Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4035
Ground-penetrating radar was used to measure the depth and extent of existing and infilled scour holes and previous scour surfaces at seven bridges in New Hampshire from April 1996 to November 1998. Ground-penetrating-radar survey techniques initially were used by the U.S. Geological Survey to study streambed scour at 30 bridges. Sixteen of the 30 bridges were re-surveyed where floods exceeded a 2-year recurrence interval. A 300-megahertz signal was used in the ground-penetrating radar system that penetrated through depths as great as 20 feet of water and as great as 32 feet of streambed materials.
Existing scour-hole dimensions, infilled thickness, previous scour surfaces, and streambed materials were detected using ground-penetrating radar. Depths to riprap materials and pier footings were identified and verified with bridge plans. Post data-collection-processing techniques were applied to assist in the interpretation of the data, and the processed data were displayed and printed as line plots. Processing included distance normalization, migration, and filtering but processing was kept to a minimum and some interference from multiple reflections was left in the record.
Of the 16 post-flood bridges, 22 ground-penetrating-radar cross sections at 7 bridges were compared and presented in this report. Existing scour holes were detected during 1996 (pre-flood) data collection in nine cross sections where scour depths ranged from 1 to 3 feet. New scour holes were detected during 1998 (post-flood) data collection in four cross sections where scour depths were as great as 4 feet deep. Infilled scour holes were detected in seven cross sections, where depths of infilling ranged from less than 1 to 4 feet. Depth of infilling by means of steel rod and hammer was difficult to verify in the field because of cobble and boulder streambeds or deep water.
Previous scour surfaces in streambed materials were identified in 15 cross sections and the depths to these surfaces ranged from 1 to 10 feet below the streambed. Riprap materials or pier footings were identified in all cross sections. Calculated record depths generally agree with bridge plans. Pier footings were exposed at two bridges and steel pile was exposed at one bridge. Exposures were verified by field observations.
Abstract
Introduction
Purpose and Scope
Description of the Study Area
Use of Terms
Acknowledgments
Ground-penetrating Radar
Equipment
Data-collection Methods
Scour Estimates at Bridge Sites
Route 9 Bridge
Downstream Bridge-face Cross Section
Column-set Cross Section, Upstream to Downstream
Route 18 Bridge
Route 13 Bridge
Upstream Bridge-face Cross Section
Downstream Bridge-face Cross Section
Routes 202 and 9 Bridge
Interstate 89 Southbound Bridge
Interstate 89 Northbound Bridge
Routes 3 and 25 Bridge
Route 13 Bridge
Downstream Bridge-face Cross Section
Right-bank-pier Cross Section
Summary and Conclusions
References Cited
- Downstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Route 9 over the Soucook River, Concord, N.H.
- Pier-set cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from upstream to downstream, Route 9 over the Soucook River, Concord, N.H.
- Upstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Route 18 over the Connecticut River, Littleton, N.H.
- Upstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1997 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from pier to right bank, Route 13 over the Cold River, Sandwich, N.H.
- Downstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1997 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from pier to right bank, Route 13 over the Cold River, Sandwich, N.H.
- Upstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Routes 202 and 9 over the Contoocook River, Hopkinton, N.H.
- Upstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Interstate 89 southbound over the Warner River, Warner, N.H.
- Downstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Interstate 89 northbound over the Warner River, Warner, N.H.
- Upstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Routes 3 and 25 over the Pemigewassett River, Ashland, N.H.
- Downstream bridge-face cross sections for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from left to right bank, Route 13 over the Souhegan River, Milford, N.H.
- Right-bank pier cross section for (A) 1996 pre-flood and (B) 1998 post-flood data collection, from upstream to downstream, Route 13 over the Souhegan River, Milford, N.H.
The text and graphics are presented here in pdf format:
The full report is 945KB.
The report is also available in sections in pdf for a faster download:
Cover, Title Pages, Table of Contents: 236KB
Use of a Ground-Penetrating Radar System to Detect Pre- and Post-Flood Scour
at Selected Bridge Sites in New Hampshire, 1996-98 :713KB
If you have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer, you may view and/or print the PDF version of this report. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, you may download it here.
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices | |