The National Map Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory Pilot Project Report
Links
- Document: Report (12.7 MB pdf) , HTML , XML
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Acknowledgments
Thank you to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory for their assistance with and input to the report.
Abstract
This report provides an overview of the U.S. Geological Survey National Map Corps —Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project in St. James Parish, Louisiana, that began in February 2024 and ended at the end of March 2024. The project used the power of The National Map Corps’ volunteer community to improve building classifications in the original Federal Emergency Management Agency’s U.S.A. Structures dataset. The report highlights the project’s completion and details the work and results achieved through a collaborative effort to enhance geospatial data quality and utility.
Introduction
As part of the National Geospatial Technical Operations Center (NGTOC), The National Map Corps (TNMCorps) is a crowd-sourced mapping project that relies on volunteers to assist the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Geospatial Program by collecting and editing built structures data.
Tracing its initial discussions to a 2020 meeting between the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and USGS personnel, the St. James Parish pilot project took place from February through March of 2024. The project focused on exploring opportunities to utilize TNMCorps platform for improving data quality and addressing mission needs of FEMA and USGS. TNMCorps partnered with FEMA to use the power of TNMCorps’ volunteer community to improve building classifications in the original FEMA U.S.A. Structures dataset.
The improvement of the U.S.A. Structures dataset is a collaborative effort between FEMA’s Response Geospatial Office, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the USGS to build and maintain the Nation’s first comprehensive inventory of all built structures larger than 450 square feet (ft2) for use in flood mitigation, emergency preparedness, and response. For a list of key staff involved in this effort, please refer to appendix 1.
The goal of the collaboration is to enhance the U.S.A. Structures dataset’s occupancy type attribution (for example, residential, industrial, and government) by augmenting ORNL’s automated workflow with verification and refinement by TNMCorps volunteers. The success of this pilot project could lead to a more versatile dataset for multiscale mapping, improve emergency decision-making, and foster interagency cooperation. Ultimately, this effort could help to expand the dataset's utility and contribute to future cartographic solutions for the USGS. Figure 1 summarizes key collaborators, goals, process, benefits, and effects of the project.

Key collaborators, goals, process, benefits, and effects of the U.S. Geological Survey National Map Corps (TNMCorps)—Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) pilot project in St. James Parish, Louisiana.
Project Area
The pilot project focused on St. James Parish, Louisiana (fig. 2). FEMA identified this region as a high-priority area due to its vulnerability to flooding and storms. Selecting this area allowed for testing the project's efficacy in a region with a high concentration of structures that benefited from the use of accurate data.

Map showing the St. James Parish project area in Louisiana. The project area is highlighted in red on a map of St. James Parish and surrounding areas. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s U.S.A. Structures dataset is displayed as blue rectangles.
Methods
The project implements an innovative methodology that combines automated classification with citizen science contributions to enhance structural classification accuracy across the United States. The ORNL has developed an automated multistep classification process that draws from machine learning in combination with 62 distinct source mapping data layers to classify structure occupancy types (Hauser and others, 2023; Yang and others, 2024). When structures lack sufficient source data for classification through traditional data conflation and fusion methods, a machine learning model is used to determine the appropriate classification.
In St. James Parish, out of 12,328 total structures, 750 required machine learning classification due to gaps in availability of the source data layers. Through the help of TNMCorps volunteers, we discovered a 15-percent error rate in the source data. Subsequent crowdsourced improvements eliminated detectable errors in the dataset.
This verification process through TNMCorps has generated valuable data that can be used to refine ORNL’s classification methodology. The two-step process, combining automated classification with human verification, demonstrates the effectiveness of hybrid approaches in achieving highly accurate structural classification data.
To enhance the accuracy of FEMA’s U.S.A. Structures dataset, TNMCorps volunteers, guided by detailed instructions (app. 2, app. 3, and app. 4), thoroughly reviewed and refined the classifications through a customized TNMCorps editing platform (fig. 3). This two-step process integrated automated classification with human verification to improve data quality.

