USGS Georgia Water Science Center
The full report is available in pdf format in four files: Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4062 (text and page-sized illustrations, 7.6 MB) and Plate 1 (1 MB), Plate 2 (1.1 MB), and Plate 3 (1 MB). Note that Plate 1 is 30 inches by 32 inches, Plates 2 and 3 are 36 inches by 48 inches.
John S. Clarke and Christopher T. West
U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4062, 134 pages (Published 1998)
Ground-water flow and stream–aquifer relations were simulated for seven aquifers in Coastal Plain sediments in the vicinity of the U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Site (SRS), in Georgia and South Carolina to evaluate the potential for ground water containing hazardous materials to migrate from the SRS into Georgia through aquifers underlying the Savannah River (trans-river flow). The work was completed as part of a cooperative study between the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Department of Energy, and Georgia Department of Natural Resources. The U.S. Geological Survey three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model, MODFLOW, was used to simulate ground-water flow in three aquifer systems containing seven discrete aquifers: (1) the Floridan aquifer system, consisting of the Upper Three Runs and Gordon aquifers in sediments of Eocene age; (2) the Dublin aquifer system, consisting of the Millers Pond, and upper and lower Dublin aquifers in sediments of Paleocene and Late Cretaceous age; and (3) the Midville aquifer system, consisting of the upper and lower Midville aquifers of sediments in Late Cretaceous age. Ground-water flow was simulated using a series of steady-state simulations of predevelopment (pre-1953) conditions and six pumping periods—1953–60, 1961–70, 1971–75, 1976–80, 1981–86, and 1987–92—results are presented for predevelopment (prior to 1953) and modern-day (1987–92) conditions.
Total simulated predevelopment inflow is 1,023 million gallons per day (Mgal/d), of which 76 percent is contributed by leakage from the Upper Three Runs aquifer. Over most of the study area, pumpage induced changes in ground-water levels, ground-water discharge to streams, and water-budget components were small during 1953–92, and changes in aquifer storage were insignificant. Simulated drawdown between predevelopment and modern-day conditions is small (less than 7 feet) and of limited areal extent—the largest simulated declines occur in the upper and lower Dublin aquifers in the vicinity of the Sandoz plant site in South Carolina. These declines extend beneath the Savannah River and change the configuration of the simulated potentiometric surface and flow paths near the river.
Predevelopment and modern-day flowpaths were simulated near the Savannah River by using the U.S. Geological Survey particle-tracking code MODPATH. Eastward and westward zones of trans-river flow were identified in three principal areas as follows:
Mean time-of-travel simulated for predevelopment conditions ranges from 300 to 24,000 years for westward trans-river flow zones; and from 550 to 41,000 years for eastward zones. Corresponding travel times under modern-day conditions range from 300 to 34,000 years for westward zones and from 580 to 31,000 years for eastward zones. Differences in travel times between predevelopment and modern-day simulations result from changes in hydraulic gradients due to ground-water pumpage that alter flow paths in the vicinity of the river.
Recharge to Georgia trans-river flow zones originating on the SRS was simulated for the Gordon and upper Dublin aquifers during predevelopment, and in the Gordon aquifer during 1987–92. During 1987–92, SRS recharge was simulated in 6 model cells covering a 2-square mile area, located away from areas of ground-water contamination. Simulated aquifer discharge from these sites occurs in a 1 square mile (mi2) marshy area immediately westward of the Savannah River that is distant from major pumping centers. Simulated time-of-travel from SRS recharge areas to westward trans-river flow zones ranged from about 90 years to 2,900 years.
Abstract
Introduction
Purpose and Scope
Description of study area
Previous investigations
Methods of study
Acknowledgments
Hydrogeology
Geologic setting
Hydrogeologic units
Floridan aquifer system
Dublin aquifer system
Midville aquifer system
Conceptualization of stream-aquifer flow system
Hydrologic budget
Predevelopment flow system
Modern-day (1987–92) flow system
Simulation of ground-water flow
Spatial and vertical discretization
Hydraulic characteristics
Boundary conditions
Pumpage
Model calibration
Steady-state simulation of predevelopment flow system
Simulated heads
Simulated water budget
Simulated ground-water recharge
Simulated ground-water discharge to streams
Simulated ground-water flow
Simulation of flow system, 1953–92
Testing of model for transient response to pumpage
Steady-state analysis of modern-day (1987–92) flow conditions
Simulated drawdown
Calibrated hydraulic properties
Trans-river flow beneath the Savannah River
Particle tracking analysis of advective ground-water flow
Westward trans-river flow
Eastward trans-river flow
Recharge areas to trans-river flow zones
Simulated time-of-travel
Trans-river flow, recharge areas, and time-of-travel at the Savannah River Site
Sensitivity analysis
Limitations of digital simulation
Limitations of particle tracking
Summary and conclusions
Selected References
Appendix A. Mean-annual ground-water discharge to streams estimated using hydrograph separation and simulated ground-water discharge for predevelopment (prior to 1953) and modern-day (1987-92) conditions
Appendix B. Estimated ground-water discharge to streams during 1954 and 1986 droughts, and simulated ground-water discharge for predevelopment (prior to 1953) and modern-day (1987-92) conditions
Appendix C. Measured heads, simulated predevelopment (prior to 1953) and modern-day (1987-92) heads, and error criteria in wells used for model calibration
The full report is available in pdf format in four files: Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4062 (text and page-sized illustrations, 7.6 MB) and Plate 1 (1 MB), Plate 2 (1.1 MB), and Plate 3 (1 MB). Note that Plate 1 is 30 inches by 32 inches, Plates 2 and 3 are 36 inches by 48 inches.
To view the PDF document, you need the Adobe Acrobat® Reader installed on your computer. (A free copy of the Acrobat® Reader may be downloaded from Adobe Systems Incorporated.)
Recent USGS publications on Georgia or Georgia Water-Resources Information
For more information, please contact webmaster-ga@usgs.gov.