African penguins and localized fisheries management: Response to Butterworth and Ross-Gillespie
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
We present a response to Butterworth and Ross-Gillespie's (2022) comment on our perspectives on how forage fish fisheries are impacting the endangered African penguin (Sphenicus demersus), and corresponding management options. Butterworth and Ross-Gillespie overstate model uncertainties and downplay the clear ecological and conservation significance of the fisheries closure experiment. We demonstrate that their criticism of “pseudo-replication” is weak, and not in line with their own analyses nor with the interpretations of many international scientific review panels commissioned by the government of South Africa to evaluate experimental results. Their comment does not alter our fundamental conclusions that forage fisheries operating near penguin breeding colonies compete with the birds for food resources, are detrimental to the penguin's population health, and are impeding recovery. Given that sardines are depleted (DFFE, 2021) and the African penguin is approaching a conservation crisis, we reiterate our position that continuing the precautionary approach of closures at the local scale of central-place foraging penguins is warranted to facilitate their population growth under fisheries management goals to conserve and maintain ecosystem functions.
| Publication type | Article |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Journal Article |
| Title | African penguins and localized fisheries management: Response to Butterworth and Ross-Gillespie |
| Series title | ICES Journal of Marine Science |
| DOI | 10.1093/icesjms/fsac116 |
| Year Published | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Oxford Academic |
| Contributing office(s) | Alaska Science Center Biology MFEB |
| Description | fsac116, 7 p. |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |