The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations

Fisheries
By:

Links

Abstract

The current inconsistency over the use of single vs. double -i endings for singular masculine scientific patronyms in official lists of scientific names of fishes causes needless confusion and labor. Taxonomists once preferred rules for Latinization calling for double -i endings, but current rules suggest single -i endings. Recent rulings by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature make it impossible to produce uniformity in this area. It is suggested that the Committee on Names of Fishes submit a petition to the Commission that modifies the present rules to allow the use of single -i endings in most cases and thus conform with current literature and the opinions of most ichthyologists.

Suggested Citation

Jennings, M., 1982, The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations: Fisheries, v. 7, no. 5, p. 9-10, https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1982)007<0009:TNEOSV>2.0.CO;2.

ISSN: 1548-8446 (online)

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations
Series title Fisheries
DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(1982)007<0009:TNEOSV>2.0.CO;2
Volume 7
Issue 5
Year Published 1982
Language English
Publisher Wiley
Contributing office(s) Western Ecological Research Center
Description 2 p.
First page 9
Last page 10
Additional publication details