Disparate stakeholder management: the case of elk and bison feeding in southern Greater Yellowstone
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
For resource decisions to make the most possible progress toward achieving agency mandates, managers must work with stakeholders and may need to at least partially accommodate some of their key underlying interests. To accommodate stakeholder interests, while also substantively working toward fulfilling legal mandates, managers must understand the sociopolitical factors that influence the decision-making process. We coin the phrase disparate stakeholder management (DSM) to describe situations with disparate stakeholders and disparate management solutions. A DSM approach (DSMA) requires decision makers to combine concepts from many sciences, thus releasing them from disciplinary bonds that often constrain innovation and effectiveness. We combined three distinct approaches to develop a DSMA that assisted in developing a comprehensive range of elk and bison management alternatives in the Southern Greater Yellowstone Area. The DSMA illustrated the extent of compromise between meeting legal agency mandates and accommodating the preferences of certain stakeholder groups.
Study Area
Publication type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
Title | Disparate stakeholder management: the case of elk and bison feeding in southern Greater Yellowstone |
Series title | Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal |
DOI | 10.1080/08941920.2012.701371 |
Volume | 26 |
Issue | 3 |
Year Published | 2012 |
Language | English |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Publisher location | London, England |
Larger Work Type | Article |
Larger Work Subtype | Journal Article |
Larger Work Title | Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal |
Country | United States |
State | Wyoming |
Other Geospatial | Yellowstone National Park |
Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |