S2HM must be real-time or not?
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Seismic structural health monitoring (S2HM) has advanced significantly in the last three decades. However, currently there is no consensus on the need for real-time processing of data acquired during an earthquake. Numerous applications exist whereby S2HM-equipped systems record valuable seismic response data. A delayed use of the seismic data prohibits timely discovery of hidden damages in a structure which, in turn, possibly increases its vulnerability during events to follow – with increased risk to occupants. Such risks are of particular concern when, for example, there are long-distance/long period effects e.g. for tall buildings and long-span bridges that are significantly affected by events that originate at far distances. These phenomena necessitate near real-time monitored data to make timely data-based informed decisions on the health or performance of the affected structure. The paper discusses criteria for functionality and occupiability thresholds in actual applications.
| Publication type | Conference Paper |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Conference Paper |
| Title | S2HM must be real-time or not? |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_2 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Year Published | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| Contributing office(s) | Earthquake Science Center |
| Description | 11 p. |
| Larger Work Type | Book |
| Larger Work Subtype | Conference publication |
| Larger Work Title | European workshop on structural health monitoring: Special collection of 2020 papers - Volume 1 |
| First page | 12 |
| Last page | 22 |
| Google Analytic Metrics | Metrics page |