USGS - science for a changing world

Open-File Report 02-99

Magnetic Property Data

Measurements of rock magnetic susceptibility, remanent polarity, or both, were completed at 35 sites within the study area, of which 20 are susceptibility only. The results of these measurements are presented in tabular form in Table 1 and the distribution of sites is shown on the plate 1. Magnetic susceptibility was measured using a Sapphire Instruments model SI-1 equipped with a 20x20 cm flat field coil designed for measurements on outcrops. Remanent magnetic polarities were measured using several fluxgate magnetometers made by California Instruments (model 70 magnetometer). The use of brand names in this document is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement. For the polarity measurements, oriented hand samples of 0.5 to 5 kg mass were used. Care was taken in collection of oriented samples to sample from areas which appeared to be protected from lightning strikes. Most specimens were measured for polarity at least twice to minimize errors in direction of polarization. Directions of magnetization determined for hand samples are probably accurate to about ±10o in any plane, but demagnetization effects for any given specimen due to sample shape and heterogeneous distribution of magnetic minerals may increase the uncertainty. In general, the susceptibility measurements are probably accurate to about ±1.0¥10-6 cgs/cc (cubic centimeter) or better, with a standard deviation of repeated measurements of about 0.4% of the mean susceptibility (Gettings and others, 1994). The field coil for the SI-1 measures the average susceptibility for a 20 by 20 cm area to a depth of about 15 cm, thus the measurements sample about a 6000 cc volume. Most outcrops measured were about 2 by 3 m in size with the five sample spots essentially randomly distributed over the outcrop. Site latitude, longitude, and altitude were obtained from Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements or from 1:24,000 scale topographic maps. The GPS horizontal locations are accurate to about ±10m, and the GPS altitudes are probably accurate to ±20m. For locations from maps, the horizontal uncertainty is about ±20m, and vertical uncertainty is about ±7m.

In this report, the terminology "reversely polarized" or similar terms will be used to describe magnetization directions which are other than in the direction of the present day magnetic (induction) field. This includes directions which are other than anti-parallel to the present day field, such as in a magnetic east or west direction. Rock magnetization directions that are along or nearly along the present day field direction will be termed "normally polarized" or with a similar term. The measurements show that rocks of several ages are reversely polarized, and this is borne out by examination of the aeromagnetic map (pl. 2). The Squaw Gulch granite batholith (Drewes, 1971; unit Jg at sites 4 and 5 on pl. 1; area around no. 7 on pl. 2) of Jurassic age is reversely polarized and forms the basement for much of the central part of the map area. Upper Cretaceous dacite flows and tuffs of the lower member of the Salero Formation (Drewes, 1971; unit Krt on pl. 1 at site 3; area around no. 8 on pl. 2) are reversed while the upper welded tuff member is normally polarized (pl. 1 at site no. 2). The upper Cretaceous Josephine Canyon diorite (Drewes, 1971; Kj on pl. 1 at site 6; no. 2 on pl. 2) is younger (about 65 Ma) and is normally polarized. This rock has a strong remanent magnetization as well as a large susceptibility and is responsible for many of the strong positive magnetic anomalies in the study area. The Gringo Gulch pluton (Drewes, 1971; unit TKg on pl. 1 at sites 8-10; no. 11 on pl. 2) is slightly younger (Lower Paleocene, Vugteveen and others, 1981) and is normally polarized, but contains a reversely polarized late phase microgranodiorite (also reported in Hagstrum, 1994). Both the Josephine Canyon diorite and the Gringo Gulch pluton are part of the Laramide magmatic episode that resulted in many diorite and granodiorite intrusions in southeast Arizona (Dickinson, 1989). Many of these intrusions are associated with the porphyry copper deposits of southeast Arizona

Table 1. Measured magnetic susceptibility and remanent magnetic polarity at selected sites.

[Map unit symbols and formation names refer to units on geologic maps by Drewes (1971, 1980) and Simons (1974). UTM northing and easting are Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates for zone 12N for the sample site. N is the number of susceptibility measurements on different areas of the outcrop at each site. Abbreviations in Remanent Polarity describe directions very different from normal or reversed, for example, "flat90dEoMN" means "flat (horizontal) 90 degrees east of magnetic north"; na, not available. Sample ID refers to the sample location plotted on Plate 1. The last 20 sites in the table were measured only for susceptibility and the maximum and minimum values are given in addition to mean and standard deviation. The instrument used for these sites was a KT-6 Kappa meter, with similar accuracy and precision to the SI-1 described in the text but measuring a smaller volume of rock, about 500 cc.]

