Natural resources management is often concerned with conserving rare-native or controlling rare-invasive fishes. Informing and assessing conservation and control efforts frequently requires information from captures. When little is understood about spatial and temporal fish distributions, captures can be infrequent and costly. If successful management depends on effective management response, optimizing for efficiency may be the difference between success and failure. We compared per vessel hour capture efficiencies for invasive grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) between two methods: electrofishing-only (electrofishing) and in combination with a trammel net (combination). Capture and effort information including 174 captures from 1853 capture attempts from 1706 total hours of effort in the Sandusky River, OH, USA from 2020–2023 was used to fit a generalized linear model. Captures were allowed to vary by river kilometer, month, and year to account for unequal capture rates and effort. Captures were offset by total vessel hours or the count of independent efforts to compare methods that prioritize detection at a single location (e.g., combination) to methods that prioritize exploiting more locations (e.g., electrofishing). Including trammel nets was intended to increase single site detection, but we found that electrofishing-only was at least 2.4x more efficient (catch per vessel hour) than when combined with a trammel net with no significant difference in catch per removal effort. Complex methods intended to increase single site detection may reduce the number of efforts completed. Therefore, overall capture efficiency and total capture numbers for rare fish may be increased through methods that prioritize per-hour efficiency.