Accuracy of estimating wolf summer territories by daytime locations
American Midland Naturalist
Links
- More Information:
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
We used locations of 6 wolves (Canis lupus) in Minnesota from Global Positioning System (GPS) collars to compare day-versus-night locations to estimate territory size and location during summer. We employed both minimum convex polygon (MCP) and fixed kernel (FK) methods. We used two methods to partition GPS locations for day-versus-night home-range comparisons: (1) daytime = 0800–2000 h; nighttime = 2000–0800 h; and (2) sunup versus sundown. Regardless of location-partitioning method, mean area of daytime MCPs did not differ significantly from nighttime MCPs. Similarly, mean area of daytime FKs (95% probability contour) were not significantly different from nightime FKs. FK core use areas (50% probability contour) did not differ between daytime and nighttime nor between sunup and sundown locations. We conclude that in areas similar to our study area day-only locations are adequate for describing the location, extent and core use areas of summer wolf territories by both MCP and FK methods.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | Accuracy of estimating wolf summer territories by daytime locations |
| Series title | American Midland Naturalist |
| DOI | 10.1674/0003-0031-165.2.436 |
| Volume | 165 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Year Published | 2011 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | University of Notre Dame |
| Publisher location | Notre Dame, IN |
| Contributing office(s) | Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center |
| Description | 10 p. |
| Larger Work Type | Article |
| Larger Work Subtype | Journal Article |
| Larger Work Title | American Midland Naturalist |
| First page | 436 |
| Last page | 445 |
| Country | United States |
| State | Minnesota |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |