By John R. Gray, G. Douglas Glysson, Lisa M. Turcios, and Gregory E. Schwarz
The full report is available in pdf. Links to the pdf.
Abstract
Introduction
Field Techniques and Laboratory Methods
Field Techniques
Laboratory Methods
Suspended-Sediment Concentration Analytical Method
Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method
Differences Between the Suspended-Sediment Concentration and Total Suspended Solids Analytical Methods
Description of Data Used in the Evaluation
Arizona
Hawaii
Illinois
Kentucky
Maryland
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Quality-Control Data
Comparability of Suspended-Sediment Concentration and Total Suspended Solids Data
Natural-Water Data
Quality-Control Data
Conclusions
References Cited
Two laboratory analytical methods — suspended-sediment concentration (SSC) and total suspended solids (TSS) — are predominantly used to quantify concentrations of suspended solid-phase material in surface waters of the United States. The analytical methods differ. SSC data are produced by measuring the dry weight of all the sediment from a known volume of a water-sediment mixture. TSS data are produced by several methods, most of which entail measuring the dry weight of sediment from a known volume of a subsample of the original. An evaluation of 3,235 paired SSC and TSS data, of which 860 SSC values include percentages of sand-size material, shows bias in the relation between SSC and TSS —SSC values tend to increase at a greater rate than their corresponding paired TSS values. As sand-size material in samples exceeds about a quarter of the sediment dry weight, SSC values tend to exceed their corresponding paired TSS values. TSS analyses of three sets of quality-control samples (35 samples) showed unexpectedly small sediment recoveries and relatively large variances in the TSS data. Two quality-control data sets (18 samples) that were analyzed for SSC showed both slightly deficient sediment recoveries, and variances that are characteristic of most other quality-control data compiled as part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Sediment Laboratory Quality Assurance Program. The method for determining TSS, which was originally designed for analyses of wastewater samples, is shown to be fundamentally unreliable for the analysis of natural-water samples. In contrast, the method for determining SSC produces relatively reliable results for samples of natural water, regardless of the amount or percentage of sand-size material in the samples. SSC and TSS data collected from natural water are not comparable and should not be used interchangeably. The accuracy and comparability of suspended solid-phase concentrations of the Nation’s natural waters would be greatly enhanced if all these data were produced by the SSC analytical method.
The text and graphics are presented here in pdf format (print quality):
The full report is 573KB
The report is also available in sections in pdf for a faster download:
If you have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer, you may view and/or print the PDF version of this report. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, you may download it here.
| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices | |
  |
|