Stream quality || Ground-water quality
Seven major water-quality characteristics were evaluated for stream sites in each NAWQA Study Unit. Summary scores for each characteristic were computed for all sites that had adequate data. Scores for each site in the upper Snake River Basin were compared with scores for all sites sampled in the 20 NAWQA Study Units during 1992-95. Results are summarized by percentiles; higher percentile values generally indicate poorer quality compared with that at other NAWQA sites. Water-quality conditions at each site also are compared with established criteria for protection of aquatic life. Applicable criteria are limited to nutrients and pesticides in water, and semivolatile organic compounds, organochlorine pesticides, and PCBs in sediment. (Methods used to compute rankings and evaluate aquatic-life criteria are described by Gilliom and others, in press [29].) |
EXPLANATION Ranking of stream quality relative to all NAWQA stream sites -- Darker colored circles generally indicate poorer quality. Bold outline of circle indicates one or more aquatic-life criteria were exceeded.
|
NUTRIENTS | |
---|---|
In general, nutrient concentrations in streams of the upper Snake River Basin were among the smallest of those reported in all NAWQA Study Units. Concentrations of nutrients in the Snake River increased in a downstream direction; concentrations were largest between Twin Falls and the basin outlet at King Hill. Sites downstream from agricultural areas contained the largest concentrations of nutrients in the basin. However, none of the concentrations exceeded drinking-water standards for nutrients. | |
PESTICIDES | |
Only two sites in the upper Snake River Basin had sufficient pesticide data to compare with national conditions. Although numerous pesticides were detected at these sites (Teton River near St. Anthony and Rock Creek near Twin Falls), the concentrations were among the smallest of those reported in all NAWQA Study Units. None of the concentrations exceeded drinking-water standards or aquatic-life criteria. | |
PCBs AND OTHER ORGANOCHLORINES in sediment and fish tissue | |
Concentrations of PCBs and other organochlorines in bed sediment and fish tissue in the upper Snake River Basin were typical of concentrations reported in other NAWQA Study Units; concentrations at about half of the sites were larger and about half were smaller, compared with the national median determined by NAWQA. Concentrations in fish tissue at two sites exceeded NAS/NAE aquatic-life criteria. These sites were Rock Creek at Twin Falls and the Snake River near Twin Falls. Compounds that exceeded aquatic-life criteria were PCBs, the insecticide DDT, and the DDT breakdown products DDE and DDD [10]. Concentrations were largest at sites downstream from agricultural and urban areas. | |
TRACE ELEMENTS in sediment | |
Trace-element contamination does not appear to be a concern in most areas of the upper Snake River Basin. Concentrations in bed sediment were largest in pristine areas where the geology is naturally rich in trace elements. | |
STREAM HABITAT | |
Stream habitat conditions can strongly influence the water quality and associated biological communities of streams. Instream modification, bank erosion, and riparian conditions represent useful measures of stream habitat conditions. In the upper Snake River Basin, the habitat conditions were generally better than those at other NAWQA sites nationwide. Sites where habitat was highly degraded were influenced primarily by hydrologic modification and agricultural activities such as excessive grazing. Because bank and riparian conditions generally are not reflective of habitat conditions in large rivers, the large-river sites in the upper Snake River Basin were not evaluated for stream habitat conditions. | |
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (SVOCs) in sediment | |
Semivolatile organic com pounds typically are present in streams receiving municipal and (or) industrial discharges. In the upper Snake River Basin, 47 different SVOCs were detected in bed-sediment samples. The most commonly detected SVOCs were phthalates (98 percent of the samples), phenol (86 percent of the samples), and 2,6-dimethylnaphthalene (83 percent of the samples). Concentrations of SVOCs in bed sediment were smallest at sites upstream from the influence of municipal and (or) industrial areas. Bed-sediment samples at Snake River sites downstream from Idaho Falls all contained SVOC concentrations that ranked higher than the national median determined by NAWQA. However, no concentrations of SVOCs in bed sediment exceeded NAS/NAE aquatic-life criteria. | |
FISH COMMUNITIES | |
Fish community indices, such as the number of omnivores, pollution-tolerant species, and non-native fish, indicated that most of the sites assessed in the upper Snake River Basin were more degraded than were sites sampled in other NAWQA Study Units. Fish communities were most degraded in the Snake River and its tributaries downstream from Twin Falls, where multiple sources of pollutants degrade water-quality conditions. Even sites where degradation was minimal showed some degradation as a result of introduced fish species. |
Stream quality || Ground-water quality
Five major water-quality characteristics were evaluated for ground-water studies in each NAWQA Study Unit. Ground-water resources were divided into two categories: (1) drinking-water aquifers and (2) shallow ground water underlying agricultural or urban areas. Summary scores were computed for each characteristic for all aquifers and shallow ground-water areas that had adequate data. Scores for each aquifer and shallow ground-water area in the upper Snake River Basin were compared with scores for all aquifers and shallow ground-water areas sampled in the 20 NAWQA Study Units during 1992-95. Results were summarized by percentiles; higher percentile values generally indicate poorer quality compared with other NAWQA ground-water studies. Water-quality conditions for each drinking-water aquifer also were compared with established drinking-water standards and criteria for protection of human health. (Methods used to compute rankings and evaluate standards and criteria are described by Gilliom and others, in press [29].) |
EXPLANATION Ranking of stream quality relative to all NAWQA stream sites -- Darker colored circles generally indicate poorer quality. Bold outline of circle indicates one or more aquatic-life criteria were exceeded.
|