Example of structures editing using The National Map Corps’ customized editing platform.
Results
This pilot project indicated that the ORNL manually verified a random sample of 100 volunteer-modified records, confirming a 100 percent accuracy rate for checked structures. During a one-month period, 1,800 edits were made using the editing platform, significantly refining classifications and descriptions within the dataset. Reviewers either agreed with the modified classifications from TNMCorps or found no compelling information to dispute the new classifications.
The ORNL expects to incorporate the feedback on occupancy types in the upcoming dataset update and cite that the validation was performed by the USGS TNMCorps. The modifications volunteers made were particularly helpful in identifying vulnerable areas and structures such as manufactured homes. The validated volunteer feedback was incorporated into the latest dataset deliverable made to FEMA.
Discussion
The sections below summarize project challenges and how they were addressed. They also include a discussion of benefits, future opportunities, and a long-term vision.
Overcoming Challenges
The project did encounter challenges, including initial concerns regarding data access, determination of occupancy classification, and the complexity of classifying structures with multiple occupancy types. For example, in Washington, D.C., buildings frequently have more than one occupancy type, which can affect data accuracy. Because of the complexity of classifying the data in Washington, D.C., the team collected data in Louisiana for the pilot project because occupancy types in Louisiana were more clearly defined. Volunteer feedback highlighted areas for platform improvement, such as providing more detailed instructions and refining categorization options.
To meet these challenges, the team iteratively refined the TNMCorps editing instructions, providing volunteers with comprehensive guidelines for classifying structures. They also focused on enhancing the editing interface's functionality, streamlining the editing process, and incorporating user feedback.
Project Benefits
The project demonstrated TNMCorps' ability to support the USGS's mission of enhancing geospatial data by using citizen science while also strengthening its position in the geospatial community through partnerships with FEMA and ORNL. Ongoing development of the editing platform could enhance cartographic capabilities, filtering options, and data attributes, enabling more precise emergency response and cartographic enhancements. Users may benefit from customizable visualizations, enhanced analytical capabilities, and richer contextual data beyond traditional point files.
For FEMA, the improved data quality can directly enhance its emergency response efforts. As they noted in a presentation, “The coordinated campaign and peer-review mechanism resulted in high-quality feedback, leading to necessary corrections that enhance the integrity of our data” (T. Hauser and L. Yan, FEMA, written commun., 2024, slide 3). More precise information about structures enables more effective planning and resource allocation during disasters. FEMA is “refining our Model by incorporating detailed feedback on occupancy classifications, thereby elevating the overall quality of the USA Structures dataset” (T. Hauser and L. Yan, FEMA, written commun., 2024, slide 7). These improvements can allow for better mapping and data filtering, enabling faster and more accurate decision-making during critical emergency situations. Looking ahead, FEMA stated they “look forward to incorporating this valuable feedback and enhancing our datasets with accurate occupancy types where we previously lacked authoritative sources” (T. Hauser and L. Yan, FEMA, written commun., 2024, slide 7).
Additionally, this project supported the partnership between USGS, FEMA, and ORNL, laying the foundation for future collaboration that could benefit the broader Federal Geographic Information System (GIS) community. By enhancing the quality of geospatial data and supporting emergency response efforts, the project aligns with the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) 2035 goals, emphasizing the importance of interagency collaboration, community engagement, and the leveraging of innovative technologies in the creation and management of spatial data (Federal Geographic Data Committee, 2024).
Potential Future Opportunities
The TNMCorps—FEMA and ORNL pilot project has generated significant interest in expanding the project’s scope and application. Future opportunities may involve incorporating additional attributes, such as building floor counts, and prioritizing high-need areas like coastal regions and data-deficient zones. The user experience and data quality could be enhanced by implementing feedback-driven updates to the application and instructions. The following elements could be considered:
-
• Establish collaborative milestones with partners to prioritize key tasks.
-
• Set a clear quality goal, such as achieving 90–95 percent data accuracy.
-
• Quantify the full-time equivalent staff effort saved through crowdsourcing.
-
• Explore innovative technical integrations, like elevation for structure base and heights.
Key strategies:
-
• Continue collaboration with FEMA.
-
• Explore additional partnerships: engage the USGS Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science (CEGIS) and the U.S. Census Bureau.
-
• Leverage volunteers: scale up efforts through volunteer engagement.
-
• Explore advanced technologies: investigate knowledge graphs and artificial intelligence (AI) for data development and quality assurance.
Long-Term Vision
Building on the pilot project, we could develop a multi-agency editing platform to streamline collaboration across the Federal Government. This platform could integrate data from various sources, fostering a comprehensive and consistent understanding of the Nation’s built environment. This vision highlights the project's potential to significantly advance geospatial data capabilities and support informed decision-making throughout the Federal Government.
Summary
The National Maps Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project was completed in February and March of 2024. The project highlighted the use of crowdsourcing, interagency collaboration, and continuous improvement in enhancing data quality to inform critical decision-making. By focusing on improving data locally—particularly in coastal areas and in regions with low data quality—the project not only addresses pressing regional needs but also contributes to a broader effect: enhancing overall national data quality through more accurate inputs for modeling. This dual benefit underscores the project’s goal of improving data at a local level while simultaneously helping to address national-scale challenges. The project’s outcomes and the interest in its continuation indicate that this innovative approach can be used across the Nation.
References Cited
Federal Geographic Data Committee, 2024, Building the geospatial future together—The NSDI [National Spatial Data Infrastructure] strategic plan 2025–2035—Goals and objectives: Federal Geographic Data Committee web page, accessed January 2, 2025, at https://www.fgdc.gov/nsdi-plan/NSDI2035GoalsandObjectives.
Hauser, T., Moehl, J., Schmidt, E., Adams, D., Whitehead, M., Morris, B., and Yang, H.L., 2023, U.S.A. Structures phase 2: U.S. Department of Energy, prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., under contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725, 25 p., accessed December 22, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.2172/2076189.
Yang, H.L., Laverdiere, M., Hauser, T., Swan, B., Schmidt, E., Moehl, J., Reith, A., Adams, D., Morris, B., McKee, J., Whitehead, M., and Tuttle, M., 2024, A baseline structure inventory with critical attribution for the U.S. and its territories: Scientific Data, v. 11, art. 502, 15 p., accessed December 22, 2024, at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03219-x.
Appendix 1. Pilot Project Staff
Table 1.1.
Project staff for the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Map Corps (TNMCorps)—Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) pilot project.Appendix 2. Testing Setup

Twelve review sections in The National Map Corps’ editing platform.

Review progress tracking table. NGTOC, National Geospatial Technical Operations Center
-
1. Volunteer contact.
-
2. Usability of editing platform’s home page.
-
3. Searching for a location on the map.
-
4. Usability of the “About” and “Help” pages.
-
5. Process for adding a service layer.
-
6. The building review process in the assigned section to verify or update occupancy classifications as needed (U.S. Geological Survey, undated, page 13; app. 4). All edits and verifications should be supported by local knowledge or corresponding research.
-
7. Additional comments.

Testing feedback form provided to The National Map Corps volunteers.
References Cited
U.S. Geological Survey, [undated], The National Map Corps (TNMCorps)—FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] Building Classification Collaborative Pilot Project User Guide: U.S. Geological Survey web page, 22 p., accessed February 2025 at https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/tnmcorps-fema/user-guide.
Appendix 3. Testing Instructions

Sections layer in the map view for testing sections as part of the National Map Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project. Colored polygons are individual editing sections. Numbers are section numbers.

Hiding and revealing the sections layer in the map for testing sections as part of the National Map Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project. Step 1 is to open the list of layers. Step 2 is to turn the sections layer on or off.
References Cited
U.S. Geological Survey, [undated], The National Map Corps (TNMCorps)—FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] Building Classification Collaborative Pilot Project User Guide: U.S. Geological Survey web page, 22 p., accessed February 2025 at https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/tnmcorps-fema/user-guide.
Appendix 4. User Guide
Abbreviations
AI
artificial intelligence
CEGIS
Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
GIS
Geographic Information System
NGTOC
National Geospatial Technical Operations Center
NSDI
National Spatial Data Infrastructure
ORNL
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
TNMCorps
The National Map Corps
U.S.A.
United States of America
USGS
U.S. Geological Survey
NGTOC
U.S. Geological Survey
Box 25046, Mail Stop 510
[or 6th and Kipling, MS 510]
Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225-0046
Or visit the National Geospatial Technical Operations Center website at
https://www.usgs.gov/national-geospatial-technical-operations-center
Publishing support provided by the Science Publishing Network,
Denver and Reston Publishing Service Centers
Disclaimers
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
Suggested Citation
Dimascio, T., Matthews, G.D., and Korris, E.M., 2025, The National Map Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2025–1052, 11 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20251052.
ISSN: 2331-1258 (online)
| Publication type | Report |
|---|---|
| Publication Subtype | USGS Numbered Series |
| Title | The National Map Corps—Federal Emergency Management Agency and Oak Ridge National Laboratory pilot project report |
| Series title | Open-File Report |
| Series number | 2025-1052 |
| DOI | 10.3133/ofr20251052 |
| Publication Date | September 24, 2025 |
| Year Published | 2025 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | U.S. Geological Survey |
| Publisher location | Reston VA |
| Contributing office(s) | NGTOC Denver |
| Description | vi, 11 p. |
| Online Only (Y/N) | Y |