Evaluation of three aging techniques and back-calculated growth for introduced Blue Catfish from Lake Oconee, Georgia
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Back-calculation of length-at-age from otoliths and spines is a common technique employed in fisheries biology, but few studies have compared the precision of data collected with this method for catfish populations. We compared precision of back-calculated lengths-at-age for an introducedIctalurus furcatus (Blue Catfish) population among 3 commonly used cross-sectioning techniques. We used gillnets to collect Blue Catfish (n = 153) from Lake Oconee, GA. We estimated ages from a basal recess, articulating process, and otolith cross-section from each fish. We employed the Frasier-Lee method to back-calculate length-at-age for each fish, and compared the precision of back-calculated lengths among techniques using hierarchical linear models. Precision in age assignments was highest for otoliths (83.5%) and lowest for basal recesses (71.4%). Back-calculated lengths were variable among fish ages 1–3 for the techniques compared; otoliths and basal recesses yielded variable lengths at age 8. We concluded that otoliths and articulating processes are adequate for age estimation of Blue Catfish.
Study Area
Publication type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
Title | Evaluation of three aging techniques and back-calculated growth for introduced Blue Catfish from Lake Oconee, Georgia |
Series title | Southeastern Naturalist |
DOI | 10.1656/058.014.0417 |
Volume | 14 |
Issue | 4 |
Year Published | 2015 |
Language | English |
Publisher | Eagle Hill Institute |
Contributing office(s) | Coop Res Unit Atlanta |
Description | 17 p. |
First page | 740 |
Last page | 756 |
Country | United States |
State | Georgia |
Other Geospatial | Lake Oconee |
Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |