Abstract
The demand for water in Thurston County has increased steadily in recent years because of a rapid
growth in population. Surface-water resources in the
county have been fully appropriated for many years and
Thurston County now relies entirely on ground water
for new supplies of water. Thurston County is underlain
by up to 2,000 feet of unconsolidated glacial and
non-glacial Quaternary sediments which overlie consolidated
rocks of Tertiary age. Six geohydrologic
units have been identified within the unconsolidated
sediments.
Between 1988 and 1990, median water levels
rose 0.6 to 1.9 feet in all geohydrologic units except
bedrock, in which they declined 1.4 feet. Greater wet-season
precipitation in 1990 (43 inches) than in 1988
(26 inches) was the probable cause of the higher 1990
water levels.
Ground-water flow in the unconsolidated sediments
underlying Thurston County was simulated with
a computerized numerical model (MODFLOW). The
model was constructed to simulate 1988 ground-water
conditions as steady state.
Simulated inflow to the model area from precipitation
and secondary recharge was 620,000 acre-feet
per year (93 percent), leakage from streams and lakes
was 38,000 acre-ft/yr (6 percent), and ground water
entering the model along the Chehalis River valley was
5,800 acre-ft/yr (1 percent). Simulated outflow from
the model was primarily leakage to streams, springs,
lakes, and seepage faces (500,000 acre-ft/yr or 75 percent
of the total outflow). Submarine seepage to Puget
Sound was simulated to be 88,000 acre-ft/yr (13 percent).
Simulated ground-water discharge along the
Chehalis River valley was simulated to be 12,000 acreft/yr (2 percent). Simulated withdrawals by wells for
all purposes was 62,000 acre-ft/yr (9 percent).
The numerical model was used to simulate the
possible effects of increasing ground-water withdrawals
by 23,000 acre-ft/yr above the 1988 rate of withdrawal.
The model indicated that the increased
withdrawals would come from reduced discharge to
springs, seepage faces, and offshore (total of 51 percent
of increased pumping) and decreased flow to rivers
(46 percent). About 3 percent would come from
increased leakage from rivers. Water levels would
decline more than 1 foot over most of the model area,
more than 10 feet over some areas, and would be at a
maximum of about 35 feet.
Contributing areas for water discharging at
McAllister and Abbott Springs and to pumping centers
near Tumwater and Lacey were estimated using a
particle-tracking post-processing computer code
(MODPATH) and a MODFLOW model calibrated to
steady-state (1988) conditions. Water discharging at
McAllister and Abbot Springs was determined to come
from water entering the ground-water system at the
water table in an area of about 20 square miles (mi2) to
the west and south of the springs. This water is estimated
to come from recharge (both precipitation and
secondary) and from leakage from Lake St. Clair and
several other surface-water bodies. Southeast of Lacey,
about 3,800 acre-ft of ground water were pumped from
five municipal wells during 1988. The source of the
pumped water was determined to be an area that covers
about 1.1 mi2. The water was estimated to come from
recharge (both precipitation and secondary) and leakage
from surface-water bodies. Along the lower
Deschutes River nearly 3,900 acre-ft/yr of ground
water were pumped during 1988 from 15 wells for municipal and industrial use. The calculated source of
this water was an area that covers about 1.3 mi2.
Within the calculated contributing area the pumped
ground water comes from recharge (both precipitation
and secondary) and leakage from the Deschutes River
and several other surface-water bodies.