to cyanotoxins through ingestion, inhalation of aerosolized water droplets, or dermal contact has the potential to produce a wide range of symptoms in humans, including liver failure, gastrointestinal distress, or, in rare cases, death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r41">Paerl and Otten, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r42">Pati&#x00F1;o and others, 2023</xref>). Of the most common classes of cyanotoxins (including anatoxins, microcystins, cylindrospermopsin and saxitoxins), microcystins are the most frequently detected and researched (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>). Increases in the frequency, duration, and magnitude of cyanoHABs have been observed globally in recent decades. Future climate projections, including the potential warming of surface waters and changes in precipitation, indicate increasingly favorable conditions for the growth of cyanobacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r40">Paerl and Huisman, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">O&#x2019;Neil and others, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Brooks and others, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Many lakes and reservoirs that are used for drinking water are located within watersheds that have documented occurrences of cyanoHABs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r28">Miller and others, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r46">Reinl and others, 2021</xref>), including the northeastern United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Gifford and others, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>). Although past studies of cyanoHAB development in lakes are extensive, less is known regarding cyanoHAB formation and persistence in flowing-water systems. As opposed to lakes, in rivers, there is not always a direct correlation between nutrient availability and cyanobacteria amounts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23">Jarvie and others, 2025</xref>). The transport of cyanobacteria and associated cyanotoxins from lakes and reservoirs during cyanoHABs has been previously documented and modeled (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Graham and others, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r39">Otten and others, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r51">Schmadel and others, 2024</xref>), but the mechanisms that control cyanobacteria occurrence and growth in rivers are not well understood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">Bukaveckas and others, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Graham and others, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r70">Zuellig and others, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>CyanoHAB monitoring often relies on analysis of discrete samples, which provide a snapshot of the phytoplankton assemblage and cyanotoxin concentrations at a specific location and time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>). Aquatic ecosystems are rarely uniform in composition, and the concentration of cyanotoxins and cyanobacteria cell densities is likely to be affected by many environmental factors, including water temperature, residence time, wind speed and direction, wave action, nutrient supply, and species competition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">O&#x2019;Neil and others, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r41">Paerl and Otten, 2013</xref>). Because of rapidly changing environmental conditions and the high spatial and temporal variability of cyanoHABs, discrete sampling methods may be insufficient to accurately capture the dynamic nature of the blooms.</p>
<p>Recent advances in genetic methodologies have increased the ability to detect cyanobacteria at low concentrations and the potential for cyanotoxin production through the measurement of specific genes, such as cyanobacteria 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) and cyanotoxin synthetase genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Al-Tebrineh and others, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r53">Stelzer and others, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Graham and others, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>). Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays quantify the presence of specific genes, which indicates the potential for cyanotoxin production; however, it is important to note that the presence of the cyanotoxin synthetase genes does not guarantee cyanotoxin occurrence. The cyanobacteria must first transcribe the DNA-encoded cyanotoxin gene into messenger RNA (mRNA) and then translate the mRNA into proteins to initiate the building of the cyanotoxin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r53">Stelzer and others, 2013</xref>). Large datasets that enable comparison among cyanobacteria assemblage, cyanotoxin concentration, and cyanobacteria genetic composition are rare, especially in riverine systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Graham and others, 2020</xref>), and are valuable for improving understanding of the relation between cyanobacteria abundance, cyanotoxin concentrations, and the results of genetic analyses.</p>
<p>Solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) is an additional alternative method of measuring cyanotoxins through passive sampler deployment that can integrate cyanotoxin concentrations over time. The SPATT samplers are used to measure the adsorption of dissolved cyanotoxins on a known amount of resin beads, with increased cyanotoxin concentrations correlated to the total time of resin exposure within the water environment (Kudela, 2011). When the samplers are retrieved after deployment, cyanotoxins are extracted from the resin, and the extract is analyzed with standard analytical methods, such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Johnston and others, 2025</xref>). The SPATT samplers are relatively low-cost, simple to build, and easy to transport, deploy, and retrieve (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r30">Negrey and others, 2019; Jaegge and others, 2026</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22"/>)<?word-comment COMMENT1: Additional citations here.?>. They can be deployed in areas with limited access where collecting discrete samples is challenging or in conditions not conducive to discrete sampling, such as high-flow conditions. Passive samplers have been shown to be a reliable, sensitive, and effective time-integrated sampling approach for marine, brackish, and freshwater contexts (Kudela, 2011; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jaegge and others, 2026</xref>). Combining passive samplers and discrete data across a riverine system can provide a more comprehensive understanding of cyanoHABs over space and time.</p>
<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued drinking-water health-advisory values and recommendations for recreational water-quality criteria for microcystins and cylindrospermopsin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r59">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">table 1</xref>). National guidelines for anatoxins or saxitoxins do not currently exist, and many States have developed State-specific guidelines in response to the rise in occurrence of cyanoHABs using several different metrics and thresholds to define potential harm to recreational or water-supply users (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r52">Stackpoole and others, 2024</xref>). The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has developed recreational State guidance levels for microcystin, anatoxins, and cylindrospermopsin, and has proposed health advisory guidance levels for these three cyanotoxins and saxitoxin in treated drinking water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2022</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">table 1</xref>). For recreational contexts, NJDEP has developed four-tiered harmful algal bloom (HAB) Alert Levels: &#x201C;Watch,&#x201D; &#x201C;Advisory,&#x201D; &#x201C;Warning,&#x201D; and &#x201C;Danger,&#x201D; based on cyanobacteria cell concentrations and cyanotoxin concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>). In New Jersey, the potential and number of documented cyanoHABs has increased in recent years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>); therefore, an improved understanding of sources and transport of cyanoHABs within the State can help water-resource managers design efficient monitoring programs and allocate resources to protect human health.</p>
<table-wrap id="t01" position="float"><label>Table 1</label><caption>
<title>Cyanotoxin advisory thresholds for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in both finished drinking water and recreational contexts. </title>
<p content-type="toc">1.	Cyanotoxin advisory thresholds for New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in both drinking water and recreational contexts</p>
<p>[Data are from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r57">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015a, 2019)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r59"/> and the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (2022, 2024)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32"/>. NJDEP, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; &#x00B5;g/L, micrograms per liter; EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; &#x2014;, not applicable]</p></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="21.17%"/>
<col width="18.26%"/>
<col width="20.19%"/>
<col width="20.19%"/>
<col width="20.19%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Cyanotoxins</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">NJDEP Draft Guidance Value Levels (&#x00B5;g/L)**</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">EPA Health Advisory Values* (&#x00B5;g/L)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">NJDEP Recreational Advisory Guidance Levels (&#x00B5;g/L)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">EPA Recreational Advisory Values (&#x00B5;g/L)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt"/>
<td valign="bottom" colspan="2" align="center" scope="colgroup" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Finished water</td>
<td valign="bottom" colspan="2" align="center" scope="colgroup" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Recreational water</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Microcystins</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">0.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">1.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">Cylindrospermopsin</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">Anatoxins</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Saxitoxin</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.11</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t01n1"><label>*</label>
<p>Guidance values for people older than 6 years of age and after a 10-day exposure   </p></fn>
<fn id="t01n2"><label>**</label>
<p>These guidance levels are draft until the point that more feasible testing is available (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2022</xref>).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t02" position="float"><label>Table 2</label><caption>
<title>New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection harmful algal bloom (HAB) alert levels applied to recreational contexts. </title>
<p content-type="toc">2.	NJDEP harmful algal bloom (HAB) Alert levels applied to recreational contexts</p>
<p>[Data are from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (2022)</xref>. HAB, harmful algal bloom; cells/mL, cells per milliliter; &#x00B5;g/L, micrograms per liter; &gt;, greater than; &lt;, less than]</p></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="23.31%"/>
<col width="36.62%"/>
<col width="40.07%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">HAB Alert Levels</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Cyanobacteria Cell Counts (cells/mL)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Toxins (&#x00B5;g/L)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Watch</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">&gt;20,000 and &lt;80,000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">Below thresholds</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">Advisory</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&gt;80,000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Above thresholds</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">Warning</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">not specified</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Toxin (microcystin) &gt;20 and &lt;2,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Danger</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">not specified</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Toxin (microcystin) &gt;2,000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>From August 2020 to August 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the New Jersey Water Supply Authority (NJWSA), the NJDEP, and Montclair State University conducted a study to characterize the extent, duration, and potential transport of cyanobacteria and associated cyanotoxins within the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex to better understand cyanotoxin and cyanobacteria occurrence in this system. The complex consists of Budd Lake, Spruce Run and Round Valley Reservoirs, and the main stem of the Raritan and Millstone Rivers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>). Collectively, the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex provides drinking water to more than 1.5 million people in New Jersey (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>). The study included extensive discrete-sample collection, use of continuous water-quality sensors, and deployment of SPATT samplers throughout the year.</p>
<p>Previous analysis of phytoplankton data found several cyanobacteria genera, including 24 known cyanotoxin producers that were present in several sites throughout the supply complex and a net decrease in phytoplankton abundance from upstream to downstream sampling sites. It was also shown that persistence mechanisms differed between the Millstone and Raritan River subwatersheds (Clonan, 2026). Using multivariate methods, the authors showed that the lake and river sampling sites had substantially different cyanobacteria assemblages&#x2014;all mainstem sites were similar, but Spruce Run Outlet and Budd Lake Outlet were each distinct. Using flow data collected at USGS streamgages, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r12">Clonan and others (2026</xref>) determined cyanobacteria persistence in the Raritan River overlapped with discharge from Spruce Run Reservoir; however, the study did not address cyanotoxin occurrence in the system, the use of genetic methods and passive samplers, or additional phytoplankton and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> data collected from within Spruce Run Reservoir.</p>
<sec>
<title>Purpose and Scope</title>
<p>This report aims to evaluate the presence of cyanobacteria and characterize the detection of cyanotoxins and cyanobacteria genes in samples collected from August 2020 to August 2021 at sites within the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. The sampling locations in this study were selected to compare conditions among upstream lake sites, tributary sites, and downstream Raritan River mainstem sites, and from a buoy within the Spruce Run Reservoir. The specific objectives of this report were to: (1) characterize findings from discrete water-quality samples, SPATTs, and continuous sensor measurements, and (2) relate those results to cyanobacteria, cyanobacteria genes, cyanotoxins, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, and water-quality data in the context of relevant New Jersey cyanoHAB advisory thresholds. These objectives were achieved by comparing data from upstream lake or reservoir and downstream river sites in the Raritan River. This information will improve our understanding of the occurrence of microcystin (and other cyanotoxins) in river systems. All data discussed in this report are available in a USGS data release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>) and the National Water Information System database (NWIS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024)</xref>.</p>
<fig id="fig01" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Map of the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex and sites that were sampled from August 2020 to August 2021. [RR, Raritan River; MR, Millstone River]</p><p content-type="toc">1.	Map of the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex and sites that were sampled from August 2020 to August 2021</p></caption><long-desc>Map showing various sampling sites located in the Raritan Water Supply Complex area.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig01"/></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Study Area</title>
<p>The Raritan River Basin comprises an area of 1,105 square miles (mi<sup>2</sup>) in New Jersey (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>). It is the largest river drainage basin entirely within New Jersey and is affected by municipal and industrial point-source discharges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005</xref>). The basin drains all (or parts of) around 100 municipalities in seven counties. The confluence of the mainstem of the Raritan River with the Millstone River (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>) is the location of two drinking-water intakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005</xref>). Numerous low-flow dams modify river flow, and two wastewater-treatment plants discharge 8.5 mi upstream of the Blackwells Mills MR site and 2 mi upstream of the Below Calco Dam RR site, respectively, which can affect water quality (Clonan, 2026).</p>
<p>The Raritan River Water Supply Complex was selected for this study because it is a source of drinking-water supply and the recurrent cyanoHABs in upstream lakes and reservoirs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>; Clonan, 2026). There are several lake-like portions within the basin, including Budd Lake and Spruce Run Reservoir (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>). Budd Lake<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<fn id="fn1"><label>1</label>
<p>The surface area of Budd Lake equals (=) 376 acres (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r33">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2025</xref>).</p></fn> is a natural lake used for recreation that serves as the headwaters of the South Branch Raritan River. Spruce Run Reservoir<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<fn id="fn2"><label>2</label>
<p>The surface area of Spruce Run Reservoir=1,350 acres and has 11 billion gallons of storage capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005).</xref></p></fn> is a water-supply reservoir fed by Mulhockaway Creek and Spruce Run; it releases water to the South Branch Raritan River further downstream (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>). These waterbodies, as well as others in the watershed, are involved in regulating water flow and supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r48">Reiser, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005</xref>). From 2018 to 2022, Budd Lake and Spruce Run Reservoir experienced annual cyanoHAB events that led to concerns about the potential transport of cyanotoxins to downstream drinking-water intakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>). Although cyanoHABs have been documented in lake systems within the basin, limited data have been collected regarding their downstream impacts, including cyanotoxin occurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This study used a combination of discrete water-quality and SPATT sampler data that were collected on 20 dates from 8 riverine and lake outlet locations in the Raritan River Water Supply Complex (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">table 3</xref>). Additionally, 24 discrete water-quality samples were collected at the Spruce Run Buoy site within Spruce Run Reservoir (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>) to record continuous water-quality data (collected in 15-minute intervals).</p>
<table-wrap id="t03" position="float"><label>Table 3</label><caption>
<title>Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex sampling locations, site type, latitude, longitude, and type of data collected at each location from August 2020 to August 2021.</title>
<p content-type="toc">3.	Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex sampling locations, site type, latitude, longitude, and type of data collected at each location</p>
<p>[Data are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>. USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; RR, Raritan River; Rd, road; NJ, New Jersey; G, cyanobacteria genes; S, solid phase adsorption toxin tracking sampler deployment; WQ, water-quality samples; Q, streamflow; ft, feet; NW, northwest; WQM, continuous water-quality monitor; MR, Millstone River]</p></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="15.2%"/>
<col width="20.04%"/>
<col width="13.28%"/>
<col width="11.44%"/>
<col width="11.16%"/>
<col width="12.66%"/>
<col width="16.22%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Site identifier</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Station name</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">USGS station number</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Type</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Latitude</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Longitude</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Data collected</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Budd Lake Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">South Branch RR at Manor House Rd at Budd Lake NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">01396085</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">Lake Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">40.86278</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">&#x2013;74.75472</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">G, S, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">High Bridge RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">South Branch RR near High Bridge NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01396500</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Riverine</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.67778</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.87917</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Q, G, S, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">Spruce Run Buoy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Spruce Run Res 3075 ft NW of dam at Clinton NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">403859074555201</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Lake Buoy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.64972</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.93111</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">WQ<sup>*</sup>, WQM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">Spruce Run Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Spruce Run at Clinton NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01396800</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Lake Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.91556</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Q, G, S, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">Stanton RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">South Branch RR at Stanton NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01397000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Riverine</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.57222</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.86806</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Q, G, S, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">Manville RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RR At Manville NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01400500</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Riverine</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.55556</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.58278</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Q, G, S, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">Stony Brook</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Stony Brook at Princeton NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01401000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Riverine</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.33306</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.68194</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Q, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" scope="row">Blackwells Mills MR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">MR at Blackwells Mills NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01402000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Riverine</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.475</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;74.57583</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Q, WQ</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Below Calco Dam RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">RR Below Calco Dam at Bound Brook NJ</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">01403060</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Riverine</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">40.55111</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">&#x2013;74.54833</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Q, WQ</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t03n1"><label><sup>*</sup></label>
<p>Discrete water-quality samples analyzed for phytoplankton and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> only.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<sec>
<title>Discrete Sample Collection</title>
<p>At all riverine and lake outlet sites, discrete water-quality samples were collected about every 2 weeks using a fixed-schedule sampling approach from August 2020 to August 2021 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">table 3</xref>), except for December 2020 to April 2021, when samples were collected once per month (total number [n]=20 sample events). Each sampling event for the eight sites occurred over two days, with upstream sites (Budd Lake Outlet, High Bridge RR, Spruce Run Outlet, Stony Brook, and Stanton RR) sampled on the first day and downstream sites (Blackwells Mills MR, Manville RR, and Below Calco Dam RR) sampled on the second day.</p>
<p>Three discrete samples were collected in 1-liter (L) polyethylene bottles at the right bank, left bank, and at the center of channel. Samples were collected at approximately 0.5 meters (m) below the water surface by wading and submersing the sample bottle in moderate-to-low-flow conditions or by suspending a Van Dorn sampler from an overhead bridge at applicable sites in high-flow conditions. The filled bottles were then combined into a 4-L polyethylene carboy, mixed by inversion, divided into separate sample bottles, and preserved as required for shipment to laboratories for analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r64">Wilde, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>; U.S. Geological Survey, variously dated; Clonan and others, 2026). Samples were analyzed for nutrients, turbidity, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, phytoplankton identification and enumeration, cyanobacteria genes, and cyanotoxins.</p>
<p>At Spruce Run Buoy, samples were collected approximately twice per month from August 2020 to August 2021, except for December 2020 to February 2021, when samples were collected once per month. Samples were analyzed for phytoplankton identification and enumeration and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> concentrations. Samples were collected immediately adjacent to the buoy with a Van Dorn sampler at a depth of three feet. During discrete-sample collection, a multiparameter sonde was used to measure water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductance at each site. The median result of readings from the left bank, center of channel, and right bank was recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>). The sample was transferred to a 14-L churn, divided into separate sample bottles, and preserved as required for shipment to laboratories for analysis as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r64">Wilde (2008)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>, and U.S. Geological Survey (variously dated).</p>
<sec>
<title>Nutrients and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic></title>
<p>Samples collected for nutrients were analyzed for orthophosphate, nitrate plus nitrite, total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and ammonia. All samples were analyzed within 2 weeks of collection by the Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring Laboratory (Leeds Point, New Jersey) according to the following methods: EPA Method 350.1 for nitrogen and ammonia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">O&#x2019;Dell, 1993</xref>), EPA Method 353.4 for nitrate plus nitrite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r68">Zhang and others, 1997</xref>), EPA Method 365.5 for orthophosphate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r69">Zimmermann and others, 1997</xref>), and USGS method I-4650-03 for TN and TP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r43">Patton and Kryskalla, 2003</xref>). Method reporting limits (MRL) were 0.100 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for TN as nitrogen; 0.010 mg/L for ammonia as nitrogen, nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen, and TP as phosphorus; and 0.005 mg/L for orthophosphate as phosphorus.</p>
<p>Turbidity and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> samples were stored on ice and transported to the New Jersey Center for Water Science and Technology (NJCWST) at Montclair State University (Montclair, New Jersey). Turbidity was measured within 48 hours from sample collection using a turbidity meter following the manufacturer&#x2019;s specifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r36">Oakton Instruments and Eutech Instruments Pte Ltd., 2006</xref>). The median turbidity was computed from three consecutive readings from each sample. Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> samples were transported in amber bottles, then filtered at the laboratory on the day of sample collection. After filtration, the filters were stored in a freezer at &#x2013;20 degrees Celsius (&#x00B0;C) and analyzed within three weeks. Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> was analyzed fluorometrically using a modification (nonacidification) of EPA Method 445.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">Arar and Collins, 1997</xref>). Data are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>. For Spruce Run Buoy samples, filters were sent frozen to the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory (Lakewood, Colorado) for chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> analysis by EPA Method 445.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">Arar and Collins, 1997</xref>); those data are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey (2024)</xref>. During discrete-sample collection, a multiparameter sonde was used to measure water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductance at each site. The median result of readings from the left bank, center of channel, and right bank was recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Phytoplankton Identification and Enumeration</title>
<p>Phytoplankton samples were collected in 250-milliliter (mL) amber bottles and preserved with glutaraldehyde to a concentration of 0.25 percent by volume. For sites other than Spruce Run Buoy, samples were analyzed at the NJCWST, where phytoplankton were identified to the genus level whenever possible. If the genus of the phytoplankton could not be determined, the cells were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r63">Wehr and others, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Bellinger and Sigee, 2015</xref>) and are summarized here as cellular abundance (cells per milliliter [mL]) within four taxonomic groups of: </p><list id="L1" list-type="simple"><list-item>
<p>Cyanophyta (cyanobacteria);</p></list-item><list-item>
<p>Bacillariophyta (diatoms);</p></list-item><list-item>
<p>Chlorophyta, (green algae); and</p></list-item><list-item>
<p>Other (all other taxa not belonging to the previous three groups).</p></list-item></list>
<p> For a full description of the NJCWST cell-counting method, refer to the supplemental material in Clonan (2026).</p>
<p>Samples at Spruce Run Buoy were collected as part of a separate effort; therefore, identification and enumeration were done at a different laboratory than the above (PhycoTech, Inc., Saint Joseph, Minnesota); microscopy was conducted using N-(2-Hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide-mounted slides and fluorescence-enabled microscopes. Phytoplankton were enumerated to the lowest possible taxonomic level, which was at least the genus level for most organisms. To correctly identify and enumerate the taxa present, which may vary by several orders of magnitude in size (0.9 micrometers [&#x00B5;m] to 25 millimeters [mm]), counts were made at multiple magnifications ranging from 200 to 1,000 times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r44">PhycoTech, 2018</xref>). Random microscope fields were counted to a minimum of 400 natural units (colonies, filaments, or single cells) of all observed organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r44">PhycoTech, 2018</xref>). The average cell dimensions were recorded for biovolume calculations, and data are reported here as biovolume (cubic micrometers per milliliter [mm<sup>3</sup>/mL]) within the same taxonomic groups as the NJCWST data (Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, and Other). Evaluations of the cyanobacteria assemblage were conducted at the genus level where possible. Sample processing, analysis methods, and quality assurance protocols are detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r44">PhycoTech (2018)</xref>.</p>
<p>It is well known that phytoplankton lab methodologies can differ substantially among labs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r18">Graham and others, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>), and it is beyond the scope of this report to harmonize the data from the two labs. For comparison of cell counts to the NJDEP HAB Alert thresholds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>), abundance (cells/mL) was utilized for the NJCWST data; however, abundance from PhycoTech Inc. tended to be elevated in comparison to the NJCWST abundance as the higher magnification and alternate methods allowed for more detailed enumeration of taxa, so biovolume (mm<sup>3</sup>/mL) is reported here instead. All phytoplankton data are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cyanobacteria Genes&#x202F;</title>
<p>Samples for genetic analysis were collected at all sites and dates in sterilized 1-L high-density polyethylene bottles and shipped to the USGS Ohio Water Microbiology Laboratory (Columbus, Ohio) for analysis. Out of all samples collected (n=160), a subset of 59 samples from five sites (Budd Lake Outlet, High Bridge RR, Spruce Run Outlet, Stanton RR, and Manville RR) from a subset of sample dates (approximately once per month) were selected for genetic analysis. These sites were selected to focus on potential bloom conditions and transport to the Raritan River mainstem from the upstream lake sites instead of the tributary sites in the Millstone River (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig01">fig. 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to analyze samples for 16S cyanobacteria rRNA and four cyanotoxin synthetase genes, following the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r53">Stelzer and others (2013)</xref>. The 16S cyanobacteria rRNA assay targeted all taxa in the phylum Cyanobacteria. The cyanotoxin synthetase gene analyses amplified specific targets associated with the occurrence of anatoxins (<italic>anaC</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r49">Sabart and others, 2015</xref>), cylindrospermopsin (<italic>cyrA</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Al-Tebrineh and others, 2012</xref>), microcystin (<italic>mcyE</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Al-Tebrineh and others, 2012</xref>), and saxitoxin (<italic>sxtA</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Al-Tebrineh and others, 2012</xref>). TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, California) was employed for most assays, except for <italic>anaC</italic> and <italic>mcyE</italic>, which utilized SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, California). Sample inhibition was determined via matrix spikes&#x2014;a sample was considered inhibited and diluted if the seeded test sample was more than two threshold cycles higher than the seeded clean-matrix control. Plasmids were used for each assay to establish quantitative standard curves. Plasmids were created by synthesizing each target in a cloning vector (small piece of DNA that can carry and copy a gene) (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa) and then transforming the vector into <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (<italic>E. coli</italic>) cells. Immediately before sample analysis, the <italic>E. coli</italic> plasmid for each target was grown to the exponential phase and then extracted. The copy number of the extracted plasmid for each target was determined using the DNA concentration measured by the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, California) and the plasmid&#x2019;s molecular weight. The sample data and detailed information on standard-curve parameters and assay-detection limits for this study are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cyanotoxins</title>
<p>Discrete cyanotoxin samples were analyzed at NJCWST for total and dissolved microcystin concentrations using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing kits (product number 520011) following EPA Method 546 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r66">Zaffiro and others, 2016</xref>) and the protocols outlined in the Gold Standard Diagnostics (Warminster, Pennsylvania) instruction manual (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">Gold Standard Diagnostics, 2025</xref>). For dissolved microcystins, samples were directly filtered using 1.2-&#x00B5;m glass-fiber syringe filters without lysing cyanobacteria cells. For total microcystins, samples were sequentially frozen and thawed three times to lyse cyanobacteria cells and release cyanotoxins, then filtered. The method detection limit (MDL) for the ELISA is 0.15 &#x00B5;g/L, and the MRL is 0.30 &#x00B5;g/L. A value between the MDL and MRL suggests that microcystin is present, but a quantifiable value cannot be reported. Data are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Passive Samplers</title>
<p>Solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) samplers were deployed and remained at a site for two to four weeks. The samplers were assembled for this study following the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r26">Lane and others (2010)</xref>. Each sampler contained three grams of DIAION HP20 resin (Mitsubishi Chemical Company, Tokyo, Japan), a porous synthetic adsorbent, encased in 100-&#x00B5;m Nitex nylon mesh. The edges of the sachet were sealed using a heat sealer. Before deployment, SPATT samplers were activated in methanol, rinsed in ultra-pure deionized water, and refrigerated. The SPATT samplers were deployed in duplicate at a single depth at each site, placed in a metal cage for protection from debris, attached to a stationary structure, and then retrieved and (or) replaced approximately every two weeks. Upon retrieval, SPATT samplers were sealed in plastic bags and kept cold on wet ice until placed in a freezer for up to one year.</p>
<p>Although more were collected, a subset of SPATT samplers that corresponded with samples selected for genetic analyses were selected for analysis from five sites (Budd Lake Outlet, High Bridge RR, Spruce Run Outlet, Stanton RR, and Manville RR), and a subset of sample dates (about one date per month). Cyanotoxins were extracted from the SPATT sampler resin using a 50-percent solution of LC-MS-grade methanol and organic-free water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r30">Negrey and others, 2019</xref>). Extracts were evaporated to dryness and then reconstituted in a two percent LC-MS-grade methanol/organic-free water solution. The extracts were shipped on ice to the College of Environmental Science and Forestry at State University of New York (Syracuse, New York) for analysis of microcystins, cylindrospermopsin, and anatoxin concentrations. Saxitoxins were not evaluated by LC-MS/MS analyses because of inconsistencies in published methods.</p>
<p>The SPATT extracts were analyzed for microcystins by LC-MS/MS using a Thermo Scientific Quantiva Altis triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer according to the methods described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">Birbeck and others (2019)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r54">Stouder and others (2024)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Johnston and others (2025)</xref>. Cylindrospermopsin and anatoxins were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a modified version of EPA Method 545 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r58">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2015b</xref>), incorporating additional congeners (molecular variations of cyanotoxins in the same class) and quantification/confirmation ions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3">Barnard and others, 2021</xref>). For this study, all quantified detections were summed for all congeners to calculate total concentrations for microcystins, anatoxins, and cylindrospermopsin.</p>
<p>The MDL for cyanotoxins analyzed by mass spectrometry was determined for each run, considering factors such as sample volume, extract volume, injection volume, and instrument-reporting limits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Boyer, 2020</xref>). Microcystin MDLs were reported as microcystin-LR equivalents. For cylindrospermopsin and anatoxins, a nonstandard data-quality check was implemented, involving the use of one quantification ion and two confirmatory ions. Detections were categorized as confirmed, possible, or suspected based on the presence and ratio of parent and confirmation ions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Boyer, 2020</xref>). Data are available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Continuous Data</title>
<p>Continuous water-quality data were collected in 15-minute intervals at a buoy installed in Spruce Run Reservoir through monitors installed at a fixed depth of 1 meter (approximately 3 feet) by the USGS; sensors were operated per USGS protocols and guidance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r62">Wagner and others, 2006</xref>). The buoy was equipped with a multiparameter sonde that collected measurements of water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, and phycocyanin fluorescence every 15 minutes. Continuous water-quality data were processed, analyzed, and approved following published techniques and methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r62">Wagner and others, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Foster and others, 2022</xref>) and are available in NWIS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024</xref>). Continuous-flow data were used to describe streamflow conditions at all sites other than Spruce Run Buoy and Budd Lake Outlet (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">table 3</xref>). Streamflow data were computed using standard USGS methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r50">Sauer and Turnipseed, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r56">Turnipseed and Sauer, 2010</xref>) and are available through NWIS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data Analysis</title>
<p>Water-quality conditions in sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex were described by site and sample date using discretely collected water-quality data, passive samplers, and continuously measured streamflow data. Flow-duration curves, which represent the relation between the magnitude and frequency of streamflow during a period of time, were used to compare streamflow for each site and to evaluate whether the range in flow conditions was captured by discrete sample collection. Duration curves are cumulative-distribution functions and were constructed using 15-minute intervals to evaluate and compare frequency and magnitude characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r45">Rasmussen and others, 2009</xref>). The curves indicate the percentage of time that specified conditions were equaled or exceeded, also known as the frequency of exceedance.</p>
<p>A comprehensive list of cyanobacteria genera detected in the samples was compared to several studies to designate potential toxigenicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r18">Graham and others, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r63">Wehr and others, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Christensen and Khan, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Graham and others, 2020</xref>). A linear model was fit to total cyanobacteria abundance and the concentration of gene copies; results were considered significant when probability (p)-values were below 0.05.</p>
<p>For comparison, cyanotoxin results from SPATT extracts were converted from the total extract concentration (&#x00B5;g/L of cyanotoxin) to a concentration over time deployed (nanograms of cyanotoxin per gram of resin per day [ng/g/day]) using the following conversion: extract concentration as &#x00B5;g/L times (&#x00D7;) 1,000 divided by (&#x00F7;) grams of resin &#x00F7; number of days deployed.</p>
<p>A comparative qualitative evaluation of consistency among four methodological approaches (indicators) was conducted for cyanotoxin detection by discrete samples and SPATT, potential for cyanotoxin production (qPCR genetic approach), and total abundance of cyanobacteria. Measurements from each sample date were compared as &#x201C;detected&#x201D; (detections of <italic>mcyE </italic>or microcystins were present in the sample), &#x201C;not detected,&#x201D; or &#x201C;not analyzed.&#x201D; The total abundance of a cyanobacteria indicator was &#x201C;detected&#x201D; if the sample exceeded the NJDEP HAB Alert Watch threshold of 20,000 cyanobacteria cells/mL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>Nonparametric Spearman rank-correlation matrix analysis was used to evaluate the strength of the association between biological-response variables and selected environmental variables. Biological-response variables consisted of discrete chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, total abundance of cyanobacteria, cyanobacteria rRNA, gene concentration (<italic>mcyE</italic> and <italic>anaC</italic>), discrete total microcystins, and microcystins in SPATT samplers. Environmental variables included water-temperature measurements, TN, TP, and turbidity. The <italic>sxtA</italic> and <italic>cyrA</italic> gene data were not included in the correlation analysis because of the small number of detections. Spearman rank-correlation coefficients were considered significant when p-values were less than or equal to 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Quality Assurance and Quality Control</title>
<p>Quality control measures are an important part of laboratory and field best practices. Approximately 20 percent of the discrete samples collected at each site included concurrent field replicates and field blanks for quality assurance and control purposes. Concurrent replicates were analyzed for most constituents. Concurrent replicates were collected over a range of streamflow conditions and at various times throughout the year. Laboratory and field blanks were used to identify potential sources of contamination related to equipment cleaning and sample-collection procedures.</p>
<p>In this study, there were no detections in field blanks for TN, but there were two dates with detections of TP. One was about half of the ambient TP (0.035 mg/L on May 11, 2021), and the other was much higher than the corresponding field value and flagged by the lab as &#x201C;estimated&#x201D; (0.596 mg/L on Oct 6, 2020). The latter detection was related to a contamination issue with the deionized water source used at that time and not an analytical error, so the data were retained. The relative percentage difference (RPD) was utilized to assess the variations in concentration between replicate water samples. The RPD was computed by taking the difference in concentration between two replicates for TN, TP, and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, dividing it by the mean concentration of the replicate pair, and then multiplying the result by 100. This calculation yields a value representing the percentage difference in concentration between the replicate samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r67">Zar, 1999</xref>). All RPDs between replicate pairs had median RPD values of less than 10 percent for field replicates; for TP: median RPD=6.9, n=20 replicate pairs; TN median RPD=2.3, n=20 replicate pairs; and chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> median RPD=7.7, n=19 replicate pairs. For laboratory replicates, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> median RPD=3.6, n=20 replicate pairs.</p>
<p>For the phytoplankton samples analyzed by NJCWST, absolute value logarithmic difference (AVLD) was used to evaluate differences in cyanobacteria between replicate pairs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">Francy and others, 2015</xref>). The AVLD was calculated as:<disp-formula id="e"><alternatives><mml:math id="m1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="sir2026-5128_m01"/></alternatives></disp-formula>where</p>
<def-list list-type="equation-where"><def-item><term><italic>R</italic>1</term>
<def>
<p>is the concentration in replicate 1, and</p></def></def-item><def-item><term><italic>R</italic>2</term>
<def>
<p>is the concentration in replicate 2.</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
<p>AVLD was used to evaluate differences for total phytoplankton data instead of RPD calculations because it is less sensitive to rare taxa present in one of the replicate samples, but not the other; replicate pairs with an AVLD value of less than 1.0 were considered acceptable for this study. Only 1 sample pair (from Stony Brook on October 20, 2020, AVLD=1.9) was above this threshold. The environmental sample was retained in this study for comparison to other samples in the context of the overall low abundance of phytoplankton at the site, and in this particular sample, an excess of a few rare taxa caused an elevated AVLD. Excluding that pair, the AVLDs for phytoplankton across all other replicate pairs ranged from less than 0.01 to 0.88 (median AVLD: 0.28, n=19 replicate pairs). All data were considered acceptable quality for the purposes of this report. Replicate samples were not collected at Spruce Run Buoy for analysis at PhycoTech Inc.</p>
<p>For the genetic analyses, all laboratory quality-control blanks (filtration blanks, extraction blanks, and qPCR no-template controls) were negative for all targets. All sample extracts, standards, and blanks were analyzed in duplicate. There were no detections in any lab blanks. For discrete samples analyzed for total microcystins by ELISA, quality-control measures (including percent coefficient of variation between two well replicates, coefficient of determination [R<sup>2</sup>], usage of laboratory reagent blanks, low-calibration verification, usage of laboratory-fortified blanks, laboratory-fortified sample matrices and duplicate, and quality-control samples) were utilized in accordance with EPA Method 546 to ensure the accuracy and precision of analyses and standard curves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r66">Zaffiro and others, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>As with many environmental studies, field replicates and blanks can be used to ensure data validity and help with SPATT sampler-data interpretation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jaegge and others, 2026</xref><italic>;</italic> U.S. Geological Survey, variously dated). Two blank SPATT samplers were activated, stored, extracted, and analyzed in the same manner as the deployed SPATT samplers, and analysis by LC-MS/MS did not detect any cyanotoxins in the extracts. For field replicates, coefficients of variation are an appropriate indication of the range in values in SPATTs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Johnston and others, 2025</xref>). The coefficients of variation for microcystin concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 86.9 ng/g/day, with the median=38.3 ng/g/day for 6 replicate pairs. Given the lack of standardized methods for evaluating SPATTs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jaegge and others, 2026</xref>; U.S. Geological Survey, variously dated), all samples were retained for analysis regardless of observed variation in results. SPATT results presented in this report should be considered a semiquantitative indicator of cyanotoxin presence.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Environmental Variable Results</title>
<p>A total of 184 discrete water-quality samples were collected among eight sites, including quality-control samples such as replicates and blanks. Discrete water-quality data were collected over a variety of streamflow conditions at all of the sites, except for the highest 10 percent of flow conditions, as personnel safety would have been a concern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig02">fig. 2</xref>). The mean streamflow over the study period was lowest at Spruce Run Outlet but streamflow values were consistently lowest at Stony Brook (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t04">table 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig02">fig. 2</xref>) and was not measured at Budd Lake Outlet, which is characterized as an impoundment and generally has low flow or nonflowing conditions.</p>
<p>Over the course of this study, the sites had a substantial range when compared to one another for several water-quality characteristics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t04">table 4</xref>). Nutrients (TN and TP) were highest at the furthest downstream mainstem Raritan River and Millstone River sites (Below Calco Dam RR and Blackwells Mills MR, respectively). Spruce Run Outlet also had elevated TP, but not TN. Median chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> was about 2&#x2013;8 times higher at lake outlet sites than the riverine locations and was about 2 times higher at Budd Lake Outlet than Spruce Run Outlet. When compared to other sites, turbidity was consistently highest at Budd Lake Outlet. Turbidity was highest at the lake outlet sites in the summer months&#x2014;concurrent with the periods of highest phytoplankton detections. The two largest riverine sites (Manville RR and Below Calco Dam RR) had relatively elevated median turbidity values compared to the upstream riverine sites, but this was largely driven by a high-flow event around February 16, 2021.</p>
<fig id="fig02" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Duration curves for streamflow at study sites in the Raritan River Basin from August 2020 to August 2021. The points show at which streamflow discrete water-quality sample collection occurred. [Data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024 and Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>]</p><p content-type="toc">2.	Duration curves for streamflow at study sites in the Raritan River Basin sampled from August 2020 to August 2021. The points show at which stream flow discrete water-quality sample collection occurred</p></caption><long-desc>Frequency of exceedance decreased as streamflow increased at all sites.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig02"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t04" orientation="landscape" position="float"><label>Table 4</label><caption>
<title>Drainage area, mean streamflow at gages, and median and range of water-quality conditions in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex study sites sampled from August 11, 2020, to August 5, 2021. Refer to <xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">table 3</xref> for U.S. Geological Survey station names and site identification numbers. </title>
<p content-type="toc">4.	Drainage area, mean streamflow at gages, and median and range of water-quality conditions for the period August 11, 2020, to August 5, 2021</p>
<p>[Values in parentheses indicate range (minimum&#x2013;maximum). Data are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey (2024)</xref>. mi<sup>2</sup>, square miles, ft<sup>3</sup>/s, cubic feet per second; &#x00B0;C, degrees Celsius; mg/L, milligrams per liter; &#x00B5;g/L, micrograms per liter; NFU, nephelometric formazin units; &#x2014;, not measured; RR, Raritan River; MR, Millstone River]</p></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="9.36%"/>
<col width="7.09%"/>
<col width="8.84%"/>
<col width="22.02%"/>
<col width="20.72%"/>
<col width="11.95%"/>
<col width="10.33%"/>
<col width="9.69%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Station Name</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Drainage area, in mi<sup>2</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Streamflow, in ft<sup>3</sup>/s</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Median water temperature, in &#x00B0;C</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Median total nitrogen, in mg/L</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Median total phosphorus, in mg/L</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Median chlorophyll <italic>a,</italic> in &#x00B5;g/L</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Median turbidity, in NFU</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Budd Lake Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.33 (0.6&#x2013;26.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.827 (0.656&#x2013;1.763)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.035 (0.014&#x2013;0.102)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25.7 (7.16&#x2013;124.66)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12.54 (3.19&#x2013;53.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">High Bridge RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">132</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13.13 (3.1&#x2013;22.2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.694 (1.307&#x2013; 2.4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.02 (0.013&#x2013;0.056)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4 (0.99&#x2013;12.69)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.45 (0.78&#x2013;6.58)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Spruce Run Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">41.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.78 (2.4&#x2013;27.3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.528 (0.425&#x2013;0.929)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.022 (0.013&#x2013;0.043)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.1 (6.15&#x2013;26.25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.05 (1.17&#x2013;13.03)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Stanton RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">147</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">274</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.96 (3.3&#x2013;25.9)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.476 (0.842&#x2013;2.087)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.035 (0.019&#x2013;0.176)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.6 (0.35&#x2013;22.61)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.96 (1.55&#x2013;19.01)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Manville RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">490</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">849</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.71 (1.2&#x2013;27.5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.508 (0.685&#x2013;2.254)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.054 (0.013&#x2013;0.301)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5 (0.5&#x2013;14.66)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10.96 (2.52&#x2013;100)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Stony Brook</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">44.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">79</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.7 (0.6&#x2013;28.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.047 (0.556&#x2013;1.584)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.11 (0.037&#x2013;0.226)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.8 (0.39&#x2013;58.29)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.77 (1.94&#x2013;45.26)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Blackwells Mills MR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">258</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">430</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.2 (1.1&#x2013;27)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.343 (1.162&#x2013; 3.768)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.229 (0.084&#x2013;0.474)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.4 (0.23&#x2013;81.62)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.88 (4.03&#x2013;19.23)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Below Calco Dam RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">785</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">1,237</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">16.58 (1.3&#x2013;27.7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">2.213 (1.484&#x2013;3.894)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0.26 (0.086&#x2013;0.615)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">2.1 (0.36&#x2013;74.01)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">10.78 (3.22&#x2013;54.9)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Phytoplankton Identification and Enumeration</title>
<p>In this study, there were substantial differences between lake outlet and riverine sites in overall phytoplankton assemblage, total taxa richness, and abundance of cyanobacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig03">figs. 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">4</xref>). The most abundant phytoplankton divisions (followed by percent abundance across all sites and dates) were: Cyanobacteria (91 percent), Chlorophyta (5 percent), and Bacillariophyta (3.3 percent). The most common cyanobacteria taxa (followed by percent abundance across all sites and dates) were: <italic>Cyanodictyon/Aphanocapsa</italic> (70.3 percent), <italic>Aphanathece</italic> (10.6 percent), <italic>Microcystis</italic> (3.9 percent), <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> (3.8 percent), and <italic>Planktothrix</italic> (3 percent). Lake outlet sites had higher phytoplankton densities and were more likely to be dominated by potential cyanotoxin-producing and filamentous cyanobacteria taxa. For example, <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> was generally the most dominant cyanobacteria taxa at Spruce Run Outlet and was present in every sample collected at that site; however, it was only identified in 6 percent of samples collected at Manville RR. Several common bloom-forming taxa (<italic>Microcystis</italic>, <italic>Merismopedia, Dolichospermum, Leptolyngya, Planktolyngbya,</italic> and <italic>Planktothrix</italic>) were only detected at the two lake sites. Several small, coccoid (round), and likely noncyanotoxin-producing taxa (such as <italic>Cyanodictyon</italic>/<italic>Aphanocapsa, Synechococcus,</italic> and <italic>Chroococus</italic>) were detected at all sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025)</xref>. Budd Lake Outlet had the strongest seasonally driven patterns in cyanobacteria concentrations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>A</italic></xref>), with a total abundance of more than 1,000,000 cells/mL in October 2020, which is more than 50 times higher than the lowest abundance of approximately 18,000 cells/mL measured in February 2021.</p>
<fig id="fig03" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Relative abundance of phytoplankton, shown as percent of total cells per milliliter, by division and sampling event at eight sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. [Data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>]</p><p content-type="toc">3.	Relative abundance of phytoplankton, shown as percent of total cells per milliliter, by division and sampling event at eight sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex</p></caption><long-desc>Bar graphs showing divisions and relative abundance of cells; Cyanophyta is shown the most, Other is shown the least.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig03"/></fig>
<fig id="fig04" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Temporal and spatial variability of cyanobacteria cell densities, in cells per milliliter, of cyanobacteria by potential toxigenicity and sampling event at eight sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex.<italic> A</italic>, Budd Lake Outlet; <italic>B</italic>, Spruce Run Outlet; <italic>C</italic>, High Bridge Raritan River (RR); <italic>D</italic>, Stanton RR; <italic>E</italic>, Manville RR; <italic>F</italic>, Stony Brook; <italic>G</italic>, Blackwells Mills Millstone River (MR); and <italic>H</italic>, Below Calco Dam RR. [Data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>]</p><p content-type="toc">Temporal and spatial variability of cyanobacteria cell densities, in cells per milliliter, of cyanobacteria by potential toxigenicity and sampling event at eight sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. <italic>A</italic>, Budd Lake Outlet; <italic>B</italic>, Spruce Run Outlet; <italic>C</italic>, High Bridge Raritan River (RR); <italic>D</italic>, Stanton RR; <italic>E</italic>, Manville RR; <italic>F</italic>, Stony Brook; <italic>G</italic>, Blackwells Mills Millstone River (MR); and <italic>H</italic>, Below Calco Dam RR</p></caption><long-desc>Bar graphs showing cyanobacteria abundance; Dashed lines indicate NJDEP action levels for cyanoHABs; most are less than NJDEP levels.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig04a"/><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig04b"/></fig>
<p>The total abundance of cyanobacteria cells in discrete samples exceeded the NJDEP HAB Alert Watch threshold (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>) in 38 samples out of 160 samples (24 percent of all samples), collected at four sites (Spruce Run Outlet, Budd Lake Outlet, Stanton RR, and Stony Brook). The NJDEP HAB Alert Advisory threshold (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>) was exceeded in 18 samples (11 percent of all samples) from only the two lake sites (Spruce Run Outlet and Budd Lake Outlet).</p>
<p>  At Budd Lake Outlet, the Watch threshold was exceeded in 95 percent of the samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>A</italic></xref>), and at Spruce Run Outlet, it was exceeded 80 percent of the time for total cyanobacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>B</italic></xref>). When only considering potentially toxin-producing cyanobacteria taxa, the exceedance frequencies decline to 50 percent at both Spruce Run Outlet and Budd Lake Outlet. All but four samples at Budd Lake Outlet exceeded the NJDEP HAB Alert Advisory threshold for total cyanobacteria (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>A</italic></xref>); however, most samples were dominated by genera <italic>Cyanodictyon</italic> and <italic>Aphanocapsa,</italic> which are not known to produce cyanotoxins. The only dates when the threshold was exceeded by cyanotoxin-producing taxa at Budd Lake Outlet were July 20, 2021, and August 3, 2021, when the samples included <italic>Microcystis</italic>, <italic>Dolichospermum,</italic> and other cyanobacteria taxa. At Spruce Run Outlet, two samples exceeded NJDEP HAB Alert Advisory threshold for total cyanobacteria, but neither were dominated by cyanotoxin-producing taxa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>B</italic></xref>).</p>
<p>Exceedances of the NJDEP HAB Alert Watch threshold (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>) occurred less than 3 percent of the time at the riverine sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>C</italic>, <italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic>, <italic>F</italic>, <italic>G</italic>, and <italic>H</italic></xref>). The only date when potentially cyanotoxin-producing taxa were above the threshold was July 20, 2021, at Stanton RR, when the sample was comprised in part of <italic>Fischerella</italic> (20,136 cells/mL), which was the only sample where that taxa was detected across the whole study period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025)</xref>. For two other dates when total cyanobacteria cell counts exceeded the NJDEP HAB Alert Watch threshold at riverine sites (May 11, 2021, at Stanton RR and February 16, 2021, at Stony Brook), the composition was dominated by taxa not known to produce cyanotoxins, such as <italic>Cyanodictyon</italic>, <italic>Aphanocapsa</italic>, and <italic>Aphanothece</italic>. No samples in this study exceeded the NJDEP HAB Warning or Danger thresholds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>At Spruce Run Buoy, samples are presented as biovolume (cubic micrometers per milliliter; &#x00B5;m<sup>3</sup>/mL) as analyzed by PhycoTech Inc. The most abundant phytoplankton divisions present across all samples on all dates (followed by total percent biovolume) were: Bacillariophyta (54.9 percent), Cyanobacteria<italic> </italic>(36.9 percent), Chlorophyta<italic> </italic>(5 percent), and Other (3.3 percent). The most common cyanobacteria taxa present across all samples on all dates (followed by total percent biovolume) were: <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> (69.8 percent), <italic>Dolichospermum</italic> (15.8 percent), <italic>Limnoraphis</italic> (3 percent), <italic>Pseudanabaena</italic> (3 percent), <italic>Microcystis</italic> (2.9 percent), <italic>Chrysosporum</italic> (1.7 percent), and <italic>Woronichinia</italic> (1.3 percent). This is consistent with the phytoplankton composition detected at Spruce Run Outlet in the samples analyzed by NJCWST.</p>
<p>A comparison of the continuous-sensor fluorescence data for chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, phycocyanin, and discrete chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig05">fig. 5<italic>A</italic></xref>) from the Spruce Run Buoy reveals some discrepancies with the trends observed in microscopy biovolume. The patterns observed in the sensor data for chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and phycocyanin are not always in sync with the total phytoplankton biovolume (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig05">fig. 5<italic>B</italic></xref>) or the cyanobacteria biovolume (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig05">fig. 5<italic>C</italic></xref>) determined from the discrete samples. The chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> sensor indicated two relative peaks in algal biomass during the study period: from November 2020 to February 2021 and from April 2021 to May 2021 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig05">fig. 5<italic>A</italic></xref>). Both periods aligned with elevated discrete sample chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> concentrations, and phytoplankton growth in the April to May 2021 period; however, phytoplankton abundance in the discrete samples was not similarly elevated in the winter period. There was little variability in the phycocyanin data over the entire study period. Both methods indicated a steady rise in algal concentration from March to June 2021, followed by a steep decline beginning on May 25 and continuing to June 8, 2021. The phycocyanin sensor data were consistent throughout the study period and were less sensitive to seasonal patterns of increase or decrease, similar to the other parameters. These findings limit the potential of only using continuous data to determine the occurrence of blooms. </p>
<fig id="fig05" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Temporal variability of algal fluorescence, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, and phytoplankton biovolume at the Spruce Run Buoy site in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. <italic>A</italic>, includes line graph showing continuous (daily mean) sensor-based estimates of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, phycocyanin fluorescence as relative fluorescence units (RFU) measured continuously (lines), and discrete sample chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> values (points) from August 1, 2020 to August 31, 2021; <italic>B</italic>, bar graph showing phytoplankton at the phylum level as biovolume in cubic micrometers per milliliter (&#x00B5;m<sup>3</sup>/mL); and <italic>C</italic>, shows cyanobacteria grouped by genera as biovolume (&#x00B5;m<sup>3</sup>/mL). [Data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>]</p><p content-type="toc">Temporal variability of algal fluorescence, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, and phytoplankton biovolume at the Spruce Run Buoy site in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex</p></caption><long-desc>Upper panel line and point graph show seasonal trends. Lower panels with bar graphs showing peaks in spring months.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig05"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cyanobacteria Genes</title>
<p>16S cyanobacteria genes were detected in all (100 percent) of the 59 analyzed samples from the subset of five sites (Budd Lake Outlet, High Bridge RR, Spruce Run Outlet, Stanton RR, and Manville RR; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">fig. 6<italic>A</italic></xref>), which was higher than the frequency cyanobacteria was found by microscopy (87 percent) in the 97 phytoplankton samples collected from all 8 study sites. The highest abundance of gene copies was at Budd Lake Outlet on October 20, 2020, with 2.2&#x00D7;10<sup>8</sup> copies per 100 mL. Overall, the 16S cyanobacteria rRNA was strongly positively associated with the abundance of total cyanobacteria (R<sup>2</sup>=0.62; <italic>p</italic>&gt;0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig07">fig. 7<italic>A</italic></xref>). On sample dates when no cyanobacteria were detected by microscopy, the cyanobacteria 16S rRNA was still detected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig07">fig. 7<italic>A</italic></xref>); however, the presence of cyanobacteria 16S rRNA does not provide information regarding the specific taxa or potential for cyanotoxin occurrence.</p>
<p>All four classes of cyanotoxin synthetase genes (<italic>mcyE</italic>, <italic>anaC, sxtA</italic>, and <italic>cyrA</italic>) were detected at least once among all analyzed samples; however, the frequency of detection (percent occurrence) and abundance of gene copies varied substantially by site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">table 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">fig. 6<italic>B</italic>, <italic>C</italic>, <italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic></xref>) and over time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">fig. 8<italic>B</italic>, <italic>C</italic>, <italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic></xref>). For <italic>anaC</italic>, 77 percent of riverine samples had detections, whereas 66 percent of samples from lakes had detections. The synthetase gene <italic>mcyE</italic> was detected in all lake outlet site samples throughout the study. In contrast, 65 percent of riverine samples had detections, which is a lower rate than a previous national study of large rivers that found <italic>mcyE</italic> in about 90 percent of riverine samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r70">Zuellig and others, 2021</xref>). Compared to the riverine sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t03">table 3</xref>), the lake outlet sites (Spruce Run Outlet and Budd Lake Outlet) had higher median abundance of <italic>mcyE</italic> and <italic>sxtA</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">fig. 6<italic>B</italic>, <italic>D</italic></xref>); but, for <italic>anaC</italic>, abundance at the riverine sites was higher (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">fig. 6<italic>C</italic></xref>), which is consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Howard and others, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r70">Zuellig and others, 2021</xref>). The highest single-sample abundance of <italic>sxtA</italic> was from Spruce Run Outlet, with 100,000 copies/100 mL detected on September 22, 2020; <italic>mcyE</italic>, Budd Lake Outlet, with 2,200,000 copies/100 mL detected on July 7, 2021; and <italic>cyrA</italic>, Budd Lake Outlet, with 5,200 copies/100 mL detected on June 8, 2021. The highest abundance of <italic>anaC</italic> was at Stanton RR, with 21,000 copies/100 mL on February 16, 2021. </p>
<p>The two lake outlet sites were dissimilar&#x2014;Spruce Run Outlet had a higher rate of detection and higher <italic>mcyE</italic> gene concentrations throughout the study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">fig. 6<italic>B</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">8<italic>B</italic></xref>). There were seasonal differences in phytoplankton composition, such as a shift to higher concentrations of microcystin-producing taxa. For example, Budd Lake Outlet had summer and fall peaks in <italic>mcyE</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">fig. 8<italic>B</italic></xref>), which is consistent with seasonal patterns in total cyanobacteria abundance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>A</italic></xref>). These patterns included a consistently high abundance of cyanobacteria at Budd Lake Outlet (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>A</italic></xref>), but a low persistence of the assemblage downstream to High Bridge RR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>C</italic></xref>) which was also reflected in the <italic>mcyE</italic> results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">figs. 6<italic>B</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">8<italic>B</italic></xref>). A different pattern was observed where the cyanobacteria assemblage from Spruce Run Outlet (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>B</italic></xref>) would often persist to Stanton RR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4<italic>D</italic></xref>). This is mirrored in the <italic>mcyE</italic> results from Spruce Run Outlet to Stanton RR, and even further downstream to Manville RR on certain dates, such as May 11&#x2013;12, 2021 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">figs. 6<italic>B</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">8<italic>B</italic></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t05" position="float"><label>Table 5</label><caption>
<title>Summary of relative percentages of occurrence of cyanobacteria genes among all analyzed samples (n=59). </title>
<p content-type="toc"><bold>5. </bold>Summary of relative percentages of occurrence of cyanobacteria genes among all analyzed samples (n=59)</p>
<p>[Data are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>. Cyano, 16S rRNA for all cyanobacteria; <italic>mcyE</italic>, <italic>microcystin </italic>synthetase gene, <italic>anaC</italic>, <italic>anatoxin </italic>synthetase gene; <italic>sxtA, saxitoxin</italic> synthetase gene; <italic>cyrA, cylindrospermopsin</italic> synthetase gene; RR, Raritan River]</p></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="20.73%"/>
<col width="11.97%"/>
<col width="11.97%"/>
<col width="13.06%"/>
<col width="14.09%"/>
<col width="14.09%"/>
<col width="14.09%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Site identifier</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Number of samples</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Cyano (percent)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt"><italic>mcyE</italic> (percent)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt"><italic>anaC</italic> (percent)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt"><italic>sxtA</italic> (percent)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt"><italic>cyrA</italic> (percent)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Budd Lake Outlet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">High Bridge RR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">50</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">75</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">Spruce Run Outlet</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">92</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">58</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" scope="row">Stanton RR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">75</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Manville RR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">11</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">45</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">82</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="fig06" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Boxplots of the number of gene copies per sample (copies/100 mL) as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at selected sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. Panels from top to bottom are <italic>A</italic>, Cyanobacteria 16S rRNA; <italic>B</italic>, microcystin synthetase gene, <italic>mcyE</italic>; <italic>C</italic>, anatoxin synthetase gene, <italic>anaC</italic>; <italic>D</italic>, saxitoxin synthetase gene, <italic>sxtA</italic>; and <italic>E</italic>, cylindrospermopsin synthetase gene, <italic>cyrA</italic>. For each site, the number of samples was 12, except for Manville RR, which was 11.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig06"/></fig>
<fig id="figa" position="float" fig-type="figure"><caption><p>[Data are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>. RR, Raritan River]</p><p content-type="toc">6. Boxplots of the number of gene copies per sample (copies/100 mL) as determined by qPCR at selected sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex</p></caption><long-desc>Box plots of qPCR-detected genes by study site. Red dashed line is at detection limit (60 gene copies/100-mL sample). </long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_figa"/></fig>
<fig id="fig07" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p>Comparison between cyanobacteria abundance (cells/mL) and gene copies (copies/100 mL sample) across all sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex by cyanotoxin synthetase gene. <italic>A</italic>, Cyanobacteria 16S rRNA; <italic>B</italic>, microcystin synthetase gene, <italic>mcyE</italic>; <italic>C</italic>, anatoxin synthetase gene, <italic>anaC</italic>; <italic>D</italic>, saxitoxin synthetase gene <italic>sxtA</italic>; and <italic>E</italic>, cylindrospermopsin synthetase gene, <italic>cyrA.</italic></p><p content-type="toc">Comparison between cyanobacteria abundance (cells/mL) and gene copies (copies/100 mL sample) across all sites in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex by cyanotoxin synthetase gene</p></caption><long-desc>Trends are generally positively correlated; sxtA and cyrA are weaker than cyanobacteria 16S rRNA, mcyE, and anaC.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig07"/></fig>
<fig id="fig08" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p>Bubble plots of the number of gene copies (copies/100 mL sample) as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) during each sampling event in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. Panels from top to bottom are <italic>A</italic>, Cyanobacteria 16S rRNA; <italic>B</italic>, microcystin synthetase gene, <italic>mcyE</italic>; <italic>C</italic>, anatoxin synthetase gene, <italic>anaC</italic>; <italic>D</italic>, saxitoxin synthetase gene, <italic>sxtA</italic>; <italic>E</italic>, cylindrospermopsin synthetase gene, <italic>cyrA</italic>. Note varying scales among plots. [RR, Raritan River]</p><p content-type="toc">8. Bubble plots of the number of gene copies (copies/100 mL sample) as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) during each sampling event in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex</p></caption><long-desc>Multicolored circles and black hollow squares showing abundance of cyanobacteria gene detections at each study site over time.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig08"/></fig>
