Performance metrics for the assessment of satellite data products: An ocean color case study

Optics Express
By: , and 

Metrics

309
Crossref references
Web analytics dashboard Metrics definitions

Links

Abstract

Performance assessment of ocean color satellite data has generally relied on statistical metrics chosen for their common usage and the rationale for selecting certain metrics is infrequently explained. Commonly reported statistics based on mean squared errors, such as the coefficient of determination (r2), root mean square error, and regression slopes, are most appropriate for Gaussian distributions without outliers and, therefore, are often not ideal for ocean color algorithm performance assessment, which is often limited by sample availability. In contrast, metrics based on simple deviations, such as bias and mean absolute error, as well as pair-wise comparisons, often provide more robust and straightforward quantities for evaluating ocean color algorithms with non-Gaussian distributions and outliers. This study uses a SeaWiFS chlorophyll-a validation data set to demonstrate a framework for satellite data product assessment and recommends a multi-metric and user-dependent approach that can be applied within science, modeling, and resource management communities.

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Performance metrics for the assessment of satellite data products: An ocean color case study
Series title Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/OE.26.007404
Volume 26
Issue 6
Publication Date March 14, 2018
Year Published 2018
Language English
Publisher Optica Publishing Group
Contributing office(s) Kansas Water Science Center
Description 19 p.
First page 7404
Last page 7422
Additional publication details