Distribution and Abundance of Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) at the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California—2025 Data Summary

Data Report 1222
Ecosystems Mission Area—Species Management Research Program
By:  and 

Links

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Data either are not available or have limited availability owing to restrictions of the funding entity (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Please contact Hanna Weyland, Operations Division, Los Angeles District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for more information. The authors thank the U.S. Geological Survey biologists who assisted in data collection for this project: Scarlett Howell and Alexandra Houston. Helpful review comments were provided by Samantha Padilla and Austin Parker. All activities were conducted under Federal 10(a)1(A) Recovery Permit ESPER0004080_0.3. Parts of this report were written following a previously developed template to maintain consistent presentation of results.

Executive Summary

We surveyed for Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus; vireo) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus; flycatcher) along Big Tujunga Creek in the Hansen Dam Basin in Los Angeles County, California, in 2025. Four vireo surveys were completed between April 17 and July 2, 2025, and three flycatcher surveys were completed between May 20 and July 2, 2025. We detected 62 territorial male vireos, 51 of which were confirmed as paired, and 2 transient vireos. Additionally, we detected 32 juvenile vireos during surveys. Seventy-seven percent of vireos were detected in habitat characterized as mixed willow, and 95 percent of vireos were detected in habitat with greater than 50-percent native plant cover. Most vireo territories were dominated by Goodding’s black willow (Salix gooddingii).

On May 20, 2025, we detected 18 transient Willow Flycatchers of unknown subspecies, none of which were confirmed to be paired, and no juveniles were detected. Mixed willow habitat was used by 78 percent of Willow Flycatchers, and all Willow Flycatchers were detected in habitat with greater than 50-percent native plant cover. Most Willow Flycatchers were detected in locations dominated by Goodding’s black willow.

Introduction

The Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus; vireo) is a small, migratory songbird that breeds in southern California and northwestern Baja California, Mexico, from April through July (Kus and others, 2020). Historically abundant within lowland riparian ecosystems, vireo populations began declining in the late 1900s as a result of multiple anthropogenic factors, including habitat loss and alteration associated with urbanization and agricultural conversion of land adjacent to rivers, the expansion in range of the brood-parasitic Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater; cowbird), and the introduction of invasive exotic plant species, such as giant reed (Arundo donax), into riparian systems (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986, 1998; Franzreb, 1989; Kus, 1998, 1999; Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, 2004; Kus and others, 2020). By 1986, the vireo population in California had declined to just 300 territorial males (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986).

In response to the considerable decline in numbers of vireos in California, the California Fish and Game Commission listed the species as endangered in 1980, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) followed suit in 1986. Since listing, the vireo population in southern California has rebounded, largely in response to cowbird control and habitat restoration and preservation (Kus and Whitfield, 2005). As of 2006, the statewide vireo population was estimated to be approximately 2,500–3,000 territories (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006).

The Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus; flycatcher) is one of four subspecies of Willow Flycatcher in the United States, with a breeding range including southern California, Arizona, New Mexico, extreme southern parts of Nevada and Utah, and western Texas (Hubbard, 1987; Unitt, 1987; Browning, 1993). Restricted to riparian habitat for breeding, the flycatcher has declined over the past five decades in response to widespread habitat loss throughout its range and, possibly, brood-parasitism by cowbirds (Wheelock, 1912; Willett, 1912, 1933; Grinnell and Miller, 1944; Remson, 1978; Garrett and Dunn, 1981; Unitt, 1984, 1987; Gaines, 1988; Schlorff, 1990; Whitfield and Sogge, 1999). By 1993, the species was believed to number approximately 70 pairs in California (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1993) in small, disjunct populations. The flycatcher was listed as endangered by the State of California in 1992 and by the USFWS in 1995. After listing, population estimates for flycatchers in California increased to 256 territories, with the increase largely attributed to expanded survey efforts rather than population growth at known sites (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2002). In the 2014 5-year status review, estimates of California flycatcher territories decreased to 172, with declines occurring statewide (Durst and others, 2008; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014).

