Leg1B (West to southwest Oahu)
K205: Waianae landslide (M. Coombs)
Aug. 29, 2001
Results of Dive K205
Date: August 29, 2001
Place: Farthest block of Waianae landslide,
54 km SW of Oahu
Observer: Michelle Coombs
Co-observers: Jim Moore, Dave Clague
Advisors: Eiichi Takahashi, Jiro Naka
Purpose of Dive K205
Waianae landslide is a slump-type landslide,
consisting of several coherent blocks spaced
5-20 km apart, separated by transverse scarps
(Moore et al. 1989). Only a small tongue
of exposed hummocky terrain projects SW from
the furthest slump block. The bulk of the
slump is believed to consist of material
from Waianae volcanoe, although the 130-km-wide
slump may comprise material from Kaena ridge
to the west and Penguin bank to the east
(Moore et al., 1989). We proposed to dive
on central portion of the steep toe of the
slump (the outer face of the outermost block),
which meets the seafloor abruptly at a depth
of ~4700m.
The purposes of this dive were twofold. The
first is to combine geologic observations
made during the dive with single channel
seismic data from Leg 1 to better understand
the structure and emplacement of the Waianae
landslide blocks. The second purpose was
to collect samples from the block, in order
to determine their lithology and composition,
and possibly age. This deep site potentially
provides access to very early Waianae volcano,
and thus may provide information regarding
the geochemical and geologic evolution of
Waianae, in much the same way that volcaniclastic
rocks from the Hilina slump are derived from
early Kilauea (e.g., Lipman et al. 2001).
If the parallel to Hilina/Kilauea holds true,
the rocks collected during this dive may
be from the alkalic stage of the volcano's
history, and thus dateable. The results of
this dive may be used in conjunction with
a dive on an upper slump block (158?28'10"
W, 21?23'15", -2560 to -1920 m), performed
earlier this summer by Dave Clague at MBARI,
to provide a more complete picture of the
evolution of Waianae.
Dive Plan
The dive track was planned to ascend the
outer scarp face of the outer block from
Waianae landslide, 54 km SW of Oahu. This
block is BLANK m high at its peak, which
descends to a flat bench at approximately
4200 m depth. Our dive ascended from the
base of the block and nearly reached the
basin. Dive site location was severely limited
due to the presence of numerous telecomm
cables in the area. At least 18 cables run
westward from Oahu in this region, many of
which lie over steep parts of the outward
block. Within the small acceptable area available
to us, we selected a portion of block's outer
scarp with ~400 m vertical rise and ~21?
slope. JAMSTEC regulations for the use of
the ROV require that the dive site be the
distance of one water depth from cables.
The base of the block of interest is ~4700m.
Therefore, the dive track was kept 4.7 to
4.2 km away from cables.
Dive Summary
We encountered only volcaniclastic rock outcrops
during the dive, with the exception of one
possible pillow lava outcrop near the top
of the ridge (see below). Kaiko landed on
a muddy slope littered with small loose rock
chips; a push core was taken in this sediment.
The first 80 m of upslope travel encountered
mud and sand covered slopes with increasing
amounts of blocks, some grouped to form vague
outcrop-like areas. Eight samples at four
locations were sampled during this portion
of the dive. They range from volcanic breccias
to mudstone.
At a depth of 4557 m, we encountered the
first probable outcrop. At 4543, coherent
outcrop was seen and sampled (sample K205-06).
From this depth to about 4300m, jointed and
fractured outcrop alternated with talus.
Above this depth, slope-mantling sediment
predominated. In addition, rocks were severely
cemented with MnO coating. In places, the
slope mantle itself was indurated, and coated
with ~2mm of MnO. Along this upper section,
one significant outcrop was encountered,
at 4291m. This was a ~30 m long band of pillow
lava. The outcrop differed significantly
from those further down: its appearance was
lobate, with several apparent squeeze-out
buds at the ends of larger pillows. Unfortunately,
we were not able to sample at this outcrop
due to exteme Mn-cementing. This was the
only possible lava outcrop encountered during
the dive.
Soon after, at 4237 m, the terrain flattened
as we reached the top of the ridge. Because
we had reached this position earlier than
expected (12:39), and the remainder of the
planned course covered flat ground, we changed
course to the SE, in order to make another
SE ascent approximately 500 SE. At the end
of this second ascent, two high-reflectivity
ridges appeared on the sonar. Both were outcrops
of mudstone containing clasts of lithified
volcanic breccia (sample sites 10 and 11).
It was difficult to tell if these two outcrops
contained "primary" outcrop or
indurated slope mantle. Finally, a push core
was taken in muddy sediment, and then the
dive ended at 14:39 at a depth of 4316m.
Geologic observations
1) As mentioned above, all samples are volcaniclastic
in origin. The majority are well-lithified
volcanic breccias. These breccias contain
clasts of basalt as well as clasts of older
breccia and sandstone.
At least some of the collected samples appear
to be clasts in younger, unlithified breccias.
It is difficult to determine whether this
is the case, or whether the samples were
taken from fractured and jointed rock. If
they were unconsolidated breccias, the amount
of matrix was very low. The emplacement history
of these samples is obvious complex, recording
as many as three generation of sedimentation
and erosion.
2) The rock outcrop on the main portion of
the scarp face is highly fractured and undergoing
continuous sloughing, as evidenced by relatively
sediment-free talus at the base of the steeper
outcrops. Whether this is simply a function
of slope steepness, or whether it indicates
active deformation, is unclear. As the slope
decreased towards the top of the dive, MnO
coating apparently increased in thickness,
as rocks became extremely cemented. Slope
mantling material also bore MnO coating,
indicating that very little erosion (or sedimentation)
was occurring there.
3) The apparent presence of pillow basalt
near the top of the scarp is somewhat puzzling,
as volcaniclastic rocks are in place above
and below the outcrop. It is unfortunate
that we wre not able to sample the pillows.
Video Highlights
Time | Depth (m) | Feature |
10:19 | 4586 | Talus slope. Large rectangular block of volcaniclastic sandstone sampled here (K205-04). This is the largest sample ever obtained by Kaiko (33 kg). |
10:26 | Tongues of thinly mantled talus, shed from outcrops just above. View upwards shows coarser, proximal talus, perhaps in-place outcrop as well. | |
10:32-10:36 | 4560 | First definite outcrop. Beds (fracture planes?) dip into slope, maybe slightly to the NW at appx. 20?. Outcrop is fractured and contains alternating layers of coherent and more fractured rock on 10s cms scale. Sample K205-05 taken here. |
10:48-10:55 | 4543 | Massive outcrop. Highly fractured. No discernible bedding or jointing planes. Sample K205-06 taken here. |
11:04-11:07 | 4479 | Large outcrop of bedded sediments. Sub-horizontal bedding planes. Sampling attempt results in crushing the rock; close-up shows that the layered outcrop consists of mudstones. This does not appear to be slope-mantle. Mn-covered sediment does appear to mantle the top of the outcrop as well. |
11:15-11:20 | 4425 | Approach group of blocks on muddy slope. Though it is difficult to tell if they are in place, sampling attempt shows that they are well-cemented. Sample site #7. The sampled clasts are breccia, is the deposit here an unlithified breccia also? |
11:33 | 4372 | Massive outcrop, highly fractured. Samples K205-8a-c taken. |
11:48-11:49 | 4331 | Slumped slabs of slope-parallel, bedded material. Bedding at 10s cm, seemingly well-indurated. |
12:03-12:07 | 4291 | Pillow lava outcrop. Showed as isolated, ~30 m long ridge on sonar. Nice squeeze-out knobs. Could not sample due to Mn-cement. |
14:10-14:14 | 4324 | Bedded outcrop. Difficult to tell if this is slope mantle or in-place outcrop, but some horizontal bedding is present. Sample site 10. |
14:20-14:25 | 4315 | Bedded outcrop, more extensive than the last one, maybe 1 m high. Again, difficult to tell if this is slope mantle or in-place outcrop, but it is massive enough to appear in-place. Sample site 11. |
Reference
Lipman, PW, Sisson TW, Ui T, Naka J, Smith
JR, 2001. Ancestral submarine growth of Kilauea volcano
and instability of its south flank. In AGU
Monograph, in press.
Moore JG, Clague DA, Holcomb RT, Lipman PW,
Normark WR, Torresan ME, 1989. Prodigious submarine landslides on the
Hawaiian ridge. Jour Geophys Res 94, 17465-17484.
Dive log
Time | Depth (m) | Altitude (m) | heading (degree) | Narrative | |
9:33 | 4524 | 125.7 | 95 | Kaiko released from launcher | |
9:44 | 4655 | 89 | On bottom, mud floor | ||
9:47 | 4655 | 0.1 | 87 | Push core (green) in mud seds | PC 1 |
9:50 | 4649 | 1.9 | 39 | Rock chips on mud seafloor | |
9:54 | 4637 | 1.2 | 45 | Sample#1A,B, put in box2 (loose talus) | 1A, 1B |
9:56 | 4637 | 1.1 | 43 | Sample#1C put in box2 (loose talus) | 1C |
9:58 | 4630 | 1.1 | 37 | Gravelly mud bottom | |
10:05 | 4612 | 1.7 | 32 | Sample#2(large) put in box2 (loose talus). Probably had not moved far downslope | 2 |
10:07 | 4610 | 3.7 | 75 | Sampling attempt | |
10:09 | 4611 | 2 | 30 | Sample#3A put in box3 (loose talus) | 3A |
10:12 | 4611 | 1.9 | 21 | Sample#3B put in box3 (loose talus) | 3B |
10:13 | 4611 | 1.8 | 20 | Sample was thrown away (too large). Fragments fall into several basket compartments, call fragments 3C | 3C |
10:16 | 4599 | 3.6 | 36 | Many fragment of rocks on the muddy sea floor | |
10:19 | 4586 | 3.6 | 42 | Sample#4 put in box 8 and 9. #4 is very large rectangular prism, either basalt column or volcanic sandstone (float) | 4 |
10:23 | 4583 | 3.2 | 43 | Many fragment of rocks on the muddy sea floor (like debris flow) | |
10:27 | 4562 | 4.1 | 33 | Many fragment of rocks (like debris flow) | |
10:33 | 4560 | 3.8 | 45 | Outcrop (?) of slabby rock | |
10:34 | 4560 | 3.7 | 48 | Sample#5 put in box4 | 5A |
10:37 | 4560 | 3.9 | 50 | Talus | |
10:40 | 4560 | 4 | 46 | Sampling attempt | |
10:44 | 4559 | 4.1 | 44 | Sample was thrown away (not good) | |
10:45 | 4557 | 4.1 | 40 | Sample#5B put in box4 (probably outcrop) | 5B |
10:49 | 4543 | 5 | 44 | Angular hyaloclastite outcrop, in place | |
10:53 | 4543 | 4.1 | 42 | Sampling attempt | |
10:55 | 4543 | 3.9 | 47 | Sample#6 put in box5 (very large; definitely in place) | 6 |
10:59 | 4526 | 3.9 | 39 | Fragment of rocks flow | |
11:03 | 4470 | Layered outcrop: consolidated mud | |||
11:03 | 4479 | 2.9 | 43 | Sampling attempt. outcrop is mudstone which breaks up upon sampling. NOT slope mantling. | |
11:11 | 4457 | 3 | 37 | Muddy floor with chip of small rocks | |
11:14 | 4425 | 3.1 | 25 | Some chips of rocks on muddy floor | |
11:16 | 4425 | 1.4 | 29 | Blocks on muddy slope, but some may be in place. Sample#7A put in box6 | 7A |
11:19 | 4425 | 1.3 | 33 | Sample#7B and #7C put in box6 | 7B, 7C |
11:22 | 4418 | 4.2 | 40 | Some chips of rocks on muddy floor | |
11:30 | 4401 | 2.6 | 17 | Sample#8A put in box7. From massive, highly fractured outcrop. In place | 8A |
11:32 | 4401 | 2.5 | 17 | Sample#8Band #8C put in box7 | 8B, 8C |
11:36 | 4380 | 4.8 | 37 | Gravel on muddy floor | |
11:37 | 4373 | 6.9 | 39 | Rock fragment flow | |
11:43 | 4371 | 3 | 25 | Sample#9 put in box3. Similar outcrop to that of sample #8. In place | 9 |
11:46 | 4338 | 3 | 40 | Massive, breccia-like outcrop | |
11:48 | 4329 | 2.2 | 40 | Mud flow with fragments of rock | |
11:53 | 4310 | 43 | Slope parallel bedding | ||
11:55 | 4299 | 1.9 | 46 | Muddy floor | |
12:02 | 4291 | 3 | 36 | Approach possible pillow lava outcrop | |
12:04 | 4291 | 36 | Isolated pillow lava outcrop. Nice squeeze-out knobs. | ||
12:05 | 4291 | 1.7 | 37 | Attempt to sample pillows thwarted by apparently very thick Mn-coating | |
12:17 | 4288 | 3.2 | 53 | Looks like debris flow | |
12:25 | 4273 | 1.7 | 56 | Slope parallel, Mn-coated, indurate mud(?) | |
12:27 | 4269 | Sample attempt fails, everything is cemented in place | |||
12:31 | 4246 | 2 | 41 | Muddy floor | |
12:34 | 4240 | 1.1 | 41 | Muddy bottom with small chips of rock | |
12:39 | 4237 | 1.3 | 40 | Muddy bottom with small chips of rock | |
12:50 | 4241 | 5.5 | 138 | Change course to SE, head down side of ridge in order to make another upslope transect to the SE | |
12:55 | 4241 | 2.5 | 119 | Muddy bottom as we slowly descend slope. | |
13:10 | 4251 | 3.3 | 118 | Muddy bottom | |
13:15 | 4255 | 1.7 | 117 | Still descending along muddy slope | |
13:20 | 4261 | 2.5 | 122 | Muddy bottom | |
13:32 | 4287 | 3.2 | 119 | Muddy bottom | |
13:40 | 4334 | 3.6 | 128 | Muddy bottom | |
13:45 | 4342 | 4 | 124 | Muddy bottom with small chips of rock | |
13:50 | 4350 | 1.9 | 124 | Reach SE base of ridge. Change direction towards NE again to head back up slope | |
13:58 | 4342 | 0.4 | 55 | Rock fragments on muddy floor | |
14:02 | 4338 | 2.7 | 62 | Two parallel lines of high reflectivity appear ahead on sonar, we approach them | |
14:10 | 4324 | 3.6 | 22 | Outcrop of sedimentary(?), hyaloclastite(?) | |
14:14 | 4325 | 0.5 | 12 | Sample#10 put in box 8 | 10 |
14:20 | 4315 | 4.1 | 1 | Reach second high reflectivity area. Outcrop of sedimentary(?), hyaloclastite(?) rocks | |
14:25 | 4318 | 0.8 | 11 | Sample#11A put in box 1 | 11A |
14:30 | 4317 | 0.8 | 31 | Sample#11B put in box 1 | 11B |
14:37 | 4316 | 0.3 | 13 | Push core (yellow) in mud seds | PC 2 |
14:39 | 4316 | 1.5 | 354 | Leave the sea floor |