S2HM must be real-time or not?
Links
- More information: Publisher Index Page (via DOI)
- Open Access Version: External Repository
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
Seismic structural health monitoring (S2HM) has advanced significantly in the last three decades. However, currently there is no consensus on the need for real-time processing of data acquired during an earthquake. Numerous applications exist whereby S2HM-equipped systems record valuable seismic response data. A delayed use of the seismic data prohibits timely discovery of hidden damages in a structure which, in turn, possibly increases its vulnerability during events to follow – with increased risk to occupants. Such risks are of particular concern when, for example, there are long-distance/long period effects e.g. for tall buildings and long-span bridges that are significantly affected by events that originate at far distances. These phenomena necessitate near real-time monitored data to make timely data-based informed decisions on the health or performance of the affected structure. The paper discusses criteria for functionality and occupiability thresholds in actual applications.
Suggested Citation
Celebi, M., Limongelli, M., 2022, S2HM must be real-time or not?, in European workshop on structural health monitoring: Special collection of 2020 papers - Volume 1, v. 1, p. 12-22, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_2.
| Publication type | Conference Paper |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | Conference Paper |
| Title | S2HM must be real-time or not? |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_2 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Publication Date | January 11, 2021 |
| Year Published | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| Contributing office(s) | Earthquake Science Center |
| Description | 11 p. |
| Larger Work Type | Book |
| Larger Work Subtype | Conference publication |
| Larger Work Title | European workshop on structural health monitoring: Special collection of 2020 papers - Volume 1 |
| First page | 12 |
| Last page | 22 |