Flycatchers in southern California co-occur with vireos. However, unlike the vireo, which has increased tenfold since the mid-1980s in response to management practices alleviating these threats (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006), the number of flycatchers has remained low. As of 2023, most of the Southwestern Willow Flycatchers in California were concentrated at two known sites: (1) the Owens River valley in Inyo County (approximately 56 territories; M. Whitfield, Southern Sierra Research Station, written commun., 2023) and (2) the upper San Luis Rey River at Lake Henshaw in San Diego County (approximately 51 territories; Howell and Kus, 2024). Outside of these sites, flycatchers occur as small, isolated populations of one to six pairs.

The Hansen Dam Basin contains suitable breeding habitat for the vireo and is within USFWS-designated critical habitat for the flycatcher (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2025). Breeding vireos have been documented in the Hansen Dam Basin over the past two decades (Griffith Wildlife Biology, 2009; Pottinger and Kus, 2019; R. Fisher, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2020). Managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for flood control, the Hansen Dam requires regular operational maintenance, including debris, sediment, and vegetation removal and management. As mandated by the USFWS, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is required to perform surveys and assess activities that might have adverse effects on these federally endangered bird species. The purpose of this report is to summarize the results of vireo and flycatcher surveys completed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) along a 4-kilometer stretch of the Big Tujunga Creek upstream from Hansen Dam (Hansen Dam Basin) in Los Angeles County, California (fig. 1). These data will inform natural resource managers about the status of these endangered species in the Hansen Dam Basin and guide land use and management practices as appropriate to support the species’ survival.

1. Topographic map with survey area outlined.
Figure 1.

Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) survey area at Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

Methods

Biologists from the USGS surveyed for vireos and flycatchers in the Hansen Dam Basin and Big Tujunga Creek following standard survey techniques (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001; Sogge and others, 2010). Four vireo surveys were completed between April 17 and July 2, 2025, and three flycatcher surveys were completed between May 20 and July 2, 2025. Observers walked slowly through or adjacent to suitable riparian habitat, listening and searching for vireos and flycatchers, systematically playing a recording of a vireo or flycatcher song to elicit a territorial response. Surveys typically began at sunrise and were completed by early afternoon, depending on wind and weather conditions. Vireo and flycatcher surveys were completed by USGS biologists Alexandra Houston, Scarlett Howell, and Suellen Lynn under Federal 10(a)1(A) Recovery Permit ESPER0004050_0.3.

For each vireo or flycatcher encountered, observers recorded age (adult or juvenile), sex, breeding status (paired or undetermined), and whether or not the bird was banded. A male was considered paired if a female was detected visually with the male, by hearing vocalizations unique to mated birds, or by observing breeding behavior (for example, food carry, a nest, or dependent juveniles in the territory). A vireo or flycatcher was considered transient if detected only once. Vireo and flycatcher locations were recorded using Esri Field Maps (Esri, 2025) on mobile phones with built-in Global Positioning System to determine geographic coordinates (World Geodetic System of 1984). Because multiple subspecies of flycatchers may be encountered during surveys, we refer to flycatchers in tables and figures as Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) to include all subspecies.

Dominant native and exotic plants were recorded, and percent cover of exotic vegetation was estimated using categories of less than 5 percent, 5–50 percent, 51–95 percent, and greater than 95 percent. The overall habitat type within the territory was specified according to the following categories:

  • Mixed willow riparian: Habitat dominated by one or more willow species, including Goodding’s black willow (Salix gooddingii), arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis), and red willow (Salix laevigata), with mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia) as a frequent co-dominant.

  • Willow-cottonwood: Willow riparian habitat in which Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) is a co-dominant.

  • Willow-sycamore: Willow riparian habitat in which California sycamore (Platanus racemosa) is a co-dominant.

  • Riparian scrub: Dry and (or) sandy habitat dominated by sandbar willow (Salix exigua) or mule fat, with few other woody species.

  • Upland scrub: Coastal sage scrub adjacent to riparian habitat.

  • Non-native: Areas vegetated primarily with non-native species, such as giant reed and tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima).

Results

A total of 62 territorial male vireos were detected in 2025 (table 1; fig. 2). Of the 62 males, 51 were confirmed as paired, and 32 juveniles were detected. We also detected two transient adult vireos. No banded birds were detected.

Table 1.    

Location, breeding status, and band status of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) detected in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

[ID, identification; —, no data]

Territory
ID
Latitude Longitude Breeding
status
Male
banded
Female
banded
HA01 34.26681 −118.37011 Pair No Undetermined
HA02 34.26708 −118.37360 Pair No Undetermined
HA03 34.26621 −118.37522 Pair No Undetermined
HA04 34.26790 −118.37429 Transient No
HA05 34.26950 −118.36260 Pair No Undetermined
HA06 34.26909 −118.37857 Pair No No
HA07 34.26941 −118.37735 Pair No No
HA08 34.26853 −118.37536 Pair No No
HA09 34.26975 −118.38243 Pair No No
HA10 34.26893 −118.36566 Pair No No
HA11 34.26711 −118.36844 Pair No No
HA12 34.26659 −118.37134 Pair No Undetermined
HA13 34.26767 −118.37609 Undetermined No
HA14 34.26732 −118.37903 Pair No No
HA15 34.26896 −118.38010 Pair No Undetermined
HA16 34.26386 −118.37454 Pair No Undetermined
HA17 34.26287 −118.37565 Pair No No
HA18 34.26341 −118.37244 Transient No
HA19 34.26349 −118.37355 Pair No No
HA20 34.26871 −118.35868 Undetermined No
HA21 34.26720 −118.36709 Undetermined No
HA22 34.26685 −118.38176 Pair No No
HA23 34.26526 −118.39012 Pair No Undetermined
HA24 34.26177 −118.37701 Undetermined No
HA31 34.26652 −118.39067 Undetermined No
HA32 34.26692 −118.38264 Pair No No
HA33 34.27022 −118.38521 Pair No No
HA34 34.27029 −118.38694 Pair No No
HA35 34.26826 −118.39147 Pair No Undetermined
HA36 34.26705 −118.39053 Pair No Undetermined
HA37 34.26468 −118.38958 Pair No No
HA38 34.26402 −118.39126 Pair No No
HA39 34.26678 −118.39417 Pair No No
HA40 34.26827 −118.39385 Pair No No
HA41 34.26828 −118.38622 Pair No No
HA42 34.26605 −118.38806 Pair No Undetermined
HA43 34.26584 −118.38801 Pair No No
HA44 34.26459 −118.38688 Pair No No
HA45 34.26227 −118.38775 Undetermined No
HA46 34.26310 −118.38363 Pair No No
HA47 34.26670 −118.38064 Pair No Undetermined
HA48 34.26551 −118.38063 Pair No Undetermined
HA49 34.26395 −118.37925 Pair No No
HA50 34.26413 −118.37799 Pair No Undetermined
HA51 34.26138 −118.37908 Undetermined No
HA52 34.26094 −118.37851 Pair No Undetermined
HA53 34.26220 −118.37967 Pair No No
HA54 34.26252 −118.37834 Pair No No
HA55 34.26046 −118.37774 Pair No No
HA56 34.26917 −118.37867 Pair No No
HA57 34.26879 −118.37814 Undetermined No
HA58 34.26840 −118.38843 Undetermined No
HA59 34.26229 −118.38076 Pair No No
HA60 34.26490 −118.37982 Pair No No
HA61 34.26650 −118.37820 Pair No No
HA62 34.26710 −118.37664 Undetermined No
HA63 34.26591 −118.37696 Undetermined No
HA64 34.26586 −118.37609 Pair No No
HA65 34.26510 −118.37582 Pair No No
HA66 34.26446 −118.37476 Pair No No
HA67 34.26119 −118.37507 Pair No No
HA68 34.26191 −118.37326 Pair No Undetermined
HA69 34.26467 −118.37843 Pair No No
HA70 34.26516 −118.37801 Pair No No
Table 1.    Location, breeding status, and band status of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) detected in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
2. Aerial photo with survey area outlined, dots for vireo pairs, squares for unknown
                     status vireos, and triangles for transient vireos.
Figure 2.

Locations of Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) territories at Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

Least Bell’s Vireos were found in five habitat types with 77 percent of vireo locations in mixed willow riparian habitat (table 2). Seventeen percent of vireos were detected in riparian scrub, 3 percent were in willow-cottonwood habitat, 2 percent were in willow-sycamore habitat, and 2 percent were in upland scrub. Most vireos (95 percent) used habitat largely composed of native vegetation (greater than 50-percent native vegetation). Willows were the dominant plants at 84 percent of vireo locations, with Goodding’s black willow dominant at 66 percent of locations (table 3).

Table 2.    

Habitat types used by Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

[>, greater than; <, less than]

Habitat type Number of vireo locations
>95-percent
native
vegetation
51–95-percent
native
vegetation
5–50-percent
native
vegetation
<5-percent
native
vegetation
Total
Mixed willow riparian 122 26 1 0 49
Riparian scrub 12 7 2 0 11
Willow-cottonwood 2 0 0 0 2
Willow-sycamore 0 1 0 0 1
Upland scrub 0 1 0 0 1
Total 26 35 3 0 64
Table 2.    Habitat types used by Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
1

Includes one transient vireo.

Table 3.    

Dominant plant species at Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) territories in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
Dominant plant species Latin name Number of
vireo locations
Goodding’s black willow Salix gooddingii 142
Red/arroyo willow Salix laevigata/Salix lasiolepis 9
Sandbar willow Salix exigua 3
Blue elderberry Sambucus mexicana 15
Mule fat Baccharis salicifolia 5
Grand total 64
Table 3.    Dominant plant species at Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) territories in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
1

Includes one transient vireo.

We detected 18 transient Willow Flycatcher of unknown subspecies in the Hansen Dam Basin (fig. 3; table 4). All flycatchers were detected on May 20, 2025, and not the following day where survey areas overlapped. No flycatchers remained to breed at the site. Most transient Willow Flycatchers (78 percent) used mixed willow riparian habitat (table 5), and all Willow Flycatchers were detected in habitat comprised of greater than 50-percent native plant cover. Willows were the dominant species at most flycatcher locations (94 percent of locations; table 6).

Table 4.    

Location, breeding status, and band status of Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) detected in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

[ID, identification]

Territory
ID
Latitude Longitude Breeding
status
Band
status
HA01F 34.26923 −118.38068 Transient Undetermined
HA02F 34.26774 −118.39205 Transient No
HA03F 34.26892 −118.37940 Transient No
HA04F 34.26468 −118.38320 Transient No
HA05F 34.26829 −118.37522 Transient No
HA06F 34.26480 −118.38329 Transient No
HA07F 34.26799 −118.37410 Transient No
HA08F 34.26555 −118.38315 Transient No
HA09F 34.26885 −118.36740 Transient Undetermined
HA11F 34.26893 −118.36522 Transient No
HA13F 34.26939 −118.36137 Transient No
HA15F 34.26847 −118.36405 Transient No
HA17F 34.26650 −118.37349 Transient No
HA19F 34.26635 −118.37497 Transient Undetermined
HA21F 34.26641 −118.37523 Transient No
HA23F 34.26572 −118.37647 Transient No
HA25F 34.26657 −118.37698 Transient No
HA27F 34.26694 −118.37855 Transient No
Table 4.    Location, breeding status, and band status of Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) detected in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

Table 5.    

Habitat types used by Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
Habitat type Number of
flycatcher locations
Mixed willow riparian 14
Willow-cottonwood 3
Upland scrub 1
Total 18
Table 5.    Habitat types used by Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

Table 6.    

Dominant plant species at Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) locations in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
Dominant plant species Number of
flycatcher locations
Goodding’s black willow (Salix gooddingii) 12
Red/arroyo willow (Salix laevigata/Salix lasiolepis) 5
Laurel sumac (Malosma laurina) 1
Total 18
Table 6.    Dominant plant species at Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) locations in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.
3. Aerial photo with survey area outlined and a triangle for each transient flycatcher.
Figure 3.

Locations of transient Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) detections at Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 2025.

Summary

In 2025, we documented 62 resident vireo territories in the Hansen Dam Basin study area. The population of vireos in the Hansen Dam Basin has declined since surveys in 2018 (77 territories; Pottinger and Kus, 2019) and 2020 (73 territories; R. Fisher, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2020). Although the number of vireo territories has remained stable in the central (37–38 territories) and eastern (11–13 territories) sections, vireo numbers have dropped 55 percent in the western section, from 29 in 2018, to 23 in 2020, and 13 in 2025. At least three brush fires have been documented within the Hansen Dam Basin since surveys were completed in 2018, all of which were in the western section (August 2018 and May 2022 [National Interagency Fire Center, 2025] and May or June 2025 [S. Howell, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 2025]). Additionally, the western section was notably drier in 2025 than in 2018. In 2018, parts of the western section were inundated with water and impassable during surveys, whereas these areas were easily navigable and dry in 2025 (S. Howell, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 2025). Although the riparian vegetation in the Hansen Dam Basin has been altered by brush fires, encampments, and recreation (hiking, bicycling, and horse trails), the confirmation of nests and juveniles during our surveys indicates that the Hansen Dam Basin retains suitable vireo breeding habitat.

Although no territorial flycatchers were detected in 2025, several transient flycatchers were detected during one survey at Hansen Dam. In 2025, we also surveyed for flycatchers at three other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sites (Carbon Canyon Dam, Mojave Dam, and Sepulveda Basin, B. Kus, U.S. Geological Survey, unpub. data, 2025), and we only detected one transient flycatcher (at Mojave Dam). The detection of several transient flycatchers indicates that the habitat in the Hansen Dam Basin provides suitable habitat for migrating flycatchers.

References Cited

Browning, M.R., 1993, Comments on the taxonomy of Empidonax traillii (Willow Flycatcher): Western Birds, v. 24, no. 4, p. 241–257, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/western_birds/vol24/iss4/3/.

Durst, S.L., Sogge, M.K., Stump, S.D., Walker, H.A., Kus, B.E., and Sferra, S.J., 2008, Southwestern Willow Flycatcher breeding sites and territory summary—2007: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1303, 31 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20081303.

Esri, 2025, ArcGIS field maps (release 25.1.0): Redlands, Calif., Esri software release.

Franzreb, K.E., 1989, Ecology and conservation of the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report, v. 89, no. 1, 17 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA322886.pdf.

Gaines, D., 1988, Birds of Yosemite and the east slope: Lee Vining, Calif., Artemisia Press, 123 p.

Garrett, K., and Dunn, J., 1981, Birds of southern California—Status and distribution: Los Angeles, Calif., Los Angeles Audubon Society, 408 p.

Griffith Wildlife Biology, 2009, The status of the Least Bell’s Vireo and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher at Los Angeles County drainage area sites in 2009: Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, 45 p.

Grinnell, J., and Miller, A., 1944, The distribution of the birds of California: Berkeley, Calif., Cooper Ornithological Club, Pacific Coast Avifauna, no. 27, 608 p., accessed August 21, 2025, at https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/pca/26.

Howell, S.L., and Kus, B.E., 2024, Distribution and abundance of Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) on the Upper San Luis Rey River, San Diego County, California—2023 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Report 1194, 13 p., accessed September 24, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.3133/dr1194.

Hubbard, J.P., 1987, The status of the Willow Flycatcher in New Mexico: Santa Fe, N. Mex., New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Endangered Species Program, 29 p.

Kus, B.E., 1998, Use of restored riparian habitat by the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus): Restoration Ecology, v. 6, no. 1, p. 75–82, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1998.06110.x.

Kus, B.E., 1999, Impacts of Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism on productivity of the endangered Least Bell’s Vireo: Studies in Avian Biology, v. 18, p. 160–166, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260363840_Impacts_of_Brown-headed_Cowbird_parasitism_on_productivity_of_the_endangered_Least_Bell's_Vireo.

Kus, B. E., Hopp, S.L., Johnson, R.R., and Brown, B.T., 2020, Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii), version 1.0, in Poole, A.F., ed., Birds of the world: Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell Lab of Ornithology, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.belvir.01.

Kus, B.E., and Whitfield, M.J., 2005, Parasitism, productivity, and population growth—Response of Least Bell’s Vireos (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii extimus) to cowbird (Molothrus spp.) control: Ornithological Monographs, v. 57, no. 57, p. 16–27, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.2307/40166811.

National Interagency Fire Center, 2025, InFORM fire occurrence data records feature service: National Interagency Fire Center web page, accessed September 24, 2025, at https://data-nifc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/60a94840152b4a89bec467a9f052f135_0/explore?location=34.261770%2C-118.375699%2C14.73.

Pottinger, R.E., and Kus, B.E., 2019, Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) surveys in the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California—2018 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 1103, 11 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1103.

Remson, J.V., Jr., 1978, Bird species of special concern in California—An annotated list of declining or vulnerable bird species: California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Management Division, Administrative Report 78-1, 54 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=169067&inline.

Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, 2004, The riparian bird conservation plan—A strategy for reversing the decline of riparian associated birds in California (ver. 2): California Partners in Flight, 156 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://partnersinflight.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/riparian_v-2.pdf.

Schlorff, R.W., 1990, Report to the Fish and Game Commission—Status review of the Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) in California: State of California, The Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Game, Department Candidate Species Status Report 90-04, 23 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=22572.

Sogge, M.K., Ahlers, D., and Sferra, S.J., 2010, A natural history summary and survey protocol for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods book 2, chap. A10, 38 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm2a10/.

Unitt, P., 1984, The birds of San Diego County: San Diego Society of Natural History, Memoir 13, 276 p.

Unitt, P., 1987, Empidonax traillii extimus—An endangered subspecies: Western Birds, v. 18, no. 3, p. 137–162.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants—Determination of endangered status for the Least Bell’s Vireo: Federal Register, v. 51, no. 85, p. 16474–16482, accessed August 21, 2025, at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-1986-05-02.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1993, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants—Proposed rule to list the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher as endangered with critical habitat: Federal Register, v. 58, no. 140, p. 39495–39522, accessed August 21, 2025, at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-1993-07-23.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998, Draft recovery plan for the Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Portland, Oreg., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 139 p., accessed August 21, 2025, at https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/980506.pdf.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2001, Least Bell’s Vireo survey guidelines: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Internal Memorandum, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/survey-protocol-for-least-bells-vireo.pdf.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2002, Final recovery plan—Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus): Albuquerque, N. Mex., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report, 210 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2002_finch_d001.pdf.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2006, Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) 5-year review summary and evaluation: Carlsbad, Calif., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report, 24 p., accessed August 21, 2025, at https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/hearings/santa_ana_river/exhibits/riverside/rs3_3.pdf.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014, Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) 5-year review—Summary and evaluation: Phoenix, Ariz., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 102 p., accessed August 12, 2025, at https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc4437.pdf.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2025, The environmental conservation online system (ECOS): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service web page, accessed August 12, 2025, at https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/.

Wheelock, I.G., 1912, Birds of California—An introduction to more than three hundred common birds of the state and adjacent islands: Chicago, Ill., A.C. McClurg and Company, 578 p.

Whitfield, M.J., and Sogge, M.K., 1999, Range-wide impact of Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism on the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus): Studies in Avian Biology, v. 18, no. 1, p. 182–190, accessed August 21, 2025, at https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/sab/vol18/iss1/27.

Willett, G., 1912, Willett’s birds of the Pacific slope of southern California: Hollywood, Calif., Cooper Ornithological Club, Pacific Coast Avifauna, v. 7, 122 p., accessed August 21, 2025, at https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/pca/6/.

Willett, G., 1933, A revised list of the birds of southwestern California: Los Angeles, Cooper Ornithological Club, Pacific Coast Avifauna, v. 21, 204 p., accessed August 21, 2025, at https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/pca/20.

Conversion Factors

International System of Units to U.S. customary units

Multiply By To obtain
kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile (mi)

Datum

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS 84).

Abbreviations

USFWS

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

USGS

U.S. Geological Survey

For more information concerning the research in this report, contact the

Director, Western Ecological Research Center

U.S. Geological Survey

3020 State University Drive East

Sacramento, California 95819

https://www.usgs.gov/centers/werc

Publishing support provided by the USGS Science Publishing Network,

Sacramento Publishing Service Center

Disclaimers

Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Suggested Citation

Lynn, S., and Kus, B.E., 2026, Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) at the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California—2025 data summary: U.S. Geological Survey Data Report 1222, 12 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/dr1222.

ISSN: 2771-9448 (online)

Study Area

Publication type Report
Publication Subtype USGS Numbered Series
Title Distribution and abundance of Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) at the Hansen Dam Basin, Los Angeles County, California—2025 data summary
Series title Data Report
Series number 1222
DOI 10.3133/dr1222
Publication Date April 03, 2026
Year Published 2026
Language English
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher location Reston, VA
Contributing office(s) Western Ecological Research Center
Description vi, 12 p.
Country United States
State California
County Los Angeles County
Other Geospatial Hansen Dam basin
Online Only (Y/N) Y
Additional publication details