Methods for measuring discharge under ice cover
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
By: J.F. Walker
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Streamflow-velocity adjustment coefficients at several common vertical positions varied significantly from station to station and from measurement to measurement at some stations. The ice-cover roughness was the primary factor affecting the profiles at most stations. Several discharge-measurement procedures were developed using one-half of the data collected, and the accuracy of the procedures were evaluated using the other half of the data. The relative error for each method was computed by comparing estimated discharge to discharge computed using complete vertical-profile information. Two procedures - a one-point method with velocity measured at 0.4D (where D is the effective depth of flow) using a site-specific adjustment coefficient and a two-point method using velocity measured at 0.4D and 0.8D - were found to be the most accurate in terms of bias and root-mean-squared error. -from Author
Suggested Citation
Walker, J., 1994, Methods for measuring discharge under ice cover: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, v. 120, no. 11, p. 1327-1336, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:11(1327).
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | Methods for measuring discharge under ice cover |
| Series title | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering |
| DOI | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1994)120:11(1327) |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Year Published | 1994 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | ASCE |
| Larger Work Type | Article |
| Larger Work Subtype | Journal Article |
| Larger Work Title | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering |
| First page | 1327 |
| Last page | 1336 |