<p>Changes in <italic>anaC</italic> presence can be linked to specific cyanobacteria taxa, and across all sites, the number of gene copies was significantly positively associated with total cyanobacteria density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig07">fig. 7<italic>C</italic></xref>). At Stanton RR, when there was a peak in <italic>anaC</italic> concentration on February 16, 2021 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">fig. 8<italic>C</italic></xref>), the cyanobacteria in that sample were comprised of: <italic>Aphanothece</italic> (40 percent abundance), <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> (36.5 percent abundance), <italic>Dolichospermum</italic> (11.3 percent abundance), and <italic>Cyanodictyon/Aphanocapsa</italic> (7.8 percent abundance). That sample from Stanton RR was the only time <italic>Dolichospermum</italic> had appreciable abundance at the site throughout the study. It is noteworthy that the abundance of <italic>Dolichospermum</italic> at Stanton RR (1,007 cells/mL) on February 16, 2021, was about 2 times higher than at the Spruce Run Outlet on the same date (620 cells/mL; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">fig. 4</xref>) and indicates local growth may have been occurring despite the cold-water temperature on that date (3.5&#x00B0;C). The abundance of <italic>anaC</italic> at Spruce Run Outlet peaked on May 11, 2021 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">fig. 8<italic>C</italic></xref>), and the associated phytoplankton sample was composed of <italic>Jaaginema</italic> and <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> (53.5 and 41.6 percent of total phytoplankton abundance, respectively), representing one of the lowest percent compositions by <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> recorded at the site throughout the study. <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> is a known anatoxins producer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Christensen and Khan, 2020</xref>), but <italic>Jaaginema</italic> is not known to produce any cyanotoxins. Cyanotoxin production is strain-specific (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r63">Wehr and others, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Christensen and Khan, 2020</xref>). It is possible that the <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> population had a higher proportion of strains with the <italic>anaC</italic> gene in May 2021. Alternatively, <italic>Jaaginema</italic> may have the <italic>anaC</italic> gene, although it has not yet been identified as a potential anatoxin producer. <italic>SxtA</italic> and <italic>cyrA</italic> were detected substantially less frequently than the other two synthetase genes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">table 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig06">figs. 6<italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic></xref>) and, when compared to the other two genes, were not significantly correlated to total cyanobacteria density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig07">figs. 7<italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic></xref>); therefore, there was no attempt to correspond increases in gene copies to the occurrence of specific cyanobacteria taxa.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cyanotoxin Analyses</title>
<p>Of the discrete samples analyzed for total and dissolved microcystins (177 analyzed samples), none had detections for dissolved microcystins above the method reporting limit (0.3 &#x00B5;g/L), although 15 samples were above the MDL (0.15 &#x00B5;g/L). For total microcystins, 11 samples (6 percent) had detections above the MRL, and an additional 20 samples were between the detection and reporting limits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t06">table 6</xref>). The samples with detections above the reporting limit were exclusively from the 2 lake outlet sites (8 from Budd Lake Outlet and 3 from Spruce Run Outlet); this suggests that microcystins are present in the lakes, but they are not persisting downstream to the riverine sites. The highest single-sample microcystin detection was 1.4 &#x00B5;g/L on August 3, 2021, at Budd Lake Outlet, which was above the EPA-treated drinking-water thresholds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">table 1</xref>), but is well below the threshold to determine a NJDEP HAB Alert Warning level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">table 2</xref>) for recreational activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2022</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t06" position="float"><label>Table 6</label><caption>
<title>Summary of detections of total microcystins in discrete samples analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and detections of microcystins from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) sampler extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. </title>
<p content-type="toc"><bold>6.</bold> Summary of detections of total microcystins in discrete samples analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and detections of microcystins from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) sampler extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex (LC-MS/MS). </p>
<p>[Data are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others (2025)</xref>. MDL, minimum detection limit; MRL, minimum reporting limit; &#x00B5;g/L, microgram per liter; RR, Raritan River; NA, not applicable; &#x2014;, not analyzed; MR, Millstone River]</p></caption>
<table rules="groups">
<col width="21.5%"/>
<col width="10.28%"/>
<col width="10.28%"/>
<col width="10.28%"/>
<col width="8.41%"/>
<col width="8.41%"/>
<col width="10.28%"/>
<col width="10.28%"/>
<col width="10.28%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left" scope="rowgroup" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Site identifier</td>
<td colspan="5" valign="top" align="left" scope="colgroup" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Discrete samples</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" align="left" scope="colgroup" style="border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Passive samplers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="1" align="left" scope="colgroup" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Number of samples analyzed</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Samples between MDL and MRL (percent)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Samples above MRL (percent)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Maximum (&#x00B5;g/L)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Median (&#x00B5;g/L)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Number of samplers analyzed</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Range of days deployed</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="col" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">Samples above MDL (percent)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Budd Lake Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">40</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">0.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11&#x2013;20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">High Bridge RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14&#x2013;20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Spruce Run Outlet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">0.23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11&#x2013;18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Stanton RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">0.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11&#x2013;15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Stony Brook</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Manville RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7&#x2013;15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" scope="row">Blackwells Mills MR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt" scope="row">Below Calco Dam RR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left" style="border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Passive Samplers</title>
<p>The SPATT samplers were retrieved after deployments ranging from 7 to 20 days, with a median value of 14 days across all samplers. Microcystin concentrations in SPATT extracts are semi-quantitative and should not be directly compared to the discrete sample results in water samples, as the SPATT results are representative of a span of time as opposed to an instantaneous measurement, and SPATT samplers were deployed for varying amounts of time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t06">table 6</xref>). Anatoxins and cylindrospermopsins were not detected in any of the extracts, so the focus of this section is on the microcystin data only.</p>
<p>Microcystins were detected in 83 percent of SPATT samplers (n=60), which was a substantially higher detection rate than discrete samples analyzed for microcystin by ELISA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t06">table 6</xref>), but similar to rates of detection of <italic>mcyE</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t05">table 5</xref>). The only sites with microcystin detections above the MRL in discrete samples (Budd Lake Outlet and Spruce Run Outlet) also had detections in SPATT samplers 100 percent of the time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig09">fig. 9</xref>). Although the lake outlet sites had more frequent detections of microcystin, the two highest SPATT-sampler microcystin concentrations across all dates were from Stanton RR and Manville RR. It is important to note that they were from the first samplers deployed at those sites (August 26 to September 9, 2020) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">fig. 10</xref>) and were not coincident with elevated concentrations of either potentially toxic cyanobacteria or <italic>mcyE</italic> gene copies at either site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">figs. 4<italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">8<italic>B</italic></xref>). Though there was a lack of microcystin detections above the MRL in the discrete samples, especially from Stanton RR and Manville RR (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t06">table 6</xref>), the detections in the SPATT sampler results suggest that transport of microcystin downstream from the lake sites may have occurred. The third-highest single-sample value was from Budd Lake Outlet by the SPATT sampler deployed from June 22 to July 7, 2021, which was coincident with elevated levels of potentially toxic cyanobacteria and <italic>mcyE</italic> gene copies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig04">figs. 4<italic>A</italic></xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig08">8<italic>B</italic></xref>). These samplers were all deployed during peak cyanoHAB season, which is generally July through September in New Jersey (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2022</xref>); SPATT cyanotoxin-accumulation rates were lowest during the winter months (October through April; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">fig. 10</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig09" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p>Boxplot of microcystin concentration in solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) sampler extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) by study site in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex, adjusted to concentration over time deployed (ng/g/day). For number of samples, refer to <xref ref-type="table" rid="t06">table 6</xref>. [RR, Raritan River]</p><p content-type="toc">9. Boxplot of microcystin concentration in solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) sampler extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) by study site, adjusted to concentration over time deployed (ng/g/day)</p></caption><long-desc>Detections of microcystins were sporadic; Stanton and Manville had high-value outliers.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig09"/></fig>
<fig id="fig10" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p>Microcystin concentration over time deployed (ng/g/day) in solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) sampler extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for each sample event over time, shown as date retrieved and colored by study site in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex.</p><p content-type="toc">10.	Microcystin concentration over time deployed (ng/g/day) in solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) sampler extracts analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for each sample event over time, shown as date retrieved</p></caption><long-desc>Microcystin concentrations were typically below 2 nanograms per gram per day; 2 outliers in Manville and Stanton with elevated values. A strong seasonal pattern is apparent.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig10"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparative Analysis</title>
<p>Evidence of movement of cyanobacteria and microcystin among sites and over time was evaluated by aligning four indicators: total phytoplankton abundance, detections of <italic>mcyE</italic> by qPCR, microcystin analysis of discrete samples, and microcystin analysis from SPATT samplers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">fig. 11</xref>). Detections across all four indicators and agreement among the methods were most common at the two lake outlet sites (Budd Lake and Spruce Run; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">figs. 11<italic>A</italic>, <italic>C</italic></xref>). There were no seasonal trends in detection that suggest downstream transport was more prevalent in the summer or winter months (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">fig. 11</xref>). Clonan (2026) showed that cyanobacteria cells did not often transport downstream in this system; however, this analysis shows that there was some transport of both genetic material and microcystin in sporadic detections by qPCR and SPATT samplers, respectively. The data from Budd Lake and Spruce Run Outlets suggest that these sites were a constant source of cyanobacteria, potential cyanotoxin producers, and cyanotoxins, with several dates where all four cyanoHAB indicators were detected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">figs. 11<italic>A</italic>, <italic>C</italic></xref>). However, the cyanoHABs did not appear to transport downstream. This was particularly apparent during the summer when cyanoHAB conditions occurred at the lake outlet sites, but were not detected at the riverine sites, such as the period from July 7, 2021, to August 3, 2021 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">fig. 11</xref>). At the riverine sites, several dates were discordant, wherein cyanotoxins were detected by one indicator and not the others (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">figs. 11<italic>B</italic>, <italic>D</italic>, <italic>E</italic></xref>). The cyanotoxins and genes that were detected at downstream sites (Stanton RR and Manville RR) were generally not linked to bloom conditions and may have been produced locally or transported from other source areas that were not sampled as part of this study. </p>
<fig id="fig11" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p>Timeline comparing detections of cyanobacteria and microcystin by four methods. Total abundance of cyanobacteria is indicated as detected if it was above the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) harmful algal bloom Alert Watch threshold (20,000 cyanobacteria cells/mL). [Data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r60">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024 </xref>and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r55">Trevi&#x00F1;o and others, 2025</xref>]</p><p content-type="toc"><bold>11.</bold>&#x2003;Timeline comparing detections of cyanobacteria and microcystin by four methods. Total abundance of cyanobacteria is indicated as detected if it was above the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) HAB Alert Watch threshold (20,000 cyanobaceria cells/mL)</p></caption><long-desc>Green color indicates detection, black is not detected or below HAB Alert threshold, gray is not analyzed. Cells are vertically aligned by sample event; Solid phase adsorption toxin tracking samplers are indicated by retrieval date.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig11"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Association Between Biological Response and Environmental Variables</title>
<p>Overall, the strength of significant Spearman-correlation associations between biological response and environmental variables (11 total variables, 55 correlations, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">fig. 12</xref>) was stronger in lake sites than riverine sites (median values=0.41 and 0.15, respectively) and more often positively correlated (87 percent and 56 percent, respectively). Relations were nearly all positive at the lake sites, except for several indicators (TN, <italic>anaC</italic>, and cyanobacteria 16S rRNA) with SPATT microcystin detections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">fig. 12<italic>A</italic></xref>), which is consistent with the restrictions of relying on SPATT as an environmentally relevant indicator of environmental concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Howard and others, 2021,</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jaegge and others, 2026)</xref>. At the riverine sites, TN and TP were negatively correlated with most of the biological indicators (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">fig. 12<italic>B</italic></xref>), which is consistent with other literature on riverine HABs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r65">Wood and others, 2020; Jarvie and others, 2025)</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23"/>. Further, several specific correlation pairs between the biological indicators were stronger in riverine sites despite less frequent detections, such as total abundance of cyanobacteria with chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, cyanobacteria 16S rRNA, and <italic>mcyE</italic> gene copies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">fig. 12<italic>B</italic></xref>). </p>
<fig id="fig12" position="float" fig-type="figure"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p>Correlation matrix showing Spearman correlation coefficients between biological response and environmental variables measured at <italic>A</italic>, lake outlet sites, and <italic>B</italic>, riverine sites. [Cyanobacteria 16S rRNA gene copies; <italic>anaC</italic>, anatoxin synthetase gene copies; <italic>mcyE,</italic> microcystin synthetase gene copies]</p><p content-type="toc">12. Correlation matrix showing Spearman correlation coefficients between biological response and environmental variables measured at A, lake outlet sites, and B, riverine sites</p></caption><long-desc>Redder/warmer colors indicate positive correlations and bluer/cooler colors indicate negative correlations.</long-desc><graphic xlink:href="sir2026-5128_fig12"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The widespread occurrence of cyanobacteria throughout the study area was consistent with genetic findings, suggesting a common presence of cyanobacteria in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. Although discrete sampling during this study did not reveal cyanotoxins above any thresholds to human health (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t01">tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t02">2</xref>), the presence of toxigenic cyanobacteria, cyanotoxin-producing genes, and consistent detections of microcystins from the SPATT samplers indicate potential for future concerns related to cyanoHABs within the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. The low cyanotoxin concentrations likely do not have human health implications, but they may affect aquatic and terrestrial food webs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r29">Moy and others, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">Bukaveckas and others, 2018</xref>). When conditions are favorable, particularly during warm temperatures from June through September and (or) during periods of low flow, cyanobacteria could begin to proliferate and lead to more widespread cyanotoxin occurrences. Considering the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex&#x2019;s extensive use as a drinking-water supply, these cyanoHAB events could lead to potential risks to human and environmental health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>). Cyanobacteria were typically most abundant in August and September, but cyanoHABs can occur any time of year; therefore, datasets that span year-round, such as this study, can enhance understanding of bloom-formation mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r47">Reinl and others, 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>These findings are consistent with previous studies, which indicated that cyanobacteria, cyanotoxin synthetase genes, and cyanotoxins have been found at low concentrations in many large rivers across the Nation, with eutrophic (high-nutrient) rivers having the highest phytoplankton biomass, abundance of cyanotoxin synthetase genes, and cyanotoxin occurrences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Graham and others, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">Linz and others, 2023</xref>). The sporadic detection of microcystins by ELISA compared to the persistent detection of both genes by qPCR (cyanotoxin synthetase genes and 16S rRNA) and microcystins by SPATT suggests there could be sources of cyanobacteria growth elsewhere in the system in addition to Budd Lake and Spruce Run Reservoir.</p>
<p>In this study, detections of cyanobacteria 16S rRNA and cyanotoxin synthetase genes had higher sensitivity to detect cyanobacteria compared to microscopy, which has also been shown in other studies for large rivers in New Jersey (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Hsu and others, 2024</xref>) and across the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Graham and others, 2020</xref>). Cyanobacteria abundance and <italic>mcyE</italic> gene copies across all sites were moderately correlated and significantly positively associated (R<sup>2</sup>=0.55, p&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig07">fig. <italic>7B</italic></xref>). Relative <italic>mcyE</italic> densities between upstream and downstream sites on each sampling date overlapped with patterns in taxa capable of producing microcystin, as described by Clonan (2026).</p>
<p>Because of their continuous-absorption capacity, SPATT samplers are well-suited for the evaluation of spatial and vertical cyanotoxin dispersal and persistence patterns in flowing-water systems (Kudela, 2011; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r65">Wood and others, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Howard and others, 2021</xref>). Other studies have advanced the understanding of SPATT use and applicability in a range of system types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9">Carpenter and Wise, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Johnston and others, 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jaegge and others, 2026</xref>). However, there are substantial limitations to extrapolating quantities of cyanotoxins detected in SPATT-sampler extracts to environmentally relevant concentrations. In addition to deployment time, cyanotoxin adsorption by SPATT samplers can be affected by water temperature, turbidity, water chemistry, salinity, hydrodynamics, and concentrations of cyanotoxins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Jaegge and others, 2026</xref>). Results from the SPATT deployments in this system show persistent low concentrations of microcystin compared to the discrete samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig09">figs. 9</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">11</xref>). At times, cyanotoxins can be detected with SPATT in the absence of any other measures, which indicates they may be transported from upstream locations in low concentrations rather than cyanobacteria growth occurring at each site. SPATT samplers can serve as an early warning tool for source-water reservoirs or downstream-intake points to detect cyanotoxins prior to the occurrence of a bloom event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Howard and others, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>During periods of increased streamflow, greater cyanobacteria biomass can be mobilized and transported downstream, potentially affecting water quality and ecological health. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Graham and others (2012)</xref> support this notion, demonstrating a correlation between larger reservoir releases and increased cyanobacteria densities in downstream waters. These findings emphasize the importance of considering hydrological factors&#x2014;such as streamflow and reservoir releases&#x2014; when assessing the potential for cyanotoxin transport and its effects downstream (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r51">Schmadel and others, 2024</xref>; Clonan, 2026).</p>
<p>Although continuous water-quality sensors provide valuable data, the findings from the Spruce Run Buoy suggest that, at least at that site, further data collection and analysis could help to: (1) accurately interpret the algal growth trends, and (2) observe indicators of algal blooms in real time. This finding aligns with previous research that highlighted the limitations of fluorescence sensors when detecting cyanoHABs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Foster and others, 2022</xref>). This discrepancy may be attributed to changes in algal material following sample preservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Gifford and others, 2024</xref>) as well as differing water-column depths between the sensor location on the buoy and the depth at which discrete water samples are collected. Additionally, the fluorescence sensor measures a biological response affected by factors such as light environment, physiological status of algal communities, and algal morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Foster and others, 2022</xref>). Potentially, continuous water-quality data collected concurrently can help identify environmental variables that may affect the adsorption of cyanotoxins to SPATT as well as natural materials in the lake and rivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Limitations</title>
<p>This study represents a snapshot of conditions from August 2020 to August 2021. To fully understand the complex dynamics of cyanotoxin transport and the effect of environmental factors, long-term monitoring studies may better capture seasonal and interannual variations. Seasonal changes in temperature, nutrient availability, and hydrological conditions can substantially affect the growth, cyanotoxin occurrence, and transport of cyanobacteria. By examining seasonal and interannual patterns, scientists and managers can gain valuable insights into the factors that drive cyanotoxin occurrences and develop more effective strategies for mitigating their effects.</p>
<p>A primary limitation in the ability to assess cyanotoxin transport in this study was the low number of cyanotoxin detections, especially cyanotoxins other than microcystin. This could be attributed to several factors:1.	<bold>Temporal and spatial sampling resolution:</bold> The sampling design aimed to capture potential cyanotoxin-transport events, but the frequency and location of sampling sites may not have been optimal for detecting sporadic or localized occurrences. The timing of the study captured portions of two years (2020 and 2021), but not the full pattern of formation and dissipation of one bloom season.2.	<bold>Low cyanotoxin concentrations:</bold> Cyanotoxins may have been present in the system, but were below MDLs, particularly during periods of low cyanoHAB activity, such as the winter months. The findings of more common detections in the SPATT samplers support this result as they tend to concentrate even low amounts of cyanotoxins (Kudela, 2011).3.	<bold>Rapid cyanotoxin degradation:</bold> Environmental factors such as sunlight, temperature, and microbial activity can rapidly degrade cyanotoxins, limiting their persistence in the water column and reducing the likelihood of detection, especially anatoxins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Christensen and Khan, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>). The discrete samples were not analyzed for anatoxins; however, anatoxins and cylindrospermopsin were measured but not detected in the SPATT samples. Although potential producers for these cyanotoxins were present in the system, microcystin is likely the most concerning cyanotoxin in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex.4.	<bold>Complex hydrological and meteorological conditions:</bold> Variable hydrological conditions, such as fluctuating flow rates and water levels, can affect cyanotoxin transport and dispersion, making it difficult to predict and track their movement. The study does not fully encompass the scope of interannual variability. For example, during times of drought, discharge from Spruce Run Reservoir makes up a much higher proportion of the Raritan River flow than the portion of discharge the reservoir contributed to the river during this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005</xref>).</p>
<p>Further research could increase understanding of the factors influencing cyanotoxin transport and support development of more effective monitoring strategies. Future studies could benefit from increased sampling frequency, the use of more sensitive analytical techniques, and the integration of hydrological and meteorological data to refine predictions of cyanotoxin-transport events. To further refine our understanding of cyanotoxin transport and its potential effect on drinking-water sources, future investigations could focus on the following key areas:</p><list id="L2" list-type="bullet"><list-item><label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>High-frequency monitoring at key locations:</bold> Implementing continuous or high-frequency monitoring of cyanotoxins and environmental constituents at critical locations can provide valuable insights into the rapid changes in riverine systems that occur during and after storm events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r51">Schmadel and others, 2024</xref>) and (or) after large releases from reservoirs, such as Spruce Run Reservoir.</p></list-item><list-item><label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Advanced modeling techniques:</bold> Utilizing sophisticated hydrodynamic and water-quality models can help predict the transport and fate of cyanotoxins under various hydrological and meteorological conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r51">Schmadel and others, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23">Jarvie and others, 2025</xref>).</p></list-item><list-item><label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Integration of remote sensing:</bold> Incorporating satellite imagery and drone-based remote sensing can provide large-scale spatial information on the distribution and occurrence of cyanobacteria blooms and possibly even their potential to produce cyanotoxins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r65">Wood and others, 2020</xref>).</p></list-item><list-item><label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Interdisciplinary collaboration:</bold> Fostering collaboration between stakeholders and collaborators can facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions between physical, chemical, and biological factors that affect cyanotoxin transport. Addressing these can improve the ability to assess risks, develop early warning systems, and implement effective management strategies to protect public health and water resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Brooks and others, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Chorus and Welker, 2021</xref>).</p></list-item></list>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Summary</title>
<p>From August 2020 to August 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with New Jersey Water Supply Authority (NJWSA), New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), and Montclair State University conducted a study to characterize the extent, duration, and potential transport of cyanobacteria and associated cyanotoxins within the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex to better understand cyanotoxin and cyanobacteria occurrence in this system. The specific objectives of this report are to: (1) characterize findings from discrete water-quality samples, solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT), and continuous-sensor measurements, and (2) relate those results to cyanobacteria, cyanobacteria genes, cyanotoxins, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, water-quality data, and relevant New Jersey cyanobacteria harmful algal bloom (cyanoHAB) advisory thresholds. </p>
<p>Data were collected on 20 dates from 8 riverine and lake outlet locations in the Raritan River Water Supply Complex. Discrete samples were analyzed for nutrients, turbidity, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, phytoplankton identification and enumeration, cyanobacteria genes, and cyanotoxins. A sonde was used to measure water temperature and pH at each site during discrete-sample collection. SPATT extract samples were analyzed for cyanotoxins. </p>
<p>This study showed substantial assemblage differences between lake outlet and riverine sites in overall phytoplankton composition. Lake outlet sites had higher densities of phytoplankton and were more likely to be dominated by potential cyanotoxin-producing and filamentous cyanobacteria taxa. On several dates, the abundance of cyanobacteria exceeded the NJDEP harmful algal bloom Alert Watch threshold (above 20,000 cells per milliliter [cells/mL]) at the lake sites. Comparatively few exceedances occurred at the riverine sites, which were rarely dominated by potential cyanotoxin-producing taxa. At the Spruce Run Buoy site, the phytoplankton composition was dominated by potential cyanotoxin-producing taxa throughout the year. Continuous-sensor-fluorescence chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and phycocyanin data show some discordance with the microscopy biovolume, limiting the potential usage of continuous data to determine if a bloom is occurring using these data alone. All four classes of cyanotoxin synthetase genes (microcystin [<italic>mcyE</italic>], anatoxins <italic>[anaC</italic>], saxitoxin [<italic>sxtA</italic>],<italic> and </italic>cylindrospermopsin [<italic>cyrA</italic>]) were detected at least once among all analyzed samples; however, the frequency of detection (percent occurrence) and abundance of gene copies varied substantially by site and over time. Compared to the riverine sites, the lake outlet sites had higher mean detections of <italic>mcyE</italic>, <italic>sxtA</italic>, and <italic>cyrA</italic>, but for <italic>anaC</italic>, detections at the riverine sites were higher. Three of the genetic indicators (cyanobacteria 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid [rRNA], <italic>mcyE</italic>, and <italic>anaC</italic>) were significantly positively associated with total cyanobacteria abundance. </p>
<p>Of the discrete samples analyzed for microcystins, none had detections above the method reporting limit (0.3 micrograms per liter [&#x00B5;g/L]). Microcystin detections were exclusively from the lake outlet sites and were all below the NJDEP HAB Alert Warning level [20 &#x00B5;g/L]). Microcystins were detected in 83 percent of SPATT samplers, a substantially higher rate than for discrete samples. Evidence of cyanobacteria and microcystin transport among sites was evaluated over time by aligning four indicators: total phytoplankton abundance, detections of <italic>mcyE</italic> by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), microcystin analysis of discrete samples, and microcystin analysis from SPATT samplers. Detections across all indicators were most common at the two lake outlet sites. There were no seasonal trends in the indicators that suggested downstream transport was more prevalent in the summer or winter months. Under the conditions sampled during this study, results suggest the cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins from Budd Lake and Spruce Run Reservoir did not often lead to pronounced cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin presence at Manville RR or further downstream. There was some transport of both genetic material and microcystin shown in sporadic detections by qPCR and SPATT samplers, respectively, but no evidence of proliferation exists at these sites. The results from Budd Lake and Spruce Run Outlets suggested that these sites were a constant source of cyanobacteria, even when a visible cyanoHAB was not present. The strength of associations between biological response and environmental variables were stronger in lake sites than in riverine sites. </p>
<p>The widespread occurrence of cyanobacteria throughout the study area is consistent with the genetic findings, suggesting a common presence of cyanobacteria in the Raritan Basin Water Supply Complex. Although discrete sampling during this study did not reveal cyanotoxins at concentrations of high risk to human health, the presence of toxigenic cyanobacteria, cyanotoxin-producing genes, and consistent detections of microcystins from the SPATT samplers indicate potential for future concerns related to cyanoHABs within the system. Although continuous water-quality sensors provide valuable data, the findings from the Spruce Run Buoy suggest, at least at that site, further analysis could help to: (1) accurately interpret the algal growth trends, and (2) observe indicators of algal blooms in real time. Additional studies of cyanobacteria and cyanoHABs in the Raritan River basin could benefit from increased sampling frequencies, more sensitive analytical techniques, and the integration of hydrological and meteorological data to refine our understanding of cyanotoxin occurrence in riverine systems.</p>
</sec>
</body>
</book-part>
</book-body>
<book-back>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn01"><label>1</label>
<p>U.S. Geological Survey</p></fn>
<fn id="fn02"><label>2</label>
<p>New Jersey Water Supply Authority</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list><title>References Cited</title>
<ref id="r1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Al-Tebrineh</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Pearson</surname>, <given-names>L.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yasar</surname>, <given-names>S.A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Neilan</surname>, <given-names>B.A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2012</year>, <article-title>A multiplex qPCR targeting hepato- and neurotoxigenic cyanobacteria of global significance</article-title>: <source>Harmful Algae</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>15</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>, accessed February 9, 2026 at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.11.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.11.001</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r2"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Arar, E.J., and Collins, G.B., 1997, Method 445.0 <italic>in vitro</italic> determination of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and pheophytin <italic>a</italic> in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence&#x2014;Revision 1.2: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, accessed February 24, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100PH99.txt">https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100PH99.txt</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Barnard</surname>, <given-names>M.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chaffin</surname>, <given-names>J.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Plaas</surname>, <given-names>H.E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Boyer</surname>, <given-names>G.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wei</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wilhelm</surname>, <given-names>S.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rossignol</surname>, <given-names>K.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Braddy</surname>, <given-names>J.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bullerjahn</surname>, <given-names>G.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bridgeman</surname>, <given-names>T.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>T.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wei</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bu</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Paerl</surname>, <given-names>H.W.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2021</year>, <article-title>Roles of nutrient limitation on western Lake Erie CyanoHAB toxin production</article-title>: <source>Toxins</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>13</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;1</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>47</fpage>, accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13010047</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r4"><mixed-citation publication-type="book">Bellinger, E.G., and Sigee, D.C., eds., 2015, A key to the more frequently occurring freshwater algae, chap. 4 <italic>of</italic> Bellinger, E.G., and Sigee, D.C., eds., 2015, Freshwater algae&#x2014;Identification, enumeration and use as bioindicators (2d ed.): New York, Wiley, p.&#x00A0;141&#x2013;252, accessed February 9, 2026, at, <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118917152.ch4</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><?word-comment COMMENT2: Reference has only first page number. Please provide the last page number if article is longer than one page. (Ref. &quot;Birbeck, Westrick, O&#x2019;Neill, Spies, Szlag, 2019&quot;)?><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Birbeck</surname>, <given-names>J.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Westrick</surname>, <given-names>J.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>O&#x2019;Neill</surname>, <given-names>G.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Spies</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Szlag</surname>, <given-names>D.C.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2019</year>, <article-title>Comparative analysis of microcystin prevalence in Michigan lakes by online concentration LC/MS/MS and ELISA</article-title>: <source>Toxins</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>11</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;1</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>13</fpage>, accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11010013</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Boyer, G.L., 2020, LCMS-SOP determination of microcystins in water samples by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with single quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS): Protocols.io website, accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bck2iuye</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Brooks</surname>, <given-names>B.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lazorchak</surname>, <given-names>J.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Howard</surname>, <given-names>M.D.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Johnson</surname>, <given-names>M.V.V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Morton</surname>, <given-names>S.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Perkins</surname>, <given-names>D.A.K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Reavie</surname>, <given-names>E.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Scott</surname>, <given-names>G.I.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Smith</surname>, <given-names>S.A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Steevens</surname>, <given-names>J.A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2016</year>, <article-title>Are harmful algal blooms becoming the greatest inland water quality threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems?</article-title>: <source>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>35</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;1</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>, accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3220</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bukaveckas</surname>, <given-names>P.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Franklin</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tassone</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Trache</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Egerton</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2018</year>, <article-title>Cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins at the river-estuarine transition</article-title>: <source>Harmful Algae</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>76</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>, accessed July 18, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2018.04.012</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Carpenter, K.D., and Wise, D.R., 2023, Cyanotoxin concentrations in extracts from cyanobacteria colonies, plankton net tows, and solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) samplers in western rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, including drinking water sources in the Oregon Cascades&#x2014;2016&#x2013;2020: U.S. Geological Survey data release, accessed July 18, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5066/P96VPGH7</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chorus, I., and Welker, M., 2021, Toxic cyanobacteria in water&#x2014;A guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management (2d&#x00A0;ed.): Boca Raton, Fla., CRC Press, 858 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003081449</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Christensen, V.G., and Khan, E., 2020, Freshwater neurotoxins and concerns for human, animal, and ecosystem health&#x2014;A review of anatoxin-a and saxitoxin: Science of the Total Environment, v.&#x00A0;736, 17 p., accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139515</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r12"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><?word-comment COMMENT3: eXtyles Bibliographic Reference Processing failed to fully style this reference. Please check the copyediting. (Ref. &quot;Clonan, Wu, Heckathorn, Desko, Ernst, Reilly, Schuster, Newby, Hurley, Rossi, 2026&quot;)?>Clonan, K.R., Wu, M., Heckathorn, H., Desko, H.A., Ernst, E., Reilly, P., Schuster, B., Newby, R., Hurley, A.C., and Rossi, A., 2026, Downstream persistence of cyanobacteria in New Jersey's Raritan River Basin: Heliyon, v. 12, no. 1, 14 p. [Also available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e44230">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e44230</ext-link>.]</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Foster, G.M., Graham, J.L., Bergamaschi, B.A., Carpenter, K.D., Downing, B.D., Pellerin, B.A., Rounds, S.A., and Saraceno, J.F., 2022, Field techniques for the determination of algal pigment fluorescence in environmental waters&#x2014;Principles and guidelines for instrument and sensor selection, operation, quality assurance, and data reporting: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 1, chap. D10, 34 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/tm1D10">https://doi.org/10.3133/tm1D10</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r14"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Francy</surname>, <given-names>D.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Graham</surname>, <given-names>J.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stelzer</surname>, <given-names>E.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ecker</surname>, <given-names>C.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Brady</surname>, <given-names>A.M.G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Struffolino</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Loftin</surname>, <given-names>K.A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2015</year>, <source>Water quality, cyanobacteria, and environmental factors and their relations to microcystin concentrations for use in predictive models at Ohio Lake Erie and inland lake recreational sites, 2013&#x2013;14</source>: <series>U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report</series> <volume>2015&#x2013;5120</volume>, <size units="page">58</size> p. [Also available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20155120">https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20155120</ext-link>.]</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r15"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gifford</surname>, <given-names>S.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>St. Amand</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Graham</surname>, <given-names>J.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Foster</surname>, <given-names>G.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sauve</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Clark</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Schroeder-Larkins</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2024</year>, <article-title>Comparison of imaging flow cytometry and microscopy for freshwater algal bloom detection</article-title>: <source>Lake and Reservoir Management</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>40</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;3</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>235</lpage>, accessed July 18, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2024.2370828</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r16"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Gold Standard Diagnostics, 2025, Microcystin-ADDA SAES ELISA kit, detailed procedure: Warminster, Pa., Gold Standard Diagnostics, 2 p., accessed September 15, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.goldstandarddiagnostics.com/pub/media/productattachments/files/m/i/microcystins_nodularins-adda-saes-flowchart-520011saes.pdf">https://www.goldstandarddiagnostics.com/pub/media/productattachments/files/m/i/microcystins_nodularins-adda-saes-flowchart-520011saes.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r17"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Graham</surname>, <given-names>J.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Dubrovsky</surname>, <given-names>N.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Foster</surname>, <given-names>G.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>King</surname>, <given-names>L.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Loftin</surname>, <given-names>K.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rosen</surname>, <given-names>B.H.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Stelzer</surname>, <given-names>E.A.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2020</year>, <article-title>Cyanotoxin occurrence in large rivers of the United States</article-title>: <source>Inland Waters</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>10</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;1</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>, accessed July 18, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2019.1700749</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Graham, J.L., Loftin, K.A., Ziegler, A.C., and Meyer, M.T., 2008, Chapter A7.5, cyanobacteria in lakes and reservoirs&#x2014;Toxin and taste-and-odor sampling guidelines: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A7.5, accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A7.5">https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A7.5</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Graham, J.L., Ziegler, A.C., Loving, B.L., and Loftin, K.A., 2012, Fate and transport of cyanobacteria and associated toxins and taste-and-odor compounds from upstream reservoir releases in the Kansas River, Kansas, September and October 2011: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012&#x2013;5129, 65 p., accessed September 15, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20125129</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r20"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Howard</surname>, <given-names>M.D.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kudela</surname>, <given-names>R.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Hayashi</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tatters</surname>, <given-names>A.O.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Caron</surname>, <given-names>D.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Theroux</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Oehrle</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Roethler</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Donovan</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Loftin</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Laughrey</surname>, <given-names>Z.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2021</year>, <article-title>Multiple co-occurring and persistently detected cyanotoxins and associated cyanobacteria in adjacent California lakes</article-title>: <source>Toxicon</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>192</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>, accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.12.019</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r21"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hsu, T.-T.D., Acosta Caraballo, Y., and Wu, M., 2024, An investigation of cyanobacteria, cyanotoxins and environmental variables in selected drinking water treatment plants in New Jersey: Heliyon, v.&#x00A0;10, no.&#x00A0;11, 17 p., accessed September 15, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31350</pub-id>. </mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r22"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jaegge, A.C., Bouma-Gregson, K., Byl, T.D., Carpenter, K.D., Christensen, V.G., Gorney, R.M., Graham, J.L., Heckathorn, H.A., Olds, H.T., Reilly, P.A., Rosen, J.J., and Stouder, M.D., 2026, Opportunities and challenges in using solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) samplers for monitoring cyanotoxins in freshwater and estuarine environments: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2025&#x2013;5093, 39 p., accessed September 15, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133.sir20255093">https://doi.org/10.3133.sir20255093</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r23"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jarvie, H.P., Worrall, F., Burt, T.P., and Howden, N.J.K., 2025, A 150-year river water quality record shows reductions in phosphorus loads but not in algal growth potential: Communications Earth &amp; Environment, v.&#x00A0;6, no.&#x00A0;62, 9 p., accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01978-4</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r24"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Johnston, B.D., Stouder, M.D.W., Gorney, R.M., Rosen, J.J., Carpenter, K.D., Wei, B., and Boyer, G.L., 2025, Evaluation of passive samplers for cyanotoxin detection by immunoassay and chromatographic-mass spectrometry: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2025&#x2013;5046, 37 p., accessed August 1, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20255046</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r25"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kudela</surname>, <given-names>R.M.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <article-title>2011, Characterization and deployment of solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) resin for monitoring of microcystins in fresh and saltwater</article-title>: <source>Harmful Algae</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>11</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>, August 1, <year>2025</year>, <comment>at </comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.08.006</pub-id><comment>.</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r26"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lane</surname>, <given-names>J.Q.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Roddam</surname>, <given-names>C.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Langlois</surname>, <given-names>G.W.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Kudela</surname>, <given-names>R.M.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2010</year>, <article-title>Application of solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) for field detection of the hydrophilic phycotoxins domoic acid and saxitoxin in coastal California</article-title>: <source>Limnology and Oceanography&#x2014;Methods</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>8</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;11</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>660</lpage>, accessed July 18, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2010.8.0645</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r27"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Linz, D.M., Sienkiewicz, N., Struewing, I., Stelzer, E.A., Graham, J.L., and Lu, J., 2023, Metagenomic mapping of cyanobacteria and potential cyanotoxin producing taxa in large rivers of the United States: Scientific Reports, v.&#x00A0;13, no.&#x00A0;2806, 13 p., accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29037-6</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r28"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Miller, T.R., Beversdorf, L.J., Weirich, C.A., and Bartlett, S.L., 2017, Cyanobacterial toxins of the laurentian Great Lakes, their toxicological effects, and numerical limits in drinking water: Marine Drugs, v.&#x00A0;15, no.&#x00A0;6, 51 p., accessed August 1, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/md15060160</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r29"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Moy</surname>, <given-names>N.J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Dodson</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Tassone</surname>, <given-names>S.J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bukaveckas</surname>, <given-names>P.A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Bulluck</surname>, <given-names>L.P.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2016</year>, <article-title>Biotransport of algal toxins to riparian food webs</article-title>: <source>Environmental Science &amp; Technology</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>50</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;18</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>10007</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10014</lpage>, accessed August 1, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02760</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r30"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Negrey, K., Howard, M., Smith, J., Kudela, R., and Caron, D., 2019, Standard operating procedure for solid phase adsorption toxin testing (SPATT) assemblage and extraction of HAB toxins: Protocols.io website, accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">dx.doi.org/</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://10.17504/protocols.io.dm6gpb255lzp/v1">10.17504/protocols.io.dm6gpb255lzp/v1</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r31"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2022, 2021 cyanobacterial harmful algal bloom (HAB)&#x2014;Freshwater recreational response strategy: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 95 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://dep.nj.gov/wp-content/uploads/hab/hab2021strategyfinal.pdf">https://dep.nj.gov/wp-content/uploads/hab/hab2021strategyfinal.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r32"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2024, Public notification guidance for cyanotoxins in finished water: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.nj.gov/dep/watersupply/pdf/public-notification-guidance-for-cyanotoxins-in-finished-water.pdf">https://www.nj.gov/dep/watersupply/pdf/public-notification-guidance-for-cyanotoxins-in-finished-water.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r33"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2025. Places to fish&#x2014;Ponds, lakes, and reservoirs: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection website, accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://dep.nj.gov/njfw/fishing/freshwater/places-to-fish-ponds-lakes-reservoirs/">https://dep.nj.gov/njfw/fishing/freshwater/places-to-fish-ponds-lakes-reservoirs/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r34"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of GIS, 2021, 11 digit hydrologic unit code delineations for New Jersey: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of GIS database, accessed February 24, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gisdata-njdep.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/02599a9424254a4ea33e689941559e3c_17/explore?location=40.262924%2C-74.838910%2C9">https://gisdata-njdep.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/02599a9424254a4ea33e689941559e3c_17/explore?location=40.262924%2C-74.838910%2C9</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r35"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 2005, Raritan Basin water supply system safe yield evaluation and operation model: New Jersey Water Supply Authority, 47 p., 3 app., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.njwsa.org/uploads/1/0/8/0/108064771/raritan_basin_riverware_model.pdf">https://www.njwsa.org/uploads/1/0/8/0/108064771/raritan_basin_riverware_model.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r36"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Oakton Instruments and Eutech Instruments Pte Ltd., 2006, Instruction manual TN-100/T-100 portable turbidimeter: Oakton Instruments and Eutech Instruments Pte Ltd., 26 p., accessed September 17, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pim-resources.coleparmer.com/instruction-manual/35635-00.pdf">https://pim-resources.coleparmer.com/instruction-manual/35635-00.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r37"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">O&#x2019;Dell, J.W., 1993, Method 350.1&#x2014;Determination of ammonia nitrogen by semi-automated colorimetry&#x2014;Revision 2.0: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 15 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/epa-350.1.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/epa-350.1.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r38"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>O&#x2019;Neil</surname>, <given-names>J.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>T.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Burford</surname>, <given-names>M.A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Gobler</surname>, <given-names>C.J.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2012</year>, <article-title>The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms&#x2014;The potential roles of eutrophication and climate change</article-title>: <source>Harmful Algae</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>14</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>334</lpage>, accessed February 9, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.027">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.027</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r39"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Otten</surname>, <given-names>T.G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Crosswell</surname>, <given-names>J.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mackey</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Dreher</surname>, <given-names>T.W.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2015</year>, <article-title>Application of molecular tools for microbial source tracking and public health risk assessment of a <italic>Microcystis</italic> bloom traversing 300km of the Klamath River</article-title>: <source>Harmful Algae</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>46</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>, accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.05.007</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r40"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Paerl</surname>, <given-names>H.W.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Huisman</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2008</year>, <article-title>Blooms like it hot</article-title>: <source>Science</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>320</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;5872</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>, accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155398</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r41"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Paerl</surname>, <given-names>H.W.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Otten</surname>, <given-names>T.G.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2013</year>, <article-title>Harmful cyanobacterial blooms&#x2014;Causes, consequences, and controls</article-title>: <source>Microbial Ecology</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>65</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>995</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1010</lpage>, accessed August 1, 2025, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0159-y</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r42"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pati&#x00F1;o, R., Christensen, V.G., Graham, J.L., Rogosch, J.S., and Rosen, B.H., 2023, Toxic algae in inland waters of the conterminous United States&#x2014;A review and synthesis: Water, v.&#x00A0;15, no.&#x00A0;2808, 40 p., accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152808</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r43"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Patton, C.J., and Kryskalla, J.R., 2003, Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory&#x2014;Evaluation of alkaline persulfate digestion as an alternative to Kjeldahl digestion for determination of total and dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus in water: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03&#x2013;4174, 33 p., accessed February 9, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/2003/4174/report.pdf">https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/2003/4174/report.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r44"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">PhycoTech, 2018, General technical approach: PhycoTech, Inc. accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.phycotech.com/Portals/0/PDFs/GenTech.pdf">https://www.phycotech.com/Portals/0/PDFs/GenTech.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r45"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rasmussen, P.P., Gray, J.R., Glysson, G.D., and Ziegler, A.C., 2009, Guidelines and procedures for computing time-series suspended-sediment concentrations and loads from in-stream turbidity-sensor and streamflow data: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 3, chap. C4, 52 p., accessed January 22, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3C4">https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3C4</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r46"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Reinl</surname>, <given-names>K.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Brookes</surname>, <given-names>J.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Carey</surname>, <given-names>C.C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Harris</surname>, <given-names>T.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ibelings</surname>, <given-names>B.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Morales-Williams</surname>, <given-names>A.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>De Senerpont Domis</surname>, <given-names>L.N.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Atkins</surname>, <given-names>K.S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Isles</surname>, <given-names>P.D.F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mesman</surname>, <given-names>J.P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>North</surname>, <given-names>R.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rudstam</surname>, <given-names>L.G.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Stelzer</surname>, <given-names>J.A.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Venkiteswaran</surname>, <given-names>J.J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Yokota</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Zhan</surname>, <given-names>Q.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2021</year>, <article-title>Cyanobacterial blooms in oligotrophic lakes&#x2014;Shifting the high-nutrient paradigm</article-title>: <source>Freshwater Biology</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>66</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;9</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>1846</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1859</lpage>, accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13791</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r47"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Reinl</surname>, <given-names>K.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Harris</surname>, <given-names>T.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>North</surname>, <given-names>R.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Almela</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Berger</surname>, <given-names>S.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bizic</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Burnet</surname>, <given-names>S.H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Grossart</surname>, <given-names>H.-P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ibelings</surname>, <given-names>B.W.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jakobsson</surname>, <given-names>E.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Knoll</surname>, <given-names>L.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lafrancois</surname>, <given-names>B.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>McElarney</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Morales-Williams</surname>, <given-names>A.M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Obertegger</surname>, <given-names>U.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ogashawara</surname>, <given-names>I.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Paule-Mercado</surname>, <given-names>M.C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Peierls</surname>, <given-names>B.L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rusak</surname>, <given-names>J.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sarkar</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sharma</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Trout-Haney</surname>, <given-names>J.V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Urrutia-Cordero</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Venkiteswaran</surname>, <given-names>J.J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Wain</surname>, <given-names>D.J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Warner</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Weyhenmeyer</surname>, <given-names>G.A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Yokota</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2023</year>, <article-title>Blooms also like it cold</article-title>: <source>Limnology and Oceanography Letters</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>8</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;4</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>546</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>564</lpage>, accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10316</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r48"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Reiser, R.G., 2004, Evaluation of streamflow, water quality, and permitted and nonpermitted loads and yields in the Raritan River Basin, New Jersey, water years 1991&#x2013;98: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03&#x2013;4207, 64 p., accessed January 22, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri03-4207/pdf/WRIR03-4207.pdf">https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri03-4207/pdf/WRIR03-4207.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r49"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sabart</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Crenn</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Perri&#x00E8;re</surname>, <given-names>F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Abila</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Leremboure</surname>, <given-names>M.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Colombet</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Jousse</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Latour</surname>, <given-names>D.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2015</year>, <article-title>Co-occurrence of microcystin and anatoxin-a in the freshwater lake Aydat (France)&#x2014;Analytical and molecular approaches during a three-year survey</article-title>: <source>Harmful Algae</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>48</volume>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>, accessed February 2, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.06.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.06.007</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r50"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sauer, V.B., and Turnipseed, D.P., 2010, Stage measurement at gaging stations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 3, chap. A7, 45 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A7">https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A7</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r51"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schmadel, N.M., Harvey, J.W., Choi, J., Stackpoole, S.M., Graham, J.L., and Murphy, J.C., 2024, River control points for algal productivity revealed by transport analysis: Geophysical Research Letters, v.&#x00A0;51, no.&#x00A0;5, 9 p., accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105137</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r52"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Stackpoole, S.M., Zwart, J.A., Graham, J.L., Harvey, J.W., Schmadel, N.M., and Murphy, J.C., 2024, Evaluation of metrics and thresholds for use in national-scale river harmful algal bloom assessments: Ecological Indicators, v.&#x00A0;162, 15 p., accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111970</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r53"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Stelzer, E.A., Loftin, K.A., and Struffolino, P., 2013, Relations between DNA- and RNA-based molecular methods for cyanobacteria and microcystin concentration at Maumee Bay State Park Lakeside Beach, Oregon, Ohio, 2012: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013&#x2013;5189, 9 p., accessed January 22, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20135189</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r54"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Stouder, M.D.W., Boyer, G., Carpenter, K.D., D&#x2019;Angelo, E., Gorney, R.M., and Rosen, J.J., 2024, Cyanotoxin concentrations in extracts from solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) and diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) samplers in Owasco Lake, Seneca Lake, and Skaneateles Lake, Finger Lakes Region, New York, 2019: U.S. Geological Survey data release, accessed February 2, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OZR89E</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r55"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Trevi&#x00F1;o, J., Gorney, R.M., Clonan, K., Heckathorn, H.A., Spitz, F., and Feinson, L., 2025, Cyanobacteria, other water-quality, and discharge data collected from the Raritan River Basin, New Jersey, August 2020 through August 2021: U.S. Geological Survey data release, <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5066/P1S5DQ6A</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r56"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Turnipseed, D.P., and Sauer, V.B., 2010, Discharge measurements at gaging stations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 3, chap. A8, 87 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm3-a8/">https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm3-a8/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r57"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2015a, Drinking water health advisory for the cyanobacterial microcystin toxins: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, 67 p., accessed December 3, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/documents/hh-rec-criteria-habs-document-2019.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/documents/hh-rec-criteria-habs-document-2019.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r58"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2015b, Method 545&#x2014;Determination of cylindrospermopsin and anatoxin-a in drinking water by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI&#x2013;MS/MS): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency webpage, accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/esam/method-545-determination-cylindrospermopsin-and-anatoxin-drinking-water-liquid-chromatography">https://www.epa.gov/esam/method-545-determination-cylindrospermopsin-and-anatoxin-drinking-water-liquid-chromatography</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r59"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2019, Recommended human health recreational ambient water quality criteria or swimming advisories for microcystins and cylindrospermopsin: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, 2 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/documents/hh-rec-criteria-habs-factsheet-2019.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/documents/hh-rec-criteria-habs-factsheet-2019.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r60"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">U.S. Geological Survey, 2024, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed February 9, 2026, at <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN</pub-id>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r61"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">U.S. Geological Survey, [variously dated], National field manual for the collection of water-quality data, section A <italic>of</italic> Handbooks for water-resources investigations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, 9 chap. (A1&#x2013;A9).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r62"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Wagner, R.J., Boulger, R.W., Jr., Oblinger, C.J., and Smith, B.A., 2006, Guidelines and standard procedures for continuous water-quality monitors&#x2014;Station operation, record computation, and data reporting: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 1, chap. D3, [variously paged], accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/tm1D3/pdf/TM1D3.pdf">https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/tm1D3/pdf/TM1D3.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r63"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wehr</surname>, <given-names>J.D.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Sheath</surname>, <given-names>R.G.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Kociolek</surname>, <given-names>J.P.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2014</year>, <source>Freshwater algae of North America&#x2014;Ecology and classification</source> (<edition>2d ed.</edition>): <publisher-loc>Cambridge, Mass.</publisher-loc>, <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>, <size units="page">1066</size> p.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r64"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wilde, F.D., 2008, Chapter A6&#x2014;Field measurements: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A6, p. 9, accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A6">https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A6</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r65"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wood</surname>, <given-names>S.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kelly</surname>, <given-names>L.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bouma-Gregson</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Humbert</surname>, <given-names>J.F.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Laughinghouse</surname>, <given-names>H.D.</given-names>, <suffix>IV</suffix></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Lazorchak</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>McAllister</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>McQueen</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Pokrzywinski</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Puddick</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Quiblier</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Reitz</surname>, <given-names>L.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Ryan</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vadeboncoeur</surname>, <given-names>Y.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Zastepa</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, and <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>T.W.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>2020</year>, <article-title>Toxic benthic freshwater cyanobacterial proliferations&#x2014;Challenges and solutions for enhancing knowledge and improving monitoring and mitigation</article-title>: <source>Freshwater Biology</source>, v.&#x00A0;<volume>65</volume>, <issue>no.&#x00A0;10</issue>, p.&#x00A0;<fpage>1824</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1842</lpage>, accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13532">https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13532</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r66"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Zaffiro, A., Rosenblum, L., and Wendelken, S.C., 2016, Method 546&#x2014;Determination of total microcystins and nodularins in drinking water and ambient water by adda enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, 21 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/method-546-determination-total-microcystins-nodularins-drinking-water-ambient-water-adda-enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/method-546-determination-total-microcystins-nodularins-drinking-water-ambient-water-adda-enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay.pdf</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r67"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zar</surname>, <given-names>J.H.</given-names></string-name></person-group>, <year>1999</year>, <source>Biostatistical analysis</source> (<edition>4th ed.</edition>): <publisher-loc>Upper Saddle River, N.J.</publisher-loc>, <publisher-name>Prentice-Hall</publisher-name>, <size units="page">663</size> p.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r68"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Zhang, J.-Z., Ortner, P.B., and Fischer, C.J., 1997, Method 353.4&#x2014;Determination of nitrate and nitrite in estuarine and coastal waters by gas segmented continuous flow colorimetric analysis: Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, 20 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100PDOG.txt">https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100PDOG.txt</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r69"><mixed-citation publication-type="web">Zimmermann, C.F., Keefe, C.W., and Arar, E.J., ed., 1997, Method 365.5&#x2014;Determination of orthophosphate in estuarine and coastal waters by automated colorimetric analysis: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Exposure Research Laboratory, 9 p., accessed February 2, 2026, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=525247">https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=525247</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r70"><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zuellig, R.E., Graham, J.L., Stelzer, E.A., Loftin, K.A., and Rosen, B.H., 2021, Cyanobacteria, cyanotoxin synthetase gene, and cyanotoxin occurrence among selected large river sites of the conterminous United States, 2017&#x2013;18: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2021&#x2013;5121, 22 p., accessed July 18, 2025, at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215121">https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215121</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<notes notes-type="colophon">
<sec>
<title>For more information about this report, contact:</title>
<p>Director, New Jersey Water Science Center</p>
<p>U.S. Geological Survey</p>
<p>3450 Princeton Pike, Suite 110</p>
<p>Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648</p>
<p>Or visit our website at</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.usgs.gov/centers/new-jersey-water-science-center">https://www.usgs.gov/centers/new-jersey-water-science-center</ext-link></p>
<p>Publishing support provided by the Baltimore Publishing Service Center</p>
</sec></notes>
</book-back>
</book>
