thumbnail

Use of survey data to define regional and local priorities for management on National Wildlife Refuges

Conference held March 20-24, 2002, Asilomar, California PDF on file: 6521_Sauer.pdf
By: , , , , and 
Edited by: C. John Ralph and Terrell D. Rich

Links

Abstract

National Wildlife Refuges must manage habitats to support a variety of species that often have conflicting needs. To make reasonable management decisions, managers must know what species are priorities for their refuges and the relative importance of the species. Unfortunately, species priorities are often set regionally, but refuges must develop local priorities that reconcile regional priorities with constraints imposed by refuge location and local management options. Some species cannot be managed on certain refuges, and the relative benefit of management to regional populations of species can vary greatly among refuges. We describe a process of 'stepping down' regional priorities to local priorities for bird species of management interest. We define three primary scales of management interest: regional (at which overall priority species are set); 'Sepik Blocks' (30 min blocks of latitude and longitude, which provide a landscape level context for a refuge); and the refuge. Regional surveys, such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey, provide information that can be summarized at regional and Sepik Block scales, permitting regional priorities to be focused to landscapes near refuges. However, refuges manage habitats, and managers need information about how the habitat management is likely to collectively influence the priority species. The value of the refuge for a species is also influenced by the availability of habitats within refuges and the relative amounts of those habitats at each scale. We use remotely-sensed data to assess proportions of habitats at the three geographic scales. These data provide many possible approaches for developing local priorities for management. Once these are defined, managers can use the priorities, in conjunction with predictions of the consequences of management for each species, to assess the overall benefit of alternative management actions for the priority species.

Suggested Citation

Sauer, J., Casey, J.F., Laskowski, H., Taylor, J., Fallon, J., 2005, Use of survey data to define regional and local priorities for management on National Wildlife Refuges, chap. of Bird Conservation Implementation and Integration in the Americas: Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference 2002, p. 1224-1231.

Publication type Book chapter
Publication Subtype Book Chapter
Title Use of survey data to define regional and local priorities for management on National Wildlife Refuges
Year Published 2005
Language English
Publisher U. S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station
Publisher location Albany, California
Contributing office(s) Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
Description 2 volumes: xiv, 1296
Larger Work Type Book
Larger Work Subtype Other Government Series
Larger Work Title Bird Conservation Implementation and Integration in the Americas: Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference 2002
First page 1224
Last page 1231
Additional publication details