Potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana

Angela L. Robinson

doi:10.3133/sir20245035

Potential Corrosivity of Untreated Groundwater in Louisiana

Scientific Investigations Report 2024-5035

Prepared in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

By: Angela L. Robinson

https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20245035

Links

Document: Report (40.9 MB pdf) , HTML , XML
Data Releases:
- USGS Data Release - Potential corrosivity scores of untreated groundwater in Louisiana
- USGS NWIS Data Release - USGS Water Data for the Nation
Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core

Abstract

Corrosive groundwater can cause lead, copper, and other metals to leach from pipes and plumbing fixtures in water distribution systems. Metals, if ingested, could lead to serious health implications to the nearly 2.9 million people in Louisiana who obtain their drinking water from groundwater sources. Four indices—the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Scaling Index (PSI), and the Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC)—in addition to an analysis which normalized the results from the existing indices, the Combined Index (CI), were used to assess the corrosivity of groundwater in Louisiana and identify areas within eight major aquifers and aquifer systems with moderate to high corrosivity potential. The purpose of this study is to provide State and local governments, public water system managers, and the nearly 500,000 private well owners in Louisiana with information needed to manage drinking-water supplies and mitigate potential health risks related to leaching of metals from water pipes and fixtures.

The average scores of untreated groundwater samples from approximately 375 wells by index are as follows: LSI, −1.28; RSI, 9.78; PSI, 9.34; and CI, 4.14. The PPGC does not produce a numerical score, but the total percentage of class counts can be used to assign a classification; overall, samples in Louisiana were classified as significant concern. The percentages of groundwater samples from wells classified as potentially corrosive, by index, are as follows: LSI, 53 percent; RSI, 94 percent; PSI, 81 percent; PPGC, 98 percent; and CI, 81 percent. The percentages of samples classified as indeterminate, by index, are as follows: LSI, 46 percent; RSI, 5 percent; PSI, 12 percent; PPGC, 0 percent; and CI, 18 percent.

Introduction

Corrosive water refers to water that has certain physiochemical properties that establish the potential for it to react with and dissolve materials it contacts. Corrosive water itself is not dangerous but, if untreated, it has the potential to react with and dissolve lead, copper, and other metals from pipes, plumbing, and other existing infrastructure in water distribution systems (Swistock and others, 2009).

A national study which assessed the occurrence of potentially corrosive untreated groundwater on a statewide basis was conducted in 2016 (Belitz and others, 2016a, b, c). This study is based on methodology used in the national study but focuses only on the State of Louisiana and provides data by parish and by aquifer or aquifer system. Data related to this study are available in the associated data release (Robinson, 2024).

In Louisiana, public water-supply facilities are monitored by the Louisiana Department of Health’s Safe Drinking Water Program, which ensures compliance with State and Federal standards. Public-supply facilities are required to treat their water to meet drinking-water regulations, avoiding or reducing corrosion, metal contamination, and other undesirable water-quality issues (Louisiana Department of Health, 2020). Although the drinking water provided after treatment is regulated, ensuring that it meets the appropriate standards, systems with aging infrastructure are more susceptible to circumstances which could lead to contamination. In their 2017 review of Louisiana’s drinking-water infrastructure, the American Society of Civil Engineers found that 58 percent of the water distribution systems in Louisiana were more than 60 years old (Louisiana Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017).

Self-supplied water from private wells is not regulated by any Federal or State agency and often is not treated, which is a cause for concern if the groundwater is potentially corrosive. Statewide, about 490,000 people, or 10.5 percent of Louisiana’s total population, rely on water from privately owned domestic wells (U.S. Census Bureau, 2016). It is assumed that little or no surface water was used for rural-domestic purposes in Louisiana because suitable groundwater that generally requires minimal treatment is available (Collier and Sargent, 2018). In 2015, groundwater was withdrawn from each of Louisiana’s 13 major aquifers and aquifer systems in every parish in the State for domestic use (figs. 1–2, table 1). In addition, public-supply facilities in Louisiana provided water from groundwater sources to about 2.4 million people or 51.1 percent of the State’s total population (Collier and Sargent, 2018). In total, about 2.9 million people, or 61.6 percent of Louisiana’s population, rely on water from a groundwater source.

Maps show approximate areal extent of Louisiana’s freshwater aquifers and aquifer
systems, by region. — Figure 1.
Approximate areal extent of Louisiana’s freshwater aquifers and aquifer systems, by region: A, southeastern (Jasper, Evangeline, and Chicot equivalent aquifer systems); B, central and southwestern (Catahoula and Evangeline aquifers and Jasper and Chicot aquifer systems); C, northern (upland terrace, Sparta, Carrizo-Wilcox, and Cockfield aquifers); and D, the Mississippi River and Red River alluvial aquifers (modified from Stuart and others, 1994; Collier and Sargent, 2018 4).

Map of Louisiana showing location and boundaries of parishes. — Figure 2.
Parishes in Louisiana.

Table 1.

General characteristics of the eight major aquifer and aquifer systems that had groundwater-quality samples for corrosivity analysis for Louisiana (Stuart and others, 1994).

^{[ft bls, feet below land surface; CSMR, chloride-to-sulfate mass ratio]}

Table 1. General characteristics of the eight major aquifer and aquifer systems that had groundwater-quality samples for corrosivity analysis for Louisiana (Stuart and others, 1994).
Aquifer (fig. 1)	Age	Average depth of wells (ft bls)¹	Primary composition	Aquifer homogeneity	Quality of water²	Recharge	Registered domestic wells³
Aquifer (fig. 1)	Age	Average depth of wells (ft bls)¹	Primary composition	Aquifer homogeneity	Quality of water²	Recharge	Number	Average depth (ft bls)
Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer	Eocene	213	Fine to medium sand, silt, clay, and lignite	Sand and gravels within the Carrizo and Wilcox aquifers are hydraulically connected and are considered to be a single aquifer (Ryals, 1984).	Soft	Direct infiltration of rainfall in subcrop and outcrop areas on northwestern edge and leakage from overlying aquifers (McGee and Brantly, 2015)	8,109	200
Chicot aquifer system	Pleistocene	150	Medium to coarse sand and gravel, grades downward to very coarse (Nyman, 1989)	Upper and lower sand units	Generally softer in northern extent, hard to very hard in south	Primarily from precipitation into sandy soil in northern portion of aquifer	20,987	177
Chicot equivalent aquifer system	Pleistocene	359	Fine sand to coarse sand and gravel	Composed of 9 local aquifers (Griffith, 2003)	Generally soft, low dissolved solids and CSMR. Harder water found in southwestern portions (Tomaszewski, 1992).	Primarily from precipitation in northern portion of aquifer system, from Mississippi-Louisiana State line (Nyman, 1989)	13,460	343
Evangeline equivalent aquifer system	Pliocene	1,342	Fine to medium sand	Composed of 11 local aquifers (Griffith, 2003)	Soft, high pH	Northern portion of aquifer system, from Mississippi-Louisiana State line	1,911	714
Jasper equivalent aquifer system	Miocene	1,934	Fine to coarse sand	Composed of 7 local aquifers (Griffith, 2003)	Soft, low CSMR	Very little in Louisiana	131	1,773
Mississippi River alluvial aquifer	Pleistocene	107	Clay, sand, and gravel (grades downward) (Tomaszewski, 2003)	Hydraulically connected to the Mississippi River (Tomaszewski, 2003)	Very hard, high alkalinity and dissolved solids (Whitfield, 1975)	Infiltration of rainfall across entire aquifer	4,169	112
Sparta aquifer	Eocene	445	Very fine to medium sand, clay, and lignite		Generally soft, low in dissolved solids. Harder water found in some western portions (Tomaszewski, 1992).	Direct infiltration of rainfall in subcrop and outcrop areas on northwestern edge and leakage from alluvium and adjacent aquifers (McGee and Brantly, 2015)	1,717	241
Upland terrace aquifer	Pleistocene	106	Clay, silt, and fine sand grading to coarse sand and gravel at bottom (Snider and Sanford, 1981)		Soft, low alkalinity and pH	Primarily infiltration of rainfall across entire aquifer	18,366	138

¹

Selected wells used in this study.

²

Hardness ranges, expressed as milligrams per liter of calcium carbonate, are as follows: 0–60, soft; 61–120, moderately hard; 121–180, hard; greater than 180, very hard (Hem, 1985).

³

Active wells only as of October 2020 (Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, 2020).

The corrosivity of water is one of many factors that can affect the occurrence of lead, copper, and other metals in household water supplies (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2016). Several different indices have been developed to measure the corrosivity of water (Singley and others, 1984; Roberge, 2007). The results presented in this report are based on four indices—the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Scaling Index (PSI), and the Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC). These indices were selected because they are commonly used, consistent, and adaptable to large datasets. Additionally, the Combined Index (CI), which normalizes the results from the existing indices, was used in this study.

Purpose and Scope

Because groundwater is an important source of drinking water, an assessment of the potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana was performed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. The purpose of this report is to present information and summaries about the distribution of untreated, potentially corrosive, groundwater in Louisiana using four common indices—the LSI, RSI, PSI, and PPGC—and the CI.

Methods Used in the Assessment

To assess the corrosivity of groundwater in Louisiana, the LSI, RSI, PSI, and PPGC corrosion indices were calculated for all approved groundwater samples from wells which had the necessary water-quality measurements in the State (table 2). The data are based on groundwater samples collected from 374 wells from 1991 to 2018 which were queried in and downloaded from the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2016).

Corrosion Indices

Even though they are referred to as “corrosion” indices, the indices used in this study do not provide a direct measure of corrosivity. Three of the four indices (the LSI, RSI, and PSI) are indicators of the saturation level of calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) in a water sample. If the water is oversaturated, CaCO₃ is more likely to precipitate and deposit in pipe interiors, serving as a “protective coating.” If the water is undersaturated, CaCO₃ will not precipitate and may dissolve, exposing pipes and other infrastructure, which may contain lead, copper, and other metals, to potentially corrosive water (Belitz and others, 2016a). The fourth indicator, the PPGC, relates the chloride-to-sulfate mass ratio (CSMR) and alkalinity of the water to assess the potential for galvanic corrosion, an electrochemical process that can cause disintegration between two or more dissimilar metals present in a water distribution system (for example, copper or lead pipe with a component made from a dissimilar metal) (Nguyen and others, 2011).

The four indices chosen for this assessment are discussed below in chronological order of development, followed by a discussion of the CI used in this study. Other indices considered for this study but ultimately excluded are discussed in appendix 1.

Langelier Saturation Index

The LSI was developed in 1936 and is still the most popular index used to estimate the corrosive potential of water (Langelier, 1936; Langland and Dugas, 1996). Langelier (1936) stated that a negative LSI score indicates that CaCO₃ is undersaturated, that CaCO₃ is unlikely to form, and that corrosion is more likely to occur. As the LSI score decreases, the water is thought to become increasingly corrosive. A positive LSI score indicates that CaCO₃ is oversaturated, suggesting that precipitation of CaCO₃, which would limit corrosion of pipes due to scaling, is more likely to occur as the LSI score increases. An LSI score of zero indicates that the water sample is in equilibrium, with neither scaling nor corrosion likely to occur.

A simplified version of the original LSI equation was presented in Roberge (2007) and was used in this study. The LSI was calculated by subtracting the pH of calcite saturation, pH_s, from the actual pH of the water:

LSI

=

pH

−

pH_s

(1)

pH_s

= (9.3 +

A

+

B

) − (

C

+

D

)

(2)

where

A: = $\frac{({log}_{10} [TDS] - 1)}{10}$ ;
B: = −13.12 × log₁₀ (°C + 273) + 34.55;
C: = log₁₀[Ca²⁺ as CaCO₃] – 0.4; and
D: = log₁₀[alkalinity as CaCO₃].

The calculation of pH_s requires values for alkalinity (milligrams per liter as CaCO₃), total dissolved solids (TDS) (milligrams per liter), calcium hardness (milligrams per liter of calcium ions [Ca²⁺] as CaCO₃), and water temperature (degrees Celsius) (Langelier, 1936; Larson and Buswell, 1942; Roberge, 2007).

Calcium hardness (milligrams per liter as CaCO₃) is calculated from the calcium concentration (milligrams per liter as Ca²⁺) by using the following equation (Spellman, 2017):

C a l c i u m h a r d n e s s = \frac{c a l c i u m c o n c e n t r a t i o n (\frac{mg}{L}) \times e q u i v a l e n t w e i g h t o f c a l c i u m c a r b o n a t e}{e q u i v a l e n t w e i g h t o f c a l c i u m}

(3)

= \frac{c a l c i u m c o n c e n t r a t i o n \times 50.045}{20.04}

An LSI score of less than –0.5 is classified as potentially corrosive, a score greater than or equal to –0.5 and less than or equal to 0.5 is indeterminate, and a score greater than 0.5 is classified as scale forming. Parishes and aquifers were assigned a classification based on the average LSI score for groundwater samples from wells within their respective bounds.

Ryznar Stability Index

The RSI, a modified version of the LSI, was published in 1944. Parameters required to calculate the RSI are the same as those needed for the LSI: pH, alkalinity (milligrams per liter as CaCO₃), calcium hardness, TDS (milligrams per liter), and water temperature (degrees Celsius) (Ryznar, 1944).

RSI

= 2(

pH_s

) –

pH

(4)

where

pH_s: = the pH of water that is at saturation of calcite or CaCO₃ (see eq. 2).

An RSI score of less than 6 is classified as likely to scale; a score equal to or greater than 6 and less than 7 is classified as indeterminate; and a score equal to or greater than 7 is classified as having the potential for corrosion. Parishes and aquifers were assigned a classification based on the average RSI score for groundwater samples from wells within their respective bounds.

Puckorius Scaling Index

The PSI, also known as the Practical Scaling Index, was developed in 1991 as an updated version of the RSI (Puckorius and Brooke, 1991). The calculation for PSI requires values for alkalinity (milligrams per liter as CaCO₃), TDS (milligrams per liter), calcium hardness (milligrams per liter as CaCO₃), and water temperature (degrees Celsius).

PSI

= 2(

pH_s

) −

pH_eq

(5)

where

pH_s: = the pH at saturation in calcite or CaCO₃ (see eq. 2);
pH_eq: = 1.465 × log₁₀(alkalinity) + 4.54; and
alkalinity: = $[{HCO}_{3}^{-}] + 2 [{CO}_{3}^{2 -}] + [{OH}^{-}]$ .

The PSI follows the same classification scoring as the RSI. A score of less than 6 was considered likely to scale; a score equal to or greater than 6 and less than 7 was indeterminate; and a score equal to or greater than 7 was considered to have potential for corrosion. Parishes and aquifers were assigned a classification based on the average PSI score for groundwater samples from wells within their respective bounds.

Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion

The PPGC index was developed in 2010 by Caroline Nguyen, Kendall Stone, and Marc Edwards (2011). The calculation for PPGC requires values for chloride (milligrams per liter), sulfate (milligrams per liter), and alkalinity (milligrams per liter as CaCO₃).

C S M R = \frac{C h l o r i d e}{S u l f a t e}

(6)

Water with an elevated CSMR could have higher potential for galvanic corrosion, particularly if the water’s alkalinity is low (Nguyen and others, 2011). The PPGC has three classifications:

1. No concern—CSMR is less than 0.2;
2. Significant concern—CSMR is greater than or equal to 0.2 but less than or equal to 0.5; or CSMR is greater than 0.5 and alkalinity is greater than or equal to 50 milligrams per liter (mg/L) as CaCO₃; and
3. Serious concern—CSMR is greater than 0.5, and alkalinity is less than 50 mg/L as CaCO₃.

Parishes and aquifers were assigned a classification based on the majority of groundwater samples from wells with each PPGC score within their respective bounds.

