Stakeholders' priorities for management of a restored elk (Cervus canadensis) population in northeast Minnesota

Conservation Science and Practice
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

Wildlife reintroduction projects are an important tool for restoring traditional wildlife heritage, increasing species diversity, providing subsistence and sport hunting and other recreational opportunities, and assisting ecosystem adaption to future climate change. In Minnesota, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and some conservationists advocate for the expansion of existing elk range to other parts of the state. For reintroduction projects to be successful, it is helpful if managers understand stakeholders' preferences for management objectives. We used best-worst scaling (BWS) to assess residents' preferences for management objective alternatives. The University of Minnesota, in collaboration with the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, conducted a mail-back questionnaire of landowners (n = 4500) and the general public (n = 4000) in northeastern Minnesota to determine their attitudes toward elk reintroduction. Results suggest that the most preferred objectives were minimizing negative impacts on existing wildlife populations and reintroducing native species. In contrast, the least important objectives were related to providing elk viewing opportunities or maximizing economic opportunities through elk-related tourism. These findings help inform management objectives related to the reintroduction proposal, provide insight to minimize potential conflict and help develop future communication material related to elk reintroduction.

Study Area

Publication type Article
Publication Subtype Journal Article
Title Stakeholders' priorities for management of a restored elk (Cervus canadensis) population in northeast Minnesota
Series title Conservation Science and Practice
DOI 10.1111/csp2.13200
Volume 7
Issue 7
Publication Date June 16, 2025
Year Published 2025
Language English
Publisher Society for Conservation Biology
Contributing office(s) Coop Res Unit Leetown
Description e13200, 13 p.
Country United States
State Minnesota
Additional publication details