USGS - science for a changing world

Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5183

cover

Simulation of the Effects of Water Withdrawals, Wastewater Return Flows, and Land-Use Change on Streamflow in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

Prepared in cooperation with the Rhode Island Water Resources Board

U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5183

 

By Jeffrey R. Barbaro

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This report is available in PDF Format (22 MB)

 

The cover for this report is also available in PDF Format (35 MB)


If you have Adobe® Acrobat® or Adobe® Acrobat® Reader® installed on your computer, you may view and print the PDF version of this report. Acrobat Reader, is a free download from Adobe Systems, Inc. Users with disabilities can view information concerning accessibility at access.Adobe.com.


Abstract

Streamflow in many parts of the Blackstone River Basin in south-central Massachusetts and northern Rhode Island is altered by water-supply withdrawals, wastewater-return flows, and land-use change associated with a growing population. Simulations from a previously developed and calibrated Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) precipitation-runoff model for the basin were used to evaluate the effects of water withdrawals, wastewater-return flows, and land-use change on streamflow. Most of the simulations were done for recent (1996–2001) conditions and potential buildout conditions in the future when all available land is developed to provide a long-range assessment of the effects of possible future human activities on water resources in the basin.

The effects of land-use change were evaluated by comparing the results of long-term (1960–2004) simulations with (1) undeveloped land use, (2) 1995–1999 land use, and (3) potential buildout land use at selected sites across the basin. Flow-duration curves for these land-use scenarios were similar, indicating that land-use change, as represented in the HSPF model, had little effect on flow in the major tributary streams and rivers in the basin. However, land-use change—particularly increased effective impervious area—could potentially have greater effects on the hydrology, water quality, and aquatic habitat of the smaller streams in the basin.

The effects of water withdrawals and wastewater-return flows were evaluated by comparing the results of long-term simulations with (1) no withdrawals and return flows, (2) actual (measured) 1996–2001 withdrawals and wastewater-return flows, and (3) potential withdrawals and wastewater-return flows at buildout. Overall, the results indicated that water use had a much larger effect on streamflow than did land use, and that the location and magnitude of wastewater-return flows were important for lessening the effects of withdrawals on streamflow in the Blackstone River Basin. Ratios of long-term (1960–2004) simulated flows with 1996–2001 water use (representing the net effect of withdrawals and wastewater-return flows) to long-term simulated flows with no water use indicated that, for many reaches, 1996–2001 water use did not deplete flows at the 90-percent flow duration substantially compared to flows unaffected by water use. Flows generally were more severely depleted in the reaches that include surface-water supplies for the larger cities in the basin (Kettle and Tatnuck Brooks, Worcester, Mass. water supply; Quinsigamond River, Shrewsbury, Mass. water supply; Crookfall Brook, Woonsocket, R.I. water supply; and Abbott Run, Pawtucket, R.I. water supply). These reaches did not have substantial wastewater-return flows that could offset the effects of the withdrawals. In contrast, wastewater-return flows from the Upper Blackstone Wastewater Treatment Facility in Millbury, Mass. increased flows at the 90-percent flow duration in the main stem of the Blackstone River compared to no-water-use conditions. Under the assumptions used to develop the buildout scenario, nearly all of the new water withdrawals were returned to the Blackstone River Basin at municipal wastewater-treatment plants or on-site septic systems. Consequently, buildout generally had small effects on simulated low flows in the Blackstone River and most of the major tributary streams compared to flows with 1996–2001 water use.

To evaluate the effects of water use on flows in the rivers and major tributary streams in the Rhode Island part of the basin in greater detail, the magnitudes of water withdrawals and wastewater-return flows in relation to simulated streamflow were calculated as unique ratios for individual HSPF subbasins, total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins, and total contributing areas to the major tributary streams. For recent conditions (1996–2001 withdrawals and 1995–1999 land use), ratios of average summer (June through September) withdrawals to the long-term (1960–2004) medians of average summer streamflow simulated in the absence of water use ranged from 0.039 to 2.5 with a median value of 0.11 for total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins. The largest ratios of withdrawal rates to streamflow were for Crookfall Brook and Abbott Run, the subbasins with major withdrawals for municipal water supply. The smallest ratios were for the rural subbasins in the Branch River drainage area in the southwestern part of the basin. For recent conditions, ratios of average summer wastewater-return flows to average summer streamflows ranged from 0.0 to 0.20 with a median value of 0.029 for total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins. The largest ratios of wastewater-return flows to streamflows were for the subbasins that contained return flows from municipal wastewater-treatment plants and the subbasins along the Blackstone River because of high wastewater-return-flow rates from upstream facilities. Under the assumptions used to develop the buildout analysis, withdrawal and return-flow ratios were estimated to increase for most of the HSPF subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the basin. Ratios more than doubled for some subbasins, but the large increases mainly were for subbasins that had low ratios in 1996–2001.

The HSPF model also was used to estimate the effects of water-conservation measures on low flows in rivers and major tributary streams in the Rhode Island part of the basin, the contribution of wastewater-return flows to streamflow in the Blackstone River, and the effects of changes to two local water supplies in Rhode Island. Water-conservation measures were evaluated by reducing 1996–2001 withdrawals by 20 percent. Simulations with 20-percent reductions in withdrawal rates indicated that conservation measures would result in appreciable increases in low flows in the subbasins with the highest withdrawal rates in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin, whereas the effects on streamflow would be much less pronounced in subbasins with lower withdrawal rates. The contribution of wastewater-return flows to streamflow in the Blackstone River was evaluated by comparing simulated flows with and without municipal wastewater-return flows. Under typical summer low-flow conditions, treated wastewater was a major component of streamflow (35 to 50 percent) in the Blackstone River, and the percentage of treated wastewater was larger during the driest periods. The simulations conducted to evaluate changes to local water supplies (effects of potential withdrawals from an inactive well adjacent to Slatersville Reservoir in North Smithfield on flows in the Branch River, and the effects of connecting the town of North Smithfield to the water-supply system for the city of Woonsocket, Rhode Island) indicated that each of these activities would alter low flows only slightly in the associated stream reaches.

Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Purpose and Scope

Description of the Basin

Streamflow-Gaging Stations

Overview of the Precipitation-Runoff Model

Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs)

Stream Reaches

Water Use

Water Withdrawals

Wastewater-Return Flows

Model Calibration

Use of Buildout Analysis to Simulate Effects of Potential Development on Streamflow

Land Use at Buildout

Potential Water Withdrawals and Wastewater-Return Flows at Buildout

Water Withdrawals

Wastewater-Return Flows

Simulation of the Effects of Water Withdrawals, Wastewater-Return Flows, and Land-Use

Change on Streamflow

Long-Term Basin-Scale Scenarios

Effects of Land-Use Change on Streamflow

Effects of Water Use on Streamflow

1996–2001 Water Use

Potential Water Use at Buildout

Scenarios Focused on the Rhode Island Part of the Basin

Withdrawals and Wastewater-Return Flows in Relation to Simulated Streamflow

Withdrawal Ratios in HSPF Subbasins

Return-Flow Ratios in HSPF Subbasins

Ratios Based on the Difference between Withdrawals and Wastewater-Return Flows (Net Ratios) in HSPF Subbasins

Effects of Conservation Measures on Streamflow

Contribution of Wastewater-Return Flows to Streamflow in the Blackstone River

Effect of Withdrawals from the Tuspani Well, North Smithfield

Effects of Connecting North Smithfield to the Woonsocket Water-Supply System

Summary and Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References Cited

Figures

1–4. Maps showing—

1. The Blackstone River Basin, towns and climatological stations used to simulate streamflow, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

2. 1995–1999 land use in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

3. Public water and sewer lines in the basin around the year 2000 and surficial geology in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

4. Streamflow-gaging stations in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

5. Graph showing areas of hydrologic response units (HRUs), wetlands, and open water as a percentage of drainage area for the baseline Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) model of the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

6–12. Maps showing—

6. Urban land-use areas and percentages of the areas considered to be effective impervious in the baseline Hydrological Simulation Program­—FORTRAN (HSPF) model of the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

7. Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) model subbasins, reach numbers, and the boundary between climatological zones, Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

8. Water withdrawals and transfers and wastewater-return flows in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

9. Developable land identified by a buildout analysis done in 2001, Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

10. Potential land use at buildout in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

11. Percentages of total new water withdrawals at buildout for each Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

12. Percentages of total new wastewater-return flows at buildout for each Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island

13–14. Graphs showing­—

13. Flow-duration curves of daily mean streamflow from long-term (1960–2004) simulations with undeveloped land use (scenario 9.0), 1995–1999 land use (scenario 8.0), and potential land use at buildout (scenario 11.0) at streamflow-gaging stations (A ) Quinsigamond River at North Grafton, Mass.(QU1A, 01110000); (B ) Blackstone River at Millbury, Mass. (BL2B, 01109730); (C ) Nipmuc River near Harrisville, R.I. (NI1A, 01111300); (D ) Branch River at Forestdale, R.I. (BR2A, 01111500); (E ) Mill River at Woonsocket, R.I., (ML2A, 01112268); (F ) Peters River at Woonsocket, R.I. (PE1A, 01112382); (G ) Abbott Run at Pawtucket, R.I. (AB3A, ungaged); (H ) Blackstone River at Woonsocket, R.I. (BL9A, 01112500); (I ) Blackstone River at Pawtucket, R.I. (BL13, 01113895); and (J ) Crookfall Brook, at Woonsocket, R.I. (CR2A, ungaged)

14. Flow-duration curves of daily mean streamflow from long-term (1960–2004) simulations with no water use (scenario 8.0), and 1996–2001 water use(scenario 7.0) at streamflow-gaging stations (A ) Quinsigamond River at North Grafton, Mass. (QU1A, 01110000); (B ) Crookfall Brook, at Woonsocket, R.I. (CR2A, ungaged); (C ) Abbott Run at Pawtucket, R.I. (AB3A, ungaged); (D ) Blackstone River at Millbury, Mass. (BL2B, 01109730); (E ) Nipmuc River near Harrisville, R.I. (NI1A, 01111300); (F ) Branch River at Forestdale, R.I. (BR2A, 01111500); (G ) Mill River at Woonsocket, R.I., (ML2A, 01112268); (H ) Peters River at Woonsocket, R.I. (PE1A, 01112382); (I ) Blackstone River at Woonsocket, R.I. (BL9A, 01112500); and (J ) Blackstone River at Pawtucket, R.I. (BL13, 01113895)

15. Map showing ratios of long-term (1960–2004) simulated flows with 1996–2001 water use (scenario 7.0) to long-term simulated flows with no water use (scenario 8.0) for the Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) reaches in the Blackstone River Basin

16. Graphs showing flow-duration curves of daily mean streamflow from long-term (1960–2004) simulations with 1996–2001 water use (scenario 10.0) and potential water use at buildout (scenario 12.0) at streamflow-gaging stations (A ) Quinsigamond River at North Grafton, Mass. (QU1A, 01110000); (B ) Mill River at Woonsocket, R.I., (ML2A, 01112268); (C ) Peters River at Woonsocket, R.I. (PE1A, 01112382); (D ) Abbott Run at Pawtucket, R.I. (AB3A, ungaged); (E ) Crookfall Brook, at Woonsocket, R.I. (CR2A, ungaged); (F ) Branch River at Forestdale, R.I. (BR2A, 01111500); (G ) Nipmuc River near Harrisville, R.I. (NI1A, 01111300); (H ) Blackstone River at Millbury, Mass.(BL2B, 01109730); (I ) Blackstone River at Woonsocket, R.I. (BL9A, 01112500); and (J ) Blackstone River at Pawtucket, R.I. (BL13, 01113895)

17–18. Maps showing—

17. Ratios of average summer withdrawals for 1996–2001 to the medians of simulated average summer streamflows for the period 1960–2004 for (A ) individual Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin contributing areas, and (B ) total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin

18. Ratios of potential average summer withdrawals at buildout to the medians of simulated average summer streamflows for the period 1960–2004 for (A ) individual Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin contributing areas, and (B ) total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin

19. Graph showing comparison between withdrawal ratios in 1996–2001 and potential withdrawal ratios at buildout for total contributing areas to Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin

20–21. Maps showing—

20. Ratios of average summer wastewater-return flows for 1996–2001 to the medians of simulated average summer streamflow for the period 1960–2004 for (A ) individual Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin contributing areas, and (B ) total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin

21. Ratios of potential average summer wastewater-return flows at buildout to the medians of simulated average summer streamflow for the period 1960–2004 for (A ) individual Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin contributing areas, and (B ) total contributing areas to HSPF subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin

22–26. Graphs showing—

22. Comparison between wastewater-return-flow ratios in 1996–2001 and potential wastewater-return-flow ratios at buildout for total contributing areas to Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasins in the Rhode Island part of the Blackstone River Basin

23. Flow-duration curves of daily mean streamflow from long-term (1960–2004) simulations with 1996–2001 water use (scenario 7.0) and 1996–2001 water use with withdrawals reduced by 20 percent to represent conservation measures (scenario 13.0) in Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasins: (A ) Crookfall Brook above outlet of Woonsocket Reservoir No. 1 (CR2A); (B ) Abbott Run above Happy Hollow Pond (AB3A); (C ) Peters River above the Route 114 bridge (PE1A); (D ) Blackstone River above Elizabeth Webbing Dam (BL13); (E ) Branch River above the streamflow-gaging station at Forestdale, R.I. (BR2A); and (F ) Blackstone River north of the Mass.-R.I. state line (BL7A)

24. (A ) Average 1996–2001 wastewater return-flow rates, and (B ) distances of the mouths of major tributaries and of municipal wastewater-treatment plant outfalls from the mouth of the Blackstone River

25. Hydrographs of daily mean streamflow and daily mean streamflow minus municipal wastewater-return flows for simulations with 1996–2001 water use for the (A ) Blackstone River near the Massachusetts-Rhode Island state line (subbasin BL7A); and (B ) the mouth of the Blackstone River at Pawtucket, Rhode Island (subbasin BL14)

26. Flow-duration curves of daily mean streamflow in the Branch River downstream of Slatersville Reservoir (Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAN (HSPF) subbasin BR1A) from long-term (1960–2004) simulations for recent conditions(1996–2001 water use and 1995–1999 land use) and for recent conditions plus hypothetical annual average withdrawals of 1,000 gallons per minute from the Tuspani well, North Smithfield, Rhode Island

Tables


Suggested citation:

Barbaro, J.R., 2007, Simulation of the effects of water withdrawals, wastewater-return flows, and land-use change on streamflow in the Blackstone River Basin, Massachusetts and Rhode Island: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5183, 98 p.


Director,
USGS Massachusetts–Rhode Island Water Science Center
10 Bearfoot Road
Northborough, MA 01532
or visit our Web site at
http://ma.water.usgs.gov

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5183/
Page Contact Information: USGS Publishing Network
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 01-Dec-2016 19:58:38 EST