Combined Index

A classification for each well, aquifer, and parish was established based on a combination of the four indices used in this assessment. The LSI, RSI, PSI, and PPGC were used to classify groundwater samples from each well into one of three categories, indicating the potential for water to cause corrosion. The CI normalized each of the LSI, RSI, and PSI scores on a scale of 1 to 5, increasing the number of possible categories from three to five and breaking the “scale” and “corrosion” potentials into two classes, each with room to indicate a level of severity. Due to the nature of its calculations, the PPGC could not be broken into further levels of severity; therefore, its three categories (no concern, significant concern, and serious concern) were assigned respective normalized CI scores of 1.5, 4, and 5.

To calculate the CI, the normalized scores for each index (1–5 for LSI, RSI, and PSI and 1.5, 4–5 for PPGC) were added together and then divided by the number of indices to obtain the average. The CI is always positive and ranges from 1 to 5. The five classes are (1) high potential for scale if the CI score is less than or equal to 1.50; (2) potential for scale, if the score is greater than 1.50 but less than or equal to 2.50; (3) indeterminate, meaning not more likely to scale than to corrode, if the score is greater than 2.50 but less than or equal to 3.50; (4) potentially corrosive, if the score is greater than 3.50 but less than or equal to 4.50; and (5) high potential for corrosion, if the score is greater than 4.50 (fig. 3).

Diagram shows 4 corrosivity indices and the Combined Index which range from less corrosive
to balanced to more corrosive. — Figure 3.
Categories of the four corrosivity indices and the Combined Index used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Water-Quality Data Compilation

The groundwater wells used in this study primarily included domestic and public-supply wells, but also included other types such as monitoring, irrigation, industrial, livestock, and observation wells. The water-quality data for these wells were obtained from NWIS (U.S. Geological Survey, 2016). The most recently approved record with the necessary water-quality measurements (table 2), collected from 1991 to September 2018, was used. All samples were collected before the water was treated, per USGS standards (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006), to characterize the water quality of the aquifer. This method also allows replication of the conditions of domestic well water, which is often consumed without any type of treatment. Alkalinity, calcium, chloride, pH, sulfate, and TDS were used to calculate the indices in this report (figs. 4, 5). If multiple alkalinity values were available for a well, a single value was chosen on the basis of availability in the following order: NWIS parameter codes 39086, 39036, 29802, 29801, and 00419 (the field alkalinities are preferred). Similarly, if multiple pH values were available, field values (00400) were chosen over laboratory (00403) values. In records without an approved TDS value, TDS was estimated by multiplying specific conductance (00095 or 90095) by a factor of 0.69 (Hem, 1985) (table 2).

Table 2.

Chemical constituents and NWIS parameter codes used in computations of the corrosivity indices for Louisiana.

^{[Parameter codes are defined in the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information
System (NWIS; https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN, U.S. Geological Survey, 2016). LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Scaling
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; mg/L CaCO₃, milligrams per liter as calcium carbonate; mg/L, milligrams per liter; µS/cm at
25 °C, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; std units, standard units]}

Table 2. Chemical constituents and NWIS parameter codes used in computations of the corrosivity indices for Louisiana.
Parameter				Index
Name	Code	Description	Unit	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC
Alkalinity	39086	Alkalinity, water, filtered, inflection-point titration method (incremental titration method), field	mg/L CaCO₃	x	x	x	x
	00419	Acid neutralizing capacity, water, unfiltered, inflection-point titration method (incremental titration method), field
	29801	Alkalinity, water, filtered, fixed endpoint (pH 4.5) titration, laboratory
	29802	Alkalinity, water, filtered, Gran titration, field
	39036	Alkalinity, water, filtered, fixed endpoint (pH 4.5) titration, field
Calcium	00915	Calcium, water, filtered	mg/L	x	x	x
Chloride	00940	Chloride, water, filtered	mg/L				x
pH	00400	pH, water, unfiltered, field	standard units	x	x
pH	00403	pH, water, unfiltered, laboratory	standard units	x	x
Specific conductance	00095	Specific conductance, water, unfiltered	µS/cm at 25 °C	x¹	x¹	x¹
Specific conductance	90095	Specific conductance, water, unfiltered, laboratory	µS/cm at 25 °C	x¹	x¹	x¹
Sulfate	00945	Sulfate, water, filtered	mg/L				x
Total dissolved solids	70300	Dissolved solids dried at 180 degrees Celsius, water, filtered	mg/L	x	x	x

¹

When no value was available for total dissolved solids, specific conductance was multiplied by 0.69 to serve as an estimate (Hem, 1985).

Maps show values of six water-quality parameters used to calculate potential corrosivity
of untreated groundwater. — Figure 4.
Values of the six water-quality parameters for groundwater samples from selected wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana: A, alkalinity, B, pH, C, calcium, D, total dissolved solids, E, chloride, and F, sulfate.

Figure 5. Box plots show values for water-quality parameters by aquifer or aquifer
system in Louisiana. — Figure 5.
Values for the water-quality parameters A, alkalinity, B, pH, C, total dissolved solids, D, chloride-to-sulfate mass ratio, and E, hardness by aquifer or aquifer system in Louisiana. Values obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System (NWIS), https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis (U.S. Geological Survey, 2016).

The use of water-quality records from additional agencies was considered but ultimately decided against. Records from other agencies may have been analyzed by using methods other than the ones used for this study; therefore, those records would not be suitable for inclusion in this study.

Estimation of Self-Supplied Population Dependent on Groundwater

Rural-domestic, or self-supplied, population data were compiled from multiple sources. Parish population estimates for 2015 were from the U.S. Census Bureau (2016), and rural-domestic populations for each parish were based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Housing Survey (U.S. Census Bureau, 1993), which reported estimates of populations served by a public-supply facility. These sources, along with survey population data obtained directly from public-supply facilities, were used to estimate the population reliant on domestic wells (table 3).

Table 3.

Summary of the population dependent on self-supplied groundwater, the number of wells available for calculating the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Stability Index (PSI), Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC), and Combined Index (CI), and the average score and classification of parish-level prevalence of potentially corrosive groundwater for the 52 parishes in Louisiana with sufficient data.

^{[NA, not applicable; T, tie]}

Table 3. Summary of the population dependent on self-supplied groundwater, the number of wells available for calculating the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Stability Index (PSI), Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC), and Combined Index (CI), and the average score and classification of parish-level prevalence of potentially corrosive groundwater for the 52 parishes in Louisiana with sufficient data.
Parish name (fig. 2)	Population dependent on domestic wells	Number of wells with complete records		Average score				Classification
Parish name (fig. 2)	Population dependent on domestic wells	LSI, RSI, PSI, CI	PPGC	LSI	RSI	PSI	CI	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Acadia	15,548	16	16	−0.121	7.42	6.43	3.48	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Allen	3,181	11	11	−2.75	11.9	11.3	4.68	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	High potential for corrosion
Ascension	33,565	2	2	−0.031	8.16	8.49	3.87	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Assumption	369	NA
Avoyelles	2,262	1	1	0.267	8.37	9.02	4.00	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Beauregard	10,103	9	9	−3.51	12.9	12.1	4.97	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Serious concern	High potential for corrosion
Bienville	4,068	9	9	−2.51	11.67	11.1	4.39	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Bossier	13,833	19	19	−1.39	9.98	9.46	4.10	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Caddo	18,379	32	32	−1.11	9.62	9.25	4.17	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Calcasieu	24,567	11	11	−0.484	8.38	8.04	3.91	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Caldwell	756	2	2	−0.608	9.72	9.65	4.37	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Cameron	918	2	2	0.0898	7.22	6.38	3.37	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Catahoula	1,262	1	1	−3.35	13.4	12.5	4.75	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	High potential for corrosion
Claiborne	2,063	2	2	−1.74	11.4	11.7	4.63	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	High potential for corrosion
Concordia	789	3	3	−0.271	7.91	6.99	3.42	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
DeSoto	7,514	24	24	−0.607	9.01	8.72	4.04	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
East Baton Rouge	2,984	13	13	−0.657	9.61	10.2	4.18	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
East Carroll	182	1	1	−0.339	7.58	6.32	3.50	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
East Feliciana	3,341	9	9	−3.42	13.1	12.7	4.86	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Serious concern	High potential for corrosion
Evangeline	4,212	8	8	−0.719	8.30	7.14	3.75	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Franklin	7,967	9	9	−0.287	7.67	6.76	3.53	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Grant	2,758	NA
Iberia	13,066	1	1	0.0576	6.88	5.51	3.00	Indeterminate	Indeterminate	Likely to scale	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Iberville	1,932	1	1	−0.411	7.82	6.86	3.50	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Jackson	1,881	2	2	−0.187	8.57	8.72	3.87	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Jefferson	412	2	2	−0.420	8.99	9.12	4.13	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Jefferson Davis	4,815	15	15	−0.392	7.84	6.90	3.60	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Lafayette	33,218	37	37	−1.55	9.62	8.59	4.25	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Lafourche	241	NA
LaSalle	712	NA
Lincoln	2,350	2	2	−1.23	10.6	11.0	4.50	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Livingston	25,051	5	5	−2.11	10.8	10.4	4.50	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Madison	239	3	3	0.515	6.10	4.55	2.50	Scaling potential	Indeterminate	Likely to scale	Significant concern	Potential for scale
Morehouse	2,004	9	9	−0.706	8.72	8.09	3.97	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Natchitoches	6,384	4	4	−1.52	10.8	11.0	4.31	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Orleans	2,585	NA
Ouachita	4,788	9	9	−0.333	9.17	9.47	4.14	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Plaquemines	614	NA
Pointe Coupee	2,839	5	5	−0.679	10.1	11.0	4.30	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Rapides	5,589	8	8	−1.87	11.0	10.8	4.47	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Red River	2,510	2	2	−1.17	8.83	7.31	3.75	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Richland	5,889	2	2	−1.22	9.34	8.58	4.25	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Sabine	12,546	5	5	−1.23	10.2	9.92	4.17	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
St. Bernard	119	NA
St. Charles	239	NA
St. Helena	6,531	3	3	−5.07	15.4	14.7	5.00	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Serious concern	High potential for corrosion
St. James	176	1	1	−0.234	7.27	5.72	3.25	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Likely to scale	Significant concern	Indeterminate
St. John the Baptist	987	NA
St. Landry	8,095	5	5	−0.707	8.33	7.38	3.75	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
St. Martin	10,108	NA
St. Mary	1,684	NA
St. Tammany	66,008	12	12	−1.24	10.5	11.0	4.32	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Tangipahoa	35,766	8	8	−4.37	14.6	14.1	4.81	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Serious concern	High potential for corrosion
Tensas	232	1	1	−0.203	7.41	6.23	3.50	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Terrebonne	92	NA
Union	2,412	7	7	−0.650	9.59	9.91	4.21	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Vermilion	27,383	11	11	−0.110	7.47	6.52	3.48	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Vernon	15,575	4	4	−5.54	16.2	15.9	5.00	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Serious concern	High potential for corrosion
Washington	16,979	2	2	−4.14	14.8	14.9	4.75	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant/serious concern (T)	High potential for corrosion
Webster	4,512	7	7	−1.07	9.43	9.23	4.16	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
West Baton Rouge	478	6	6	−0.934	10.6	11.6	4.45	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
West Carroll	889	1	1	−0.064	7.13	5.93	3.25	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Likely to scale	Significant concern	Indeterminate
West Feliciana	513	4	4	−1.88	11.0	10.8	4.62	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	High potential for corrosion
Winn	2,518	6	6	−1.33	10.5	10.4	4.46	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
State	491,582	374	373	−1.28	9.78	9.34	4.14	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive

Results and Discussion

Calculations of four corrosivity indices for groundwater samples from wells in Louisiana were the primary results of this study. The LSI, RSI, and PSI were calculated for 374 samples. The PPGC was calculated for only 373 samples because the chloride and sulfate values were unavailable at one well in Caddo Parish. The CI, which normalized the results from the indices to provide an overall classification of each aquifer and parish, was also calculated.

A summary page for each index was created and includes a State map with the index’s calculated score at each well, a pie chart with the distribution of samples in each classification, and a box plot with results by aquifer. In addition, a summary for the eight aquifers or aquifer systems, as well as one for wells from aquifers with fewer than ten samples, was created and provides a map of each sample’s combined index score, stacked bar charts of samples by classification and by index, and a table which lists the average score by index and parish.

Corrosion Indices

Langelier Saturation Index Scores

Statewide, the LSI classified 53 percent of the untreated groundwater samples as potentially corrosive, 46 percent as indeterminate, and 2 percent as scale forming (fig. 6). Parishwide, of the 52 parishes with sufficient data, the average LSI score of samples within 33 parishes classified as having the potential for corrosion and 18 classified as indeterminate. Madison was the only parish whose average score classified as scale forming. Groundwater samples in Vernon Parish had the lowest average score at −5.54, which indicates a strong potential for corrosion. Groundwater samples from Madison Parish had the highest average score at 0.515, indicating that it is the least likely to have corrosive water (table 3).

Seven of the eight major aquifers and aquifer systems that were sampled had an average LSI score that classified as potentially corrosive (table 4). The upland terrace aquifer had groundwater samples with the highest corrosion potential, with an average score of −4.98. The Mississippi River alluvial aquifer was the only aquifer whose samples classified as indeterminate, with an average score of −0.226. No aquifers had an average score that was classified as scale forming (fig. 7).

Map and pie graph of Langelier Saturation Index classifications for 374 wells with
53% classified as potentially corrosive. — Figure 6.
Langelier Saturation Index classifications for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Box plot showing LSI classifications, by aquifer, for 374 wells with most classified
as potentially corrosive. — Figure 7.
Langelier Saturation Index classifications, by aquifer, for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Table 4.

Summary of the number of wells available for calculating the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Stability Index (PSI), Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC), and Combined Index (CI), and the average score and classification of aquifer-level prevalence of potentially corrosive groundwater for the eight aquifers or aquifer systems and ungrouped wells in Louisiana with sufficient data.

Table 4. Summary of the number of wells available for calculating the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Stability Index (PSI), Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC), and Combined Index (CI), and the average score and classification of aquifer-level prevalence of potentially corrosive groundwater for the eight aquifers or aquifer systems and ungrouped wells in Louisiana with sufficient data.
Aquifer (fig. 1)	Number of wells with complete records		Average score				Classification
Aquifer (fig. 1)	LSI, RSI, PSI, CI	PPGC	LSI	RSI	PSI	CI	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer	82	81	−0.822	9.26	8.90	4.07	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Chicot aquifer system	129	129	−1.29	9.30	8.41	4.03	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Chicot equivalent aquifer system	22	22	−1.57	10.4	10.1	4.36	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Evangeline equivalent aquifer system	22	22	−0.824	10.1	10.9	4.27	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Jasper equivalent aquifer system	12	12	−0.761	10.0	10.7	4.35	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Mississippi River alluvial aquifer	21	21	−0.226	7.46	6.36	3.36	Indeterminate	Potentially corrosive	Indeterminate	Significant concern	Indeterminate
Sparta aquifer	53	53	−1.46	10.5	10.5	4.33	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
Upland terrace aquifer	18	18	−4.98	15.2	14.5	4.99	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Serious concern	High potential for corrosion
Ungrouped wells	15	15	−0.843	9.49	9.26	4.12	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive
State	374	373	−1.28	9.78	9.34	4.14	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Potentially corrosive	Significant concern	Potentially corrosive

Ryznar Stability Index Scores

Statewide, 94 percent of the groundwater samples were classified by the RSI as potentially corrosive, 5 percent as indeterminate, and 1 percent as potential for scale forming (fig. 8). Parishwide, of the 52 parishes with sufficient data, the average RSI score of groundwater samples within 50 parishes classified as having the potential for corrosion and two were indeterminate. Vernon Parish had the highest average RSI score at 16.2. Madison Parish had the lowest average score at 6.10, making it the least likely parish to contain corrosive water and classifying the groundwater samples in this parish as indeterminate (table 3).