 

Map unit

Lithology

UTM Easting (m)

UTM Northing (m)

Altitude
(ft)

Mean magnetic
Susceptibility
K, cgs/cc

Standard
deviation

N

Remanent
Polarity
Normal/
Reversed

Remanent
Intensity
weak moderate
strong

Sample ID

Tgd_a

agglomerate

501154e

3505133n

3665f

2.99e-4

1.88e-4

15

N

weak

1

Ksw

Salero welded tuff

505871e

3501793n

4265f

7.80e-4

1.16e-4

5

N(flat90dEoMN)

moderate

2

Kse

Salero megabreccia

506995e

3501570n

4386f

1.39e-5

1.74e-6

5

R(flat90dWoMN)

very weak

3

Js

Squaw Gulch granite

516383e

3493614n

4775f

9.23e-4

1.02e-4

5

R(steepWoMN)

moderate

4

Js

Squaw Gulch granite

515315e

3493422n

4805f

5.74e-4

4.30e-5

5

R(steepWoMN)

moderate

5

Kj

Josephine Canyon diorite

515652e

3492991n

4791f

2.404e-3

2.26e-4

5

N(60dEoMN)

strong

6

Tgut

Gringo Volcanics rhyolite tuff

521882e

3493885n

4433f

7.14e-6

2.52e-5

5

na

na

7

Tgm

micrograndiorite

520994e

3494288n

4627f

2.75e-3

1.13e-4

5

R

weak/

moderate

8

Tgm

micrograndiorite

520991e

3494066n

4453f

3.63e-3

1.60e-4

5

R

strong

9

Tgdp

diorite porphyry

521085e

3493771n

4539f

2.13e-3

3.24e-4

5

N(flat)

strong

10

Kbm_w

Bathtub rhyolite welded tuff

521393e

3493766n

4684f

9.72e-6

2.21e-6

5

R(upEoMS)

moderate

11

Kbm

Bathtub hornblende dacite

521425e

3494728n

4785f

1.13e-3

9.18e-5

5

?

?

12

Kbm

Bathtub gray tuff breccia

521899e

3494595n

4439f

5.47e-4

7.80e-5

5

?

?

13

Trp

Piper Gulch

monzonite

516910e

3498422n

5435f

2.09e-3

3.53e-4

5

?

?

14

Klp

Quartz latite porphyry

518580e

3497900n

4721f

1.26e-5

3.02e-6

5

?

?

15

Map
unit
Lithology
UTM
Easting
(m
UTM
Northing
(m
Altitude
(ft)
Mean magnetic
Susceptibility
K, cgs/cc
Standard
deviation
N
Minimum
Maximum
Sample ID

Tuc

Nogales conglomerate

479901e

3513797n

3595f

1.05e-04

2.40e-05

6

6.21e-05

1.33e-04

16

Kr

Rhyodacite welded tuff

478388e

3519766n

3990f

8.22e-06

3.25e-06

6

3.18e-06

1.19e-05

17

Kr

Rhyodacite welded tuff

478288e

3519813n

4020f

5.41e-06

3.79e-06

5

7.96e-07

1.11e-05

18

Kr

Andesite tuff breccia

478600e

3521805n

4115f

1.58e-05

1.84e-06

6

1.35e-05

1.83e-05

19

Kr

Lithic tuff breccia

478624e

3521954n

4127f

1.17e-05

3.25e-06

6

7.16e-06

1.51e-05

20

Kr

Lithic tuff breccia

478613e

3522026n

4140f

1.31e-05

2.79e-06

6

9.55e-06

1.67e-05

21

Kr

Andesite lava block in bx

478613e

3522026n

4140f

2.05e-05

1.38e-05

7

5.57e-06

3.98e-05

22

Js?

Squaw Gulch granite

507216e

3504405n

4785f

1.04e-03

6.38e-04

6

1.84e-04

1.87e-03

23

Kse

Salero megabreccia

507216e

3504395n

4785f

2.47e-05

7.85e-06

4

1.59e-05

3.34e-05

24

Kse

Salero megabreccia

507216e

3504400n

4785f

4.64e-05

3.87e-05

4

2.47e-05

1.04e-04

25

Kjd?

Diabase dike

507216e

3504401n

4785f

7.33e-04

0.00e+00

1

7.33e-04

7.33e-04

26

Js?

Squaw Gulch granite

507216e

3504410n

4785f

2.27e-04

1.37e-04

4

5.97e-05

3.41e-04

27

Keqf?

Elephant Head quartz monzonite, fine grained dike

509690e

3503690n

5922f

2.85e-03

4.42e-04

6

2.31e-03

3.33e-03

28

Keqc

Elephant Head quartz monzonite

509690e

3503690n

5922f

3.05e-03

5.95e-04

5

2.28e-03

3.94e-03

29

Keqc

Elephant Head quartz monzonite

509766e

3503855n

6027f

3.91e-04

5.30e-05

5

3.19e-04

4.67e-04

30

Kj

Josephine Canyon diorite (float)

510099e

3504022n

6098f

5.16e-04

0.00e+00

1

5.16e-04

5.16e-04

31

Kj

Josephine Canyon diorite

510099e

3504022n

6098f

2.01e-04

6.27e-05

5

1.33e-04

2.75e-04

32

Kj

Josephine Canyon diorite

510099e

3504012n

6098f

1.65e-04

8.39e-05

3

7.24e-05

2.36e-04

33

Keqc

Elephant Head quartz monzonite

509105e

3504011n

5710f

5.26e-04

1.06e-04

5

3.90e-04

6.52e-04

34

Keqf?

Elephant Head quartz monzonite, fine grained dike

509105e

3504011n

5710f

1.96e-03

2.63e-04

5

1.70e-03

2.35e-03

35

| Previous Section | Next Section |

 

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2002/0099/magprop.html
Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 07-Dec-2016 19:25:52 EST