Comparability and accuracy of fluvial-sediment data - A view from the U.S. Geological Survey
By: J. R. Gray, G.D. Glysson, and D. S. Mueller
Edited by: Wahl T.L.Pugh C.A.Oberg K.A.Vermeyen T.B.Wahl T.L.Pugh C.A.Oberg K.A.Vermeyen T.B.
Links
- The Publications Warehouse does not have links to digital versions of this publication at this time
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
The quality of historical fluvial-sediment data cannot be taken for granted, based on a review of upper Colorado River basin suspended-sediment discharges, and on an evaluation of the reliability of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) data. Additionally, the quality of future fluvial-sediment data are not assured. Sediment-surrogate technologies, including those that operate on acoustic, laser, bulk optic, digital optic, or pressure differential principles, are being used with increasing frequency to measure in-stream and (or) laboratory fluvial-sediment characteristics. Data from sediment-surrogate technologies may yield results that differ significantly from those obtained by traditional methods for the same sedimentary conditions. Development of national sediment data-quality criteria and rigorous comparisons of data derived from sediment-surrogate technologies to those obtained by traditional techniques will minimize the potential for future fluvial-sediment data-quality concerns.
| Publication type | Conference Paper |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Conference Paper |
| Title | Comparability and accuracy of fluvial-sediment data - A view from the U.S. Geological Survey |
| ISBN | 0784406553 |
| Year Published | 2002 |
| Language | English |
| Larger Work Title | Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods |
| First page | 919 |
| Last page | 924 |
| Conference Title | Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods 2002 |
| Conference Location | Estes Park, CO |
| Conference Date | 28 July 2002 through 1 August 2002 |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |