By Janet M. Carter, Daniel G. Driscoll, and Ghaith R. Hamade
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Water Resources Investigation Report 00-4278
Prepared in cooperation with the
South Dakota Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the West Dakota Water Development District
The Madison and Minnelusa aquifers are two of the most important aquifers in the Black Hills area. Long-term estimates of recharge to the Madison and Minnelusa aquifers are important for managing the water resources in the Black Hills area. Thus, annual recharge from streamflow losses and infiltration of precipitation on outcrop areas is estimated for water years 1931-98. All estimates are for recharge that contributes to regional ground-water flow patterns and that occurs in outcrop areas connected to the regional flow system. Estimates exclude recharge to outcrop areas that are isolated from the regional flow system, which generally results in ground-water discharge to area streams.
Streamflow recharge is calculated directly for 11 streams in the Black Hills area that have continuous-record gaging stations located upstream from loss zones, using available records of daily streamflow, against which estimated loss thresholds (from previous investigations) are applied. Daily streamflow records are extrapolated, when necessary, using correlations with long-term gages, to develop annual estimates of streamflow recharge for 1950-98.
Streamflow recharge is estimated for a number of smaller basins using loss thresholds for miscellaneous-record sites. Annual recharge estimates are derived from synthetic records of daily streamflow for 1992-98, which are based on drainage-area ratios applied to continuous-record gaging stations. Recharge estimates are further extrapolated for 1950-91, based on the average percentage of streamflow recharge contributed by these basins during 1992-98, relative to overall streamflow recharge.
Streamflow recharge also is estimated for small drainage areas with undetermined loss thresholds that are situated between larger basins with known thresholds. Estimates for 1992-98 are based on estimates of annual streamflow derived using drainage-area ratios, with assumed losses equal to 90 percent of annual streamflow. Recharge estimates also are extrapolated for 1950-91, based on the average percentage of streamflow recharge contributed by these basins.
Precipitation recharge for 1931-98 is estimated using relations between precipitation and streamflow (or basin yield) for representative gaging stations. Basin yields are first normalized, relative to drainage area, by expressing in inches per unit of drainage area. Yields are further converted to yield efficiencies, by dividing by precipitation on contributing drainage areas. Relations between yield efficiency and precipitation are identified, which are developed for use in generically estimating annual yield for given areas, based on average yield efficiency and annual precipitation. The resulting annual yield is used as a surrogate for estimating annual recharge from infiltration of precipitation on outcrop areas of the Madison and Minnelusa aquifers. Annual yield (or recharge) efficiencies are estimated to range from about 2 percent to in excess of 30 percent, with corresponding average annual recharge estimates ranging from 0.4 inch in the southern Black Hills to about 8.7 inches in the northwestern Black Hills.
Estimates of precipitation recharge for 1931-49 are used to estimate streamflow recharge for the same period, based on correlations between the two variables for 1989-98. Combined streamflow and precipitation recharge to both aquifers averaged about 344 ft3/s for 1931-98. Streamflow recharge averaged about 93 ft3/s, or 27 percent of combined recharge, and precipitation recharge averaged about 251 ft3/s, or 73 percent of combined recharge. Combined recharge ranged from 62 ft3/s in 1936 to 847 ft3/s in 1995. The lowest recharge amounts generally occurred during the 1930s; however, a more prolonged period of low recharge occurred during 1947-61.
For 1931-98, average precipitation recharge to the Madison aquifer is about 3.6 inches, compared with 2.6 inches for the Minnelusa aquifer. However, recharge volumes to these aquifers are nearly identical because the outcrop area of the Minnelusa Formation is larger than the outcrop area of the Madison Limestone. Streamflow recharge to the Madison aquifer is presumed slightly larger than for the Minnelusa aquifer, primarily because of preferential recharge resulting from an upgradient location. Considering both precipitation and streamflow recharge, the Madison aquifer receives about 55 percent of combined recharge, relative to about 45 percent for the Minnelusa aquifer.
The western flank of the Black Hills is almost entirely dominated by precipitation recharge, because of the large outcrop areas of Madison Limestone and Minnelusa Formation and absence of perennial streams. Recharge along the southeastern flank of the Black Hills generally is dominated by streamflow recharge. The relative contribution from streamflow and precipitation recharge is highly variable along the northern and northeastern flanks of the Black Hills.
Inside Title Pages and TOC (54 KB) -- 5 pages
Section -- 1 (185 KB) -- 4 pages
Purpose and Scope
Description of Study Area
Physiography, Land Use, and Climate
Section -- 2 (3.1 KB) -- 18 pages
Recharge Processes and General Methods for Quantifying Recharge
General Methods for Quantifying Recharge
Considerations Regarding Recharge Areas
Methods for Quantifying Streamflow Recharge
Methods for Quantifying Precipitation Recharge
Uncertainties Associated with Recharge Estimates
Section -- 3 (3.1 KB) -- 38 pages
Recharge from Gaged Streams
Continuous-Record Gaging Stations
Calculated Streamflow Recharge
Extrapolation of Streamflow Recharge Estimates
Miscellaneous-Record Measurement Sites
Recharge from Ungaged Streams
Summary of Streamflow Recharge, 1950-98
Combined Recharge, 1931-98
Section -- 4 (49 KB) -- 6 pages
Whole report (PDF, 6.4MB)-- 71 pages
(Download Acrobat reader)
Document Accessibility: Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired. This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible speech. In addition, an accessible version of Acrobat Reader 5.0 for Windows (English only), which contains support for screen readers, is available. These tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at Adobe Access.
|AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices|
|U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Last modified: Wednesday, December 07 2016, 01:11:42 PM