Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5205
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5205
Table 6. Mean annual ground-water inflow to basin-fill deposits of Carson Valley simulated with watershed models, water years 1990–2002, and compared with mean annual inflow simulated during dry conditions, water years 1990–92, and wet conditions, water years 1995–97, Nevada and California.
{Values are rounded to two significant figures. Mean annual ground-water inflow, dry conditions: If MAG is mean annual ground-water inflow, percent difference calculated as 100*(MAGdry conditions–MAG1990–2002/MAG1990–2002; wet conditons: If MAG is mean annual ground-water inflow, percent difference calculated as 100*(MAGwet conditions–MAG1990–2002/MAG1990–2002. Abbreviations: acre-ft, acre-feet]
Ground-water inflow source | Simulated mean annual ground-water inflow | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water years 1990–2002 (acre-feet) |
Dry conditions, water years 1990–92 |
Wet conditions, water years 1995–97 |
|||||
(acre-ft) | (Percent difference) |
(acre-ft) | (Percent difference) |
||||
Carson Range | |||||||
Ground-water inflow from watersheds | |||||||
Perennial | 16,200 | 3,400 | -45 | 9,900 | 60 | ||
Ephemeral | 23,500 | 1,200 | -66 | 5,200 | 49 | ||
Infiltration of ephemeral runoff | 39,400 | 2,600 | -72 | 17,000 | 81 | ||
Subtotal (rounded) | 19,000 | 7,200 | -62 | 32,000 | 68 | ||
Pine Nut Mountains | |||||||
Ground-water inflow from watersheds | |||||||
Perennial | 18,200 | 100 | -99 | 21,000 | 156 | ||
Ephemeral | 25,700 | 0 | -100 | 18,000 | 216 | ||
Infiltration of ephemeral runoff | 42,100 | 470 | -78 | 4,800 | 128 | ||
Subtotal (rounded) | 16,000 | 570 | -96 | 44,000 | 175 | ||
Total for Carson Range and Pine Nut Mountains | |||||||
Total (rounded) | 35,000 | 7,800 | -78 | 76,000 | 117 |
1 From table 4.
2 From table 5.
3 From table 5, simulated mean annual ephemeral runoff, 9,900 acre-ft, less 5 percent loss to evapotranspiration, 500 acre-ft.
4 From table 5, plus runoff of Pine Nut and Buckeye Creeks, less 5 percent loss to evapotranspiration.