Using mark-recapture models to estimate survival from telemetry data: Chapter 9.2
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Larger Work: Telemetry techniques: A user guide for fisheries research
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Analyzing telemetry data within a mark–recapture framework is a powerful approach for estimating demographic parameters (e.g., survival and movement probabilities) that might otherwise be difficult to measure. Yet many studies using telemetry techniques focus on fish behavior and fail to recognize the potential of telemetry data to provide information about fish survival. The sophistication of both mark–recapture modeling and telemetry has dramatically improved since the 1980s, largely due to technological advancements in computing power (for mark–recapture models) and electronic components (for telemetry). Such advances now allow mark–recapture models to take advantage of the detailed information that telemetry techniques can provide.
The key feature of mark–recapture models is simultaneous estimation of detection and survival probabilities. With telemetry, a “capture” event consists of detecting a given tag code one or more times at a specific location or time. By contrast, in some studies interest may focus on the probability of detecting a single tag transmission (see Sections 7.2 and 9.1). Compared to conventional mark and recapture methods, telemetry methods often have greater detection probabilities due to large detection ranges, increased “effort” (i.e., continuous monitoring with autonomous receivers), and ability to simultaneously monitor multiple locations. Nonetheless, perfect detectability is rare in telemetry studies because both random (e.g., from electronic noise) and nonrandom processes (e.g., receiver loses power temporarily) can allow a fish to pass a receiver undetected. Failure to account for imperfect detection can lead to serious bias in survival estimates. When using telemetry to estimate survival, it is therefore critical to explicitly estimate detection probabilities to ensure unbiased estimates of survival (see Section 7.2). Fortunately, using telemetry techniques and mark–recapture models together yields the best of both worlds: Well-designed telemetry systems deliver high detection probabilities that result in precise estimates from small sample sizes. Mark–recapture models ensure estimates of the demographic parameters are unbiased with respect to the detection process.
Publication type | Book chapter |
---|---|
Publication Subtype | Book Chapter |
Title | Using mark-recapture models to estimate survival from telemetry data: Chapter 9.2 |
DOI | 10.47886/9781934874264.ch19 |
Year Published | 2012 |
Language | English |
Publisher | American Fisheries Society |
Publisher location | Bethesda, MD |
Contributing office(s) | Great Lakes Science Center, Leetown Science Center, Western Fisheries Research Center |
Description | 23 p. |
Larger Work Type | Book |
Larger Work Subtype | Monograph |
Larger Work Title | Telemetry techniques: A user guide for fisheries research |
First page | 453 |
Last page | 475 |
Online Only (Y/N) | N |
Additional Online Files (Y/N) | N |
Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |