References Cited


Bureau of Reclamation, 2011, Hydrology, hydraulics and sediment transport studies for the Secretary’s determination on Klamath Dam removal and basin restoration: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Technical Report No. SRH-2011-02, prepared for Mid-Pacific region, Denver, Colo, variously paged.


Cole, T.M., and Wells, S.A., 2008, CE-QUAL-W2—A two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water-quality model, version 3.6: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Instruction Report EL-08-1, variously paged.


Crites, R., and Tchobanoglous, G., 1998, Small and decentralized wastewater management systems: WCB McGraw-Hill, p. 582–588.


Deas, M.L., and Vaughn, J., 2011, Keno Reservoir particulate study 2008—Technical memorandum, Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, April 2011: Davis, California, Watercourse Engineering, Inc., 38 p.


King, D., Sutley, D., and Raff, D., 2011, Klamath Dam removal study climate change hydrology development—Appendix E, Documentation of hydrology simulations for the Klamath Dam removal studies, Section 17.2, climate change hydrology, in Bureau of Reclamation, 2011, Hydrology, Hydraulics and Sediment Transport Studies for the Secretary’s Determination on Klamath River Dam Removal and Basin Restoration: Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, Technical Service Center, Denver, Colo. Technical Report No. SRH-2011-02, p. 1–15.


Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, 2010, Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement for the Sustainability of Public and Trust Resources and Affected Communities: U.S. Department of the Interior, 371 p., accessed June 19, 2013, at http://klamathrestoration.gov/sites/klamathrestoration.gov/files/Klamath-Agreements/Klamath-Basin-Restoration-Agreement-2-18-10signed.pdf.


Mahugh, S., Deas, M.L., Gearhart, R.A., Vaughn, J., Piaskowski, R., and Rabe, A., 2008, Keno Reservoir Feasibility Study, Phase II—Identification and Assessment of Potential Treatment Wetland Sites in the upper Klamath River: Prepared for U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office, Proposal No. 07SF200051, 49 p.


Mohseni, O., Stefan, H.G., and Erickson, T.R., 1998, A nonlinear regression model for weekly stream temperatures: Water Resources Research, v. 34, no. 10, p. 2685–2692, accessed July 15, 2013, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98WR01877.


Mrazik, S., 2007, Oregon water quality index summary report, water years 1997–2006: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, DEQ07-LAB-007-TR, 13 p.


Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 2002, Upper Klamath Lake drainage Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP): Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 188 p.


Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 2007, Oregon’s 2004/2006 integrated report: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Web site, accessed November 16, 2007, at http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/assessment/rpt0406.htm.


Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 2010, Upper Klamath and Lost River subbasins total maximum daily load (TMDL) and water quality management plan (WQMP): Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Web site, accessed December 2010 at http://www.deq.state.or.us/WQ/TMDLs/klamath.htm.


Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 2011, Oregon Administrative Rules OAR 340-041, accessed October 21, 2011, at http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars_300/oar_340/340_041.html.


Perry, R.W., Risley, J.C., Brewer, S.J., Jones, E.C., and Rondorf, D.W., 2011, Simulating water temperature of the Klamath River under dam removal and climate change scenarios: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1243, 78 p. (Also available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1243/.)


Poulson, S.R., and Sullivan, A.B., 2010, Assessment of diel chemical and isotopic techniques to investigate biogeochemical cycles in the upper Klamath River, Oregon, USA: Chemical Geology, v. 269, nos. 1–2, p. 3–11, accessed July 15, 2013, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.05.016.


Rounds, S.A., and Sullivan, A.B., 2009, Review of Klamath River total maximum daily load models from Link River Dam to Keno Dam, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Administrative Report, 37 p., accessed July 17, 2013, at http://www.usbr.gov/mp/kbao/waterquality/klamath_river_model_review_final.pdf.


Rounds, S.A., and Sullivan, A.B., 2013, Review of revised Klamath River total maximum daily load models from Link River Dam to Keno Dam, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2013-1136, 32 p. (Also available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1136/.)


Snyder, R.S. and Shaw, R.H., 1984, Converting humidity expressions with computer and calculators: University of California Cooperative Extension Leaflet 21372, 23 p.


Stillwater Sciences, Riverbend Sciences, Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, Atkins, Tetra Tech, NSI/Biohabitats, and Jones and Trimiew Design, 2012, Klamath River pollutant reduction workshop—information packet: Technical Memorandum prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy, Oakland, Calif., 87 p.


Sullivan, A.B., Deas, M.L., Asbill, Jessica, Kirshtein, J.D., Butler, Kenna, and Vaughn, Jennifer, 2009, Klamath River water quality data from Link River Dam to Keno Dam, Oregon, 2008: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1105, 25 p. (Also available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1105/.)


Sullivan, A.B., Deas, M.L., Asbill, Jessica, Kirshtein, J.D., Butler, Kenna, Stewart, M.A., Wellman, R.W., and Vaughn, J., 2008, Klamath River Water quality and acoustic Doppler current profiler data from Link River Dam to Keno Dam, 2007: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2008-1185, 24 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1185/.


Sullivan, A.B., Rounds, S.A., Asbill-Case, J.R., and Deas, M.L., 2013, Macrophyte and pH buffering updates to the Klamath River water-quality model upstream of Keno Dam, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5016, 52 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5016/.


Sullivan, A.B., Rounds, S.A., Deas, M.L., Asbill, J.R., Wellman, R.E., Stewart, M.A., Johnston, M.W., and Sogutlugil, I.E., 2011, Modeling hydrodynamics, water temperature, and water quality in the Klamath River upstream of Keno Dam, Oregon, 2006–09: U.S. Geological Survey Investigations Report 2011–5105, 70 p. (Also available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5105.)


Sullivan, A.B., Rounds, S.A., Deas, M.L., and Sogutlugil, I.E., 2012, Dissolved oxygen analysis, TMDL model comparison, and particulate matter shunting-Preliminary results from three model scenarios for the Klamath River upstream of Keno Dam, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1101, 30 p. (Also available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1101/.)


Sullivan, A.B., Snyder, D.M., and Rounds, S.A., 2010, Controls on biochemical oxygen demand in the upper Klamath River, Oregon: Chemical Geology, v. 269, nos. 1–3, p. 12–21, accessed July 15, 2013, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.08.007.


Tchobanoglous, G., Crites, R., Gearhart, R. and Reed, W., 2000, A review of treatment kinetics for constructed wetlands, in Woo, S., Smith, B., Finney, B.A., eds., The role of wetlands in watershed management-lessons learned: Arcata, Calif., Humboldt State University, p. 147–158.


Tetra Tech, Inc., 2009, Klamath River model for TMDL development, Prepared for U.S. Environmental Agency Region 9 and 10, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, and North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, December 2009: Tetra Tech, Inc., 196 p., accessed May 20, 2011, at http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/tmdls/docs/klamathbasin/uklost/KlamathLostAppendixC.pdf.


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986, Quality criteria for water 1986. EPA 440/5-86-001: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA 440/5-86-001, 477 p., accessed June 5, 2013, at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/aqlife/upload/2009_01_13_criteria_goldbook.pdf.


Vymazal, Jan, 2007, Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands: Science of the Total Environment, v. 380, nos. 1–3, p. 48–65, accessed July 15, 2013, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014.


Watercourse Engineering, Inc., 2004, Klamath River modeling framework to support the PacifiCorp Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Hydropower Relicensing Application, March 9, 2004: Watercourse Engineering, Inc., 248 p.

First posted July 24, 2013