Assessment of Undiscovered Conventional Oil and Gas Resources in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala, 2024

Fact Sheet 2025-3040
National and Global Petroleum Assessment
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

Using a geology-based assessment methodology, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated undiscovered, technically recoverable mean conventional resources of 14.6 billion barrels of oil and 83.7 trillion cubic feet of gas in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.

Introduction

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessed the potential for undiscovered, technically recoverable conventional oil and gas resources in 14 assessment units (AUs) (fig. 1A, B) within 9 geologically defined provinces of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala. The geologic provinces assessed in this report are as follows: Burgos Basin, Tampico-Misantla Basin, Veracruz Basin, Campeche-Sigsbee Salt Basin, Saline-Comalcalco Basin, Villahermosa Uplift, Macuspana Basin, Yucatan Platform, and Sierra Madre de Chiapas-Petén Fold Belt. The geologic evolution of these provinces and the oil and gas resources within them resulted from a complex tectonic history (Lara, 1993; Bartok and others, 2015; Hudec and Norton, 2019; Davison, 2021; Graham and others, 2021; Hasan and Mann, 2021; Miranda-Madrigal and Chávez-Cabello, 2021; Pindell and others, 2021; Villagómez and others, 2022) that is briefly summarized for this report. Crustal extension in the Triassic to Early Jurassic between North America, the Yucatan Platform, and South America signaled the initial fragmentation of Pangaea and led to peripheral rift basins filled with synrift fluvial-alluvial and lacustrine sediments, possibly including viable petroleum source rocks, reservoir rocks, and traps. Intermittent access to the ocean during the Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) and possibly as late as the Callovian led to the deposition of as much as 2,000 meters of salt on extended continental crust. Rifting continued to extend the continental crust between North America, the Yucatan Platform, and South America up to the Oxfordian. As rifting waned and thermal subsidence occurred, transgressive organic-rich source rocks of Oxfordian, Kimmeridgian, and Tithonian age were deposited on the thick salt. Oxfordian sandstones and carbonates deposited along the western margin of the Yucatan Block may contain potential reservoirs like the Norphlet and Smackover Formations of the offshore eastern Gulf Coast margin of the United States (Snedden and others, 2021). Seafloor spreading began in the Oxfordian between North America and the Yucatan Platform as the Yucatan Platform rotated counterclockwise, resulting in the separation of the Bajocian salt basin into a northern salt basin along the U.S. Gulf of America margin (Louann salt basin) and a southern salt basin on the western margin of the Yucatan Block (Campeche salt basin). With burial, the salt began to deform into a spectrum of structures in the Campeche salt basin, forming numerous traps for oil and gas. By Valanginian time, the Yucatan Block ceased movement, ending seafloor spreading. Open marine conditions prevailed throughout the Gulf of America, and several transgressions and regressions led to the formation of extensive, stacked carbonate platforms along the passive margins of the Burgos Basin, Tampico-Misantla Basin, and Veracruz Basin Provinces, as well as the formation of carbonate platforms throughout the passive margins of the Yucatan Block. Carbonate platforms contain many potential reservoirs, such as karsts, dolomites, reefs, mounds, debris-flow conglomerates, and breccias. Subduction of the Farallon plate along the western margin of Mexico from the Late Cretaceous to Eocene led to deformation that formed the northwest–southeast-trending Sierra Madre de Chiapas Fold Belt, with potential fractured carbonate reservoirs within structural traps. Uplift and erosion of the fold belts resulted in the eastward progradation of major offshore clastic sequences in the Burgos Basin, Tampico-Misantla Basin, and Veracruz Basin Provinces, providing numerous potential reservoirs and traps. Burial by these clastic sequences caused continuous movement and deformation of the underlying salt of the Campeche salt basin, with the potential for modifying the existing structures and possibly disrupting seal integrity. Northward dextral movement of the Greater Antilles arc system in the Paleogene caused the inversion of extensional structures along the once-passive southeastern Yucatan margin, with possible loss of oil and gas (Lara, 1993). Subduction of the Cocos-Nazca plate in the Miocene along the western Mexico margin formed the Sierra Madre de Chiapas Fold Belt and the foreland Petén Basin. Uplift in the Miocene and Pliocene resulted in eastward-prograding clastic sequences with numerous potential reservoirs and traps. In the Miocene, detachment surfaces along undercompacted and overpressured Eocene shales led to upslope extensional structures and downslope contractional structures, forming the Mexican Ridges Fold Belt offshore from the Burgos Basin, Tampico-Misantla Basin, and Veracruz Basin margins with potential for deep-water reservoirs, traps, and seals. Salt withdrawal in the southern Yucatan margin formed the Macuspana Basin and Saline-Comalcalco Basin that filled with Miocene to Pliocene clastics, providing potential reservoirs, traps, and seals.

Six conventional oil and gas assessment units span southeastern Mexico, and eight
                     conventional oil and gas assessment units span southeastern Mexico, northern Guatemala,
                     and Belize.
Figure 1.

Maps showing the locations of (A) six conventional oil and gas assessment units (AUs) within Mexico and (B) eight conventional oil and gas AUs within Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.

Total Petroleum System and Assessment Units

The USGS defined a Mesozoic–Cenozoic Composite Total Petroleum System (TPS) that encompasses oil and gas generated from several Mesozoic and Cenozoic source rocks. Organic-rich shales of the Oxfordian Smackover Formation and Tithonian Pimienta Formation are cited as having generated most oil and gas in the nine defined provinces (Jacques and Clegg, 2002; Arzate and others, 2009; Kenning and Mann, 2021; Shann, 2021). Other sources of oil and gas in this composite TPS are Triassic lacustrine shales, Kimmeridgian marine shales, Early Cretaceous (Albian) marls, Cenomanian–Turonian marine shales, and Paleogene and Neogene marine and terrestrial shales (Guzmán-Vega and others, 2001; Prost and Aranda, 2001; Lourdes Clara Valdés and others, 2009; Petersen and others, 2012; Holland and others, 2024). Not all source rocks are present or have contributed oil and gas in all provinces.

Fourteen AUs were defined within the composite TPS based on the predominant types of hydrocarbon reservoirs and traps. The Burgos Basin Offshore Reservoirs AU, Tampico-Misantla Basin Reservoirs AU, and Veracruz Basin Offshore Reservoirs AU were defined on the presence of deep-water slope and basin-floor fan sandstone reservoirs within structural traps, including the Mexican Ridges Fold Belt offshore. The Golden Lane El Abra Formation Reservoirs AU and the Golden Lane Tamabra Formation Reservoirs AU are dominated by reef and reef-margin debris-flow reservoirs, respectively. The Veracruz Fold Belt Reservoirs AU contains fractured carbonate reservoirs within stacked thrust sheets. The Saline-Comalcalco Basin Reservoirs AU and Macuspana Basin Reservoirs AU are dominated by shallow- to deep-marine sandstone reservoirs within stratigraphic traps. The Villahermosa-Reforma Trend Reservoirs AU has extensive Tamabra-like debris-flow reservoirs in salt-related structural and combination traps. The Campeche-Yucatan Basin Postsalt Reservoirs AU is defined by carbonate reservoirs within salt-related structural traps. The Campeche-Yucatan Basin Presalt Reservoirs AU contains potential Triassic fluvial-deltaic to deep-lacustrine sandstone reservoirs within stratigraphic traps. The Yucatan Platform NW Margin Reservoirs AU is defined by a spectrum of carbonate reservoirs within stratigraphic traps. The Yucatan Platform SE Margin Reservoirs AU has fluvial-deltaic to shallow-marine sandstone reservoirs within complex, inverted structural traps. The Sierra Madre de Chiapas-Petén Fold Belt and Basin Reservoirs AU is defined by sandstone reservoirs within structural traps in the fold belt and adjacent foreland basin. The assessment input data for 14 conventional AUs are summarized in table 1 and in Schenk (2025).

Table 1.    

Key input data for 14 conventional oil and gas assessment units in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.

[Gray shading indicates not applicable. AU, assessment unit; MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet of gas]

Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Burgos Basin Offshore Reservoirs AU Tampico-Misantla Basin Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 80 240 85.1 1 40 80 41.0
Number of gas fields 1 30 90 31.9 1 40 120 42.5
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 5 8 5,000 45.4 0.5 0.8 2,000 10.9
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 30 48 12,000 168.0 3 24 8,000 120.3
AU probability 1.0 1.0
Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Veracruz Basin Offshore Reservoirs AU Golden Lane El Abra Formation Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 15 45 16.0 1 3 6 3.1
Number of gas fields 1 60 180 63.8
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 1 4 500 11.9 0.5 0.8 20 1.2
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 6 24 8,000 115.5
AU probability 1.0 1.0
Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Golden Lane Tamabra Formation Reservoirs AU Veracruz Fold Belt Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 8 40 9.1 1 15 30 15.4
Number of gas fields 1 2 8 2.2 1 30 100 51.2
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 0.5 0.8 800 6.0 0.5 1.0 500 5.4
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 3 24 300 33.0 3 24 12,000 150.4
AU probability 1.0 1.0
Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Saline-Comalcalco Basin Reservoirs AU Macuspana Basin Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 100 200 102.4 1 5 15 5.3
Number of gas fields 1 40 80 41.0 1 60 120 61.5
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 0.5 0.8 4,000 17.6 0.5 0.8 60 1.7
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 3 24 12,000 150.4 3 24 10,000 135.8
AU probability 1.0 1.0
Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Villahermosa-Reforma Trend Reservoirs AU Campeche-Yucatan Basin Postsalt Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 60 120 61.5 1 80 240 85.1
Number of gas fields 1 30 90 31.9 1 40 120 42.5
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 0.5 1 5,000 23.6 5 10 8,000 70.7
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 3 24 8,000 120.3 30 60 14,000 217.4
AU probability 1.0 1.0
Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Campeche-Yucatan Basin Presalt Reservoirs AU Yucatan Platform NW Margin Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 10 40 11.0 1 40 120 42.5
Number of gas fields 1 40 160 44.1 1 20 60 21.3
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 5 8 500 15.9 0.5 0.8 250 3.1
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 30 48 4,000 105.4 3 24 2,000 62.0
AU probability 0.144 1.0
Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Yucatan Platform SE Margin Reservoirs AU Sierra Madre de Chiapas-Petén Fold Belt and Basin Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 10 30 10.6 1 60 180 63.8
Number of gas fields 1 40 120 42.5
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 0.5 0.8 20 1.2 0.5 0.8 1,200 7.7
Size of gas fields (BCFG) 3 24 8,000 120.3
AU probability 1.0 1.0
Table 1.    Key input data for 14 conventional oil and gas assessment units in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.

Undiscovered Resources Summary

The USGS quantitatively assessed undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in 14 AUs in geologic provinces of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala (table 2). The estimated mean undiscovered resources are 14,612 million barrels of oil (MMBO), or 14.6 billion barrels of oil, with an F95–F5 range from 3,957 to 34,303 MMBO; 83,711 billion cubic feet of gas (BCFG), or 83.7 trillion cubic feet of gas, with an F95–F5 range from 25,835 to 187,036 BCFG; and 4,849 million barrels of natural gas liquids (MMBNGL), with an F95–F5 range from 1,493 to 10,685 MMBNGL.

Table 2.    

Results for 14 conventional oil and gas assessment units in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.

[Gray shading indicates not applicable. Results shown are fully risked estimates. F95 represents a 95-percent chance of at least the amount tabulated; other fractiles are defined similarly. MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet of gas; NGL, natural gas liquids; MMBNGL, million barrels of natural gas liquids]

Total petroleum system and assessment units (AUs) AU prob-ability Accum-ulation type Total undiscovered resources
Oil (MMBO) Gas (BCFG) NGL (MMBNGL)
F95 F50 F5 Mean F95 F50 F5 Mean F95 F50 F5 Mean
Burgos Basin Offshore Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 1,183 3,333 8,257 3,852 2,955 8,325 20,678 9,628 251 708 1,756 818
Gas 1,563 4,396 12,617 5,366 111 312 896 381
Tampico-Misantla Basin Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 79 290 1,395 443 127 464 2,230 709 2 9 42 13
Gas 1,470 4,405 11,243 5,120 37 110 281 128
Veracruz Basin Offshore Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 51 156 449 190 81 250 719 304 2 5 14 6
Gas 2,468 6,522 14,993 7,346 30 78 180 88
Golden Lane El Abra Formation Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 2 3 8 4 1 2 7 3 0 0 0 0
Gas
Golden Lane Tamabra Formation Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 4 23 211 54 5 31 284 74 0 1 9 2
Gas 17 60 177 74 0 1 4 2
Veracruz Fold Belt Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 17 55 250 83 22 71 325 107 0 1 7 2
Gas 2,743 6,710 15,929 7,688 170 416 989 477
Saline-Comalcalco Basin Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 430 1,414 4,528 1,813 515 1,696 5,455 2,175 36 119 381 152
Gas 1,982 5,215 13,622 6,161 192 506 1,322 598
Macuspana Basin Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 3 7 24 9 5 14 50 19 0 0 1 0
Gas 3,267 7,528 16,186 8,342 56 128 275 142
Villahermosa-Reforma Trend Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 268 1,008 4,276 1,457 454 1,711 7,262 2,477 11 41 174 59
Gas 993 3,177 8,918 3,825 86 276 776 333
Campeche-Yucatan Basin Postsalt Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 1,769 5,187 13,109 6,042 2,121 6,219 15,771 7,249 148 435 1,104 507
Gas 2,970 8,044 19,757 9,273 288 780 1,916 899
Campeche-Yucatan Basin Presalt Reservoirs AU 0.14 Oil 0 0 186 25 0 0 130 18 0 0 1 0
Gas 0 0 5,103 672 0 0 51 7
Yucatan Platform NW Margin Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 40 111 302 133 67 189 513 226 2 5 12 5
Gas 427 1,154 2,754 1,318 37 100 240 115
Yucatan Platform SE Margin Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 5 12 25 13 3 7 15 8 0 0 0 0
Gas
Sierra Madre de Chiapas-Petén Fold Belt and Basin Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 106 379 1,283 494 85 302 1,029 395 1 2 6 2
Gas 1,494 4401 11,269 5,134 33 97 248 113
Total undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources 3,957 11,978 34,303 14,612 25,835 70,893 187,036 83,711 1,493 4,130 10,685 4,849
Table 2.    Results for 14 conventional oil and gas assessment units in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala.

For More Information

Assessment results are also available at the USGS Energy Resources Program website, https://www.usgs.gov/programs/energy-resources-program.

Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala Assessment Team

Christopher J. Schenk, Tracey J. Mercier, Phuong A. Le, Andrea D. Cicero, Ronald M. Drake II, Sarah E. Gelman, Jane S. Hearon, Benjamin G. Johnson, Jenny H. Lagesse, Heidi M. Leathers-Miller, and Kira K. Timm

References Cited

Arzate, S.O., Moguel, C.R., López, M.M., and Flores, M.F., 2009, Basin modeling of the Upper Jurassic petroleum systems (Tithonian and Oxfordian) in the Akalan-Chilam area of the Campeche Sound in the southern Gulf of Mexico, in Bartolini, C., and Román Ramos, J.R., eds., Petroleum systems in the southern Gulf of Mexico: AAPG Memoir 90, p. 285–313, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1306/13191089M903333.

Bartok, P., Mejia-Hernandez, M.C., and Ismael, M., 2015, Paleogeographic constraints on Middle- to Late-Jurassic tectonic reconstruction of the Maya block of southern Mexico and equivalent strata of northwestern South America, chap. 8 of Bartolini, C., and Mann, P., eds., Petroleum geology and potential of the Colombian Caribbean Margin: AAPG Memoir 108, p. 201–216, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://archives-datapages-com.usgslibrary.idm.oclc.org/data/specpubs/memoir108/data/pdfs/201.pdf.

Davison, I., 2021, Salt tectonics in the Sureste Basin, SE Mexico—Some implications for hydrocarbon exploration, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 147–165, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2019-227.

Graham, R., Pindell, J., Villagómez, D., Molina-Garza, R., Granath, J., and Sierra-Rojas, M., 2021, Integrated Cretaceous–Cenozoic plate tectonics and structural geology in southern Mexico, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 285–314, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2020-70.

Guzmán-Vega, M.A., Castro Ortíz, L., Román Ramos, J.R., Medrano-Morales, L., Lourdes Clara Valdés, M. de, Vázquez-Covarrubias, E., and Ziga-Rodríguez, G., 2001, Classification and origin of petroleum in the Mexican Gulf Coast Basin—An overview, chap. 5 of Bartolini, C., Buffler, R.T., and Cantú-Chapa, A., eds., The western Gulf of Mexico Basin—Tectonics, sedimentary basins, and petroleum systems: AAPG Memoir 75, p. 127–142, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/memoir75/m75ch05/m75ch05.htm.

Hasan, M.N., and Mann, P., 2021, Structural styles and evolution of the Campeche salt Basin, southern Gulf of Mexico: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 133, article 105313, 18 p., accessed July 14, 2025, at https://www-sciencedirect-com.usgslibrary.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0264817221004165.

Holland, B., Alsen, P., Nytoft, H.P., Rudra, A., Sanei, H., and Petersen, H.I., 2024, Quality and composition of Lower Cretaceous carbonate source rocks and seepage oils in the Belize Basin, southern Belize, Central America: International Journal of Coal Geology, v. 285, article 104478, 23 p., accessed July 14, 2025, at https://www-sciencedirect-com.usgslibrary.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0166516224000351.

Hudec, M.R., and Norton, I.O., 2019, Upper Jurassic structure and evolution of the Yucatán and Campeche subbasins, southern Gulf of Mexico: AAPG Bulletin, v. 103, no. 5, p. 1133–1151, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1306/11151817405.

Jacques, J.M., and Clegg, H., 2002, Late Jurassic source rock distribution and quality in the Gulf of Mexico—Inferences from plate tectonic modeling: Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, v. 52, p. 429–440, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://archives.datapages.com/data/gcags/data/052/052001/0429.htm.

Kenning, J.J., and Mann, P., 2021, Regional thermal maturity modelling of hydrocarbons along the deep-water Yucatan margin, southern Gulf of Mexico, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 203–231, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2019-252.

Lara, M.E., 1993, Divergent wrench faulting in the Belize southern lagoon—Implications for Tertiary Caribbean plate movements and Quaternary reef distribution: AAPG Bulletin, v. 77, no. 6, p. 1041–1063, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://archives-datapages-com.usgslibrary.idm.oclc.org/data/bulletns/1992-93/images/pg/00770006/1000/10410.pdf.

Lourdes Clara Valdés, M. de, Rodríguez, L.V., and García, E.C., 2009, Geochemical integration and interpretation of source rocks, oils, and natural gases in southeastern Mexico, chap. 16 of Bartolini, C., and Román Ramos, J.R., eds., Petroleum systems in the southern Gulf of Mexico: AAPG Memoir 90, p. 337–368, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/memoir90/CHAPTER16/CHAPTER16.HTM.

Miranda-Madrigal, E., and Chávez-Cabello, G., 2021, Regional geological analysis of the southern deep Gulf of Mexico and northern Yucatán Shelf, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 183–202, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2020-1.

Petersen, H.I., Holland, B., Nytoft, H.P., Cho, A., Piasecki, S., Cruz, J. de la, and Cornec, J.H., 2012, Geochemistry of crude oils, seepage oils and source rocks from Belize and Guatemala—Indications of carbonate-sourced petroleum systems: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 35, no. 2, p. 127–163, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.2012.00523.x.

Pindell, J., Villagómez, D., Molina-Garza, R., Graham, R., and Weber, B., 2021, A revised synthesis of the rift and drift history of the Gulf of Mexico and surrounding regions in the light of improved age dating of Middle Jurassic salt, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 29–76, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2020-43.

Prost, G., and Aranda, M., 2001, Tectonics and hydrocarbon systems of the Veracruz Basin, Mexico, chap. 11 of Bartolini, C., Buffler, R.T., and Cantú-Chapa, A., eds., The western Gulf of Mexico Basin—Tectonics, sedimentary basins, and petroleum systems: AAPG Memoir 75, p. 271–291, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/memoir75/m75ch11/m75ch11.htm.

Schenk, C.J., 2025, USGS National and Global Oil and Gas Assessment Project—Provinces of Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala—Assessment unit boundaries, assessment input data, and fact sheet data tables: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P1ZDDFCV.

Shann, M.V., 2021, The Sureste Basin of Mexico—Its framework, future oil exploration opportunities and key challenges ahead, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 119–146, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2019-214.

Snedden, J.W., Stockli, D.F., and Norton, I.O., 2021, Paleogeographical reconstruction and provenance of Oxfordian aeolian sandstone reservoirs in Mexico offshore areas—Comparison to the Norphlet aeolian system of the northern Gulf of Mexico, in Davison, I., Hull, J.N.F., and Pindell, J., eds., The basins, orogens and evolution of the southern Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean: Geological Society of London Special Publication 504, p. 233–253, accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1144/SP504-2019-219.

Villagómez, D., Steffensen, C., Pindell, J., Molina-Garza, R.S., Gray, G., Graham, R., O’Sullivan, P., Stockli, D., and Spikings, R., 2022, Tectono-sedimentary evolution of southern Mexico, Implications for Cretaceous and younger source-to-sink systems in the Mexican foreland basins and the Gulf of Mexico: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 231, article 104066, 38 p., accessed July 14, 2025, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104066.

Disclaimers

Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Suggested Citation

Schenk, C.J., Mercier, T.J., Le, P.A., Cicero, A.D., Drake, R.M., II, Gelman, S.E., Hearon, J.S., Johnson, B.G., Lagesse, J.H., Leathers-Miller, H.M., and Timm, K.K., 2025, Assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala, 2024: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2025–3040, 6 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20253040.

ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)

Study Area

Publication type Report
Publication Subtype USGS Numbered Series
Title Assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala, 2024
Series title Fact Sheet
Series number 2025-3040
DOI 10.3133/fs20253040
Publication Date August 20, 2025
Year Published 2025
Language English
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher location Reston VA
Contributing office(s) Central Energy Resources Science Center
Description Report: 6 p.; Data Release
Country Belize, Guatemala, Mexico
Online Only (Y/N) Y
Additional publication details