U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4158
Prepared in cooperation with the
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES SECTION
By Charles E. Heywood
Albuquerque, New Mexico 2003
This reports is also available in pdf (1.05MB).
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)
Two counter-weighted-pipe borehole extensometers were installed on the left bank of the Rio Grande between El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico, in 1992. A shallow extensometer measures vertical compaction in the 6- to 100-meter aquifer-system depth interval. A deep extensometer measures vertical compaction in the 6- to 305-meter aquifer-system depth interval. Both extensometers are referenced to the same surface datum, which allows time-series differencing to determine vertical compaction in the depth interval between 100 and 305 meters. From April 2, 1993, through June 13, 2002, 1.6 centimeters of compaction occurred in the 6-to 305-m depth interval. Until February 1999, most aquifer-system compaction occurred in the deeper aquifer-system interval between 100 and 305 meters, from which ground water was extracted. After that time, compaction in the shallow interval from 6 to 100 meters was predominant and attained a maximum of 7.6 millimeters by June 13, 2002. Minor residual compaction is expected to continue; continued maintenance of the El Paso extensometers would document this process.
Concerns about potential land subsidence associated with changes to the surface-water delivery system in the Rio Grande Valley in El Paso, Texas (fig. 1), were summarized by Land and Armstrong (1985). A primary concern was the potential for increased land subsidence in the area of a proposed extension to the American Canal, which is adjacent to areas of substantial ground-water withdrawals by the cities of El Paso, Texas, and Juarez, Mexico. Seepage to the underlying aquifer system in the El Paso-Juarez area reduces flow in the Rio Grande. Salvaging surface-water flow by diverting it from the Rio Grande into the American Canal Extension (ACE) might decrease aquifer-system recharge in this area, exacerbating ground-water decline. Subsidence in this area could be caused either by compaction in the interval (approximately 100 to 200 m below land surface) from which ground water is extracted or by compaction in a shallower aquifer interval that is more hydraulically connected to the Rio Grande. A decrease or cessation of flow in the Rio Grande would cause the local water table to decline and possibly cause compaction in the shallow parts of the aquifer system. To distinguish between these two components of land-surface subsidence, two vertical extensometers were installed adjacent to the Rio Grande downstream from the terminus of the original American Canal. The monitoring site was selected at the location of probable maximum hydrologic effects from construction of the ACE rather than at the location of maximum subsidence (probably north of the Rio Grande Valley near areas of maximum ground-water drawdown). About 4 years of preliminary compaction data were obtained while the ACE was being constructed. Flow diversion from the Rio Grande into the western section of the ACE began on February 15, 1997; the entire length of the ACE was operational by February 1999 (Rong Kuo, U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission, oral commun., 2002).
|Figure 1. Shaded relief map of southern Hueco Bolson showing location of extensometer site near El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico. American Canal and American Canal Extension shown in blue.|
This report was prepared in cooperation with the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States Section. The report documents extensometric measurements made adjacent to the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas, between April 2, 1993, and June 13, 2002. Although water levels were measured at seven depth intervals over this period, these data are not included in this report but are stored in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System database. The extensometers are very sensitive to vertical aquifer-system strain and have recorded seismic surface waves (Heywood, 2000). The use of El Paso extensometric and piezometric data to determine aquifer-system compressibility has been documented (Heywood, 1995) and is not discussed in this report.
In the summer and fall of 1992, two vertical borehole extensometers were installed adjacent to the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas, at latitude 31°44'35" N., longitude 106°23'57" W. (fig. 1). A shallow extensometer was completed to a depth of 100 m, which is just above the interval of water production in wells in the Rio Grande Valley. A deep extensometer was completed to a depth of 340 m in low-permeability clay underlying the freshwater-producing interval of the Hueco aquifer system. The construction and depth intervals of each extensometer, short-and long-normal electrical resistivity logs of the deep extensometer borehole, and the potentiometric heads in the screened intervals of piezometers adjacent to the extensometers are shown in figure 2.
|Figure 2. Hydrogeologic summary of borehole electrical resistivity logs, intervals of selected core samples collected at the extensometer site, and water levels measure in piezometers on November 16, 1992.|
Sandy parts of the aquifer system, presumed to be relatively permeable, correlate with the higher resistivity depth intervals on the resistivity log. Zones in which low-permeability clays were cored correlate with lower resistivity depth intervals on the resistivity log. The clay zones are, in places, more than 10 m thick (fig. 2).
