The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
The current inconsistency over the use of single vs. double -i endings for singular masculine scientific patronyms in official lists of scientific names of fishes causes needless confusion and labor. Taxonomists once preferred rules for Latinization calling for double -i endings, but current rules suggest single -i endings. Recent rulings by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature make it impossible to produce uniformity in this area. It is suggested that the Committee on Names of Fishes submit a petition to the Commission that modifies the present rules to allow the use of single -i endings in most cases and thus conform with current literature and the opinions of most ichthyologists.
Publication type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
Title | The nomenclatural enigma of single versus double -i endings for scientific patronyms emended to represent a man's name: A comment and some considerations |
Series title | Fisheries |
DOI | 10.1577/1548-8446(1982)007<0009:TNEOSV>2.0.CO;2 |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 5 |
Year Published | 1982 |
Language | English |
Publisher | Wiley |
Contributing office(s) | Western Ecological Research Center |
Description | 2 p. |
First page | 9 |
Last page | 10 |
Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |