Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California, 2024

Fact Sheet 2025-3052
National and Global Petroleum Assessment
By: , and 

Links

Abstract

Using a geology-based assessment methodology, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated undiscovered, technically recoverable mean resources of 67 million barrels of oil and 56 billion cubic feet of gas in the Santa Maria Basin Province of California.

Introduction

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessed the potential for undiscovered, technically recoverable conventional and continuous (unconventional) oil and gas resources within the Santa Maria Basin Province of California (fig. 1). The assessment encompasses the onshore and State waters part of the province and does not include the Federal offshore. The Santa Maria Basin Province has a long history of oil exploration, beginning with the discovery of the Orcutt oil field in 1901 based on the occurrence of oil seeps. Most oil fields were discovered by 1956, and one more conventional field was added in 1984 (Tennyson and Isaacs, 2001).

Two assessment units span the Santa Maria Basin Province on the central coast of California.
Figure 1.

Maps showing the location of two assessment units (AUs) in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California.

The assessment is based upon the definition of a Miocene Composite Total Petroleum System (TPS) that formed through a multiphase tectonic evolution (Namson and Davis, 1990; Luyendyk, 1991; Wilson and others, 2005; Sweetkind and others, 2021). Miocene to Quaternary sediments overlie a complex basement assemblage composed of Jurassic Franciscan metamorphic rocks and ophiolites. In the early Miocene, the future site of the Santa Maria Basin was a westward-facing continental slope that was subjected to regional extension or transtension, possibly due to subduction trench rollback or backarc extension, which formed a horst and graben topography on the continental slope. Unconformably overlying the extended basement assemblage are nonmarine coarse clastics of the lower Miocene Lospe Formation, which are overlain by mudstones and turbidite sandstones of the marine Point Sal Formation. The Point Sal Formation transitions into the Miocene Monterey Formation, which is characterized by organic-rich mudstones, cherts, siliceous shales, phosphatic mudstones, dolomites, and sandstones that were deposited in bathyal conditions and collectively are more than 1,000 meters thick. The Monterey Formation drapes the extensional structures. By late Miocene to early Pliocene, clockwise rotation of the western Coast Ranges block initiated regional deformation, forming the northwest–southeast-trending contractional structures in the Santa Maria Basin, as the continental margin changed from transtension to transpression deformation. Uplift and erosion during this phase of deformation resulted in the progradation of mudstones and sandstones of the Miocene to Pliocene Sisquoc Formation, the upper Pliocene Foxen Mudstone, and the Careaga Sandstone into the basin. Deposition of as much as 5 kilometers of Pliocene to Quaternary sediments placed the Monterey Formation organic-rich source rocks and possibly other source rocks into the thermal window for oil generation.

Total Petroleum System and Assessment Units

The USGS defined the Miocene Composite TPS to encompass oil potentially sourced from several organic-rich shales and marls. Organic-rich lithologies of the Monterey Formation in the Santa Maria Basin Province have the highest volumes of oil generated, migrated, and trapped (Isaacs, 1989; Tennyson and Isaacs, 2001). Monterey Formation source rocks are dominated by Type IIS organic matter and have total organic carbon (TOC) values as much as 14 weight percent (wt. pct.), hydrogen index values greater than 600 milligrams of hydrocarbon per gram of TOC, and sulfur content as much as 5.9 wt. pct. The level of thermal maturation is problematic to assess in the Monterey Formation because standard thermal maturation indices are difficult to apply to these rocks (Isaacs and Tomson, 1990). Other source rocks may include organic-rich mudstones of the Point Sal Formation with TOC values as much as 3.5 wt. pct. (Bennett and others, 2022), the lower Miocene Rincon Shale with an average TOC of 3.5 wt. pct., and mudstones of the Sisquoc Formation with TOC values as much as 6 wt. pct. and an average of 2.3 wt. pct. (Baskin and Peters, 1992; Bohacs, 1993; Tennyson and Isaacs, 2001).

Two assessment units (AUs) were defined within the Miocene Composite TPS: the Santa Maria Basin Conventional Reservoirs AU and the Santa Maria Basin Continuous Oil AU. The geologic model for the Santa Maria Basin Conventional Reservoirs AU is for high-sulfur oil generated from Monterey Formation organic-rich lithologies to have migrated updip into fractured Monterey Formation reservoirs on structural highs. Low seal integrity in this AU may have caused numerous oil seeps and tar accumulations on the surface.

The geologic model for the assessment of the Santa Maria Basin Continuous Oil AU is for oil generated from Monterey Formation organic-rich source rocks to have been partly retained within the matrix of the reservoirs after migration of oil updip into conventional fractured reservoirs. Because there are no production data from the Monterey Formation in this AU, the input to the assessment of continuous resources was guided by the input for the assessment of continuous oil resources from the Monterey Formation in the nearby San Joaquin Basin Province (Tennyson and others, 2015). The assessment input data for the two AUs are summarized in table 1 and Schenk (2025).

Table 1.    

Key input data for one conventional and one continuous assessment unit in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California.

[Gray shading indicates not applicable. The average estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) input is the minimum, median, maximum, and calculated mean. AU, assessment unit; MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet of gas; %, percent]

Assessment input data—Conventional AUs Santa Maria Basin Conventional Reservoirs AU
Minimum Median Maximum Calculated mean
Number of oil fields 1 16 32 16.4
Number of gas fields
Size of oil fields (MMBO) 0.5 0.7 500 4.0
Size of gas fields (BCFG)
AU probability 1.0
Assessment input data—Continuous AUs Santa Maria Basin Continuous Oil AU
Minimum Mode Maximum Calculated mean
Potential production area (acres) 50 28,600 57,200 28,617
Average drainage area (acres) 5 10 40 18.3
Success ratio (%) 5 10 40 18.3
Untested area (%) 100 100 100 100
Average EUR (MMBO, oil; BCFG, gas) 0.003 0.005 0.02 0.006
AU probability 0.9
Table 1.    Key input data for one conventional and one continuous assessment unit in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California.

Undiscovered Resources Summary

The USGS quantitatively assessed undiscovered conventional and continuous oil and gas resources in two AUs in the Santa Maria Basin Province (table 2). The estimated mean undiscovered resources are 67 million barrels of oil (MMBO), with an F95–F5 range from 13 to 218 MMBO; 56 billion cubic feet of gas (BCFG), with an F95–F5 range from 11 to 183 BCFG; and 4 million barrels of natural gas liquids (MMBNGL), with an F95–F5 range from 1 to 14 MMBNGL.

Table 2.    

Results for one conventional and one continuous assessment unit in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California.

[Gray shading indicates not applicable. Results shown are fully risked estimates. F95 represents a 95-percent chance of at least the amount tabulated; other fractiles are defined similarly. MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet of gas; NGL, natural gas liquids; MMBNGL, million barrels of natural gas liquids]

Total petroleum system and assessment units (AUs) AU prob-ability Accum-ulation type Total undiscovered resources
Oil (MMBO) Gas (BCFG) NGL (MMBNGL)
F95 F50 F5 Mean F95 F50 F5 Mean F95 F50 F5 Mean
Santa Maria Basin Conventional Reservoirs AU 1.0 Oil 13 39 213 65 11 33 179 55 1 3 14 4
Gas
Total undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources 13 39 213 65 11 33 179 55 1 3 14 4
Santa Maria Basin Continuous Oil AU 0.9 Oil 0 1 5 2 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0
Gas
Total undiscovered continuous oil and gas resources 0 1 5 2 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0
Total undiscovered oil and gas resources 13 40 218 67 11 34 183 56 1 3 14 4
Table 2.    Results for one conventional and one continuous assessment unit in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California.

For More Information

Assessment results are also available at the USGS Energy Resources Program website, https://www.usgs.gov/programs/energy-resources-program.

Santa Maria Basin Province Assessment Team

Christopher J. Schenk, Marilyn E. Tennyson, Tracey J. Mercier, Phuong A. Le, Andrea D. Cicero, Ronald M. Drake II, Sarah E. Gelman, Jane S. Hearon, Benjamin G. Johnson, Jenny H. Lagesse, and Heidi M. Leathers-Miller

References Cited

Baskin, D.K., and Peters, K.E., 1992, Early generation characteristics of a sulfur-rich Monterey kerogen: AAPG Bulletin, v. 76, no. 1, 13 p., accessed September 30, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF874A-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D.

Bennett, B., Larter, S.R., and Taylor, P.N., 2022, Geochemical rationalisation for the variable oil quality in the Orcutt reservoir, California, USA: Organic Geochemistry, v. 163, article 104348, 15 p., accessed September 26, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2021.104348.

Bohacs, K.M., 1993, Source quality variations tied to sequence development in the Monterey and associated formations, southwestern California, chap. 12 of Katz, B.J., and Pratt, L.M., eds., Source rocks in a sequence stratigraphic framework: AAPG Studies in Geology, v. 37, p. 177–204, accessed September 30, 2024, at https://archives.datapages.com/data/specpubs/geochem1/data/a033/a033/0001/0150/0177.htm.

Isaacs, C.M., 1989, Marine petroleum source rocks and reservoir rocks of the Miocene Monterey Formation, California, USA, in Wagner, H.C., Wagner, L.C., Wang, F.F.H., and Wong, F.L., eds., Petroleum resources of China and related subjects: Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources Earth Science Series, v. 10, p. 825–848.

Isaacs, C.M., and Tomson, J.H., 1990, Reconnaissance study of petroleum source-rock characteristics of core samples from the Sisquoc and Monterey Formations in a north-south subsurface transect across the onshore Santa Maria Basin and in surface sections along the Santa Barbara-Ventura coast, southern California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-108, 43 p., accessed September 30, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr89108.

Luyendyk, B.P., 1991, A model for Neogene crustal rotations, transtension, and transpression in southern California: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 103, no. 11, p. 1528–1536, accessed September 30, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103<1528:AMFNCR>2.3.CO;2.

Namson, J., and Davis, T.L., 1990, Late Cenozoic fold and thrust belt of the southern Coast Ranges and Santa Maria Basin, California: AAPG Bulletin, v. 74, no. 4, p. 467–492, accessed September 26, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B2335-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D.

Schenk, C.J., 2025, USGS National and Global Oil and Gas Assessment Project—Santa Maria Basin Province, California—Assessment unit boundaries, assessment input data, and fact sheet data tables: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P14QM36P.

Sweetkind, D.S., Langenheim, V.E., McDougall-Reid, K., Sorlien, C.C., Demas, S.C., Tennyson, M.E., and Johnson, S.Y., 2021, Geologic and geophysical maps of the Santa Maria and part of the Point Conception 30’x60’ quadrangles, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3472, 1 sheet, scale 1:100,000, 58-p. pamphlet, accessed September 26, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3472.

Tennyson, M.E., Charpentier, R.R., Klett, T.R., Brownfield, M.E., Pitman, J.K., Gaswirth, S.B., Hawkins, S.J., Lillis, P.G., Marra, K.R., Mercier, T.J., Leathers, H.M., Schenk, C.J., and Whidden, K.J., 2015, Assessment of undiscovered continuous oil and gas resources in the Monterey Formation, San Joaquin Basin Province, California, 2015: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2015–3058, 2 p., accessed September 30, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20153058.

Tennyson, M.E., and Isaacs, C.M., 2001, Geologic setting and petroleum geology of Santa Maria and Santa Barbara basins, coastal California, in Isaacs, C.M., and Rullkötter, J., eds., The Monterey Formation—From rocks to molecules: New York, Columbia University Press, p. 206–229.

Wilson, D.S., McCrory, P.A., and Stanley, R.G., 2005, Implications of volcanism in coastal California for the Neogene deformation history of western North America: Tectonics, v. 24, article TC3008, 22 p., accessed September 26, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001621.

Disclaimers

Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Suggested Citation

Schenk, C.J., Tennyson, M.E., Mercier, T.J., Le, P.A., Cicero, A.D., Drake, R.M., II, Gelman, S.E., Hearon, J.S., Johnson, B.G., Lagesse, J.H., and Leathers-Miller, H.M., 2025, Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California, 2024 (ver. 1.1, November 26, 2025): U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2025–3052, 4 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20253052.

ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)

Study Area

Publication type Report
Publication Subtype USGS Numbered Series
Title Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources in the Santa Maria Basin Province, California, 2024
Series title Fact Sheet
Series number 2025-3052
DOI 10.3133/fs20253052
Edition Version 1.0: November 21, 2025; Version 1.1: November 26, 2025
Publication Date November 21, 2025
Year Published 2025
Language English
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher location Reston VA
Contributing office(s) Central Energy Resources Science Center
Description Report: 4 p.; Data Release
Country United States
State California
Other Geospatial Santa Maria Basin Province
Online Only (Y/N) Y
Additional publication details