Vertical displacement of both extensometer pipes was measured with respect to the same datum by use of a datum table in the extensometer shelter (fig. 3). The three legs of the datum table are each thermally insulated and mechanically isolated from surrounding alluvium to a depth of 6 m, where they are anchored in cement. The extensometers therefore measure aquifer-system compaction in the intervals from 6 to 100 m and from 6 to 340 m. By subtracting the shallow extensometer data from the deep extensometer data, a record was obtained of aquifer-system compaction in the 100-to 340-m interval. This depth interval includes the freshwater-producing interval of the Hueco aquifer system in the Rio Grande Valley in which water production wells are screened.
|Figure 3. Photograph of shallow extensometer lever arm, datum table, and selected associated instruments.|
Temperature variations can cause the metal extensometer components to change length, thereby creating an apparent displacement that is noise to the signal of interest. Five thermistor sensors were installed at various points on the extensometer apparatus to monitor temperature variations and their correlation to the displacement signals. The amplitude of the diurnal temperature variations changed with the seasons and was typically less than 0.07 mm. Because the extensometer pipes and table legs were components with comparable thermal expansion in a similar temperature environment, the temperature effects in each were of similar amplitude and phase. Temperature effects are relatively insignificant in the 100-to 340-m compaction record because the compaction time series for the 100- to 340-m depth interval was obtained by calculating the difference between the deep and shallow extensometer displacement time series.
Riley (1969) discussed the desirability of minimizing frictional contact between an extensometer pipe and the surrounding borehole casing in order to accurately measure aquifer-system compaction. Compaction not measured because of either static (stick-slip) or sliding friction is termed "frictional dead band." During final assembly of the extensometric apparatus, the optimal counter weight for each extensometer pipe was determined by measuring and minimizing frictional dead band.
A precision digital barometer monitored changes in atmospheric pressure to determine barometric effects in the piezometers. The atmosphere exerts a buoyant force on the extensometer counter weights and lever arms, which in turn exerts a tensile stress on the extensometer pipes. The effect of a reasonable range of barometric pressure on extensometer pipe length was calculated and determined to be negligible.
The displacement of each extensometer pipe with respect to the surface datum table was measured with three instruments: (1) a dial gage with 5micrometer (0.0002-in.) resolution, (2) a 100-mm linear displacement transducer with 10-micrometer (0.0004-in.) resolution, and (3) an analog strip-chart recorder (modified for 13X amplification and 96-day chart duration) with 30-micrometer (0.001-in.) resolution. The dial gages were used to calibrate the displacement measured with the transducers and strip-chart recorders. The configuration of one transducer and dial gage located between the shallow extensometer pipe and datum table is shown in figure 3.
Both dial-gage measurements were recorded when the extensometer site was visited and when analog strip charts were replaced. These measurements and the displacement since April 2, 1993, are summarized in table 1.
|Table 1. Dial-gage readings on deep and shallow extensometers|
|4/19/1994||2200||No data||No data||0.4502||0.140|
|4/20/1994||1452||No data||No data||0.4488||0.104|
|5/27/1998||No data||No data||No data||0.4850||1.024|
|3/3/1998||No data||No data||No data||0.4628||0.460|
|5/19/1999||No data||No data||No data||0.5562||2.832|
|11/5/1999||1942||No data||No data||0.5128||1.730|
|11/5/1999||2000||No data||No data||0.5141||1.763|
An analog water-level recorder provided a continuous analog record of displacement for each extensometer. A custom counter weight provided torque on the recorder drum to prevent dead band from gear backlash. From April 2 to June 24, 1993, the strip-chart clock-motor gear was set so that one chart encompassed a 32-day period. The drive-gear assembly was then further modified to increase the chart time span to 96 days. A field visit to the extensometer site was scheduled approximately every 3 months to replace charts and download digital data. A complete analog record of extensometer displacement from April 2, 1993, to March 15, 2002, has been recorded on 82 paper charts (41 for each extensometer), which are archived at the USGS office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Zero displacement values were assigned to the beginning of the digital and analog record at 17:30 Greenwich mean time on April 2, 1993; displacement data were measured from these initial positions. The vertical displacement of each extensometer pipe was recorded every 30 minutes with the displacement transducer and digital data logger. The ratiometric resistance of each transducer in an AC Half Bridge configuration was an analog for displacement. The digital data logger provided 2,500-millivolt excitation for two single-ended measurements with opposite polarity for ion depolarization. The measurement was recorded on a digital storage module. Dial-gage readings (table 1) and corresponding transducer measurements were fit with linear least-squares regression to obtain a conversion factor for translating the ratiometric transducer output to vertical displacement. The displacement transducers have a nominal 10-cm (4-in.) range. The regression fit of transducer output to dial-gage measurement of extensometer displacement for the deep extensometer is shown in figure 4. The slope of the regression line is -3.8928, the y intercept is 2.4433, and the coefficient of determination (r2) is 0.99956. Because of several malfunctions, the fit of transducer data from the shallow extensometer to all dial-gage readings (table 1) was poor. The strip-chart records for the shallow extensometer were digitized for problematic periods.
|Figure 4. Regression fit of transducer output and deep extensometer displacement.|
After the raw digital transducer output was downloaded, the data were converted to vertical displacements (in millimeters) and smoothed with a 24-hour moving average filter to remove the small diurnal temperature effects. The 30-minute data were then resampled at a daily interval (fig. 5). Calculating the difference between the shallow and deep extensometer displacement time series yielded a measure of compaction in the aquifer-system interval between 100 and 340 m deep (fig. 6).
|Figure 5. El Paso Extensometer displacements.|
|Figure 6. Measured compaction in the depth interval from 100-335 meters.|
From April 1993 through January 1999, minor (less than 1 mm) compaction occurred within the 6-to 100-m aquifer-system interval spanned by the shallow extensometer (fig. 5). The similarity of the total compaction record (6 to 340 m) to the compaction record in the deeper (100 to 340 m) aquifer-system interval (fig. 6) indicates that most aquifer-system compaction occurred in the deeper interval from April 1993 through January 1999. Ground-water withdrawals within the United States part of the Rio Grande Valley decreased after 1995 because of increased chloride concentration in production wells (Heywood and Yager, 2003). The consequent decreased change in ground-water-level variations is evident as decreased amplitude of monthly and seasonal compaction variations in the deep compaction record fig. 6).
