Table of Contents
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Purpose and Scope
- Acknowledgments
- Methods
- Well Installation and Water-Level Measurements
- Slug Tests
- Description of Study Area
- Geographic Setting
- Geologic Setting
- Hydrogeology of the Study Area
- Description of Sedimentary Deposits
- Streamflow Infiltration
- Ground-Water Flow
- Simulation of Ground-Water Flow
- Description of Ground-Water Flow Model
- Boundary and Initial Conditions
- Model Calibration
- Calibrated Model
- Model Sensitivity
- Simulation of Recharge from a Hypothetical Infiltration Basin
- Model Limitations
- Summary and Conclusions
- References Cited
FIGURES
1-6. Maps showing:
- Locations of Carson River basin, Carson Valley, Pine Nut Creek study area, and precipitation gages in the Pine Nut Creek watershed
- Geographic and geologic features of Carson Valley, and the locations of Pine Nut Creek study area and infiltration site
- Locations of the incised flood plain of Pine Nut Creek, the infiltration site, two streamflow
measurement sites along the Allerman Canal, three indirect measurement sites along Pine Nut Creek,
and three wells that were installed for this study
- Area of model, location of wells including depth to water, and water-level altitude, December 2000
- (A) Locations of nine selected wells near Pine Nut Creek where water levels were measured from
August 1999 through April 2001, and (B) graph showing water-level fluctuations in nine wells
measured from August 1999 through April 2001
- Conditions at model boundaries, and locations of model grid, municipal and domestic wells,
hypothetical infiltration basin and pumping wells, and three observation points within the model grid
where changes in simulated water levels are calculated
7-9. Graphs showing:
- Water-level fluctuations from 1977 through 2000 near western boundary of the model
- Timing of simulated recharge and simulated water-level altitude near Pine Nut Creek, model
calibration period, and synoptic water-level measurements
- Comparison of simulated and measured water-level altitude, August 1999 through April 2001
10. Map showing comparison of simulated and measured water-level altitude contours, and difference of
simulated minus measured water-level altitude at selected wells, December 2000
11-14. Graphs showing:
- Comparison of simulated and measured water-level changes at wells 1-9 near Pine Nut Creek from
August 1999 through April 2001
- Model sensitivity to independent changes in calibration parameters in terms of RMS error between
simulated and observed water levels
- Simulated changes in ground-water storage and water-level altitudes at three observation points
from simulation of recharge from Pine Nut Creek once every three years
- Simulated changes in ground-water storage from recharge from hypothetical infiltration basin
and subsequent pumping at 400 and 800 acre-feet per year; pumpage applied on a 6-month cycle
15. Map showing peak of simulated water-level rise after five consecutive years of recharge applied to the
hypothetical infiltration basin totaling 3,500 acre-feet
16. Graph showing simulated water-level changes at center, east, and north observation points from recharge
applied to the hypothetical infiltration basin
17. Plan view and cross sections along the base of the alluvial fan, showing simulated water-level changes
at 1, 4, 7, and 10 years after cessation of recharge, and no pumpage
18. Graph showing simulated water-level changes at center, east, and north observation points from recharge
applied to the hypothetical infiltration basin and subsequent pumping at 400 and 800 acre-feet per year
19-20. Plan view and north-south cross sections along the base of the alluvial fan, showing simulated water-level
change after recharge of 3,500 acre-feet, 1 year after beginning of pumping, at end of pumping, and 3 years
and 6 years after the end of pumping at rates of:
- 400 acre-feet per year
- 800 acre-feet per year
TABLES
- Calibrated and alternative values of parameters estimated for the model
- Water budgets for modeled area of Pine Nut Creek for steady-state and transient conditions
|