All eight aquifers and aquifer systems that were sampled during this study had an average score classified by the RSI as potentially corrosive (table 4). The upland terrace aquifer had groundwater samples with the highest average RSI score by a substantial margin at 15.2, with the second highest being the samples from the Sparta aquifer at 10.5. The samples from the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer had the least corrosive groundwater, with an average score of 7.46, which is still classified as corrosive (fig. 9).

Map and pie graph show Ryznar Stability Index classifications for 374 wells with 94%
classified as potentially corrosive. — Figure 8.
Ryznar Stability Index classifications for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Box plot shows Ryznar Stability Index classifications by aquifer for 374 wells with
most classified as potentially corrosive. — Figure 9.
Ryznar Stability Index classifications, by aquifer, for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Puckorius Scaling Index Scores

Statewide, 81 percent of the groundwater samples were classified by the PSI as having potentially corrosive conditions, 12 percent as indeterminate, and 7 percent as scale forming (fig. 10). Parishwide, of the 52 parishes with adequate data, the average PSI score of groundwater samples within 39 parishes classified as potentially corrosive, 9 classified as indeterminate, and 4 classified as scale forming. Vernon Parish had the highest average score at 15.9, indicating that samples from the parish have potentially corrosive groundwater. Madison Parish had the lowest average score at 4.55, making it the least likely to have corrosive groundwater and classifying the groundwater samples in this parish as scale forming (table 3).

Of the eight major aquifers and aquifer systems that were sampled, seven had an average PSI score that classified as potentially corrosive and one classified as indeterminate (table 4). Samples from the upland terrace aquifer ranked as the most corrosive with an average score of 14.5, and the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer, the only aquifer whose average classified as indeterminate, was the least corrosive with an average score of 6.36 (fig. 11).

Map and pie graph show Puckorius Scaling Index classifications for 374 wells with
81% classified as potentially corrosive. — Figure 10.
Puckorius Scaling Index classifications for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Box plot of Puckorius Scaling Index classifications by aquifer for 374 wells with
most classified as potentially corrosive. — Figure 11.
Puckorius Scaling Index classifications, by aquifer, for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion Scores

Statewide, the PPGC classified 16 percent of the groundwater samples from wells as having serious concern for corrosion, 83 percent as significant concern for corrosion, and 2 percent as having no concern for corrosion (fig. 12). Parishwide, 46 of the 52 parishes (table 3) and seven of the eight aquifers included in this analysis were classified as significant concern with respect to the highest percentage of groundwater samples from wells having each score within their respective bounds (table 4). Groundwater in five parishes and one aquifer, the upland terrace, was classified as having serious concern for corrosivity. One parish had a tie with the same number of groundwater samples which classified as having significant and serious concerns for corrosion.

Map and pie graph show classifications for 373 wells with 82% classified as significant
concern and 16% as serious concern. — Figure 12.
Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion classifications for 373 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Combined Index Scores

Statewide, the CI classified 81 percent of the groundwater samples as potentially corrosive or having a high potential for corrosion (58 and 23 percent, respectively), 18 percent as indeterminate, and 1 percent as having potential for scale (fig. 13). Parishes and aquifers were assigned a classification based on the average CI score for untreated groundwater samples from wells within their respective bounds. Of the 52 parishes with adequate data, 10 had an average CI score which classified as having a high potential for corrosion, 31 as potentially corrosive, and 10 were classified as indeterminate. Madison Parish was the only parish whose average groundwater sample score classified as having the potential for scale. The average CI score in two parishes, St. Helena and Vernon, indicated the highest potential for corrosive water, with CI scores of 5.00, meaning they scored in the highest category for potential corrosivity in each index. Samples from Madison Parish had the lowest average score at 2.50, making it the least likely to have corrosive groundwater.

Of the eight aquifers and aquifer systems with sufficient data for this study, one had samples whose average CI score classified as having a high potential for corrosion, six classified as potentially corrosive, and one classified as indeterminate. Samples from the upland terrace aquifer had the highest average CI score at 4.99. Samples from the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer classified as indeterminate with an average score of 3.36. There were no aquifers whose average CI score classified as scale forming (fig. 14).

Map and pie graphs for 374 wells with most classified as potentially corrosive or
with high potential for corrosion. — Figure 13.
A, E, Combined Index (CI) classifications and B, Langelier Saturation Index, C, Ryznar Stability Index, and D, Puckorius Scaling Index CI-normalized classifications for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Figure 13.
A, E, Combined Index (CI) classifications and B, Langelier Saturation Index, C, Ryznar Stability Index, and D, Puckorius Scaling Index CI-normalized classifications for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Box plot shows Combined Index classifications by aquifer for 374 wells with most classified
as potentially corrosive. — Figure 14.
Combined Index classifications, by aquifer, for 374 wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana.

Potential Corrosivity of Groundwater in Aquifers

Eight of Louisiana’s 13 aquifer groups had a sufficient number of samples to summarize and characterize the potential corrosivity of groundwater in the aquifers. A minimum of 10 samples was established as the threshold required to characterize the potential corrosivity of groundwater in an aquifer; therefore, the Catahoula, Cockfield, and Evangeline aquifers, the Jasper aquifer system, and the Red River alluvial aquifer were not included in this analysis because they each had fewer than 7 complete samples available (U.S. Geological Survey, 2016).

Mississippi River Alluvial Aquifer

Data associated with groundwater samples from 21 wells screened in the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores (figs. 15–16). The average scores for the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI, respectively, were −0.226, 7.46, 6.36, and 3.36 (table 5). The PPGC classified all 21 samples as having significant concern for corrosivity (fig. 16). Samples from the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer had the lowest scores of any aquifer or aquifer system in this study for the potential for corrosion (table 4).

Map showing Combined Index classifications for wells, with greatest number of potentially
corrosive wells in Franklin Parish. — Figure 15.
Combined Index classifications for wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer in Louisiana.

Graph shows numbers of wells in each classification of the 5 indices with highest
number classified as potentially corrosive. — Figure 16.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer in Louisiana.

Table 5.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index]}

Table 5. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 15)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Concordia	0.431	6.34	5.15	Significant concern	2.88
East Carroll	−0.339	7.58	6.32	Significant concern	3.50
Franklin	−0.287	7.67	6.76	Significant concern	3.53
Iberville	−0.411	7.82	6.86	Significant concern	3.50
Madison	0.515	6.10	4.55	Significant concern	2.50
Morehouse	−0.675	8.00	6.70	Significant concern	3.50
Richland	−2.20	10.7	9.93	Significant concern	4.75
Tensas	−0.203	7.41	6.23	Significant concern	3.50
West Carroll	−0.0637	7.13	5.93	Significant concern	3.25
Average	−0.226	7.46	6.36	Significant concern	3.36

Upland Terrace Aquifer

Data associated with groundwater samples from 18 wells screened in the upland terrace aquifer were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores (figs. 17–18). The average scores for the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI, respectively, were −4.98, 15.2, 14.5, and 4.99 (table 6). The PPGC classified 17 of 18 samples (or 94 percent) in this aquifer as having a serious concern for corrosion (fig. 18). The upland terrace aquifer had the highest average scores of any aquifer or aquifer system in this study for the potential for corrosion.

Map shows many wells classified as having high potential for corrosion in East and
West Feliciana and St. Helena Parishes. — Figure 17.
Combined Index classifications for wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in the upland terrace aquifer in Louisiana.

Graph shows almost all wells in the study in upland terrace aquifer classified as
high potential for corrosion. — Figure 18.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the upland terrace aquifer in Louisiana.

