The Solar Cycle, Geology, and Geoelectric Hazards for Power Grids

Fact Sheet 2024-3036
By: , and 

Links

Introduction

The Sun’s variability is notably seen in the waxing and waning of the number and size of sunspots over the approximately 11-year period of a solar cycle. Sunspots are concentrations of tangled magnetic-field lines. With their occasional and abrupt rearrangement, concentrations of superheated and electrically conducting plasma (electrons, protons, and ions) can be ejected from the Sun. If one of these “coronal-mass ejections” happens to be directed toward the Earth, it can cause a “magnetic storm”—a global disturbance of the geomagnetic field that can last a day or two.

During a storm, electromagnetic disturbance descends from the near-Earth space environment to the Earth’s surface, and into its interior. The strength of the electromagnetic fields in the Earth, and the depth of their penetration, depend on the rate at which the field varies in time and the electrical conductivity of the underlying geologic structures. For example, 10-second-period field variation can penetrate a kilometer or so into wet sedimentary rock (a relatively good conductor), but 100 kilometers or so into dry metamorphic or igneous rock (which are usually electrically resistive). Longer-period variation can penetrate even deeper—hundreds of kilometers or more. Geoelectric fields generated at Earth’s surface are generally of low amplitude over sedimentary basins and of high amplitude over metamorphic provinces. For some storms, more than 10 volts per kilometer (V/km) can be induced over electrically resistive parts of the Earth (Love and others, 2022).

Consider a power-transmission line that happens to be deployed across a metamorphic province. Storm-induced electric currents will meet resistance in flowing through the poorly conducting rock, and this is where the power grid offers an alternative path—one of less resistance. For a power line of 100 km in length, the integration of 10 V/km adds up to 1,000 V. Such voltages can drive currents through grounding points at high-voltage transformer substations and into the power grid. They are not the tightly managed alternating currents that power grids are designed to carry. Magnetic-storm-induced currents can interfere with grid operation and even damage or destroy transformers.

This long chain of physical effects, stretching from the Sun to the Earth to the power grid, can be especially consequential for the most intense magnetic storms that are produced by the strongest coronal-mass ejections. A very intense magnetic superstorm could, potentially, result in prolonged and widespread blackouts, possibly spanning international boundaries. Such an event is more probable around the time of sunspot “solar maximum,” when spots are relatively numerous.

History of Sunspots and Storms

For hundreds of years, astronomers have observed and counted sunspots. Since the middle of the 19th century, geophysicists have regularly measured geomagnetic disturbance at ground-based stations. The combination of these two types of data provides a long history of solar-terrestrial activity. Figure 1 shows time series representing sunspot number (R) from 1843 to 2024 (Clette and Lefèvre, 2016; WDC-SILSO, 2024) and geomagnetic disturbance (aa) from 1868 to 2024 (Lockwood and others, 2018; Mayaud and others, 2023). The semiregular solar cycle is clearly seen in the sunspot data. Intense magnetic storms tend to occur when sunspot numbers are high, and they are rare when sunspot numbers are low.

The two time series are correlated, showing rise and fall of sunspot number and, correspondingly,
                     rise and fall of geomagnetic disturbance.
Figure 1.

A, Variation in sunspot number (R), 1843–2024; B, variation in geomagnetic disturbance (αα), in nanoteslas, 1868–2024. Note the 11-year modulation in both time series and their correlation. The 1921 and 1989 magnetic storms are labeled.

The magnetic storm of March 1989 happened during the ascending phase of the solar cycle, just before sunspot maximum in November 1989. This storm damaged satellites and disrupted geophysical surveys and radio communication. Geomagnetically induced currents led to the complete collapse of the Hydro-Québec electric power grid in Canada (Allen and others, 1989; Bolduc, 2002), caused substantial interference in U.S. power grids (North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 1990), and damaged a high-voltage transformer at a nuclear power plant in New Jersey (Rossi, 1990; Barnes and others, 1991).

Looking further back in time, the great magnetic storm of May 1921 occurred during the declining phase of the solar cycle, following sunspot maximum in August 1917. This storm, one of the most intense ever recorded, caused worldwide disruption of telegraph and telephone systems—which, in those days, relied on long-grounded networks of wires (like power grids of today). In New York State and City, the storm caused fires in telegraph stations used by railroad companies (for example, Hapgood, 2019; Love and others, 2019).

In September 1859, an astronomer named Richard Carrington was looking at sunspots through a telescope when he saw a very bright solar flare. Seventeen hours later, one of history’s greatest magnetic storms transpired. The storm was so intense it overwhelmed magnetometer systems used at most observatories at the time. The Carrington storm disrupted telegraph systems and caused fires at numerous telegraph stations around the world.

With the rise of the global economy and humanity’s ever-increasing reliance on electricity-based technology, a recurrence of a storm like that of March 1989 could carry a worldwide economic impact of $2.4 trillion to $3.4 trillion, equivalent to a global loss in gross productivity of 3.9 to 5.6 percent (Schulte in den Bäumen and others, 2014). The future occurrence of a Carrington-class magnetic storm might carry an economic cost for the United States alone of $0.6 trillion to $2.6 trillion (for example, National Research Council, 2008; Lloyd’s of London, 2013).

Geoelectric Hazard Maps

As part of an interagency Federal Government project to improve national preparedness for space-weather hazards, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Geomagnetism Program scientists have performed research on magnetic-storm-induced geoelectric fields. This work relies on two important and very different datasets: (1) multidecadal records of magnetic storms acquired at ground-based monitoring stations operated by the USGS (for example, Love and Finn, 2011; Love and Lewis, 2021) and Natural Resources Canada (for example, Newitt and Coles, 2007), and (2) measurements of the electromagnetic properties of the Earth acquired through national-scale surveys supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the USGS (for example, Schultz, 2010; Kelbert and others, 2018).

The combination of these datasets permits retrospective mapping of time-dependent geoelectric fields across the contiguous United States (CONUS). The USGS and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also collaborate on the presentation of real-time geoelectric field maps.

Figure 2 shows a map of the amplitudes of geoelectric fields induced across CONUS during the March 1989 magnetic storm. The same figure also shows a map of the locations of reported instances of power-grid interference during that storm (Love and others, 2022). Notably, geoelectric amplitudes were high in the Upper Midwest and in the Eastern United States. These are regions of electrically resistive metamorphic and igneous rock (Kelbert and others, 2019). Conversely, geoelectric amplitudes were low over more electrically conductive sedimentary basins, such as in Michigan and Illinois. During the March 1989 storm, operational interference for U.S. power grids was greatest where geoelectric amplitudes were high, occurring in power grids serving many of the largest cities in the United States: Boston, Massachusetts; New York City, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; and Washington, District of Columbia—a combined megalopolis of more than 50 million people.

Amplitudes were high in the East and in the upper Midwest; the interference to electric-power
                     grids during the March 1989 storm was concentrated in the Eastern United States.
Figure 2.

A, Map of geoelectric field amplitudes realized during the March 1989 magnetic storm. B, Map of the locations of power-grid interference realized during the March 1989 magnetic storm.

Retrospective mapping of storm-time geoelectric fields, such as for the March 1989 storm, shows where utility companies might concentrate their efforts to improve the resilience of the Nation’s electric-power grids to the deleterious impacts of magnetic storms. It also shows where utility companies could be especially vigilant in operating power transmission systems during a magnetic storm to help ensure operational continuity.

References Cited

Allen, J., Sauer, H., Frank, L., and Reiff, P., 1989, Effects of the March 1989 solar activity: Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, v. 70, no. 46, p. 1479, 1486–1488, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1029/89EO00409.

Barnes, P.R., Rizy, D.T., McConnell, B.W., Tesche, F.M., and Taylor, E.R., Jr., 1991, Electric utility industry experience with geomagnetic disturbances: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, report ORNL–6665, prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Power Systems Technology Program, 78 p., accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.2172/10108452.

Bolduc, L., 2002, GIC observations and studies in the Hydro-Québec power system: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, v. 64, no. 16, p. 1793–1802, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00128-1.

Clette, F., and Lefèvre, L., 2016, The new sunspot number—Assembling all corrections: Solar Physics, v. 291, p. 2629–2651, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-1014-y.

Hapgood, M., 2019, The great storm of May 1921—An exemplar of a dangerous space weather event: Space Weather, v. 17, no. 7, p. 950–975, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002195.

Kelbert, A., Bedrosian, P.A., and Murphy, B.S., 2019, The first 3D conductivity model of the contiguous United States—Reflections on geologic structure and application to induction hazards, chap. 8 of Gannon, J.L., Swidinsky, A., and Xu, Z., eds., Geomagnetically induced currents from the sun to the power grid, v. 244 of Geophysical Monograph: Washington, D.C., American Geophysical Union, p. 127–151, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119434412.ch8.

Kelbert, A., Erofeeva, S., Trabant, C., Karstens, R., and Van Fossen, M., 2018, Taking magnetotelluric data out of the drawer: Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, v. 99, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO112859.

Lloyd’s of London, 2013, Solar storm risk to the North American electric grid: London, United Kingdom, Lloyd’s, 21 p.

Lockwood, M., Chambodut, A., Barnard, L.A., Owens, M.J., Clarke, E., and Mendel, V., 2018, A homogeneous aa index—1. Secular variation: Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, v. 8, article A53, 27 p., accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018038.

Love, J.J., and Finn, C.A., 2011, The USGS Geomagnetism Program and its role in space weather monitoring: Space Weather, v. 9, no. 7, article S07001, 5 p., accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1029/2011SW000684.

Love, J.J., Hayakawa, H., and Cliver, E.W., 2019, Intensity and impact of the New York Railroad Superstorm of May 1921: Space Weather, v. 17, no. 8, p. 1281–1292, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002250.

Love, J.J., and Lewis, K.A., 2021, Geomagnetic monitoring in the mid-Atlantic United States: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2021–3001, 2 p., accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20213001.

Love, J.J., Lucas, G.M., Rigler, E.J., Murphy, B.S., Kelbert, A., and Bedrosian, P.A., 2022, Mapping a magnetic superstorm—March 1989 geoelectric hazards and impacts on United States power systems: Space Weather, v. 20, no. 5, article e2021SW003030, 27 p., accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW003030.

Mayaud, P.-N., Menvielle, M., and Chambodut, A., 2023, aa geomagnetic index: École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre [dataset time range 1868–2024], accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.25577/9z05-v751.

National Research Council, 2008, Severe space weather events—Understanding societal and economic impacts—A workshop report: Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 144 p., accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.17226/12507.

Newitt, L.R., and Coles, R., 2007, Observatories in Canada, in Gubbins, D., and Herrero-Bervera, E., eds., Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism: Dordrecht, Netherlands, Springer, p. 726–727, accessed August 4, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_234.

North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 1990, March 13, 1989 Geomagnetic disturbance, in The 1989 system disturbances Disturbance Analysis Working Group report: Princeton, New Jersey, North American Electric Reliability Corporation, p. 36–60.

Rossi, C.E., 1990, Information Notice No. 90–42—Failure of electrical power equipment due to solar magnetic disturbances: Washington, D.C., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 3 p.

Schulte in den Bäumen, H., Moran, D., Lenzen, M., Cairns, I., and Steenge, A., 2014, How severe space weather can disrupt global supply chains: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, v. 14, no. 10, p. 2749–2759, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2749-2014.

Schultz, A., 2010, EMScope—A continental scale magnetotelluric observatory and data discovery resource: Data Science Journal, v. 8, published online October 24, 2009, p. IGY6–IGY20, accessed June 2024 at https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.SS_IGY-009.

WDC-SILSO, 2024, Sunspot number catalogue—1843–2024: Brussels, Royal Observatory of Belgium, accessed June 2024 at https://www.sidc.be/SILSO/home.

For additional information, visit

https://geomag.usgs.gov

Disclaimers

Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Suggested Citation

Love, J.J., Sobieszczyk, S., Rigler, E.J., Kelbert, A., and Lewis, K.A., 2024, The solar cycle, geology, and geoelectric hazards for power grids (ver. 1.1, October 2024): U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2024–3036, 4 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20243036.

ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)

Study Area

Publication type Report
Publication Subtype USGS Numbered Series
Title The solar cycle, geology, and geoelectric hazards for power grids
Series title Fact Sheet
Series number 2024-3036
DOI 10.3133/fs20243036
Edition Version 1.1: October 16, 2024; Version 1.0: October 16, 2024
Year Published 2024
Language English
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher location Reston, VA
Contributing office(s) Geologic Hazards Science Center - Seismology / Geomagnetism
Description 4 p.
Country United States
Online Only (Y/N) Y
Additional Online Files (Y/N) N
Google Analytic Metrics Metrics page
Additional publication details