USGS

Assessing Ground-Water Vulnerability to Contamination: Providing Scientifically Defensible Information for Decision Makers

U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1224

By Michael J. Focazio, Thomas E. Reilly, Michael G. Rupert, Dennis R. Helsel

A pdf is available for this report.

Errata Sheet


ABSTRACT

Throughout the United States increasing demands for safe drinking water and requirements to maintain healthy ecosystems are leading policy makers to ask complex social and scientific questions about how to assess and manage our water resources. This challenge becomes particularly difficult as policy and management objectives require scientific assessments of the potential for ground-water resources to become contaminated from anthropogenic, as well as natural sources of contamination. Assessments of the vulnerability of ground water to contamination range in scope and complexity from simple, qualitative, and relatively inexpensive approaches to rigorous, quantitative, and costly assessments. Tradeoffs must be carefully considered among the competing influences of the cost of an assessment, the scientific defensibility, and the amount of acceptable uncertainty in meeting the objectives of the water-resource decision maker.

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Background

Purpose of this report

UNDERSTANDING THE HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM AND THE ASSOCIATED BEHAVIOR OF CONTAMINANTS: A NECESSARY STEP IN SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENTS OF GROUND-WATER VULNERABILITY

The Ground-Water-Flow System

a. Description of a ground-water-flow system

b. Factors that control ground-water movement

c. Advective transport of contaminants through the ground-water-flow system

d. Unsaturated zone

The Geochemical System

a. Sources of contamination

b. Chemical properties

c. Diffusion and dispersion

OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY

Subjective rating methods

a. Index methods

b. Subjective hybrid methods

Statistical and process-based methods

a. Statistical methods

b. Process-based methods

SCIENTIFICALLY DEFENSIBLE GROUND-WATER-VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS

Examples of considerations in designing a scientifically defensible assessment

Hypothetical Example 1. Regional-scale mapping of ground-water resource vulnerability to a targeted contaminant.

Sources of uncertainty and limitations in the index method used for hypothetical example

Minimizing uncertainty by using sound statistical approaches to meet science objectives of hypothetical example

Hypothetical Example 2. Local-scale process-based determination of the vulnerability of a public ground-water supply to a targeted contaminant.

Sources of uncertainty and limitations in the fixed radius method used for hypothetical example 2

Minimizing uncertainty by using sound process-based approaches to meet science objectives of hypothetical example 2

Summary of scientifically defensible approaches

CONCLUSIONS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES


For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services

Box 25286, Federal Center

Denver, CO 80225

 

For more information about the USGS and its product:

Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS

World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov

 


The text and graphics are presented here in pdf format (print quality):

The main report is:

Circular_1224_ver1.01  2.5MB

Because of the size of figure 9, page 17 is not in the main report (4.2MB).

The front end of the report 90KB

If you have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer, you may view and/or print the PDF version of this report. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, you may download it here.

Users with visual disabilities can visit this site for conversion tools and information to help make PDF files accessible.



U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Persistent URL: http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/cir1224
Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact
Last modified: Friday, January 11 2013, 12:39:22 PM
FirstGov button  Take Pride in America button