Grouping species into guilds can be useful to inform management decisions locally and at broader scales because guilds lack species-specificity. We investigated the response of five breeding bird guilds to riparian habitat restoration in the arid Colorado River delta, based on two decades of bird detections (2002–2021) at 230 bird count stations across 7 routes in actively revegetated (“restored”) sites, and 20 routes in non-actively revegetated (“control”) sites. We used guilds based on habitat associations. We also described changes in vegetation and explored their influence on bird species detections and guild dynamics. Riparian forest bird specialists responded positively to active revegetation, but this positive response was delayed and weaker in a river reach where restoration began later and featured less typical riparian vegetation. Birds associated with wetland habitat showed a positive response to restoration in the wettest reach, which had a baseline of high abundance of wetland birds in control sites and relatively abundant macrophyte cover. Conversely, the abundance of desert scrub bird specialists was highest in the driest and least vegetated restored reach. Generalists only exhibited decreased detections in the wettest restored reach. All this occurred while declines of riparian forest, wetland, desert scrub, and generalist bird species observed over a decade prior to restoration had stabilized in control sites. Detections of birds associated with agricultural fields increased in the study area, irrespective of restoration efforts. Our study demonstrates that the choice of bird guilds as ecological indicators can significantly influence the interpretation of restoration outcomes.