Deer harvest variation in small and large management units in Pennsylvania
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Large game management units often lead to criticisms from hunters because they assume smaller units possess less variation in wildlife populations and more closely represent their local area. In 2003, Pennsylvania, USA, replaced smaller, socio-political county-based management units with larger wildlife management units (WMUs). We tested the hypothesis that smaller county units possessed less variation in antlered and antlerless white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) harvest densities among municipalities than did larger WMUs. Spatial variation, as measured by standard deviation and coefficient of variation of deer harvested per km2 was similar for antlered deer (county units 0.44 SD, CV = 0.35; WMUs 0.43 SD, CV = 0.38) and antlerless deer (county units 0.71 SD, CV = 0.44; WMUs 0.84 SD, CV = 0.45). We found no support for the assumption that larger management units resulted in greater spatial variation in deer harvest density.
Suggested Citation
Diefenbach, D.R., Rosenberry, C.S., 2019, Deer harvest variation in small and large management units in Pennsylvania: Wildlife Society Bulletin, v. 43, no. 1, p. 71-76, https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.939.
ISSN: 1938-5463 (online)
Study Area
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | Deer harvest variation in small and large management units in Pennsylvania |
| Series title | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.939 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication Date | January 06, 2019 |
| Year Published | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Contributing office(s) | Coop Res Unit Leetown |
| Description | 6 p. |
| First page | 71 |
| Last page | 76 |
| Country | United States |
| State | Pennsylvania |