Leg1B (West to southwest Oahu)

K205: Waianae landslide (M. Coombs)
Aug. 29, 2001

Results of Dive K205

Date: August 29, 2001
Place: Farthest block of Waianae landslide, 54 km SW of Oahu
Observer: Michelle Coombs
Co-observers: Jim Moore, Dave Clague
Advisors: Eiichi Takahashi, Jiro Naka


Purpose of Dive K205
Waianae landslide is a slump-type landslide, consisting of several coherent blocks spaced 5-20 km apart, separated by transverse scarps (Moore et al. 1989). Only a small tongue of exposed hummocky terrain projects SW from the furthest slump block. The bulk of the slump is believed to consist of material from Waianae volcanoe, although the 130-km-wide slump may comprise material from Kaena ridge to the west and Penguin bank to the east (Moore et al., 1989). We proposed to dive on central portion of the steep toe of the slump (the outer face of the outermost block), which meets the seafloor abruptly at a depth of ~4700m.

The purposes of this dive were twofold. The first is to combine geologic observations made during the dive with single channel seismic data from Leg 1 to better understand the structure and emplacement of the Waianae landslide blocks. The second purpose was to collect samples from the block, in order to determine their lithology and composition, and possibly age. This deep site potentially provides access to very early Waianae volcano, and thus may provide information regarding the geochemical and geologic evolution of Waianae, in much the same way that volcaniclastic rocks from the Hilina slump are derived from early Kilauea (e.g., Lipman et al. 2001). If the parallel to Hilina/Kilauea holds true, the rocks collected during this dive may be from the alkalic stage of the volcano's history, and thus dateable. The results of this dive may be used in conjunction with a dive on an upper slump block (158?28'10" W, 21?23'15", -2560 to -1920 m), performed earlier this summer by Dave Clague at MBARI, to provide a more complete picture of the evolution of Waianae.

Dive Plan
The dive track was planned to ascend the outer scarp face of the outer block from Waianae landslide, 54 km SW of Oahu. This block is BLANK m high at its peak, which descends to a flat bench at approximately 4200 m depth. Our dive ascended from the base of the block and nearly reached the basin. Dive site location was severely limited due to the presence of numerous telecomm cables in the area. At least 18 cables run westward from Oahu in this region, many of which lie over steep parts of the outward block. Within the small acceptable area available to us, we selected a portion of block's outer scarp with ~400 m vertical rise and ~21? slope. JAMSTEC regulations for the use of the ROV require that the dive site be the distance of one water depth from cables. The base of the block of interest is ~4700m. Therefore, the dive track was kept 4.7 to 4.2 km away from cables.

Dive Summary
We encountered only volcaniclastic rock outcrops during the dive, with the exception of one possible pillow lava outcrop near the top of the ridge (see below). Kaiko landed on a muddy slope littered with small loose rock chips; a push core was taken in this sediment. The first 80 m of upslope travel encountered mud and sand covered slopes with increasing amounts of blocks, some grouped to form vague outcrop-like areas. Eight samples at four locations were sampled during this portion of the dive. They range from volcanic breccias to mudstone.
At a depth of 4557 m, we encountered the first probable outcrop. At 4543, coherent outcrop was seen and sampled (sample K205-06). From this depth to about 4300m, jointed and fractured outcrop alternated with talus.
Above this depth, slope-mantling sediment predominated. In addition, rocks were severely cemented with MnO coating. In places, the slope mantle itself was indurated, and coated with ~2mm of MnO. Along this upper section, one significant outcrop was encountered, at 4291m. This was a ~30 m long band of pillow lava. The outcrop differed significantly from those further down: its appearance was lobate, with several apparent squeeze-out buds at the ends of larger pillows. Unfortunately, we were not able to sample at this outcrop due to exteme Mn-cementing. This was the only possible lava outcrop encountered during the dive.
Soon after, at 4237 m, the terrain flattened as we reached the top of the ridge. Because we had reached this position earlier than expected (12:39), and the remainder of the planned course covered flat ground, we changed course to the SE, in order to make another SE ascent approximately 500 SE. At the end of this second ascent, two high-reflectivity ridges appeared on the sonar. Both were outcrops of mudstone containing clasts of lithified volcanic breccia (sample sites 10 and 11). It was difficult to tell if these two outcrops contained "primary" outcrop or indurated slope mantle. Finally, a push core was taken in muddy sediment, and then the dive ended at 14:39 at a depth of 4316m.

Geologic observations
1) As mentioned above, all samples are volcaniclastic in origin. The majority are well-lithified volcanic breccias. These breccias contain clasts of basalt as well as clasts of older breccia and sandstone.
At least some of the collected samples appear to be clasts in younger, unlithified breccias. It is difficult to determine whether this is the case, or whether the samples were taken from fractured and jointed rock. If they were unconsolidated breccias, the amount of matrix was very low. The emplacement history of these samples is obvious complex, recording as many as three generation of sedimentation and erosion.

2) The rock outcrop on the main portion of the scarp face is highly fractured and undergoing continuous sloughing, as evidenced by relatively sediment-free talus at the base of the steeper outcrops. Whether this is simply a function of slope steepness, or whether it indicates active deformation, is unclear. As the slope decreased towards the top of the dive, MnO coating apparently increased in thickness, as rocks became extremely cemented. Slope mantling material also bore MnO coating, indicating that very little erosion (or sedimentation) was occurring there.

3) The apparent presence of pillow basalt near the top of the scarp is somewhat puzzling, as volcaniclastic rocks are in place above and below the outcrop. It is unfortunate that we wre not able to sample the pillows.

Video Highlights

Time Depth (m) Feature
10:19 4586 Talus slope. Large rectangular block of volcaniclastic sandstone sampled here (K205-04). This is the largest sample ever obtained by Kaiko (33 kg).
10:26 Tongues of thinly mantled talus, shed from outcrops just above. View upwards shows coarser, proximal talus, perhaps in-place outcrop as well.
10:32-10:36 4560 First definite outcrop. Beds (fracture planes?) dip into slope, maybe slightly to the NW at appx. 20?. Outcrop is fractured and contains alternating layers of coherent and more fractured rock on 10s cms scale. Sample K205-05 taken here.
10:48-10:55 4543 Massive outcrop. Highly fractured. No discernible bedding or jointing planes. Sample K205-06 taken here.
11:04-11:07 4479 Large outcrop of bedded sediments. Sub-horizontal bedding planes. Sampling attempt results in crushing the rock; close-up shows that the layered outcrop consists of mudstones. This does not appear to be slope-mantle. Mn-covered sediment does appear to mantle the top of the outcrop as well.
11:15-11:20 4425 Approach group of blocks on muddy slope. Though it is difficult to tell if they are in place, sampling attempt shows that they are well-cemented. Sample site #7. The sampled clasts are breccia, is the deposit here an unlithified breccia also?
11:33 4372 Massive outcrop, highly fractured. Samples K205-8a-c taken.
11:48-11:49 4331 Slumped slabs of slope-parallel, bedded material. Bedding at 10s cm, seemingly well-indurated.
12:03-12:07 4291 Pillow lava outcrop. Showed as isolated, ~30 m long ridge on sonar. Nice squeeze-out knobs. Could not sample due to Mn-cement.
14:10-14:14 4324 Bedded outcrop. Difficult to tell if this is slope mantle or in-place outcrop, but some horizontal bedding is present. Sample site 10.
14:20-14:25 4315 Bedded outcrop, more extensive than the last one, maybe 1 m high. Again, difficult to tell if this is slope mantle or in-place outcrop, but it is massive enough to appear in-place. Sample site 11.

Reference
Lipman, PW, Sisson TW, Ui T, Naka J, Smith JR, 2001. Ancestral submarine growth of Kilauea volcano and instability of its south flank. In AGU Monograph, in press.
Moore JG, Clague DA, Holcomb RT, Lipman PW, Normark WR, Torresan ME, 1989. Prodigious submarine landslides on the Hawaiian ridge. Jour Geophys Res 94, 17465-17484.

Dive log

Time Depth (m) Altitude (m) heading (degree) Narrative
9:33 4524 125.7 95 Kaiko released from launcher
9:44 4655 89 On bottom, mud floor
9:47 4655 0.1 87 Push core (green) in mud seds PC 1
9:50 4649 1.9 39 Rock chips on mud seafloor
9:54 4637 1.2 45 Sample#1A,B, put in box2 (loose talus) 1A, 1B
9:56 4637 1.1 43 Sample#1C put in box2 (loose talus) 1C
9:58 4630 1.1 37 Gravelly mud bottom
10:05 4612 1.7 32 Sample#2(large) put in box2 (loose talus). Probably had not moved far downslope 2
10:07 4610 3.7 75 Sampling attempt
10:09 4611 2 30 Sample#3A put in box3 (loose talus) 3A
10:12 4611 1.9 21 Sample#3B put in box3 (loose talus) 3B
10:13 4611 1.8 20 Sample was thrown away (too large). Fragments fall into several basket compartments, call fragments 3C 3C
10:16 4599 3.6 36 Many fragment of rocks on the muddy sea floor
10:19 4586 3.6 42 Sample#4 put in box 8 and 9. #4 is very large rectangular prism, either basalt column or volcanic sandstone (float) 4
10:23 4583 3.2 43 Many fragment of rocks on the muddy sea floor (like debris flow)
10:27 4562 4.1 33 Many fragment of rocks (like debris flow)
10:33 4560 3.8 45 Outcrop (?) of slabby rock
10:34 4560 3.7 48 Sample#5 put in box4 5A
10:37 4560 3.9 50 Talus
10:40 4560 4 46 Sampling attempt
10:44 4559 4.1 44 Sample was thrown away (not good)
10:45 4557 4.1 40 Sample#5B put in box4 (probably outcrop) 5B
10:49 4543 5 44 Angular hyaloclastite outcrop, in place
10:53 4543 4.1 42 Sampling attempt
10:55 4543 3.9 47 Sample#6 put in box5 (very large; definitely in place) 6
10:59 4526 3.9 39 Fragment of rocks flow
11:03 4470 Layered outcrop: consolidated mud
11:03 4479 2.9 43 Sampling attempt. outcrop is mudstone which breaks up upon sampling. NOT slope mantling.
11:11 4457 3 37 Muddy floor with chip of small rocks
11:14 4425 3.1 25 Some chips of rocks on muddy floor
11:16 4425 1.4 29 Blocks on muddy slope, but some may be in place. Sample#7A put in box6 7A
11:19 4425 1.3 33 Sample#7B and #7C put in box6 7B, 7C
11:22 4418 4.2 40 Some chips of rocks on muddy floor
11:30 4401 2.6 17 Sample#8A put in box7. From massive, highly fractured outcrop. In place 8A
11:32 4401 2.5 17 Sample#8Band #8C put in box7 8B, 8C
11:36 4380 4.8 37 Gravel on muddy floor
11:37 4373 6.9 39 Rock fragment flow
11:43 4371 3 25 Sample#9 put in box3. Similar outcrop to that of sample #8. In place 9
11:46 4338 3 40 Massive, breccia-like outcrop
11:48 4329 2.2 40 Mud flow with fragments of rock
11:53 4310 43 Slope parallel bedding
11:55 4299 1.9 46 Muddy floor
12:02 4291 3 36 Approach possible pillow lava outcrop
12:04 4291 36 Isolated pillow lava outcrop. Nice squeeze-out knobs.
12:05 4291 1.7 37 Attempt to sample pillows thwarted by apparently very thick Mn-coating
12:17 4288 3.2 53 Looks like debris flow
12:25 4273 1.7 56 Slope parallel, Mn-coated, indurate mud(?)
12:27 4269 Sample attempt fails, everything is cemented in place
12:31 4246 2 41 Muddy floor
12:34 4240 1.1 41 Muddy bottom with small chips of rock
12:39 4237 1.3 40 Muddy bottom with small chips of rock
12:50 4241 5.5 138 Change course to SE, head down side of ridge in order to make another upslope transect to the SE
12:55 4241 2.5 119 Muddy bottom as we slowly descend slope.
13:10 4251 3.3 118 Muddy bottom
13:15 4255 1.7 117 Still descending along muddy slope
13:20 4261 2.5 122 Muddy bottom
13:32 4287 3.2 119 Muddy bottom
13:40 4334 3.6 128 Muddy bottom
13:45 4342 4 124 Muddy bottom with small chips of rock
13:50 4350 1.9 124 Reach SE base of ridge. Change direction towards NE again to head back up slope
13:58 4342 0.4 55 Rock fragments on muddy floor
14:02 4338 2.7 62 Two parallel lines of high reflectivity appear ahead on sonar, we approach them
14:10 4324 3.6 22 Outcrop of sedimentary(?), hyaloclastite(?)
14:14 4325 0.5 12 Sample#10 put in box 8 10
14:20 4315 4.1 1 Reach second high reflectivity area. Outcrop of sedimentary(?), hyaloclastite(?) rocks
14:25 4318 0.8 11 Sample#11A put in box 1 11A
14:30 4317 0.8 31 Sample#11B put in box 1 11B
14:37 4316 0.3 13 Push core (yellow) in mud seds PC 2
14:39 4316 1.5 354 Leave the sea floor

home