From February 1999 through the end of the record in June 2002, 6.7 mm of net compaction occurred in the shallow aquifer-system interval, with seasonal elastic rebound during the winter months. Compaction in the deep aquifer-system interval appears to have continued until August 2000, then abated or recovered somewhat. Possibly decreased total geostatic stress resulting from the declining water table has compensated for decreased aquifer-system pore pressure in this depth interval in a way that the resulting intergranular effective stress has remained constant or decreased somewhat.
The electrical resistivity log (fig. 2) suggests that clay beds may be about 10 to 20 m thick. Clay and silt sequences as thick as 13 m were penetrated during drilling (Arthur Clark, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1992). Measured hydraulic-conductivity values of clay samples from cores ranged from 1 x 10-6 to 4 x 10-3 m/day during laboratory consolidation testing at effective stresses equivalent to in situ burial depths (Harold Olsen, Colorado School of Mines, written commun., 1997). If these values are representative of in situ clay vertical hydraulic-conductivity values, the time required for clay pore-pressure equilibration may be calculated (Scott, 1963; Riley, 1969) assuming reasonable values of clay-unit specific storage. For a 13-m-thick clay bed with a vertical hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-6 m/day and specific storage of 3 x 10-4 m-1, the time required to reach 93 percent of total consolidation is 32 years.
Compaction of aquifer-system sediments between 6 and 340 m in depth resulted in land subsidence of 1.6 cm at the El Paso extensometer site for the period of record between April 2, 1993, and June 13, 2002. As much as 9 mm of compaction occurred in the deeper aquifer interval (100 to 340 m) before July 2000. This compaction likely was a response to ground-water withdrawals. As much as 7.6 mm of compaction has occurred in the shallow aquifer-system interval (6 to 100 m). Because individual clay unit thicknesses of about 10 m exist within the aquifer system at this location, the time required for pore pressures within low-permeability clays to equilibrate with those in the surrounding, more permeable sands may be tens of years. Residual compaction of several cm will likely continue because of this equilibration process, even if water levels measured in the permeable sandy parts of the aquifer system stabilize. Continued maintenance of the El Paso extensometers would document this process.
Galloway, D.L., Jones, D.R., and Ingebritsen, S.E., eds., 1999, Land subsidence in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1182, 175 p.
Heywood, C.E., 1993, Monitoring aquifer compaction and land subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal in the El Paso, Texas - Juarez, Chihuahua, area, in Prince, K.R., Galloway, D.L., and Leake, S.A., eds., U.S. Geological Survey Subsidence Interest Group Conference, Edwards Air Force Base, Antelope Valley, California, November 18-19, 1992—Abstracts and summary: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-532, 84 p.
------1995, Investigation of aquifer-system compaction in the Hueco Basin, El Paso, Texas, USA, in Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Land Subsidence, The Hague: International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 234, IAHS Press, Oxfordshire, UK, p. 35-45.
Heywood, C.E., 2000, Extensometers as seismometers: American Geophysical Union Transactions, v. 81, no. 48, abstract S11B-16.
Heywood, C.E., and Yager, R.M., 2003, Simulated groundwater flow in the Hueco Bolson, an alluvial-basin aquifer system near El Paso, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 024108, 73 p.
Land, L.F., and Armstrong, C.A., 1985, A preliminary assessment of land-surface subsidence in the El Paso area, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4155, 96 p.
Riley, F.S., 1969, Analysis of borehole extensometer data from central California, in Tison, L.J., ed., Land subsidence: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Land Subsidence, Tokyo, International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication no. 89,
------1986, Developments in borehole extensometry, in Johnson, A.I., Carbognin, L., and Ubertini, L., eds., Land subsidence: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Land Subsidence, Venice, Italy, 1984, International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication no. 151, p. 169-186.
Scott, R.F., 1963, Principles of soil mechanics: Palo Alto, Calif., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 550 p.
For sale by:
U.S. Geological Survey
Water Resources Division
5338 Montgomery Blvd. NE, Suite 400
Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311
U.S. Geological Survey
Box 25286, Denver Federal Center
Denver, CO 80225
For more information about the USGS and its products:
World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/
Information about water resources in New Mexico is available on the World Wide Web at:
|AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices|
|U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Last modified: Wednesday, December 07 2016, 01:20:23 PM