Table 6.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the upland terrace aquifer in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index; T, tie]}

Table 6. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the upland terrace aquifer in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 17)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
East Feliciana	−4.58	14.6	14.0	Serious concern	5.00
Morehouse	−2.29	10.6	9.53	Significant/serious concern (T)	4.87
St. Helena	−5.07	15.4	14.7	Serious concern	5.00
St. Tammany	−5.29	15.9	15.5	Serious concern	5.00
Tangipahoa	−6.03	16.9	16.4	Serious concern	5.00
Vernon	−6.39	17.3	16.5	Serious concern	5.00
Washington	−6.49	17.8	17.3	Serious concern	5.00
West Feliciana	−4.71	14.3	13.0	Serious concern	5.00
Average	−4.98	15.2	14.5	Serious concern	4.99

Chicot Aquifer System

Data associated with groundwater samples from 129 wells screened in the Chicot aquifer system were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI scores (figs. 19–20). The average scores for the indices, respectively, were −1.29, 9.30, 8.41, and 4.03; The PPGC classified the groundwater samples in this aquifer as having significant concern for corrosivity, with 105 of the 129 samples (or 81 percent) scoring in this class (fig. 20). Allen, Beauregard, Rapides, and Vernon Parishes, all in the northwest portion of the Chicot aquifer system (fig. 19), have the highest numbers of samples with groundwater that is potentially corrosive (table 7).

Graph shows most wells in the study in the Chicot aquifer system classified as potentially
corrosive. — Figure 20.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Chicot aquifer system in Louisiana.

Table 7.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Chicot aquifer system in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index; T, tie]}

Table 7. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Chicot aquifer system in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 19)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Acadia	−0.121	7.42	6.43	Significant concern	3.48
Allen	−2.95	12.0	11.3	Significant/serious concern (T)	4.70
Beauregard	−3.51	12.9	12.1	Serious concern	4.97
Calcasieu	−0.484	8.38	8.04	Significant concern	3.91
Cameron	0.0898	7.22	6.38	Significant concern	3.37
Evangeline	−0.720	8.24	7.05	Significant concern	3.71
Iberia	0.0576	6.88	5.51	Significant concern	3.00
Jefferson Davis	−0.392	7.84	6.90	Significant concern	3.60
Lafayette	−1.55	9.62	8.59	Significant concern	4.25
Rapides	−4.53	14.5	13.7	Serious concern	5.00
St. Landry	−0.707	8.33	7.38	Significant concern	3.75
Vermilion	−0.110	7.47	6.52	Significant concern	3.48
Vernon	−5.25	15.8	15.7	Serious concern	5.00
Average	−1.29	9.30	8.41	Significant concern	4.03

Chicot Equivalent Aquifer System

Data associated with groundwater samples from 22 wells screened in the Chicot equivalent aquifer system were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores (figs. 21–22). The average scores for the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI, respectively, were −1.57, 10.4, 10.1, and 4.36 (table 8). The PPGC classified 17 of the 22 samples (or 77 percent) in this aquifer system as having significant concern for corrosivity (fig. 22). Groundwater samples from wells in the northern portion of the Chicot equivalent aquifer system, in the area known as the Florida Parishes (Nyman and Fayard, 1978), have higher corrosivity potential than the samples from wells in the southern part of the aquifer system (fig. 21, table 8).

Graph shows most wells in the study in the Chicot equivalent aquifer classified as
high potential for corrosion. — Figure 22.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Chicot equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

Table 8.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Chicot equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index]}

Table 8. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Chicot equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 21)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Ascension	−0.0313	8.16	8.49	Significant concern	3.87
East Baton Rouge	−1.11	10.0	10.2	Significant concern	4.37
Jefferson	−0.420	8.99	9.12	Significant concern	4.13
Livingston	−2.11	10.8	10.4	Significant concern	4.50
St. James	−0.234	7.27	5.72	Significant concern	3.25
St. Tammany	−2.40	11.7	11.4	Significant concern	4.67
Tangipahoa	−3.01	12.3	11.6	Significant concern	4.67
Average	−1.57	10.4	10.1	Significant concern	4.36

Evangeline Equivalent Aquifer System

Data associated with groundwater samples from 22 wells screened in the Evangeline equivalent aquifer system were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores (figs. 23–24). The average scores for the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI, respectively, were −0.824, 10.1, 10.9, and 4.27 (table 9). The PPGC classified the samples in this aquifer as having significant concern for corrosivity, with 18 of the 22 samples (or 82 percent) in this class (fig. 24). Samples from wells in East Feliciana Parish had the highest likelihood for potentially corrosive water.

Map shows wells classified as high potential for corrosion located in East Feliciana
Parish. — Figure 23.
Combined Index classifications for wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in the Evangeline equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

Graph shows nearly equal number of potentially corrosive and high potential wells
in Evangeline equivalent aquifer system. — Figure 24.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Evangeline equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

Table 9.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Evangeline equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index]}

Table 9. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Evangeline equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 23)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
East Baton Rouge	−0.242	9.12	10.1	Significant concern	3.93
East Feliciana	−3.51	12.7	11.7	Serious concern	5.00
Pointe Coupee	−1.04	10.5	11.3	Significant concern	4.42
St. Tammany	−0.197	9.29	10.2	Significant concern	4.06
West Baton Rouge	−0.934	10.6	11.6	Significant concern	4.46
Average	−0.824	10.1	10.9	Significant concern	4.27

Jasper Equivalent Aquifer System

Data associated with groundwater samples from 12 wells screened in the Jasper equivalent aquifer system were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores (figs. 25–26). The average scores for the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI, respectively, were −0.761, 10.0, 10.7, and 4.35 (table 10). The PPGC classified all 12 samples in this aquifer system as having significant concern for corrosivity (fig. 26).

Graph shows nearly equal number of wells in the high potential and potentially corrosive
categories in the Jasper equivalent aquifer system. — Figure 26.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Jasper equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

Table 10.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Jasper equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index]}

Table 10. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Jasper equivalent aquifer system in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 25)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
East Baton Rouge	−0.352	9.55	10.4	Significant concern	4.25
East Feliciana	−0.530	9.76	10.7	Significant concern	4.50
Pointe Coupee	−0.141	9.33	10.6	Significant concern	4.13
St. Tammany	−0.619	9.74	10.5	Significant concern	4.25
Tangipahoa	−1.80	11.9	12.6	Significant concern	4.50
Washington	−1.79	11.8	12.4	Significant concern	4.50
West Feliciana	−0.931	9.83	10.1	Significant concern	4.50
Average	−0.761	10.0	10.7	Significant concern	4.35

Sparta Aquifer

Data associated with groundwater samples from 53 wells screened in the Sparta aquifer were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores (figs. 27–28). The average scores for the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI, respectively, were −1.46, 10.5, 10.5, and 4.33 (table 11). The PPGC classified 45 of the 53 samples (or 85 percent) as having significant concern for corrosivity (fig. 28).

Graph shows nearly equal numbers of high potential and potentially corrosive wells
in the Sparta aquifer. — Figure 28.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Sparta aquifer in Louisiana.

Table 11.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Sparta aquifer in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index; T, tie]}

Table 11. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Sparta aquifer in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 27)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Bienville	−3.54	13.0	12.5	Significant concern	4.58
Bossier	−4.78	14.9	14.2	Serious concern	4.92
Caldwell	−0.608	9.72	9.65	Significant concern	4.37
Claiborne	−1.74	11.4	11.7	Significant concern	4.63
Jackson	−0.187	8.57	8.72	Significant concern	3.88
Lincoln	−1.23	10.6	10.9	Significant concern	4.50
Morehouse	−0.0856	8.52	8.54	Significant concern	3.87
Natchitoches	−2.94	12.9	13.1	Significant/serious concern (T)	4.63
Ouachita	−0.333	9.17	9.47	Significant concern	4.14
Sabine	−5.03	15.1	14.1	Serious concern	5.00
Union	−0.650	9.59	9.91	Significant concern	4.21
Webster	−1.07	9.43	9.23	Significant concern	4.16
Winn	−1.33	10.5	10.4	Significant concern	4.46
Average	−1.46	10.5	10.5	Significant concern	4.33

Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer

Data associated with groundwater samples from 82 wells screened in the Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer were used to calculate the LSI, RSI, PSI, and CI scores, and data associated with groundwater samples from 81 wells were used to calculate the PPGC score (figs. 29–30). The average scores for the indices, respectively, were −0.822, 9.26, 8.90, and 4.07, all indicating potentially corrosive groundwater (table 12). The PPGC classified the samples in this aquifer as having significant concern for corrosivity, with 74 out of the 81 samples (or 91 percent) in this class (fig. 30).

Graph shows greatest number of wells in the Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer classified as potentially
corrosive. — Figure 30.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in the Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer in Louisiana.

Table 12.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index]}

Table 12. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells screened in the Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 29)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Bienville	−0.457	8.65	8.21	Significant concern	4.00
Bossier	−0.749	9.05	8.57	Significant concern	3.95
Caddo	−1.11	9.62	9.25	Significant concern	4.17
DeSoto	−0.607	9.01	8.72	Significant concern	4.04
Natchitoches	−0.0991	8.80	8.92	Significant concern	4.00
Red River	−2.49	11.1	9.68	Significant concern	4.75
Sabine	−0.277	8.96	8.87	Significant concern	3.97
Average	−0.822	9.26	8.90	Significant concern	4.07

Aquifers and Aquifer Systems With Insufficient Data

Fifteen wells were screened in the 5 remaining aquifers and aquifer systems that had at least 1 adequate water-quality record but in total did not have the minimum number of samples per aquifer for calculation of individual LSI, RSI, PSI, CI, and PPGC scores for each of those aquifers or aquifer systems; therefore, the scores for these samples, as a group, were calculated (figs. 31–32) (table 13).

Map shows one well with high potential for corrosion in aquifers with insufficient
data for individual classification. — Figure 31.
Combined Index classifications for wells used to calculate potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in aquifers with insufficient water-quality data for individual classification in Louisiana.

Graph shows most wells in aquifers with insufficient water-quality data for individual
classification as potentially corrosive. — Figure 32.
Numbers of wells in each classification of the Langelier Saturation Index, Ryznar Stability Index, Puckorius Stability Index, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion, and Combined Index for calculation of potential corrosivity of groundwater in aquifers with insufficient water-quality data for individual classification in Louisiana.

Table 13.

Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells in ungrouped aquifers in Louisiana.

^{[LSI, Langelier Saturation Index; RSI, Ryznar Stability Index; PSI, Puckorius Stability
Index; PPGC, Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion; CI, Combined Index]}

Table 13. Average potential corrosivity scores by index by parish for wells in ungrouped aquifers in Louisiana.
Parish (fig. 31)	LSI	RSI	PSI	PPGC	CI
Allen	−0.799	10.4	11.5	Significant concern	4.50
Avoyelles	0.267	8.37	9.02	Significant concern	4.00
Catahoula	−3.35	13.4	12.5	Significant concern	4.75
Concordia	−1.67	11.1	10.7	Significant concern	4.50
East Feliciana	−0.343	9.39	10.1	Significant concern	4.25
Evangeline	−0.717	8.73	7.75	Significant concern	4.00
Morehouse	−0.0846	7.27	6.17	Significant concern	3.50
Rapides	−0.978	9.87	9.83	Significant concern	4.29
Red River	0.161	6.58	4.93	Significant concern	2.75
Richland	−0.241	7.98	7.23	Significant concern	3.75
Average	−0.843	9.49	9.26	Significant concern	4.12

Summary and Conclusions

Corrosive groundwater itself is not dangerous, but it has the potential to react with and release metals from pipes and plumbing in water distribution systems. These metals, if ingested, could cause serious health implications; therefore, the corrosivity potential of groundwater in Louisiana has been estimated at a statewide scale by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, by using water-quality data from about 375 untreated groundwater samples from wells. Four existing indices—the Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), Ryznar Stability Index (RSI), Puckorius Scaling Index (PSI), and the Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion (PPGC)—and an analysis which normalized the results from the existing indices, the Combined Index (CI), were used to assess the corrosivity of groundwater in Louisiana for eight major aquifers and aquifer systems and ungrouped wells screened in miscellaneous aquifers.

The percentages of samples classified as potentially corrosive, by index, are as follows: LSI, 53 percent; RSI, 94 percent; PSI, 81 percent; PPGC, 98 percent; and CI, 81 percent. The percentages of samples classified as indeterminate, by index, are as follows: LSI, 46 percent; RSI, 5 percent; PSI, 12 percent; and CI, 18 percent.

Even with the discrepancies among the indices, a few commonalities are evident. All five indices indicate that, of the aquifers or aquifer systems with sufficient data for analysis, the upland terrace aquifer has the highest potential for corrosive groundwater and the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer has the least potential for corrosive groundwater. Additionally, the area known as the Florida Parishes, in southeastern Louisiana, north of Lake Pontchartrain, has consistently high scores, indicating potentially corrosive groundwater in that area’s aquifers. Vernon, Rapides, Beauregard, Allen, and Evangeline Parishes also have consistently high scores. Both aforementioned areas have high concentrations of domestic wells that often provide untreated groundwater for rural-domestic purposes.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are given to USGS employees Jill Jenkins, John Lovelace, Melissa Harris, Paul Frederick, and Jim Kingsbury.

References Cited

Belitz, K., Jurgens, B.C., and Johnson, T.D., 2016a, Potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5092, 16 p., accessed September 19, 2019, at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20165092.

Belitz, K., Jurgens, B.C., and Johnson, T.D., 2016b, Classification of chloride-to-sulfate mass ratio for U.S. groundwater with respect to the potential to promote galvanic corrosion of lead, 1991–2015; Water well data and characteristic values for States: U.S. Geological Survey data release, accessed March 6, 2020, at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7MC8X40.

Belitz, K., Jurgens, B.C., Johnson, T.D., 2016c, Langelier Saturation Indices computed for U.S. groundwater, 1991–2015; Water well data and characteristic values for States: U.S. Geological Survey data release, accessed March 6, 2020, at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7XW4GWX.

Collier, A.L., and Sargent, B.P., 2018, Water use in Louisiana, 2015: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Water Resources Special Report no. 18, 138 p. [Also available at https://wise.er.usgs.gov/dp/pdfs/WaterUseinLouisiana_2015.pdf.]

Griffith, J.M., 2003, Hydrogeologic framework of southeastern Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Water Resources Technical Report no. 72, 21 p.

Hem, J.D., 1985, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2254, 264 p.

Langelier, W.F., 1936, The analytical control of anti-corrosion water treatment: Journal of the American Water Works Association, v. 28, no. 10, p. 1500–1521.

Langland, M.J., and Dugas, D.L., 1996, Assessment of severity and distribution of corrosive ground water in Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95–377, 2 pls.

Larson, J.E., and Skold, R.V., 1958, Laboratory studies relating mineral quality of water to corrosion of steel and cast iron: Corrosion, v. 14, no. 6, p. 285t–288t.

Larson, T.E., and Buswell, A.M., 1942, Calcium carbonate saturation index and alkalinity interpretations [with discussion]: Journal of the American Water Works Association, v. 34, no. 11, p. 1667–1684.

Leitz, F., and Guerra, K., 2013, Water chemistry analysis for water conveyance, storage and desalination projects—Manuals and Standards Program: Denver, Colo., U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, 14 p., accessed February 11, 2020, at https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/mands-pdfs/WQeval_documentation.pdf.

Louisiana Department of Health, 2020, Community preparedness and health protection—Safe Drinking Water Program, accessed January 16, 2020, at https://ldh.la.gov/index.cfm/page/963.

Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, 2020, SONRIS (Strategic Online Natural Resources Information System), accessed October 30, 2020, at https://www.sonris.com/.

Louisiana Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, Report card for Louisiana infrastructure, 2017: American Society of Civil Engineers, accessed March 7, 2019, at https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Lousiana-FullReport-LA_2017.pdf.

McGee, B.D., and Brantly, J.A., 2015, Potentiometric surface, 2012, and water-level differences, 2005–12, of the Sparta aquifer in north-central Louisiana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3313, 2 sheets, accessed November 3, 2019 at https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3313.

Nguyen, C.K., Stone, K.R., and Edwards, M.A., 2011, Chloride-to-sulfate mass ratio—Practical studies in galvanic corrosion of lead solder: Journal of the American Water Works Association, v. 103, no. 1, p. 81–92. accessed March 12, 2020, at https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11384.x.

Nyman, D.J., 1989, Quality of water in freshwater aquifers in southwestern Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Water Resources Technical Report no. 42, 22 p.

Nyman, D.J., and Fayard, L.D., 1978, Ground-water resources of Tangipahoa and St. Tammany Parishes, southeastern Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Office of Public Works Water Resources Technical Report no. 15, 76 p.

Puckorius, P.R., and Brooke, J.M., 1991, A new practical index for calcium carbonate scale prediction in cooling tower systems: Corrosion, v. 47, no. 4, p. 280–284, accessed March 12, 2020, at https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3585256.

Roberge, P.R., 2007, Appendix B of Corrosion inspection and monitoring: New York, John Wiley & Sons, 4 p. [Also available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470099766.app2.]

Robinson, A.L., 2024, Potential corrosivity scores of untreated groundwater in Louisiana: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9MFM8J1.

Ryals, G.N., 1984, Regional geohydrology of the northern Louisiana salt-dome basin; Part II, Geohydrologic maps of the Tertiary aquifers and related confining layers: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83–4135, 6 p., 7 pls. [Also available at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wri834135.]

Ryznar, J.W., 1944, A new index for determining amount of calcium carbonate scale formed by a water: Journal of the American Water Works Association, v. 36, no. 4, p. 472–483. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1944.tb20016.x.]

Singley, J.E., Beaudet, B.A., and Markey, P.H., 1984, Corrosion manual for internal corrosion of water distribution systems: Gainesville, Fla., Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc., and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, EPA–570/9–84–001 and ORNL/TM–8919.

Snider, J.L., and Sanford, T.H., Jr., 1981, Water resources of the terrace aquifer, central Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Office of Public Works Water Resources Technical Report no. 25, 48 p.

Spellman, F.R., 2017, Hydraulic fracturing wastewater, treatment, reuse, and disposal: Boca Raton, Fla., CRC Press, p. 131–134.

Stuart, C.G., Knochenmus, D., and McGee, B.D., 1994, Guide to Louisiana’s ground-water resources: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94–4085, 55 p.

Swistock, B.R., Clemens, S., and Sharpe, W.E., 2009, Drinking water quality in rural Pennsylvania and the effect of management practices: Harrisburg, Pa., The Center for Rural Pennsylvania, 24 p. [Also available at http://www.rural.palegislature.us/drinking_water_quality.pdf.]

Tomaszewski, D.J., 1992, Louisiana hydrologic atlas map no. 5—Quality of freshwater in aquifers of Louisiana, 1988: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90–4119, 7 sheets.

Tomaszewski, D.J., 2003, Ground-water resources along the lower Mississippi River, southeastern Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Water Resources Technical Report no. 69, 23 p.

U.S. Census Bureau, 1993, 1990 Census of housing—Detailed housing characteristics, Louisiana: Washington, D.C., U.S. Census Bureau, 337 p.

U.S. Census Bureau, 2016, Annual estimates of the resident population—April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015, accessed March 9, 2017, at https://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/PEP/2015/PEPANNRES/0400000US22|0400000US22.05000.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2016, Basic information about lead in drinking water, accessed August 2, 2018, at https://www.epa.gov/your-drinking-water/basic-information-about-lead-drinking-water.

U.S. Geological Survey, 2006, Collection of Water Samples (ver. 2.0): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A4, accessed March 9, 2022, at http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A.

U.S. Geological Survey, 2016, USGS Water Data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed April 21, 2020, at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Whitfield, M.S., Jr., 1975, Geohydrology and water quality of the Mississippi River alluvial aquifer, northeastern Louisiana: Louisiana Department of Public Works Water Resources Technical Report no. 10, 29 p.

Appendix 1. Other Indices

Other indices were considered for this study but were ultimately excluded. The Aggressive Index (AI) was developed by members of the American Water Works Association as an informative tool for selecting the appropriate asbestos-cement piping material to use with water of a certain quality to prevent corrosion of the pipe’s materials. The AI is considered a simplified version of the Langelier Saturation Index, omitting the requirements for temperature and total dissolved solids in the calculation. While the AI is considered to be an effective tool for selection of asbestos-cement piping, it does not provide the same level of accuracy as other corrosion indices and, therefore, was not included as an index in this assessment) (Singley and others, 1984).

Another common index, the Larson-Skold Index, was developed in 1958 by Thurston E. Larson and Ronald V. Skold to estimate corrosion tendency in steel pipelines in the Great Lakes area of the United States (Larson and Skold, 1958). Larson and Skold used in situ samples to compare the ratio of the concentration of chloride and sulfate ions to the concentration of carbonate and bicarbonate ions with actual corrosive tendency (Leitz and Guerra, 2013). Because of the nature of its developmental origins and the uncertainty in its applicability to different water types, this index was ultimately excluded from this study.

Conversion Factors

Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as follows: °F = (1.8 × °C) + 32.

Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) may be converted to degrees Celsius (°C) as follows: °C = (°F – 32) / 1.8.

Supplemental Information

Specific conductance is given in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius (µS/cm at 25 °C).

Concentrations of chemical constituents in water are given in milligrams per liter (mg/L).

Because of rounding, totals and percentages presented in the tables, figures, and text in the report may differ slightly from totals or percentages calculated individually.

Abbreviations

CaCO₃: calcium carbonate
CI: Combined Index
CSMR: chloride-to-sulfate mass ratio
LSI: Langelier Saturation Index
NWIS: National Water Information System
PPGC: Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion
PSI: Puckorius Scaling Index
RSI: Ryznar Stability Index
TDS: total dissolved solids
USGS: U.S. Geological Survey

For more information about this publication, contact

Director, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center

U.S. Geological Survey

640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100

Nashville, TN 37211

For additional information, visit

https://www.usgs.gov/centers/lmg-water/

Publishing support provided by

Lafayette Publishing Service Center

Disclaimers

Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Suggested Citation

Robinson, A.L., 2024, Potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2024–5035, 52 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20245035.

ISSN: 2328-0328 (online)

Study Area

Additional publication details
Publication type	Report
Publication Subtype	USGS Numbered Series
Title	Potential corrosivity of untreated groundwater in Louisiana
Series title	Scientific Investigations Report
Series number	2024-5035
DOI	10.3133/sir20245035
Year Published	2024
Language	English
Publisher	U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher location	Reston, VA
Contributing office(s)	Lower Mississippi-Gulf Water Science Center
Description	Report: viii, 52 p.; Appendix; 2 Data Releases
Country	United States
State	Louisiana
Online Only (Y/N)	Y
Google Analytic Metrics	Metrics page

Potential Corrosivity of Untreated Groundwater in Louisiana

Table of Contents

Links

Abstract

Introduction

Table 1.

Purpose and Scope

Methods Used in the Assessment

Corrosion Indices

Langelier Saturation Index

(1)

(2)

(3)

Ryznar Stability Index

(4)

Puckorius Scaling Index

(5)

Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion

(6)

Combined Index

Water-Quality Data Compilation

Table 2.

Estimation of Self-Supplied Population Dependent on Groundwater

Table 3.

Results and Discussion

Corrosion Indices

Langelier Saturation Index Scores

Table 4.

Ryznar Stability Index Scores

Puckorius Scaling Index Scores

Potential to Promote Galvanic Corrosion Scores

Combined Index Scores

Potential Corrosivity of Groundwater in Aquifers

Mississippi River Alluvial Aquifer

Table 5.

Upland Terrace Aquifer

Table 6.

Chicot Aquifer System

Table 7.

Chicot Equivalent Aquifer System

Table 8.

Evangeline Equivalent Aquifer System

Table 9.

Jasper Equivalent Aquifer System

Table 10.

Sparta Aquifer

Table 11.

Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer

Table 12.

Aquifers and Aquifer Systems With Insufficient Data

Table 13.

Summary and Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References Cited

Appendix 1. Other Indices

Conversion Factors

Supplemental Information

Abbreviations

Disclaimers

Suggested Citation

Study Area