Detection probabilities of Flathead Catfish in small Kansas impoundments

Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
By: , and 

Metrics

1
Crossref references
Web analytics dashboard Metrics definitions

Links

Abstract

A primary challenge of Flathead Catfish Pylodictis olivaris management is uncertainty associated with sampling strategies and resulting ambiguity in population-level information. Assessment of impoundment and environmental conditions that affect detection probability may aid in reducing sample variance and benefit inferences regarding changes to Flathead Catfish populations. We sampled eight small impoundments in Kansas (37–114 surface ha) using low-frequency electrofishing in summer, 2021. We revisited sites nine times over three months using an occupancy modeling framework to estimate the influence of impoundment and environmental conditions on detection probability of Flathead Catfish. We employed an information theoretic approach and ranked models built with impoundment as a random effect and three environmental variables predicted to influence detection of Flathead Catfish in small impoundments. Detection probability across all populations was 0.526 (SE = 0.020) and was influenced by water temperature, mean depth of the impoundment, and proportion of impoundment sampled. Generally, detection probability increased with all measured variables. The inclusion of detection probability in assessments of Flathead Catfish in small impoundments can inform interpretation of catch-related metrics. Further, variable detection suggests collection of multiple samples during a defined sampling period might be more suitable for characterizing populations than a single sample.

Study Area

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Detection probabilities of Flathead Catfish in small Kansas impoundments
Series title Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
DOI 10.3996/jfwm-23-057
Volume 15
Issue 2
Publication Date March 13, 2025
Year Published 2024
Language English
Publisher U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Contributing office(s) Coop Res Unit Atlanta
Description 7 p.
First page 530
Last page 536
Country United States
State Kansas
Additional publication details