Avoidance behavior of ruffe exposed to selected formulations of piscicides

Journal of Great Lakes Research
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

Ruffe were introduced into Duluth Harbor, Minnesota in the early 1980s, probably by release of ballast water from sea-going freighters. Since then, it has become the most abundant species in the fish community. The sensitivity of ruffe to a number of piscicides has been demonstrated, however, the feasibility of using piscicides to control populations depends on whether ruffe can detect piscicides and move to untreated water. We used a two-choice preference testing system to evaluate avoidance or attraction reactions of ruffe during exposures to the lampricides TFM and bayluscide and the general fish toxicants rotenone and antimycin. We used a second testing system to evaluate the potential for benthic ruffe to move vertically in the water column to avoid piscicides dissolving from experimental bottom-release formulations of bayluscide and antimycin. Near-lethal concentrations of TFM and rotenone tended to repel ruffe. Antimycin and bayluscide did not seem to repel ruffe in the avoidance chamber, but bottom-release formulations (antimycin granules—0.25% a.i. and bayluscide granules—3.2% a.i.) did cause increased swimming and surfacing activity among ruffe in column tests. We conclude that TFM and rotenone could be used to treat entire bodies of water, while bottom-release formulations of antimycin and bayluscide may have more application for treating localized concentrations of ruffe.

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Avoidance behavior of ruffe exposed to selected formulations of piscicides
Series title Journal of Great Lakes Research
DOI 10.1016/S0380-1330(98)70825-1
Volume 24
Issue 2
Year Published 1998
Language English
Publisher Elsevier
Contributing office(s) Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
Description 8 p.
First page 343
Last page 350
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details