A comparison of triploid induction validation techniques

Progressive Fish-Culturist
By: , and 

Metrics

19
Crossref references
Web analytics dashboard Metrics definitions

Links

Abstract

Triploidy induction is a technique that allows genetic manipulation of chromosome number to control reproduction and potentially create faster‐growing animals; however, most methods for inducing polyploidy are not 100% effective. Using sunshine bass (white bass Morone chrysops ♀ × striped bass M. saxatilis ♂) as a model, we cross‐validated the most common verification techniques: DNA staining and fluorescence quantification with a flow cytometer, erythrocyte nuclear volume with a Coulter counter particle size analyzer, silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), and cytological karyotyping. Results indicated that the electronic techniques of particle size analysis and flow cytometry were the simplest and quickest methods of validation. The major drawback of both electronic ploidy determination methods is the cost of the equipment required for analysis. Cytological karyotyping was the most accurate method for determining polyploidy because actual chromosome numbers were determined. It was also the most time‐consuming, tedious, and frustrating of the techniques, which reduces its applicability in mass screening of fish. Silver staining was the least expensive technique used for verifying a nominal number of fish, but it was also the most suspect because the NORs were sometimes difficult to detect, and there were conflicting results in older fish. All techniques demand a certain technical competence that can either be self‐taught or requires extramural training.

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title A comparison of triploid induction validation techniques
Series title Progressive Fish-Culturist
DOI 10.1577/1548-8640(1998)060%3C0221:ACOTIV%3E2.0.CO;2
Volume 60
Issue 3
Year Published 1998
Language English
Publisher Oxford Academic
Contributing office(s) Leetown Science Center
Description 6 p.
First page 221
Last page 226
Additional publication details