The Chemical Analysis of
Edited by Curtis A. Palmer
U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2144
Coal ash by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
By Allen L. Meier, Frederick E. Lichte, Paul H. Briggs, and John H. Bullock, Jr.
PRINCIPLE
In coal ash, 58 major, minor, and trace elements are determined by a combination of inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using two decomposition techniques. A multi-acid decomposition (a mixture of hydrochloric, nitric, perchloric, and hydrofluoric acids) is used to determine 31 elements (Crock and others, 1983), the remaining elements are determined in coal ash following a sodium peroxide sinter decomposition technique (modification of Borsier and Garcia, 1983). The ICP-AES is standardized with a digested coal ash reference standard and a series of multi-element solution standards (Lichte, Golightly, and Lamothe, 1987). Calibration for each element determined by the ICP-MS is made by using the average intensity of five blanks taken through the entire procedure(s) and the intensities acquired on a solution of a glass standard (PP-93) containing a known concentration of each element (Lichte, Meier, and Crock, 1987).
INTERFERENCES
ICP-AES interferences may result from spectral interferences, background shifts, and matrix effects (Thompson and Walsh, 1983). Interelement correction factors and background corrections are applied using the proprietary data system software (Thermo Jarrell Ash, 1988). It is common to not report an affected element due to the extraordinary interference of the affecting element. Matrix effects can generally be negated by proper matching of standard and sample matrices.
ICP-MS interferences come from matrix effects, instrumental drift, and isobaric overlap of some elemental isotopes and molecular ions formed in the plasma resulting in suppression or enhancement of measured ion intensity. A glass standard is used so samples and standards are matrix matched. Internal standards are added to compensate for matrix effects and instrumental drift. The standard solution is run at 15 sample intervals, drift is calculated, and correction applied between standards. The isotopes measured are selected to minimize isobaric overlap from other elements and molecular species that might be present.
SCOPE
Analysis by ICP-AES and ICP-MS for major, minor, and trace elements is useful for a variety of coal and geochemical investigations. The elements analyzed and their reporting limits are shown in tables 26 and 27. Twelve to twenty samples can be prepared daily for each decomposition technique.
APPARATUS
REAGENTS
Internal standards
Oxide correction solutions
Calibration standard
PP-93: In house glass standard material containing all elements used for calibration.
SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
All laboratory personnel must wear safety glasses, a lab coat or apron, and gloves when working in the laboratory. All digestions and flux (sodium peroxide) preparations must be performed in a chemical fume hood (digestions using perchloric acid are handled in a perchloric acid hood); the latter is washed down after each days use. All personnel must read the CHP and MSDS for each procedure. Calcium glucaonte gel should be available in labs where HF is in use.
PROCEDURE
The instrument operating parameters are shown in tables 28 and 29.
Multi-acid digestion:
Sinter method:
CALCULATIONS
For the multi-acid decomposition, a 0.200 g sample is diluted to 20 mL. The dilution factor = 100.
Concentration (ppm) = sample volume (mL) ´
ICP-AES reading (ppm)
sample weight (g)
For ICP-MS, a 2 mL aliquot is diluted to 8 mL before analysis. The dilution factor = 400.
Concentration (ppm) = Sample volume (mL) ´
ICP-MS reading (ppm)
sample weight (g)
For the sinter decomposition, a 0.100 g sample is diluted to 40 mL. The dilution factor = 400.
Concentration (ppm) = Sample volume (mL) ´
ICP-AES reading (ppm)
sample weight (g)
Concentration (ppm) = Sample volume (mL) ´
ICP-MS reading (ppm)
sample weight (g)
ASSIGNMENT OF UNCERTAINTY
The analytical results for selected reference materials duplicate samples, and method blanks are summarized in tables 30 and 31.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Borsier, M. and Garcia, M., 1983, Analyse automatique d'echantillons geologiques par plasma ICP: Spectrochimica Acta, v. 38B, nos. 1/2, p. 123-127.
Crock, J.G., Lichte, F.E., and Briggs, P.H., 1983, Determination of elements in National Bureau of Standards geological reference materials SRM 278 obsidian and SRM 688 basalt by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy: Geostandards Newsletter, v. 7, no. 2, p. 335-340.
Kane J., 1990, Written communication to the editor,
Collaborative trial values (percent ash = 6.32): U.S. Geological Survey,
Lichte, F.E., Golightly, D., and Lamothe, P.J., Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, in Baedecker, P., ed., Methods for Geochemical Analysis: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1770, p. B1-B10.
Lichte, F.E., Meier, Allen L., and Crock, James G., 1987, Determination of the rare earth elements in geological materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: Analytical Chemistry, v. 59, no. 8, p. 1150-1157.
National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1985 and 1993, Certificate
of analysis: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Potts, P.J., Tindle, A.G., and Webb, P.C., 1992, Geochemical reference materials compositions: CRC Press
Inc.,
Thermo Jarrell Ash Corporation, 1988, ICAPtm61 Operator's Manual.
Thompson, M. and Walsh, J.N., 1983, A handbook of inductively coupled plasma spectrometry, p. 16-36.
Source: pubs.usgs.gov/bul/b2144/coal_ash.htm
[ Contents ]
Created by the EERT WWW Staff.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]