Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

Numerical sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) for freshwater ecosystems have previously been developed using a variety of approaches. Each approach has certain advantages and limitations which influence their application in the sediment quality assessment process. In an effort to focus on the agreement among these various published SQGs, consensus-based SQGs were developed for 28 chemicals of concern in freshwater sediments (i.e., metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and pesticides). For each contaminant of concern, two SQGs were developed from the published SQGs, including a threshold effect concentration (TEC) and a probable effect concentration (PEC). The resultant SQGs for each chemical were evaluated for reliability using matching sediment chemistry and toxicity data from field studies conducted throughout the United States. The results of this evaluation indicated that most of the TECs (i.e., 21 of 28) provide an accurate basis for predicting the absence of sediment toxicity. Similarly, most of the PECs (i.e., 16 of 28) provide an accurate basis for predicting sediment toxicity. Mean PEC quotients were calculated to evaluate the combined effects of multiple contaminants in sediment. Results of the evaluation indicate that the incidence of toxicity is highly correlated to the mean PEC quotient (R2= 0.98 for 347 samples). It was concluded that the consensus-based SQGs provide a reliable basis for assessing sediment quality conditions in freshwater ecosystems.

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems
Series title Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
DOI 10.1007/s002440010075
Volume 39
Issue 1
Year Published 2000
Language English
Publisher Springer
Contributing office(s) Columbia Environmental Research Center
Description 12 p.
First page 20
Last page 31
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details